Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T06:47:38.257Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2011

Sara Negri
Affiliation:
University of Helsinki
Jan von Plato
Affiliation:
University of Helsinki
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Proof Analysis
A Contribution to Hilbert's Last Problem
, pp. 254 - 261
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Avron, A. (1984) On modal systems having arithmetical interpretations. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 49, pp. 935–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basin, D., S., Matthews, and L., Viganó (1998) Natural deduction for non-classical logics. Studia Logica, vol. 60, pp. 119–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Benthem, J. (1984) Correspondence theory. In D., Gabbay and F., Guenther (eds.) Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. 2, pp. 167–247, Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Bernays, P. (1945) Review of Ketonen (1944). The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 10, pp. 127–130.Google Scholar
Bezem, M. and D., Hendriks (2008) On the mechanization of the proof of Hessenberg's theorem in coherent logic. Journal of Automated Reasoning, vol. 40, pp. 61–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, P. (2000) Representation, reasoning, and relational structures: a hybrid logic manifesto. Logic Journal of the IGPL, vol. 8, pp. 339–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, P., M., de Rijke, and Y., Venema (2001) Modal Logic. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blass, A. (1988) Topoi and computation. Bulletin of the European Association for Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 36, pp. 57–65.Google Scholar
Borga, M. (1983) On some proof theoretical properties of the modal logic GL. Studia Logica, vol. 4, pp. 453–459.Google Scholar
Braüner, T. (2000) A cut-free Gentzen formulation of the modal logic S5. Logic Journal of the IGPL, vol. 8, pp. 629–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouwer, L. (1924) Intuitionistische Zerlegung mathematischer Grundbegriffe. As reprinted in Brouwer'sCollected Works, vol. 1, pp. 275–280, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1980.Google Scholar
Brouwer, L. (1927) Virtuelle Ordnung und unerweiterbare Ordnung. As reprinted in Brouwer'sCollected Works, vol. 1, pp. 406–408.Google Scholar
Brouwer, L. (1950) Remarques sur la notions d'ordre. As reprinted in Brouwer'sCollected Works, vol. 1, pp. 499–500.Google Scholar
Bull, R. and K., Segerberg (1984) Basic modal logic. In D., Gabbay and F., Guenther (eds.) Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. 2, pp. 1–88, Kluwer, Dordrecht. Second edition 2001.Google Scholar
Burris, S. (1995) Polynomial time uniform word problems. Mathematical Logic Quarterly, vol. 41, pp. 173–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, S. (1995) On Herbrand's theorem. In D., Leivant (ed.) Logical and Computational Complexity (LNCS 960), pp. 195–209, Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
Castellini, C. and A., Smaill (2002) A systematic presentation of quantified modal logics. Logic Journal of the IGPL, vol. 10, pp. 571–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cederqvist, J., T., Coquand, and S., Negri (1998) The Hahn-Banach theorem in type theory. In G., Sambin and J., Smith (eds.) Twenty-Five Years of Constructive Type Theory, pp. 39–50, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chagrov, A. and M., Zakharyaschev (1997) Modal Logic. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Copeland, B. J. (2002) The genesis of possible worlds semantics. Journal of Philosophical Logic, vol. 31, pp. 99–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coste, M., H., Lombardi, and M.-F., Roy (2001) Dynamical method in algebra: effective Nullstellensätze. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 111, pp. 203–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curry, H. B. (1952) The elimination theorem when modality is present. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 17, pp. 249–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dalen, D. and R., Statman (1978) Equality in the presence of apartness. In J., Hintikkaet al. (eds.) Essays in Mathematical and Philosophical Logic, pp. 95–116, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Degtyarev, A. and A., Voronkov (2001) Equality reasoning in sequent-based calculi. In A., Robinson and A., Voronkov (eds.)Handbook of Automated Reasoning, vol. 1, pp. 611–706, Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Dragalin, A. (1988) Mathematical Intuitionism: Introduction to Proof Theory. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dummett, M. (1959) A propositional calculus with a denumerable matrix. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 24, pp. 97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dummett, M. and E., Lemmon (1959) Modal logics between S4 and S5. Zeitschrift für Mathematische Logik und Grundlagen derMathematik, vol. 5, pp. 250–264.Google Scholar
Dunn, J. M. and G., Restall (2002) Relevance logic. In D., Gabbay and F., Guenthner (eds.) Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. 6, pp. 1–128, Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Dyckhoff, R. (1988) Implementing a simple proof assistant. In J., Derrick and H. A., Lewis (eds.) Workshop on Programming for Logic Teaching, pp. 49–59. Proceedings 23/1988, University of Leeds: Centre for Theoretical Computer Science. Mimeograph.Google Scholar
Dyckhoff, R. and S., Negri (2005) Proof analysis in intermediate propositional logics. Ms.
Dyckhoff, R. and S., Negri (2006) Decision methods for linearly ordered Heyting algebras. Archive for Mathematical Logic, vol. 45, pp. 411–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrenfeucht, A. (1959) Decidability of the theory of linear ordering relation. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 6, pp. 268–269.Google Scholar
Fitch, F. (1966) Tree proofs in modal logic. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 31, p. 152.Google Scholar
Fitting, M. (1983) Proof Methods for Modal and Intuitionistic Logics. D. Reidel, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitting, M. (1999) A simple propositional S5 tableau system. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 96, pp. 107–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitting, M. and R. L., Mendelsohn (1998) First-OrderModal Logic. Synthese Library vol. 277. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freese, R., J., Ježek, and J., Nation (1995) Free Lattices. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabbay, D. (1996) Labelled Deductive Systems. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gentzen, G. (19341935) Untersuchungen über das logische Schließen. Mathematische Zeitschrift, vol. 39, pp. 176–210 and 405–431.Google Scholar
Gentzen, G. (1938) Neue Fassung des Widerspruchsfreiheitsbeweises für die reine Zahlentheorie. Forschungen zur Logik und zur Grundlegung der exakten Wissenschaften, vol. 4, pp. 19–44.Google Scholar
Gentzen, G. (1969) The Collected Papers of Gerhard Gentzen. Ed. M., Szabo, North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Gentzen, G. (2008) The normalization of derivations. The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, vol. 14, pp. 245–257.Google Scholar
Girard, J.-Y. (1987) Proof Theory and Logical Complexity, vol. 1. Bibliopolis, Naples.Google Scholar
Gödel, K. (1933) Eine Interpretation des intuitionistischen Aussagenkalküls. Ergebnisse eines mathematischen Kolloquiums, vol. 4, pp. 39–40. English tr. in Gödel's Collected Works (1986), vol. 1, pp. 300–303.Google Scholar
Goldblatt, R. (2005) Mathematical modal logic: a view of its evolution. In D., Gabbay and J., Woods (eds.) Handbook of the History of Logic, vol. 7, pp. 1–98, Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Goré, R. (1998) Tableau methods for modal and temporal logis. In M., D'Agostinoet al. (eds.) Handbook of Tableau Methods, Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Goré, R. and R., Ramanayake (2008) Valentini's cut-elimination for provability logic resolved. In C., Areces and R., Goldblatt (eds.) Advances in Modal Logic, vol. 7, pp. 67–96, College Publications, London.Google Scholar
Hallett, M. and U., Majer (ed.) (2004) David Hilbert's Lectures on the Foundations of Geometry1891–1902. Springer, Berlin.
Hakli, R. and S., Negri (2011a) Does the deduction theorem fail for modal logic? Synthese, in press.
Hakli, R. and S., Negri (2011b) Reasoning about collectively accepted group beliefs. Journal of Philosophical Logic, vol. 40, pp. 531–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyting, A. (1927) Zur intuitionistischen Axiomatik der projektiven Geometrie. Mathematische Annalen, vol. 98, pp. 491–538.Google Scholar
Heyting, A. (1956) Intuitionism, an Introduction, North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Hilbert, D. (1899) Grundlagen der Geometrie. Teubner, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Janisczak, A. (1953) Undecidability of some simple formalized theories. Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 40, pp. 131–139.Google Scholar
Jankov, V. A. (1968) The calculus of the weak ‘law of excluded middle’. Mathematics of the USSR: Izvestija, vol. 2, pp. 997–1004.Google Scholar
Joachimski, F. and R., Matthes (2003) Short proofs of normalization for the simply typed λ-calculus, permutative conversions and Gödel's T. Archive for Mathematical Logic, vol. 42, pp. 59–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, Peter T. (1977) Topos Theory. LMS Monograph no. 10. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Kanger, S. (1957) Provability in Logic. Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Kanger, S. (1963) A simplified proof method for elementary logic. In P., Braffort and D., Hirshberg (eds.) Computer Programming and Formal Systems, pp. 87–94, North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Ketonen, O. (1943) ‘Luonnollisen päättelyn’ kalkyylista (On the calculus of ‘natural deduction’, in Finnish). Ajatus (Yearbook of the Finnish Philosophical Society), vol. 12, pp. 128–140.Google Scholar
Ketonen, O. (1944) Untersuchungen zum Prädikatenkalkül. Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn., Ser. A.I. 23.
Kleene, S. (1952) Introduction to Metamathematics. North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Kohlenbach, U. (2008) Applied Proof Theory: Proof Interpretations and Their Use in Mathematics. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
Kreisel, G. (1954) Review of Janisczak (1953). Mathematical Reviews, vol. 15, pp. 669–670.Google Scholar
Kripke, S. (1959) A completeness theorem in modal logic. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 24, pp. 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, S. (1963a) Semantical analysis of modal logic I. Normal modal propositional calculi. Zeitschrift für mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik, vol. 9, pp. 67–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, S. (1963b) Semantical considerations on modal logic. Acta Philosophica Fennica, vol. 16, pp. 83–94.Google Scholar
Kripke, S. (1965) Semantical Analysis of Intuitionistic Logic I. In M., Dummett and J., Crossley (eds.) Formal Systems and Recursive Functions, pp. 92–130, North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Kushida, H. and M., Okada (2003) A proof-theoretic study of the correspondence of classical logic and modal logic. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 68, pp. 1403–1414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Läuchli, H. and J., Leonard (1966) On the elementary theory of linear order. Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 59, pp. 109–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leivant, D. (1981) On the proof theory of the modal logic for arithmetic provability. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 46, pp. 531–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez-Escobar, L. (1999) Standardizing the N-systems of Gentzen. In X., Caicedo and C., Montenegro (eds.) Models, Algebras and Proofs, pp. 411–434, Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
McKinsey, J. and A., Tarski (1948) Some theorems about the sentential calculi of Lewis and Heyting. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 13, pp. 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mac Lane, S. and I., Moerdijk (1992) Sheaves in Geometry and Logic. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maksimova, L. (1979) Interpolation properties of superintuitionistic logics. Studia Logica, vol. 38, pp. 419–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mares, E. (2004) Relevant logic: A Philosophical Interpretation. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massacci, F. (2000) Single step tableaux for modal logics: methodology, computations, algorithms. Journal of Automated Reasoning, vol. 24, pp. 319–364.Google Scholar
Meinander, A. (2010) A solution of the uniform word problem for ortholattices. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science, vol. 20, pp. 625–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mints, G. (1970) Cut-free calculi of type S5. Translation of Russian original in A., Slisenko (ed.) Studies in Constructive Mathematics andMathematical Logic, vol. 8, pt II, pp. 79–82, n.p., Leningrad.Google Scholar
Mints, G. (1997) Indexed systems of sequents and cut-elimination. Journal of Philosophical Logic, vol. 26, pp. 671–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moen, A. (2003) A normal form for Gödel Löb sequent calculus, manuscript. Abstract published in The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, vol. 10 (2004), p. 266.Google Scholar
Mostowski, A. (1965) Thirty Years of Foundational Studies. The Philosophical Society of Finland, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Negri, S. (1999) Sequent calculus proof theory of intuitionistic apartness and order relations. Archive for Mathematical Logic, vol. 38, pp. 521–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Negri, S. (2003) Contraction-free sequent calculi for geometric theories, with an application to Barr's theorem. Archive for Mathematical Logic, vol. 42, pp. 389–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Negri, S. (2005a) Proof analysis in modal logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic, vol. 34, pp. 507–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Negri, S. (2005b) Permutability of rules for linear lattices. Journal of Universal Computer Science, vol. 11, pp. 1986–1995.Google Scholar
Negri, S. (2008) Proof analysis in non-classical logics. In C., DimitracopoulosL., NewelskiD., Normann, and J., Steel (eds.) Logic Colloquium '05, ASL Lecture Notes in Logic, vol. 28, pp. 107–128, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Negri, S. (2009) Kripke completeness revisited. In G., Primiero and S., Rahman (eds.) Acts of Knowledge – History, Philosophy and Logic, pp. 247–282, College Publications, London.Google Scholar
Negri, S. and J., von Plato (1998) Cut elimination in the presence of axioms. The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, vol. 4, pp. 418–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Negri, S. and J., von Plato (2001) Structural Proof Theory. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Negri, S. and J., von Plato (2002) Permutability of rules in lattice theory. Algebra Universalis, vol. 48, pp. 473–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Negri, S. and J., von Plato (2004) Proof systems for lattice theory. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science, vol. 14, pp. 507–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Negri, S. and J., von Plato (2005) The duality of classical and constructive notions and proofs. In L., Crosilla and P., Schuster (eds.) From Sets and Types to Topology and Analysis: Towards Practicable Foundations for Constructive Mathematics, pp. 149–161, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Negri, S., J., von Plato, and Th., Coquand (2004) Proof-theoretic analysis of order relations. Archive for Mathematical Logic, vol. 43, pp. 297–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nerode, A. (1991) Some lectures on modal logic. In F., Bauer (ed.) Logic, Algebra, and Computation, NATO ASI Series, Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Ohlbach, H. (1993) Translation methods for non-classical logics – an overview. Bulletin of the IGPL, vol. 1, pp. 69–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohnishi, M. and K., Matsumoto (1957) Gentzen method in modal calculi. Osaka Mathematical Journal, vol. 9, pp. 113–130.Google Scholar
Palmgren, E. (2002) An intuitionistic axiomatization of real closed fields. Mathematical Logic Quarterly, vol. 48, pp. 297–299.3.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Plato, J. (1995) The axioms of constructive geometry. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 76, pp. 169–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Plato, J. (1996) Organization and development of a constructive axiomatization. In S., Berardi and M., Coppo (eds.) Types for Proofs and Programs (LNCS 1158), pp. 288–296, Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
von Plato, J. (1997) Formalization of Hilbert's geometry of incidence and parallelism. Synthese, vol. 110, pp. 127–141.Google Scholar
von Plato, J. (2001a) Natural deduction with general elimination rules. Archive for Mathematical Logic, vol. 40, pp. 541–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Plato, J. (2001b) A proof of Gentzen's Hauptsatz without multicut. Archive for Mathematical Logic, vol. 40, pp. 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Plato, J. (2001c) Positive lattices. In P., Schusteret al. (eds.) Reuniting the Antipodes, pp. 185–197, Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
von Plato, J. (2004) Ein Leben, ein Werk – Gedanken über das wissenschaftliche Schaffen des finnischen Logikers Oiva Ketonen. In R., Seising (ed.) Form, Zahl, Ordnung: Studien zur Wissenschafts- und Technikgeschichte, pp. 427–435, Franz Steiner Verlag, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
von Plato, J. (2005) Normal derivability in modal logic. Mathematical Logic Quarterly, vol. 51, pp. 632–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Plato, J. (2007) In the shadows of the Löwenheim-Skolem theorem: early combinatorial analyses of mathematical proofs. The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, vol. 13, pp. 189–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Plato, J. (2008) Gentzen's proof of normalization for intuitionistic natural deduction. The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, vol. 14, pp. 240–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Plato, J. (2009) Gentzen's logic. In D., Gabbay and J., Woods (eds.) Handbook of the History of Logic, vol. 5: Logic from Russell to Church, pp. 667–721, Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
von Plato, J. (2010) Combinatorial analysis of proofs in projective and affine geometry. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 162, no. 2, pp. 144–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pohlers, W. (2009) Proof Theory: The First Step into Impredicativity. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
Popkorn, S. [Harold Simmons] (1994) First Steps in Modal Logic. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prawitz, D. (1965) Natural Deduction: A Proof-Theoretical Study. Almqvist & Wicksell, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Prawitz, D. (1971) Ideas and results in proof theory. In J., Fenstad (ed.) Proceedings of the Second Scandinavian Logic Symposium, pp. 235–308, North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Read, S. (2008) Harmony and Modality. In C., DégremontL., Kieff, and H., Rückert (eds.) Dialogues, Logics and Other Strong Things: Essays in Honour of Shahid Rahman, pp. 285–303, College Publications, London.Google Scholar
Restall, G. (2000) An Introduction to Substructural Logics. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Restall, G. (2008) Proofnets for S5: sequents and circuits for modal logic. In C., DimitracopoulosL., NewelskiD., Normann, and J., Steel (eds.) Logic Colloquium '05, ASL Lecture Notes in Logic, vol. 28, pp. 151–172, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sambin, G. and S., Valentini (1982) The modal logic of provability: the sequential approach. Journal of Philosophical Logic, vol. 11, pp. 311–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sasaki, K. (2002) A cut-free sequent system for the smallest interpretability logic. Studia Logica, vol. 70, pp. 353–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sato, M. (1980) A cut-free Gentzen-type system for the modal logic S5. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 45, pp. 67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. and U., Hustadt (2003) A principle for incorporating axioms into the first-order translation ofmodal formulae. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2741, pp. 412–426.Google Scholar
Schroeder-Heister, P. (1984) A natural extension of natural deduction. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 49, pp. 1284–1300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, D. (1968) Extending the topological interpretation to intuitionistic analysis. Compositio Mathematica, vol. 20, pp. 194–210.Google Scholar
Shvarts, G. (1989) Gentzen style systems for K45 and K45D. In A. R., Meyer and M. A., Taitslin (eds.) Logic at Botik '89 (LNCS 363), pp. 245–256, Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
Skolem, T. (1920) Logisch-kombinatorische Untersuchungen über die Erfüllbarkeit oder Beweisbarkeit mathematischer Sätze, nebst einem Theoreme über dichte Mengen. As reprinted in Skolem 1970, pp. 103–136.
Skolem, T. (1970) Selected Papers in Logic. Ed. J., Fenstad, University of Oslo Press, Oslo.Google Scholar
Smorynski, C. (1973) Elementary intuitionistic theories. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 38, pp. 102–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solovay, R. (1976) Provability interpretations of modal logic. Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 25, pp. 287–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stouppa, P. (2007) A deep inference system for the modal logic S5. Studia Logica, vol. 85, pp. 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szpilrajn, E. (1930) Sur l'extension de l'ordre partiel. Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 16, pp. 386–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takeuti, G. (1987) Proof Theory. North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Tarski, A. (1949) On essential undecidability. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 14, pp. 75–76.Google Scholar
Tennant, N. (1992) Autologic. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Troelstra, A. and D., van Dalen (1988) Constructivism inMathematics, vol. 1. North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Troelstra, A. and H., Schwichtenberg (1996) Basic Proof Theory. Cambridge University Press. Second edition 2000.Google Scholar
Valentini, S. (1983) The modal logic of provability: cut-elimination. Journal of Philosophical Logic, vol. 12, pp. 471–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vickers, S. (1989)Topology via Logic. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Viganó, L. (2000) Labelled Non-Classical Logics. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, H. (1960) Towards mechanical mathematics. IBM Journal of Research and Development, vol. 4, pp. 2–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wansing, H. (1994) Sequent calculi for normal modal propositional logics. Journal of Logic and Computation, vol. 4, pp. 125–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wansing, H. (ed.) (1996) Proof Theory of Modal Logic. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRef
Wansing, H. (2002) Sequent systems for modal logics. In D., Gabbay and F., Guenther (eds.) Handbook of Philosophical Logic, 2nd edn, vol. 8, pp. 61–145, Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Sara Negri, University of Helsinki, Jan von Plato, University of Helsinki
  • Book: Proof Analysis
  • Online publication: 07 October 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139003513.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Sara Negri, University of Helsinki, Jan von Plato, University of Helsinki
  • Book: Proof Analysis
  • Online publication: 07 October 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139003513.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Sara Negri, University of Helsinki, Jan von Plato, University of Helsinki
  • Book: Proof Analysis
  • Online publication: 07 October 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139003513.015
Available formats
×