Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T23:49:32.142Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Making way for the public interest in international investment agreements

from Part III - Actors in international investment law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

Chester Brown
Affiliation:
University of Sydney
Kate Miles
Affiliation:
University of Sydney
Get access

Summary

Introduction

One of the crucial questions posed by the expanding application of international investment agreements (IIAs) over the last two decades is the extent to which they regulate host States' ability to enact and enforce regulation intended to protect society and the environment. That question is now on the agenda of the international community and has been taken up by a prominent figure at the United Nations, the Special-Representative of the Secretary-General (SRSG) on the Issue of Human Rights, Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises, Harvard political science professor John Gerald Ruggie. In his 2009 report to the Human Rights Council, the SRSG expressed concern that ‘recent experience suggests that some [investment] treaty guarantees and contract provisions may unduly constrain the host Government's ability to achieve its legitimate policy objectives, including its international human rights obligations’. Undue constraints may emerge, the SRSG explained, because ‘under threat of binding international arbitration, a foreign investor may be able to insulate its business venture from new laws and regulations, or seek compensation from the Government for the cost of compliance’. A number of non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and other analysts have expressed similar concerns and warned that IIAs and investor–State arbitration may have a chilling effect on host State regulatory initiatives that are needed to address non-investment policy objectives.

The SRSG and others cite as the basis for their concern a growing number of investor–State cases in which investors have challenged sensitive domestic legislative and administrative measures. These include cases under the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in which investors have challenged environmental and social regulation; cases brought by investors from the US and UK in which Argentina has been held liable as a result of measures that it took in response to a serious economic crisis in 2001; and cases under a range of IIAs in which investors have challenged regulatory measures that host States have defended as designed to achieve legitimate domestic policy objectives.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bean, V.Beauvais, J.‘Global Fifth Amendment: NAFTA's investment protection and the misguided quest for an international regulatory takings doctrine’New York University Law Review 78 2003 30Google Scholar
Salacuse, J. W.Sullivan, N. P.‘Do BITs really work? An evaluation of BITs and their grand bargain’Harvard International Law Journal 67 2005 46Google Scholar
van Harten, G.Investment Treaty Arbitration and Public LawOxford University Press 2007 67Google Scholar
Alvarez, J. E.Khamsi, K.‘The Argentine crisis and foreign investors: A glimpse into the heart of the investment regime’Yearbook on International Investment Law and Policy 1 2008 379Google Scholar
Muchlinski, P.‘Trends in international investment agreements: Balancing investor rights and the right to regulate: The issue of national security’Yearbook on International Investment Law and Policy 1 2008 37Google Scholar
Vandevelde, K.‘A comparison of the 2004 and 1994 US Model BITs: Rebalancing investor and host country interests’Yearbook on International Investment Law and Policy 1 2008 288Google Scholar
Schwebel, S. M.‘The United States 2004 model bilateral investment treaty and denial of justice’Binder, C.International Investment Law for the 21st Century: Essays in honour of Christoph SchreuerOxford University Press 2009Google Scholar
Waibel, M.‘The backlash against investment arbitration: Perceptions and reality’Waibel, M.The Backlash against Investment Arbitration: Perceptions and realityThe HagueKluwer 2010 xxxviiGoogle Scholar
Crawford, J.‘Foreword’Douglas, Z.The International Law of Investment ClaimsCambridge University Press 2009 xxiCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brower, C.Ottolenghi, M.Prows, P.‘The saga of : , precedent, and legitimacy of ICSID arbitration’Binder, C.International Investment Law for the 21st Century: Essays in honour of Christoph SchreuerOxford University Press 2009 519Google Scholar
Brower, C. H.‘Obstacles and pathways to consideration of the public interest in investment treaty disputes’Yearbook on International Investment Law and Policy 1 2008 356Google Scholar
Paulsson, J.‘Arbitration without privity’ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 10 1995 232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sohn, L. B.Baxter, R. R.‘Responsibility of States for injuries to the economic interests of aliens’American Journal of International Law 55 1961 561Google Scholar
McLachan, C.Shore, L.Weiniger, M.International Investment Arbitration: Substantive PrinciplesOxford University Press 2007 306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, J. E‘The evolving BIT’Journal of International Economic Law 1 2009 22Google Scholar
Ali, A. H.Tallent, K.‘The effect of BITs on the international body of investment law: The significance of fair and equitable treatment provisions’Rogers, C. A.Alford, R. P.The Future of Investment ArbitrationOxford University Press 2009 199Google Scholar
van Harten, G.Testimony Before U.S. State Department Public Hearing on Bilateral Investment Treaty ReformOsgoode Hall Law School 2009Google Scholar
Kalderimis, D.Investment Treaties and Public GoodsTokyo 2009 13Google Scholar
Alvarez, J. E.‘Book review of Gus van Harten, investment treaty arbitration and public law’American Journal of International Law 102 2008 909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, D.‘The rule of law, political choices, and development common-sense’Trubek, D. M.Santos, A.The New Law and Economic DevelopmentCambridge 2006 95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newcombe, A.‘Sustainable development and investment treaty law’Journal of World Investment and Trade 8 2007 357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauvant, K. P.Sachs, L. E.The Effect of Treaties on Foreign Direct Investment: Bilateral investment treaties, double taxation treaties, and investment flowsOxford University Press 2009CrossRef
Vandevelde, K.Bilateral Investment Treaties: History, policy and interpretationOxford University Press 2010Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×