Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T04:20:08.543Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

28 - Ethics and literary criticism

from PHILOSOPHY, AESTHETICS AND LITERARY CRITICISM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Christa Knellwolf
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Christopher Norris
Affiliation:
University of Wales College of Cardiff
Get access

Summary

No single concept has had a more vital, complex and uncertain relation to literary criticism than ethics. While criticism has long been felt to represent in part an ethical enterprise, the origin and nature of the ethical obligation binding criticism has been a matter of great uncertainty. In part, this uncertainty reflects at a distance a parallel uncertainty concerning the relation of literature to ethics; in part, it is a feature of the practice of criticism or scholarship in any field; and in part it derives from the discourse of ethics itself.

While there are many different strands of ethical thinking, including those grounded in the thought of Aristotle, Augustine, Kant, Hegel, Marx, Nietzsche, Freud, John Rawls, Michel Foucault, Jacques Lacan, Jacques Derrida and others, a few very general statements can apply to all. Ethics is a way of putting things in which a given concept or term is set in relation to another concept or term in such a way that each exerts pressure on the other. In ethical discourse, ‘inclination’ might be set against ‘duty’, ‘self-interest’ against ‘altruism’, ‘law’ against ‘custom’, ‘long-term interests’ against ‘shortterm desires’, ‘facts’ against ‘values’; such oppositions become ‘ethical’ when they are seen to constitute a relation of ‘otherness’ in which the two terms are defined in mutual resistance.

The disputes arising from such a relation can only be settled by the imposition of an ‘ought’: one ought (for example) to behave out of respect for the law rather than simply pursuing the pleasures of the moment because, for whatever reason, adherence to the law possesses a higher value than the pursuit of pleasure.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnold, Matthew, ‘The Function of Criticism at the Present Time’, in Essays in Criticism: First Series, London: Dent, 1964.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail, The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, ed. Michael Holquist, trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist, Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland, The Rustle of Language, trans. Howard, Richard, New York: Hill and Wang, 1986.Google Scholar
Booth, Wayne, The Company We Keep: An Ethics of Fiction, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.Google Scholar
De Man, Paul, Allegories of Reading: Figural Language in Rousseau, Nietzsche, Rilke, and Proust, New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques, ‘Afterword: Toward an Ethic of Discussion’, Limited Inc, trans. , Samuel Weber and Mehlman, Jeffrey, Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques, ‘Racism's Last Word’, in Gates, Henry Louis (ed.), ‘Race’, Writing, and Difference, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Truth and Method, New York: Seabury Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Harpham, Geoffrey Galt, Getting it Right: Language, Literature, and Ethics, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric, The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, ‘Metaphysical Foundations of Morals’, in Friedrich, Carl J. (trans. and ed.), The Philosophy of Kant: Immanuel Kant's Moral and Political Writings, New York: Random House, 1977.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel, Otherwise Than Being or Beyond Essence, trans. Lingis, Alphonso, The Hague: Nijhoff, 1981.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel, Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority, trans. Lingis, Alphonso, Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, London: Duckworth, 1981.Google Scholar
Miller, J. Hillis, The Ethics of Reading: Kant, de Man, Eliot, Trollope, James, and Benjamin, New York: Columbia University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Murdoch, Iris, The Fire and the Sun: Why Plato Banished the Artists, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Newton, Adam Zachary, Narrative Ethics, Cambridge, Mass. and London: Harvard University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich, On the Genealogy of Morals, in Kaufmann, Walter (trans.), On the Genealogy of Morals and Ecce Homo, New York: Random House, 1969.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C., Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Pope, Alexander, Essay on Criticism, in Wimsatt, William K. (ed.), Alexander Pope: Selected Poetry and Prose (New York: Rinehart, 1955).Google Scholar
Rainsford, Dominic, Authorship, Ethics and the Reader: Blake, Dickens, Joyce, New York: St. Martin's Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard, ‘Freud and Moral Reflection’, in Smith, Joseph H. and Kerrigan, William (eds.), Pragmatism's Freud: The Moral Disposition of Psychoanalysis, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard, ‘Solidarity or Objectivity?’, in Rajchman, John and West, Cornel (eds.), Post-Analytic Philosophy, New York: Columbia University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Sidney, Philip, An Apology for Poetry, ed. Shepherd, Geoffrey (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1973).Google Scholar
Siebers, Tobin, The Ethics of Criticism, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Wilde, Oscar, ‘The Critic as Artist’, in Ellmann, Richard (ed.), The Artist as Critic (London: W. H. Allen, 1970).Google Scholar
Williams, Raymond, Marxism and Literature, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×