Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T23:44:55.254Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Introduction: New Legal Realism: Law and Social Science in the New Millennium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2016

Elizabeth Mertz
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin
Elizabeth Mertz
Affiliation:
American Bar Foundation and University of Wisconsin School of Law
Stewart Macaulay
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Thomas W. Mitchell
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Get access

Summary

A mystery has persisted from the end of the Legal Realist era in the United States until the present day. How can it be that legal scholarship and training, while fully acknowledging law's place in society, proceeds along an almost willfully ignorant path in terms of available empirical research on this issue? How can knowledge about what law practice is really like be relegated, even now, to a marginal status (along with the social scientists and clinicians who bring this knowledge into law training)? Almost everyone would concede that law as it plays out on the ground, in real life, cannot be understood by just reading Supreme Court opinions – or any court's opinions. However, the core analyses in many law review articles still focus primarily on the texts of those opinions, and often proceed as if the mere fact that a judge has ruled means that the ruling will have certain effects in the world – for example, that criminal defendants who have been “given” certain rights by a court will actually be accorded those rights in real life. Legal analyses still proceed on what everyone knows to be a fiction – that changing the words used in a legal opinion can automatically cause real change on the ground. For a long time now, social science scholarship has demonstrated that this is not true. For a brief period in the early twentieth century, the original Legal Realists made a dent in the consciousness of lawyers and legal scholars, asking them to think about how social context affects the delivery of law on the ground – and also about how real-world influences going far beyond doctrine might affect judges’ decision making. At the same time, they pushed for legal education that took seriously how lawyers practiced in the real world, laying the groundwork for clinical education to develop. And yet, although their insights were broadly accepted, the central world of legal analysis soon returned to its accustomed, largely abstract form of scholarship and reasoning.

This volume is dedicated to tackling that persistent mystery, and even more to moving the interdisciplinary discussion envisioned by the original Realists forward into the new millennium.

Type
Chapter
Information
The New Legal Realism
Translating Law-and-Society for Today's Legal Practice
, pp. 1 - 26
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burns, Robert. 1999. A Theory of the Trial. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Chambliss, Elizabeth. 2000. “Professional Responsibility: Lawyers, A Case Study.” Fordham Law Review 69: 817–857.Google Scholar
Cross, Frank. 1997. “Political Science and the New Legal Realism: A Case of Unfortunate Interdisciplinary Ignorance.” Northwestern University Law Review 92: 251–326.Google Scholar
Dagan, Hanoch. 2007. “The Realist Conception of Law.” University of Toronto Law Journal 57: 607–660.Google Scholar
Erlanger, Howard, Garth, Bryant, Larson, Jane, Mertz, Elizabeth, Nourse, Victoria, and Wilkins, David. 2005. “Foreword: Is it Time for a New Legal Realism?Wisconsin Law Review 2005: 335–363.Google Scholar
Fineman, Martha. 2005. “Gender and Law: Feminist Legal Theory's Role in a New Legal Realism.” Wisconsin Law Review 2005: 405–431.Google Scholar
García Villegas, Mauricio. 2006. “Comparative Sociology of Law: Legal Fields, Legal Scholarships, and Social Sciences in Europe and the United States.” Law & Social Inquiry 31(2): 343–382.Google Scholar
Garth, Bryant. 2006. “Introduction: Taking New Legal Realism to Transnational Issues and Institutions.” Law & Social Inquiry 31: 939–945.Google Scholar
Gulati, Mitu, and Nielsen, Laura Beth. 2006. “Introduction: A New Legal Realist Perspective on Employment Discrimination.” Law & Social Inquiry 31: 797–800.Google Scholar
Hertogh, Marc, ed. 2009. Living Law: Reconsidering Eugen Ehrlich. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Israel, Liora. 2009. L'Arme du Droit. Paris: Sciences Po-Les Presses.
Klug, Heinz, and Merry, Sally, eds. 2016. Studying Law Globally: New Legal Realist Perspectives (The New Legal Realism, Vol. II). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Leiter, Brian. 2013. “Legal Realisms, Old and New.” Valparaiso Law Review 47: 949–963.Google Scholar
Levi, Edward. 1949. An Introduction to Legal Reasoning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Levin, Leslie, and Mather, Lynn. 2012. Lawyers in Practice: Ethical Decision Making in Context. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Levine, Donald. 2006. Powers of the Mind: The Reinvention of Liberal Learning in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Llewellyn, Karl N. 1960. The Common Law Tradition: Deciding Appeals. Boston: Little, Brown.
Luna, Guadalupe. 2005. “Legal Realism and the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo – A Fractionalized Legal Template.” Wisconsin Law Review 2005: 519–555.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Stewart. 2005. “The New Versus the Old Legal Realism: ‘Things Ain't What They Used to Be.’” Wisconsin Law Review 2005: 265–403.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Stewart, and Mertz, Elizabeth. 2013. “New Legal Realism and the Empirical Turn in Law.” In An Introduction to Law and Social Theory, edited by Banakar, Reza and Travers, Max, 195–210. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Mayer, Milton. 1993. Robert Maynard Hutchins: A Memoir. Berkeley: University of California Press.
McEvoy, Arthur. 2005. “A New Legal Realism for Legal Studies.” Wisconsin Law Review 2005: 433–454.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 2006. “New Legal Realism and the Ethnography of Transnational Law.” Law & Social Inquiry 31: 975–995.Google Scholar
Mertz, Elizabeth. 1994a. “Legal Loci and Places in the Heart: Community and Identity in Sociolegal Studies.” Law & Society Review 28(5): 971–992.Google Scholar
Mertz, Elizabeth. 1994b. “A New Social Constructionism for Sociolegal Studies.” Law & Society Review 28(5): 1243–1265.Google Scholar
Mertz, Elizabeth, ed. 1998. “Legal Ethics in the Next Generation: The Push for a New Legal Realism.” Law & Social Inquiry 23: 2–3.Google Scholar
Mertz, Elizabeth, Ford, William, and Matoesian, Gregory, eds. Forthcoming. Translating the Social World for Law: Linguistic Tools for a New Legal Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Miles, Thomas, and Sunstein, Cass. 2008. “The New Legal Realism.” University of Chicago Law Review 75: 831–851.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Thomas. 2005. “Destabilizing the Normalization of Rural Black Land Loss: A Critical Role for Legal Empiricism.” Wisconsin Law Review 2005: 557–615.Google Scholar
Nourse, Victoria, and Shaffer, Gregory. 2009. “Varieties of New Legal Realism: Can a New World Order Prompt a New Legal Theory?Cornell Law Review 95: 61–138.Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick. 2013. “Legal Realism Untamed.” Texas Law Review 91: 749–780.Google Scholar
Schlegel, John. 1995. American Legal Realism and Empirical Social Science. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Schmidt, Patrick. 2012. “The Ethical Lives of Securities Lawyers.” In Lawyers in Practice: Ethical Decision Making in Context, edited by Levin, Leslie and Mather, Lynn, 221–244. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Shaffer, Gregory. 2008. “A New Legal Realism: Method in International Economic Law Research.” In International Economic Law – The State & Future of the Discipline, edited by Picker, Colin, Bunn, Isabella, and Arner, Douglas, 29–42. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Shdaimah, Corey. 2012. “Legal Service Lawyers: When Conceptions of Lawyering and Values Clash.” In Lawyers in Practice: Ethical Decision Making in Context, edited by Levin, Leslie and Mather, Lynn, 317–339. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Southworth, Ann, and Fisk, Catherine. 2014. The Legal Profession: Ethics in Contemporary Practice. St. Paul: West Academic.
Suchman, Mark C., and Mertz, Elizabeth. 2010. “Toward a New Legal Empiricism: Empirical Legal Studies and New Legal Realism.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 6: 555–579.Google Scholar
Sullivan, William, Colby, Anne, Wegner, Judith Welch, Bond, Lloyd, and Shulman, Lee. 2007. Educating Lawyers: Preparation for the Profession of Law. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Symposium. 2005. “Is It Time for a New Legal Realism?Wisconsin Law Review 2005(2): 335–745.
Symposium. 2006. “The New Legal Realism.” Law & Social Inquiry 31(4): 795–1069.
Tamanaha, Brian. 1997. Realistic Socio-Legal Theory: Pragmatism and a Social Theory of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Tamanaha, Brian. 2001. A General Jurisprudence of Law and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tamanaha, Brian. 2009. “Understanding Legal Realism.” Texas Law Review 87: 731–786.Google Scholar
Tamanaha, Brian. 2010. Beyond the Formalist-Realist Divide: The Role of Politics in Judging. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Tamanaha, Brian. 2012. “What is ‘General Jurisprudence’? A Critique of Universalistic Claims by Philosophical Concepts of Law.” Transnational Legal Theory 2: 287–308.Google Scholar
Tamanaha, Brian. 2015 (forthcoming). “The Third Pillar of Jurisprudence” (Wythe Lecture) William & Mary Law Review.
Tomlins, Christopher. 2006. “In This Issue.” Law & Social Inquiry 31: 795–796.Google Scholar
Trubek, Louise G. 2005. “Crossing Boundaries: Legal Education and the Challenge of the ‘New Public Interest Law.’Wisconsin Law Review 2005(2): 455–478.Google Scholar
Van Cleve, Nicole Martorano. 2012. “Reinterpreting the Zealous Advocate: Multiple Intermediary Roles of the Criminal Defense Attorney.” In Lawyers in Practice: Ethical Decision Making in Context, edited by Levin, Leslie and Mather, Lynn, 293–316. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Weber, Max. 1958. “Science as a Vocation.” In From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, edited by Gerth, Hans H. and Mills, C. Wright, 129–157. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wilkins, David. 1990. “Legal Realism for Lawyers.” Harvard Law Review 104: 468–524.Google Scholar
Wilkins, David. 1998. “Everyday Practice Is the Troubling Case: Confronting Context in Legal Ethics.” In Everyday Practices and Trouble Cases, edited by Sarat, Austin, Constable, Marianne, Engle, David, Hans, Valerie, and Lawrence, Susan, 68–108. Chicago: Northwestern University Press.
Wilkins, David. 2012. “Some Realism About Legal Realism for Lawyers.” In Lawyers in Practice: Ethical Decision Making in Context, edited by Levin, Leslie and Mather, Lynn, 25–46. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Yaroshefsky, Ellen, and Green, Bruce. 2012. In Lawyers in Practice: Ethical Decision Making in Context, edited by Levin, Leslie and Mather, Lynn, 267–292. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×