Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T01:19:28.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Geopolitics and Drafting the UN Treaty on Women’s Rights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2014

Lisa Baldez
Affiliation:
Dartmouth College, New Hampshire
Get access

Summary

Despite interference due to Cold War struggles between the superpowers, the CSW quietly passed a series of limited measures that laid the groundwork for future progress on women’s rights. Conflicts between the United States and the USSR limited the CSW’s ability to require UN members to take decisive action on women’s rights. As Chapter 2 illustrates, U.S. and Soviet delegates used the CSW to broadcast the superiority of their progress on women’s issues as well as their opposition to each other. Communist bloc countries wanted the CSW to adopt policies that required UN member states to take concrete action, whereas the United States and its allies envisioned the CSW as a source of general affirmations of support for women’s civil and political rights.

In the early 1970s, however, the UN abandoned its obstructionist stance. It suddenly changed course and took the lead on two major UN initiatives for women – the IWY conference and the drafting of CEDAW. Changes in the balance of power within the UN made this change possible. The emergence of the developing world as a majority-voting bloc within the UN led to the increasing marginalization of the United States and the USSR within the UN. The U.S. government under the Nixon, Ford, and Carter administrations looked to human rights, and women’s rights in particular, as a way to reassert declining U.S. power within the UN. These efforts did not immediately succeed in restoring American status within the UN; the United States would face humiliating diplomatic defeats at the World Conferences on Women in Mexico City in 1975 and Copenhagen in 1980. Nonetheless, U.S. support for these conferences proved crucial for getting CEDAW off the ground.

Type
Chapter
Information
Defying Convention
US Resistance to the UN Treaty on Women's Rights
, pp. 63 - 99
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×