[1] K., Aamodt, et al. (ALICE Collaboration). Higher harmonic anisotropic flow measurements of charged particles in pb-pb collisions at. Physical Review Letters, 107:032301, 2011.

[2] B. I., Abelev, et al. (STAR Collaboration). Centrality dependence of charged hadron and strange hadron elliptic flow from s(NN)**(1/2) = 200-GeV Au + Au collisions. Physical Review C, 77:054901, 2008.

[3] B. I. et al. (STAR Collaboration). Beam-energy and system-size dependence of dynamical net charge fluctuations. Physical Review C, 79:024906, 2009.

[4] B. I., Abelev, M. M., Aggarwal, Z., Ahammed, et al. K/π fluctuations at relativistic energies. Physical Review Letters, 103(9):092301, 2009.Google Scholar

[5] M., Abramowitz and I. A., Stegun. Handbook of mathematical functions. New York: Dover Publications, 1965.

[6] D., Adamova, et al. (CERES Collaboration). Event-by-event fluctuations of the mean transverse momentum in 40, 80, and 158 agev/c Pb + Au collisions. Nuclear Physics A, 727(1):97–119, 2003.

[7] J., Adams, et al. (STAR Collaboration). Azimuthal anisotropy in Au+Au collisions at s(NN)**(1/2) = 200-GeV. Physical Review C, 72:014904, 2005.Google Scholar

[8] J., Adams, et al. (STAR Collaboration). Event by event pT fluctuations in Au – Au collisions at. Physical Review C, 71:064906, 2005.Google Scholar

[9] J., Adams, et al. (STAR Collaboration). Incident energy dependence of pt correlations at RHIC. Physical Review C, 72:044902, 2005.Google Scholar

[10] C., Adler, et al. (STAR Collaboration). Elliptic flow from two- and four-particle correlations in Au+Au collisions at. Physical Review C, 66:034904, 2002.Google Scholar

[11] C., Adler, et al. (STAR Collaboration). Disappearance of back-to-back high-pT hadron correlations in central Au+Au collisions at. Physical Review Letters, 90:082302, 2003.Google Scholar

[12] S. S., Adler, et al. (PHENIX Collaboration). Measurement of nonrandom event-byevent fluctuations of average transverse momentum in s NN = 200 GeV – Au and p – p collisions. Physical Review Letters, 93(9):092301, 2004.Google Scholar

[13] T., Adye. Unfolding algorithms and tests using RooUnfold. ArXiv e-prints, May 2011.

[14] S., Agostinelli, J., Allison, K., Amako, et al. Geant4, a simulation toolkit. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 506(3):250–303, 2003.

[15] Murray A, Aitkin, Brian, Francis, and John, Hinde. Statistical modelling in GLIM 4, Volume 32. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.

[16] N. N., Ajitanand, J. M., Alexander, P., Chung, et al. Decomposition of harmonic and jet contributions to particle-pair correlations at ultrarelativistic energies. Physical Review C, 72:011902, Jul 2005.Google Scholar

[17] M., Albrow and R., Raja. In Proceedings, Hadronic Shower Simulation Workshop, Batavia, September 6–8, 2006. AIP Conference Proceedings, 896:1–254, 2007.Google Scholar

[18] T., Alexopoulos, M., Bachtis, E., Gazis, and G., Tsipolitis. Implementation of the legendre transform for track segment reconstruction in drift tube chambers. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 592(3):456–462, 2008.Google Scholar

[19] B., Alver, B. B., Back, M. D., Baker, et al. Importance of correlations and fluctuations on the initial source eccentricity in high-energy nucleus-nucleus collisions. Physical Review C, 77:014906, 2008.Google Scholar

[20] C., Amsler et al. (Particle Data Group). Review of particle physics. Physics Letters B, 667(1):1–6, 2008.Google Scholar

[21] A., Andronic and J. P., Wessels. Transition radiation detectors. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, 666:130–147, 2012.Google Scholar

[22] T., Anticic, B., Baatar, D., Barna, et al. Transverse momentum fluctuations in nuclear collisions at 158A gev. Physical Review C, 70(3):034902, 2004.Google Scholar

[23] V. B., Anykeyev, A. A., Spiridonov, and V. P., Zhigunov. Comparative investigation of unfolding methods. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 303(2):350–369, 1991.Google Scholar

[24] J. P., Archambault, A., Artamonov, M., Cadabeschi, et al. Energy calibration of the atlas liquid argon forward calorimeter. Journal of Instrumentation, 3(2):P02002, 2008.Google Scholar

[25] Paul, Avery. Applied fitting theory vi: Formulas for kinematic fitting. CLEO Note CBX, 98–37, 1998.Google Scholar

[26] Roger J., Barlow. Statistics: A guide to the use of statistical methods in the physical sciences, volume 29. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1989.

[27] V. E., Barnes, P. L., Connolly, D. J., Crennell, et al. Observation of a hyperon with strangeness minus three. Physical Review Letters, 12:204–206, 1964.

[28] R. M., Barnett, C. D., Carone, D. E., Groom, et al. Review of particle physics. Physical Review D, 54:1–708, Jul 1996.Google Scholar

[29] S. A., Bass, M., Bleicher, M., Brandstetter, C., Ernst, L., Gerland, et al. Urqmd: A new molecular dynamics model from ganil to CERN energies. In Structure of vacuum and elementary matter: Proceedings, International Conference on Nuclear Physics at the Turn of the Millennium, Wilderness, South Africa, March 10–16, 1996, pp. 399–405.

[30] Steffen A., Bass, Pawel, Danielewicz, and Scott, Pratt. Clocking hadronization in relativistic heavy-ion collisions with balance functions. Physical Review Letters, 85:2689–2692, 2000.Google Scholar

[31] Steffen A., Bass, Pawel, Danielewicz, and Scott, Pratt. Clocking hadronization in relativistic heavy ion collisions with balance functions. Physical Review Letters, 85:2689–2692, 2000.Google Scholar

[32] Giuseppe, Battistoni, F., Cerutti, A., Fasso, A., Ferrari, S., Muraro, J., Ranft, S., Roesler, and P. R., Sala. The fluka code: Description and benchmarking. In Hadronic Shower Simulation Workshop (AIP Conference Proceedings, Volume 896), pp. 31–49, 2007.Google Scholar

[33] S. S., Baturin and A. D., Kanareykin. Cherenkov radiation from short relativistic bunches: General approach. Physical Review Letters, 113:214801, 2014.Google Scholar

[34] Florian, Beaudette. The CMS particle flow algorithm. arXiv:1401.8155 [hep-ex].

[35] J., Beringer, et al. (Particle Data Group). Review of particle physics. Physical Review D, 86:324–325, 2012.Google Scholar

[36] Didier H., Besset. Object-oriented implementation of numerical methods: An introduction with Java and Smalltalk. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann, 2001.

[37] Rajeev S., Bhalerao, Jean-Yves, Ollitrault, and Subrata, Pal. Characterizing flow fluctuations with moments. Physics Letters, B742:94–98, 2015.Google Scholar

[38] R. S., Bhalerao, N., Borghini, and J. Y., Ollitrault. Analysis of anisotropic flow with Lee-Yang zeroes. Nuclear Physics A, 727:373–426, 2003.Google Scholar

[39] Hans, Bichsel. A method to improve tracking and particle identification in tpcs and silicon detectors. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 562(1):154–197, 2006.Google Scholar

[40] Pierre, Billoir and Sijin, Qian. Simultaneous pattern recognition and track filtering by the Kalman filtering method. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, 294(1–2):219–228, 1990.Google Scholar

[41] Pierre, Billoir. Further test for the simultaneous pattern recognition and track filtering by the Kalman filtering method. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, 295(3):492–500, 1990.Google Scholar

[42] Pierre, Billoir. Track fitting with multiple scattering: A new method. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, 225(2):352–366, 1984.

[43] Pierre, Billoir. Progressive track recognition with a Kalman-like fitting procedure. Computer Physics Communications, 57(1):390–394, 1989.

[44] Pierre, Billoir, R., Frühwirth, and Meinhard, Regler. Track element merging strategy and vertex fitting in complex modular detectors. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 241(1):115–131, 1985.Google Scholar

[45] Pierre, Billoir and Sijin, Qian. Fast vertex fitting with a local parametrization of tracks. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 311(1):139–150, 1992.Google Scholar

[46] M., Bleicher, S., Jeon, and V., Koch. Event-by-event fluctuations of the charged particle ratio from nonequilibrium transport theory. Physical Review C, 62:061902, 2000.Google Scholar

[47] V., Blobel. Alignment algorithms. In S., Blusk, O., Buchmuller, A., Jacholkowski, T., Ruf, J., Schieck, and S., Viret (eds.), Proceedings, First LHC Detector Alignment Workshop, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, September 4–6, 2006, p. 5.

[48] Volker, Blobel. An unfolding method for high energy physics experiments. arXiv preprint hep-ex/0208022, 2002.

[49] Christoph, Blume. Search for the critical point and the onset of deconfinement. Central European Journal of Physics, 10(6):1245–1253, 2012.Google Scholar

[50] Rudolf K., Bock and Angela, Vasilescu. The particle detector briefbook. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag 1998.

[51] G., Bonvicini. Private communication, 2009.

[52] Fritz W., Bopp, R., Engel, and J., Ranft. Rapidity gaps and the PHOJET Monte Carlo. pp. 729–741, 1998.

[53] N., Borghini, R. S., Bhalerao, and J.-Y., Ollitrault. Anisotropic flow from lee yang zeros: A practical guide. Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, 30(8):S1213, 2004.Google Scholar

[54] Nicolas, Borghini. Multiparticle correlations from momentum conservation. European Physical Journal, C30:381–385, 2003.Google Scholar

[55] Nicolas, Borghini. Momentum conservation and correlation analyses in heavy-ion collisions at ultrarelativistic energies. Physical Review C, 75:021904, 2007.Google Scholar

[56] Nicolas, Borghini, Phuong Mai, Dinh, and Jean-Yves, Ollitrault. Flow analysis from cumulants: A practical guide. In International Workshop on the Physics of the Quark Gluon Plasma Palaiseau, France, September 4–7, 2001.

[57] G. E. P., Box and Mervin E., Muller. A note on the generation of random normal deviates. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 29(2):610–611, 1958.Google Scholar

[58] Lawrence D., Brown, T., Tony Cai, and Anirban, DasGupta. Interval estimation for a binomial proportion. Statistical Science, 16(2):101–133, 2001.Google Scholar

[59] Rene, Brun and Fons, Rademakers. ROOT, an object oriented data analysis framework. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 389(1):81–86, 1997.Google Scholar

[60] Lars, Bugge and Jan, Myrheim. Tracking and track fitting. Nuclear Instruments and Methods, 179(2):365–381, 1981.Google Scholar

[61] Alessandro, Buzzatti and Miklos, Gyulassy. An overview of the CUJET model: Jet Flavor Tomography applied at RHIC and LHC. Nuclear Physics A, 910–911:490–493, 2013.Google Scholar

[62] Vladimir, Cerny. Thermodynamical approach to the traveling salesman problem: An efficient simulation algorithm. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 45(1):41–51, 1985.Google Scholar

[63] Zhe, Chen. Bayesian filtering: From kalman filters to particle filters, and beyond. Statistics, 182(1):1–69, 2003.Google Scholar

[64] Sen, Cheng, Silvio, Petriconi, Scott, Pratt, Michael, Skoby, Charles, Gale, et al. Statistical and dynamic models of charge balance functions. Physical Review C, 69:054906, 2004.Google Scholar

[65] C. J., Clopper and E. S., Pearson. The use of confidence or fiducial limits illustrated in the case of the binomial. Biometrika, 26(4):404–413, 1934.Google Scholar

[66] G., Corcella, I. G., Knowles, G., Marchesini, S., Moretti, K., Odagiri, et al. HERWIG 6: An event generator for hadron emission reactions with interfering gluons (including supersymmetric processes). JHEP, 0101:010, 2001.

[67] Glen, Cowan. Statistical data analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.

[68] Glen, Cowan. A survey of unfolding methods for particle physics. In Prepared for Conference on Advanced Statistical Techniques in Particle Physics, Durham, England, pp. 18–22, 2002.

[69] Richard T., Cox. Probability, frequency and reasonable expectation. American Journal of Physics, 14(1):1–13, 1946.Google Scholar

[70] J. L., Crassidis and J. L., Junkins. Optimal estimation of dynamic systems. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2004.

[71] S., Cucciarelli. The performance of the cms pixel detector and the primary-vertex finding. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 549(1):49–54, 2005.Google Scholar

[72] G., D'Agostini. Fits, and especially linear fits, with errors on both axes, extra variance of the data points and other complications. ArXiv Physics e-prints, November 2005.

[73] G., D'Agostini. Improved iterative Bayesian unfolding. ArXiv e-prints, October 2010.

[74] R. H., Dalitz. Cxii. on the analysis of τ -meson data and the nature of the τ -meson. Philosophical Magazine, 44(357):1068–1080, 1953.Google Scholar

[75] R. H., Dalitz. Decay of τ mesons of known charge. Physical Review, 94(4):1046, 1954.

[76] J., Damgov, V., Genchev, and S. C., Mavrodiev. Nonlinear energy calibration of CMS calorimeters for single pions. 2001.

[77] S. R., Das. On a new approach for finding all the modified cut-sets in an incompatibility graph. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 100(2):187–193, 1973.Google Scholar

[78] F. W., Dyson, A. S., Eddington, and C., Davidson. A determination of the deflection of light by the sun's gravitational field, from observations made at the total eclipse of May 29, 1919. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 220(571–581):291–333, 1920.

[79] Christian W., Fabjan and T., Ludlam. Calorimetry in high-energy physics. Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, 32(1):335–389, 1982.Google Scholar

[80] Gary J., Feldman and Robert D., Cousins. Unified approach to the classical statistical analysis of small signals. Physical Review D, 57(7):3873, 1998.Google Scholar

[81] Thomas, Ferbel. Experimental techniques in high-energy nuclear and particle physics. Singapore: World Scientific, 1991.

[82] Daniel Fin, k.A compendium of conjugate priors. See www.people.cornell.edu/pages/df36/CONJINTRnew%20TEX.pdf, p. 46, 1997.

[83] Y., Fisyak. Private communication, 2015.

[84] R., Fletcher. Practical methods of optimization: Unconstrained optimization. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1980.

[85] L., Foa. Inclusive study of high-energy multiparticle production and two-body correlations. Physics Reports, 22:1–56, 1975.Google Scholar

[86] R.|Frühwirth. Application of Kalman filtering to track and vertex fitting. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 262(2–3):444–450, 1987.

[87] R., Frühwirth, Pascal Vanlaer, and Wolfgang Waltenberger. Adaptive vertex fitting. Technical report, CERN-CMS-NOTE-2007-008, 2007.

[88] E., Widl and Rudolph, Frühwirth. Application of the Kalman alignment algorithm to the CMS tracker. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 291(3):32–65, 2010.Google Scholar

[89] Rudolf, Frühwirth and Meinhard, Regler. Data analysis techniques for high-energy physics, Vol. 11. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.

[90] Daihong, Fu, Kenneth C, Dyer, Stephen H., Lewis, and Paul J., Hurst. A digital background calibration technique for time-interleaved analog-to-digital converters. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 33(12):1904–1911, 1998.Google Scholar

[91] N. D., Gagunashvili. Densities mixture unfolding for data obtained from detectors with finite resolution and limited acceptance. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 778:92–101, 2015.Google Scholar

[92] M., Gazdzicki and S., Mrowczynski. A Method to study ‘equilibration’ in nucleusnucleus collisions. Zeitschrift für Physik C, 54:127–132, 1992.Google Scholar

[93] A., Gelb. Applied optimal estimation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004.

[94] A., Glazov, I., Kisel, E., Konotopskaya, and G., Ososkov. Filtering tracks in discrete detectors using a cellular automaton. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 329(1):262–268, 1993.Google Scholar

[95] I. A., Golutvin, Yu T., Kiryushin, S. A., Movchan, G. A., Ososkov, V. V., Pal'chik, and E. A., Tikhonenko. Robust optimal estimates of the parameters of muon track segments in cathode strip chambers for cms experiments. Instruments and Experimental Techniques, 45(6):735–741, 2002.Google Scholar

[96] T. G., Gregoire. Design-based and model-based inference in survey sampling: Appreciating the difference. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 28(10):1429–1447, 1998.Google Scholar

[97] Phil, Gregory. Bayesian logical data analysis for the physical sciences: A comparative approach with mathematica support. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.

[98] Guenter, Grindhammer, M., Rudowicz, and S., Peters. The fast simulation of electromagnetic and hadronic showers. Nuclear Instruments and Methods, 290:469, 1990.Google Scholar

[99] Claus, Grupen and Boris, Schwartz. Particle detectors. http://ajbell.web.cern.ch/ajbell/Documents/eBooks/Particle_Detectors_Grupen.pdf 2008.

[100] M., Haahr. True random number service. www.random.org/.

[101] F. R., Hampel, E., Ronchetti, P., Rousseeuw, and W., Stahel. Robust statistics: The approach based on influence functions. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1986.

[102] M., Hansroul, H., Jeremie, and D., Savard. Fast circle fit with the conformal mapping method. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 270(2):498–501, 1988.Google Scholar

[103] H. L., Harney. Bayesian inference: Parameter estimation and decisions. Advanced Texts in Physics. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer, 2014.

[104] Stefan, Heckel, et al. (ALICE Collaboration). Event-by-event mean pt fluctuations in pp and PPb collisions measured by the alice experiment at the lhc. Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, 38(12):124095, 2011.Google Scholar

[105] H., Hirayama, Y., Namito, A. F., Bielajew, S. J., Wilderman, and W. R., Nelson. The EGS5 code system. 2005.

[106] Andreas, Hocker and Vakhtang, Kartvelishvili. SVD approach to data unfolding. Nuclear Instruments and Methods A, 372:469–481, 1996.Google Scholar

[107] John H., Holland. Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press, 1992.

[108] C., Hoppner, S., Neubert, B., Ketzer, and S., Paul. A novel generic framework for track fitting in complex detector systems. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 620(2–3):518–525, 2010.Google Scholar

[109] P. V. C., Hough. Machine analysis of bubble chamber pictures. Conference Proceedings, C590914:554–558, 1959.Google Scholar

[110] Kerson, Huang. Introduction to statistical mechanics. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2001.

[111] W. D., Hulsbergen. The global covariance matrix of tracks fitted with a Kalman filter and an application in detector alignment. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 600(2):471–477, 2009.Google Scholar

[112] David J., Jackson. A topological vertex reconstruction algorithm for hadronic jets. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 388(1):247–253, 1997.Google Scholar

[113] F., James. Monte Carlo phase space. CERN 68-15, 1968.

[114] F., James. A review of pseudorandom number generators. Computer Physics Communications, 60(3):329–344, 1990.Google Scholar

[115] F., James and M., Roos. Minuit: A system for function minimization and analysis of the parameter errors and correlations. Computer Physics Communications, 10:343–367, 1975.Google Scholar

[116] Frederick, James. Statistical methods in experimental physics, Vol. 7. Singapore: World Scientific, 2006.

[117] Edwin T., Jaynes. Probability theory: The logic of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

[118] Harold, Jeffreys. Scientific inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973.

[119] Harold, Jeffreys. The theory of probability. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.

[120] S., Jeon and V., Koch. Fluctuations of particle ratios and the abundance of hadronic resonances. Physical Review Letters, 83:5435–5438, 1999.Google Scholar

[121] S., Jeon and V., Koch. Charged particle ratio fluctuation as a signal for QGP. Physical Review Letters, 85:2076–2079, 2000.Google Scholar

[122] Rudolph Emil, Kalman. A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 82(1):35–45, 1960.Google Scholar

[123] M. G., Kendall and A., Stuart. The advanced theory of statistics, Vol. 1. London: C. Griffin and Co., 1969.

[124] Dmitri E., Kharzeev. The chiral magnetic effect and anomaly-induced transport. Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, 75(0):133–151, 2014.Google Scholar

[125] Dmitri E., Kharzeev, Larry D., McLerran, and Harmen J., Warringa. The effects of topological charge change in heavy ion collisions: “Event by event p. and cp violation.” Nuclear Physics A, 803(3):227–253, 2008.Google Scholar

[126] Scott, Kirkpatrick, C., Daniel Gelatt, Mario P., Vecchi, et al. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science, 220(4598):671–680, 1983.Google Scholar

[127] Ivan, Kisel. Event reconstruction in the cbm experiment. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 566(1):85–88, 2006.Google Scholar

[128] W., Kittel and E. A., De Wolf. Soft Multihadron Dynamics. Singapore: World Scientific, 2005.

[129] Andrej N., Kolmogorov. Sulla determinazione empirica di una legge di distribuzione . na, 1933.

[130] G., Kopylov. JETP, 8:996, 1959.

[131] G. I., Kopylov. Like particle correlations as a tool to study the multiple production mechanism. Physics Letters B, 50(4):472–474, 1974.Google Scholar

[132] Thomas S., Kuhn. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012.

[133] D. J., Lange. The EvtGen particle decay simulation package. Nuclear Instruments and Methods, A462:152–155, 2001.Google Scholar

[134] Bin, Le, T. W., Rondeau, J. H., Reed, and C. W., Bostian. Analog-to-digital converters. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 22(6):69–77, Nov 2005.Google Scholar

[135] William R., Leo. Techniques for nuclear and particle physics experiments: A how-to approach. Heidelberg and New York: Springer-Verlag, 1994.

[136] Kenneth, Levenberg. A method for the solution of certain non–linear problems in least squares. 1944.

[137] Zi-wei, Lin, Subrata, Pal, C.M., Ko, Bao-An, Li, and Bin, Zhang. Multiphase transport model for heavy ion collisions at RHIC. Nuclear Physics A, 698:375–378, 2002.Google Scholar

[138] Louis, Lyons. Open statistical issues in particle physics. Annals of Applied Statistics, 887–915, 2008.

[139] Rainer, Mankel. A concurrent track evolution algorithm for pattern recognition in the hera-b main tracking system. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 395(2):169–184, 1997.Google Scholar

[140] Donald W, Marquardt. An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 11(2):431–441, 1963.Google Scholar

[141] Makoto, Matsumoto and Takuji, Nishimura. Mersenne twister: A 623-dimensionally equidistributed uniform pseudo-random number generator. ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation, 8(1):3–30, January 1998.

[142] S., Mertens, T., Lasserre, S., Groh, et al. Sensitivity of next-generation tritium betadecay experiments for keV-scale sterile neutrinos. JCAP, 1502(02):20, 2015.Google Scholar

[143] Nicholas, Metropolis, Arianna W., Rosenbluth, Marshall N., Rosenbluth, Augusta H., Teller, and Edward, Teller. Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 21(6):1087–1092, 1953.Google Scholar

[144] Zbigniew, Michalewicz. Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs (2nd, extended ed.). New York: Springer-Verlag, 1994.

[145] Melanie, Mitchell. An introduction to genetic algorithms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996.

[146] Stanislaw, Mrowczynski. Transverse momentum and energy correlations in the equilibrium system from high-energy nuclear collisions. Physics Letters, B439:6–11, 1998.

[147] John A., Nelder and Roger, Mead. A simplex method for function minimization. Computer Journal, 7(4):308–313, 1965.Google Scholar

[148] Robert G., Newcombe. Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. Statistics in Medicine, 17(8):857–872, 1998.Google Scholar

[149] Jerzy, Neyman. Outline of a theory of statistical estimation based on the classical theory of probability. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 236(767):333–380, 1937.Google Scholar

[150] K. A., Olive, et al. (Particle Data Group). Review of particle physics. Chinese Physics, C38:090001, 2014.

[151] Jean-Yves, Ollitrault. On the measurement of azimuthal anisotropies in nucleusnucleus collisions. 1997.

[152] W., Pinganaud. Contributions to the development of the silicon microstrip detector for the star experiment at rhic. 2000. Thesis, Universite de Nantes.

[153] J., Podolanski and R., Armenteros. Iii. analysis of v-events. Philosophical Magazine, 45(360):13–30, 1954.Google Scholar

[154] M. J. D., Powell. An efficient method for finding the minimum of a function of several variables without calculating derivatives. The Computer Journal, 7(2):155–162, 1964.Google Scholar

[155] Scott, Pratt. General charge balance functions: A tool for studying the chemical evolution of the Quark-Gluon Plasma. Physical Review C, 85:014904, 2012.Google Scholar

[156] William H, Press. Numerical recipes, 3rd ed.: The art of scientific computing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

[157] C., Pruneau, S., Gavin, and S., Voloshin. Methods for the study of particle production fluctuations. Physical Review C, 66:044904, 2002.Google Scholar

[158] C. A., Pruneau. Methods for jet studies with three-particle correlations. Physical Review C, 74:064910, 2006.Google Scholar

[159] C. A., Pruneau. Net charge fluctuations at RHIC. Acta Physica Hungarica, A25:401– 408, 2006.

[160] C. A., Pruneau. Three-particle cumulant study of conical emission. Physical Review C, 79:044907, 2009.Google Scholar

[161] C. A., Pruneau, S., Gavin, and S., Voloshin. Net charge dynamic fluctuations. Nuclear Physics A, 715:661–664, 2003.Google Scholar

[162] Claude A., Pruneau, Sean, Gavin, and Sergei A., Voloshin. Transverse radial flow effects on two- and three-particle angular correlations. Nuclear Physics A, 802(14):107–121, 2008.Google Scholar

[163] Shantam, Ravan, Prabhat, Pujahari, Sidharth, Prasad, and Claude A., Pruneau. Correcting Correlation Function Measurements. Physical Review C, 89(2):024906, 2014.

[164] Thorsten, Renk. YaJEM: A Monte Carlo code for in-medium shower evolution. International Journal of Modern Physics E, 20:1594–1599, 2011.Google Scholar

[165] F., Ronchetti and the ALICE collaboration. The alice electromagnetic calorimeter project. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 160(1):012012, 2009.Google Scholar

[166] Peter J., Rousseeuw and Annick M., Leroy. Robust regression and outlier detectiobn, Vol. 589. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2005.

[167] Richard, Royall. Statistical evidence: A likelihood paradigm, Vol. 71. Boca Raton, FL: CRC press, 1997.

[168] Andrew P., Sage and James L., Melsa. Estimation theory with applications to communications and control. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.

[169] Bjoern, Schenke, Charles, Gale, and Sangyong, Jeon. MARTINI: An Event generator for relativistic heavy-ion collisions. Physical Review C, 80:054913, 2009.Google Scholar

[170] Ekkard, Schnedermann, Josef, Sollfrank, and Ulrich, Heinz. Thermal phenomenology of hadrons from 200 A gev s+s collisions. Physical Review C, 48:2462–2475, Nov 1993.

[171] Michael, Schulz, Daniel, Fischer, Thomas, Ferger, Robert Moshammer, and Joachim Ullrich. Four-particle dalitz plots to visualize atomic break-up processes. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 40(15):3091, 2007.Google Scholar

[172] Claude E., Shannon and Warren, Weaver. The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, 2015.

[173] M., Sharma and C. A., Pruneau. Methods for the study of transverse momentum differential correlations. Physical Review C, 79:024905, 2009.Google Scholar

[174] Torbjorn, Sjostrand and Mats, Bengtsson. The Lund Monte Carlo for jet fragmentation and e+ e- physics. Jetset Version 6.3: An update. Computer Physics Communications, 43:367, 1987.Google Scholar

[175] Torbjorn, Sjostrand, Stephen, Mrenna, and Peter Z., Skands. A brief introduction to PYTHIA 8.1. Computer Physics Communications, 178:852–867, 2008.Google Scholar

[176] H., Sorge, R., Mattiello, A., Jahns, Horst, Stoecker, and W., Greiner. Meson production in P-A and A-A collisions at AGS energies. Physics Letters, B271:37–42, 1991.Google Scholar

[177] P., Srivastava and G., Sudarshan. Multiple production of pions in nuclear collisions. Physical Review, 110:765–766, 1958.Google Scholar

[178] Are Strandlie and Rudolf Frühwirth. Track and vertex reconstruction: From classical to adaptive methods. Reviews of Modern Physics, 82(2):1419, 2010.

[179] S., Viret, C., Parkes, and M., Gersabeck. Alignment procedure of the “LHCb” vertex detector. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 596(2):157–163, 2008.Google Scholar

[180] Sergei, Voloshin. Fluctuations in the mixed event technique. 1994.

[181] Sergei, Voloshin. Transverse radial expansion in nuclear collisions and two particle correlations. Physics Letters B, 632(4):490–494, 2006.Google Scholar

[182] Sergei, Voloshin, Arthur M., Poskanzer, and Raimond, Snellings. Collective phenomena in non-central nuclear collisions. 2008.

[183] Sergei A., Voloshin. Discussing the possibility of observation of parity violation in heavy ion collisions. Physical Review C, 62:044901, Aug 2000.

[184] Sergei A., Voloshin. Toward the energy and the system size dependence of elliptic flow: Working on flow fluctuations. 2006.

[185] Sergei A, Voloshin, Arthur M, Poskanzer, Aihong, Tang, and Gang, Wang. Elliptic flow in the gaussian model of eccentricity fluctuations. Physics Letters B, 659(3):537–541, 2008.Google Scholar

[186] R. H., Walden. Analog-to-digital converter survey and analysis. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 17(4):539–550, Apr 1999.

[187] Wolfgang, Waltenberger. Development of vertex finding and vertex fitting algorithms for CMS.

[188] Xin-Nian, Wang and Miklos, Gyulassy. HIJING: A Monte Carlo model for multiple jet production in p p, p A and A A collisions. Physical Review D, 44:3501–3516, 1991.Google Scholar

[189] Yongge, Wang and Tony, Nicol. Statistical Properties of Pseudo Random Sequences and Experiments with PHP and Debian OpenSSL, Vol. 8712 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2014.

[190] Hans-Peter, Wellisch, J. P., Kubenka, H., Oberlack, and P., Schacht. Hadronic calibration of the H1 LAr calorimeter using software weighting techniques. Max-Planck- Inst. für Physik, 1994.

[191] K., Werner. Analysis of proton – nucleus and nucleus-nucleus scattering at 200-agev by the multistring model Venus. Physics Letters, B208:520, 1988.

[192] Klaus, Werner. The hadronic interaction model EPOS. Nuclear Physics Proceedings, 175–176:81–87, 2008.

[193] J., Whitmore. Multiparticle Production in the Fermilab Bubble Chambers. Physics Reports, 27:187–273, 1976.Google Scholar

[194] Richard, Wigmans. Advances in hadron calorimetry. Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, 41(1):133–185, 1991.Google Scholar

[195] M. C. S., Williams. Particle identification using time of flight. Journal of Physics G, 39:123001, 2012.

[196] Edwin B., Wilson. Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 22(158):209–212, 1927.Google Scholar

[197] William A, Zajc. kno scaling isn't what it used to be. Physics Letters B, 175(2):219–222, 1986.Google Scholar

[198] Korinna C., Zapp, Frank, Krauss, and Urs A., Wiedemann. A perturbative framework for jet quenching. JHEP, 1303:080, 2013.

[199] P., Zarchan and H., Musoff. Fundamentals of Kalman filtering: A practical approach. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2000.