Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-18T20:37:48.972Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - The German Political Parties and the USA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2013

Detlef Junker
Affiliation:
Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Germany
Get access

Summary

Translated by Eric Weinberger

The East-West conflict defined the terms of German-American relations until 1990, considerable fluctuations in the intensity of that conflict notwithstanding. West Germany's dependence on American protection determined where the country stood politically in the later decades of the Cold War, as it had before 1968, and colored the views the West German parties held of the relationship between their country and the United States. The Harmel Report issued by NATO in 1967 had called for equal weight to be given to defense and détente in the interests of European security. West Germany's political parties differed on security policy in large part because they placed different weight on defense and détente and, consequently, placed different value on relations with the United States. Moreover, positive attitudes toward the United States began to fade in the mid-1960s, when America became the focus of criticism - especially from the younger generation - for its methods of warfare in Indochina. The loss of faith in American politics, aggravated by the Watergate scandal, cast increasing doubt on taking America as a role model.

Beginning in the late 1970s, skepticism about the motives and goals of American policy began to spread within the Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD) and among the Greens. The Reagan administration’s distinctive combination of a focus on American interests, Manichaean worldview, and sense of political mission helped spur the SPD and the Greens to question the wisdom of West Germany’s security dependence on the United States. Their unease would persist throughout the Reagan era. However, the Christian Democratic Union (CDU), the Christian Social Union (CSU), and the Free Democratic Party (FDP) functioned as a domestic counterbalance to those critical of the United States.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×