Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-26T01:44:51.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

III.2 - Breast Milk and Artificial Infant Feeding

from Part III - Dietary Liquids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Kenneth F. Kiple
Affiliation:
Bowling Green State University, Ohio
Get access

Summary

The importance of maternal breast feeding is considerable for infant survival until weaning and beyond. In addition to nutrition, it also provides many of the mother’s immunological defenses to a baby whose own defenses are weak at birth. In the past, however, the protective (as well as the nutritive) qualities of maternal milk were unknown, and wet-nursing practices were common for social, cultural, and economic reasons. In the West, maternal breast feeding in the first year of life was most common in rural areas. But animal milks and solid food were given to babies everywhere when breast feeding was not possible, practical, or convenient, or when it was considered insufficient.

Maternal Breast Feeding

During the first year of life, mortality should be independent of the purely nutritional factor. It has been demonstrated that even undernourished mothers, subsisting on around 1,500 calories a day, are able to nourish their babies adequately through breast feeding (Livi-Bacci 1991). Nonetheless, in the past, infant mortality figures (which were usually high) varied enormously with maternal feeding practices. Babies not breast-fed are easily prone to gastrointestinal infections in summer and to respiratory infections in winter. Thus, environmental circumstances and child care were secondary factors of survival when compared with the manner in which infants were nourished.

Mother’s milk is in itself complete nourishment for a new infant. However, compared to the milk of a new mother (which comes in response to the direct demand of the suckling child), the milk of a wet nurse has neither the “age” nor the exact composition required for neonates, because usually the nurse has given birth to a child of her own some months earlier. Nevertheless, female milk is preferable to animal milk. Our ancestors were perfectly aware of the age of the milk – its color and consistency – when choosing a wet nurse. Yet before the 1750s, they did not fully appreciate the qualities of human milk and the superiority of a mother’s milk for her own child.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aries, Philippe. 1962. Centuries of childhood: A social history of family life. New York.Google Scholar
Badinter, Elisabeth. 1981. The myth of motherhood. An historical view of the maternal instinct, trans. DeGaris, R.. London.Google Scholar
Bardet, J.-P., Corsini, C., Perez Moreda, V., et al. 1991. Enfance abandonnée et société en Europe, XIVe–XXe siècle. Rome.Google Scholar
Bardet, Jean-Pierre. 1973. Enfants abandonnés et enfants assistés. Sur la population française du XVIIe et XVI-IIe siècles. Paris.Google Scholar
Betzy, M. 1775. Le plan et les statuts des établissements ordonnés par Catherine II. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Cadogan, William. 1748. An essay upon nursing and the management of children. London.Google Scholar
Carballo, Manuel, and Marin-Lira, Angelica. 1984. Patterns of breast-feeding, child health and fertility. Geneva.Google Scholar
Chamoux, Antoinette. 1973a. L'enfance abandonnée à Reims à la fin du XVIIIe siècle. Annales de Démographie Historique 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamoux, Antoinette. 1973b. L'allaitement artificiel. Annales de Démographie Historique 1973.Google Scholar
Corsini, Carlo. 1974. La fécondité naturelle de la femme mariée: Le cas des nourrices. Genus 30.Google Scholar
Corsini, Carlo. 1979. Is the fertility-reducing effect of lactation really substantial? In Natural fertility, ed. Leridon, Henri and Menken, Jane. Liège.Google Scholar
Davidson, Stanley, Passemore, R., Brock, J. F., and Truswell, A. S.. 1975. Human nutrition and dietetics. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Delahaye, Marie-Claude. 1990. Tétons et tétines. Histoire de l'allaitement. Paris.Google Scholar
Dionis, P. 1721. Traité général des accouchements…. Paris.Google Scholar
Fauve-Chamoux, Antoinette. 1983. La femme devant l'allaitement. Annales de Démographie Historique 1983.Google Scholar
Fauve-Chamoux, Antoinette. 1985. Innovation et comportement parental en milieu urbain XVe–XIXe siècles. Annales (E.S.C.) 5.Google Scholar
Fay-Sallois, Fanny. 1980. Les nourrices à Paris au XIXe siècle. Paris.Google Scholar
Fildes, Valerie. 1988. Wet nursing. A history from antiquity to the present. Oxford.Google Scholar
Flandrin, Jean-Louis. 1973. L'attitude à l'égard du petit enfant et les conduites sexuelles dans la civilisation occidentale. Annales de Démographie Historique 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, Rachel G. 1984. Abandoned children. Foundlings and child welfare in nineteenth-century France. Albany, N.Y.Google Scholar
Gift, Helen H., Washbon, Marjorie B., and Harrison, Gail G.. 1972. Nutrition, behavior and change. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.Google Scholar
Hecquet, Philippe. 1708. De l'obligation aux mères de nourrir leurs enfants. Paris.Google Scholar
Hélias, Pierre Jakez. 1975. Le cheval d'orgeuil. Mémoires d'un breton du pays bigouden. Paris.Google Scholar
Kay, Margarita A. 1981. Anthropology of human birth. Philadelphia, Pa.Google Scholar
Klapisch-Zuber, Christiane. 1985. Blood parents and milk parents: Wet nursing in Florence, 1300–1530. In Women, family, and ritual Renaissance Italy, trans. Cochrane, L. G.. Chicago.Google Scholar
Knibiehler, Yvonne, and Fouquet, Catherine. 1980. L'histoire des mères du moyen-âge à nos jours. Paris.Google Scholar
Knodel, J., and Walle, E.. 1967. Breast-feeding, fertility and infant mortality. Population Studies 21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,La Leche International, ed. 1981. The womanly art of breastfeeding. New York.
Lallemand, Leon. 1885. Histoire des enfants abandonnés et délaissés: étude sur la protection de l'enfance aux diverses époques de la civilisation. Paris.Google Scholar
Lemieux, Denise. 1985. Les petits innocents. L'enfance en Nouvelle-France. Quebec.Google Scholar
L'Epinoy, Roze. 1785. Avis aux mères qui veulent allaiter. Paris.Google Scholar
Lerebourg, M. 1767. Avis aux mères qui veulent nourrir leurs enfants. Utrecht.Google Scholar
Livi-Bacci, Massimo. 1991. Population and nutrition. An essay on European demographic history. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montaigne, Michel. 1580. Les essais. Paris.Google Scholar
Noonan, John T. Jr. 1966. Contraception: A history of its treatment by the Catholic theologians and canonists. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Paré, Ambroise. 1573. De la génération. Paris.Google Scholar
Paul, Pauline C., and Palmer, Helen H.. 1972. Food theory and applications. New York.Google Scholar
Pliny, . 1601. History of the world. Commonly called the natural history of Plinius secundus, trans. Holland, P.. London.Google Scholar
Pontas, M. 1764. Abrégé du dictionnaire des cas de conscience. Paris.Google Scholar
Prost de Royer, Antoine-François. 1778. Mémoire sur la conservation des enfants. Lyon.Google Scholar
Ransel, David L. 1988. Mothers of misery: Child abandonment in Russia. Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
Rollet-Echalier, Catherine. 1990. La politique à l'égard de la petite enfance sous la IIIe République. Paris.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. [1789]1959. Les confessions. In Oeuvres complètes. Paris.Google Scholar
Shorter, Edward. 1975. The making of the modern family. New York.Google Scholar
Soranus of, Ephesus. 1956. Gynecology, trans. Temkin, O. et al. Baltimore, Md.Google Scholar
Souci, S. W., Fachmann, W., and Kraut, H.. 1981. Food composition and nutrition tables 1981/82. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Sussman, G. D. 1982. Selling mothers' milk. The wet-nursing business in France 1715–1914. London.Google Scholar
Tissot, Samuel. 1782. Avis au peuple sur sa santé. Paris.Google Scholar
Van de Walle, étienne, and Walle, Francine. 1972. Allaitement, stérilité et contraception: Les opinions jusqu'au XIXe siècle. Population 4–5.Google Scholar
Verdier-Heurtin, J. F. 1804. Discours sur l'allaitement. Paris.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×