Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T19:27:47.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - The service-dominant mindset

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Robert F. Lusch
Affiliation:
University of Arizona
Stephen L. Vargo
Affiliation:
University of Hawaii, Manoa
Get access

Summary

Once destiny was an honest game of cards which followed certain conventions, with a limited number of cards and values. Now the player realizes in amazement that the hand of his future contains cards never seen before and that the rules of the game are modified by each play.

Paul Valéry

Introduction

Part of our nature as humans is to develop belief systems that become handy ways for seeing and understanding the world around us and for ordering our reality. We can refer to these mechanisms as institutional logics. Institutional logics become normative and play a key role in guiding and determining our behavior. Many of these institutional logics arise from our training and education and thus the ordered view of the world from the perspective of an economist is different from that of an accountant, mechanic, sociologist, physicist, fire fighter, or moral philosopher. Regardless, they enable viewing a complex world in what promises to be coherent terms and provide a lens for perceptually separating noise from signal. Thus, they contribute to comfort, understanding, and sense-making.

Just because we are comfortable with our institutional logics does not suggest these logics are always correct or appropriate or do not need to change or evolve. In fact, some institutional logics become so strongly held across individuals that they become paradigmatic and very difficult to shift. It has been found repeatedly throughout history that these paradigms can restrict vision and understanding and scientific advancement. Of course, in business, there are many such “worlds” that need to be understood: cultural, ecological, economic, social, physical, political, technological, and many others. The primary purpose of this book is to contribute to the understanding of the world of economic and social exchange among human actors, both individually and in groups, by proposing an alternative view or perspective, what we call “service-dominant logic” (S-D logic), to the traditional “goods-dominant logic” (G-D logic).

Type
Chapter
Information
Service-Dominant Logic
Premises, Perspectives, Possibilities
, pp. 3 - 30
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Friedland, Roger and Alford, Robert R., “Bringing society back in: symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions,” in Powell, Walter W. and DiMaggio, Paul J. (eds.),The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (University of Chicago Press, 1991), pp. 232–266.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (University of Chicago Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Loasby, Brian, Knowledge, Institutions and Evolution in Economics (New York: Routledge, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penrose, Edith Tilton, The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1959), pp. 24–25.Google Scholar
Richardson, G. B., “The organisation of industry,” Economic Journal, 82 (September 1972), 883–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theodore Levitt, Theodore (1960), “Marketing myopia,” Harvard Business Review, 38 (July–August 1960), 26–44, 173–181.Google Scholar
Dixon, Donald F., “Marketing as production: the development of a concept,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 18 (Fall 1990), 337–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vargo, Stephen L. and Morgan, Fred W., “Services in society and academic thought: an historical analysis,” Journal of Macromarketing, 25 (June 2005), 42–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Say, Jean-Baptiste, A Treatise on the Political Economy (Boston: Wells & Lilly, 1821).Google Scholar
Marshall, Alfred, Principles of Economics (London: Macmillan, 1927 [1890]);Google Scholar
Walras, L., Elements of the Political Economy (Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, 1984 [1954]);Google Scholar
Vargo, Stephen L., Maglio, Paul P., and Akaka, Melissa Archpru, “On value and value co-creation: a service systems and service logic perspective,” European Management Journal, 26 (June 2008), 145–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vargo, Stephen L. and Lusch, Robert F., “It’s all B2B … and beyond: toward a systems perspective of the market,” Industrial Marketing Management, 40:2 (2011), 181–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Converse, Paul D., Essentials of Distribution (New York: Prentice-Hall, 1936), p. 492.Google Scholar
Vargo, Stephen L. and Lusch, Robert F., “Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 68 (January 2004), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priem, Richard L., “A consumer perspective on value creation,” Academy of Management Review, 32:1 (2007), 219–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pine, Joseph and Gilmore, James H., The Experience Economy: Work is Theater and Every Business a Stage (Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1999)Google Scholar
Callon, Michel, The Laws of Markets (Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 1998).Google Scholar
Vargo, Stephen L. and Lusch, Robert F., “The four services marketing myths: remnants from a manufacturing model,” Journal of Service Research, 6 (May 2004), 324–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, Ronald H., “The nature of the firm,” Economica, 4 (November 1937), 386–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, N., Scheer, L., and Kotler, P., “From market driven to market driving,” European Management Journal, 18:2 (2000), 129–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vargo, Stephen L. and Lusch, Robert F., “Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36:1 (2008), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, Jennifer and Vargo, Stephen L., “Contextualization: network intersections, value-in-context, and the co-creation of markets,” Marketing Theory, 11:1 (2011), 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vargo, Stephen L., Lusch, Robert F., Akaka, Melissa, and He, Yi, “Service-dominant logic: a review and assessment,” Review of Marketing Research, 6 (2010), 125–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, Anthony, The Constitution of Society (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Sarasvathy, Saras D., Effectuation: Elements of Entrepreneurial Expertise (Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×