Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T00:37:04.600Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 2 - Image acquisition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2012

Gary J. Whitman
Affiliation:
MD Anderson Cancer Center
Tamara Milner Haygood
Affiliation:
MD Anderson Cancer Center
Get access

Summary

Introduction

One of the most recent advances in mammography is digital mammography. When first approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2000, digital mammography systems were categorized as class III devices, because they were then considered novel systems for screening and diagnosing breast cancer [1]. The class III device category usually includes new technologies that have not been widely used and require proof of safety and effectiveness before the product can be approved for marketing. Other examples of class III devices include heart valves and orthopedic implants. As of January 2012, 22 digital mammography systems have been approved by the FDA (Table 2.1). From the time the first digital mammography system, the GE Senographe 2000D, was approved in 2000 until today, digital mammography has been validated by multiple scientific studies [2–4]. The benefits and risks of digital versus film-screen mammography have been well documented and well described. In November 2010 the FDA reclassified digital mammography systems as class II devices. Class I and class II devices pose lower risks and include adhesive bandages, wheelchairs, and many medical imaging technologies, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners and film-screen mammography. The class II device category usually requires submission of a premarket notification or a 510(k) to establish that the product is substantially equivalent to a device already on the market [1].

Type
Chapter
Information
Digital Mammography
A Practical Approach
, pp. 18 - 21
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

US Food and Drug Administration. FDA reclassifies certain digital mammography devices, 2010. (accessed January 2012).
Lewin, JM, D’Orsi, CJ, Hendrick, RE, et al. Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179: 671–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skaane, P, Skjennald, A. Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: randomized trial in a population-based screening program: the Oslo II Study. Radiology 2004; 232: 197–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skaane, P, Hofvind, S, Skjennald A. Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in population-based screening program: follow-up and final results of Oslo II study. Radiology 2007; 244: 708–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
US Food and Drug Administration. FFDM and DBT Systems, 2012. (accessed January 2012).
Hashimoto, BE. Physics of digital mammography. In Hashimoto, BE, ed., Practical Digital Mammography. New York, NY: Thieme, 2008; pp. 4–8.Google Scholar
James, JJ. The current status of digital mammography. Clin Radiol 2004; 59: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hurter, F, Driffield, VC. Photo-chemical investigations and a new method of the sensitivities of photographic plates. J Soc Chem Indust 1890; 9: 455–69.Google Scholar
Feig, S, Yaffe, MJ. Current status of digital mammography. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 1996; 17: 424–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mahesh, M. AAPM/RSNA Physics tutorial for residents: digital mammography: an overview. Radiographics 2004; 24: 1747–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feig, SA, Yaffe, MJ. Digital mammography. Radiographics 1998; 18: 893–901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, MB, Krupinshki, EA, Strauss, KJ, et al. Digital radiography image quality: image acquisition. J Am Coll Radiol 2007; 4: 371–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuzmiak, CM, Pisano, ED, Cole, EB, et al. Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to contrast and spatial resolution in tissue equivalent breast phantoms. Med Phys 2005; 32: 3144–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yaffe, MJ, Mainprize, JG. Detectors for digital mammography. In Pisano, ED, Yaffe, MJ, Kuzmiak, CM, eds., Digital Mammography. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2004; pp. 15–26.Google ScholarPubMed
Pisano, E, Yaffe, M. Digital mammography. Breast Dis 1998; 10: 127–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nees, A. Digital mammography: are there advantages in screening for breast cancer?Acad Radiol 2006; 15: 401–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikeda, DM. Mammographic acquisition: screen-film and digital mammography, computer-aided detection, and the mammographic quality standards act. In Ikeda, DM, ed., Breast Imaging: the Requisites. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby, 2004; pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
Smith, AP, Hall, PA, Marcello DM. Emerging technologies in breast cancer detection. Radiol Manage 2004; 26: 16–24.Google ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×