Alexander, D., and Numbers, R.. 2010. Biology and ideology from Descartes to Dawkins (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderegg, W., Prall, J., Harold, J. and Schneider, S.. 2010. ‘Expert credibility in climate change’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 12107–12109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Archer, D., and Rahmstorf, S.. 2010. The climate crisis: an introductory guide to climate change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Ariely, D. 2010. Predictably irrational, expanded revised edition (New York: Harper Perennial).Google Scholar

Bacon, F. 1999. Selected philosophical works, Hackett Classics (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett). First published in Bacon, F., Novum Organum Scientiarum, 1620.Google Scholar

Barbour, I. 1990. Religion in an age of science, Gifford Lectures 1989–1991 (New York: HarperCollins).Google Scholar

Barker, G., and Kitcher, P.. 2013. Philosophy of science: a new introduction, Fundamentals of philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Behe, M. 1996. Darwin's black box: the biochemical challenge to evolution (New York: Free Press).Google Scholar

Behe, M. 2007. The edge of evolution: the search for the limits of Darwinism (New York: Simon and Schuster).Google Scholar

Bekelman, J., Li, Y. and Gross, C.. 2003. ‘Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a systematic review’, Journal of the American Medical Association, 289, 454–465.Google ScholarPubMed

Bird, A. 2001. Thomas Kuhn, Philosophy Now (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

Black, M. 1954. ‘The inductive support of inductive rules’, in Problems of analysis (Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar

Bloor, D. 1991. Knowledge and social imagery (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar

Bogen, J. 2014. ‘Theory and observation in science’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (summer edition), Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2014/entries/science-theory-observation/.

Bowler, P., and Morus, I.. 2005. Making modern science: a historical survey (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brandt, A. 2009. The cigarette century: the rise, fall, and deadly persistence of the product that defined America (Cambridge, MA: Basic Books).Google Scholar

Brockman, J. (ed.). 2006. Intelligent thought: science versus the intelligent design movement (New York: Vintage).Google Scholar

Cairns-Smith, A. G. 1990. Seven clues to the origin of life: a scientific detective story (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Carroll, S. 2007. The making of the fittest: DNA and the ultimate forensic record of evolution (New York: W.W. Norton).Google Scholar

Ceccarelli, L. 2011. ‘Manufactured scientific controversy: science, rhetoric, and public debate’, Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 14, 195–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chakravartty, A. 2008. ‘What you don't know can't hurt you: realism and the unconceived’, Philosophical Studies, 137, 149–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chalmers, A.F. 2013. What is this thing called science?, edition (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing).Google Scholar

Collins, H., and Pinch, T.. 2002. The Golem at large: what you should know about technology, Canto (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cook, J., Nuccitelli, D., Green, S., Richardson, M., Winkler, B., Painting, R., Way, R., Jacobs, P. and Skuce, A.. 2013. ‘Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature’, Environmental Research Letters, 8, 024024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coyne, J. 2009. Why evolution is true (New York: Viking Penguin Books).Google Scholar

Darwin, C. 2004. On the origin of species (New York: CRW Publishing). First published in 1859.Google Scholar

Dawkins, R. 2010. The greatest show on earth: the evidence for evolution, reprint edition (New York: Free Press).Google Scholar

Dembski, W. 2002. Intelligent design: the bridge between science & theology (Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic).Google Scholar

Dixon, T. 2008. Science and religion: a very short introduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Douglas, H. 2009. Science, policy and the value-free ideal (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dupré, J. 1995. The disorder of things: metaphysical foundations of the disunity of science (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Durban Declaration. 2000. Nature, 406, 15–16.

Elliott, K., and Resnik, D.. 2015. ‘Scientific Reproducibility, Human Error, and Public Policy’, BioScience, 65, 5–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fahrbach, L. 2011. ‘How the growth of science ends theory change’, Synthese, 180, 139–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fedoroff, N., and Brown, N.. 2006. Mendel in the kitchen: a scientist's view of genetically modified food (Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press).Google Scholar

Ferngren, G.B. 2002. Science and religion: a historical introduction (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar

Flannery, T. 2001. The weather makers: how man is changing the climate and what it means for life on earth (New York: Grove Press).Google Scholar

Fodor, J. 1984. ‘Observation reconsidered’, Philosophy of Science, 51, 23–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forrest, B., and Gross, P.. 2004. Creationism's Trojan horse: the wedge of intelligent design (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franklin, A., Edwards, A.W.F., Fairbanks, D.J. and Hartl, D.L.. 2008. Ending the Mendel-Fisher controversy (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press).Google Scholar

Futuyama, D.J. 2013. Evolution, edition (Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates).Google Scholar

Gelman, S. 2004. ‘Psychological essentialism in children’, Trends in cognitive sciences, 8, 404–409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gigerenzer, G. 2006. ‘Out of the frying pan into the fire: behavioral reactions to terrorist attacks’, Risk Analysis, 26, 347–351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Godfrey-Smith, P. 2003. Theory and reality: an introduction to the philosophy of science, Science and its conceptual foundations series (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Godfrey-Smith, P. 2008. ‘Recurrent, transient underdetermination and the glass half-full’, Philosophical Studies, 137, 141–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldacre, B. 2010. Bad science: quacks, hacks, and big pharma flacks (New York: Faber and Faber).Google Scholar

Goldman, A. 2001. ‘Experts: which ones should you trust?’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 63, 85–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gould, S.J. 1997. ‘Nonoverlapping magisteria’, Natural History, 106, 16–22.Google Scholar

Hacking, I. 1983. Representing and intervening: introductory topics in the philosophy of natural science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hacking, I. 1992. ‘The self-vindication of the laboratory sciences’, in Pickering, Andrew (ed.), Science as practice and culture (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), 29–64.Google Scholar

Hacking, I., 2000. The social construction of what? (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Hamilton, C. 2013. Earthmasters: the dawn of the age of climate engineering (New Haven, CT:Yale University Press).Google Scholar

Hanson, N.R. 1958. Patterns of discovery: an inquiry into the conceptual foundations of science (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Heath, C., and Heath, D.. 2007. Made to stick: why some ideas survive and others die (New York: Random House).Google Scholar

Henig, R. 2001. The monk in the garden: the lost and found genius of Gregor Mendel, the father of genetics (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt).Google Scholar

Houghton, J. 2009. Global warming: the complete briefing, edition (New York: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoyningen-Huene, P. 1993. Reconstructing scientific revolutions: Thomas S. Kuhn's philosophy of science (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar

Hull, D. 1988. Science as a process: an evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science, Science and its conceptual foundations series (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hume, D. 2000. Treatise of human nature, Norton, D. and Norton, M. (eds.), Oxford philosophical texts (New York: Oxford University Press). First published 1738.Google Scholar

Hurley, P. 2014. A concise introduction to logic (Boston: Cengage Learning).Google Scholar

Isaak, M. 2007. The counter-creationism handbook (Oakland: University of California Press).Google Scholar

Jacoby, S. 2009. The Age of American Unreason (New York: Vintage Books).Google Scholar

Johnson, P. 2002. The wedge of truth: splitting the foundations of naturalism (Downer's Grove, IL: IVP Press).Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. 2013. Thinking, fast and slow (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux).Google Scholar

Kalichman, S. 2009. Denying AIDS: conspiracy theories, pseudoscience, and human tragedy (New York: Springer,).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kalichman, S., Eaton, L. and Cherry, C.. 2010. ‘“There is no Proof that HIV causes AIDS”: AIDS denialism beliefs among people living with HIV/AIDS’, Journal for Behavioral Medicine, 33, 432–440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kitcher, P. 1993. The advancement of science (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Kitcher, P. 2003. Science, truth, and democracy, Oxford studies in the philosophy of science (Oxford University Press,).Google Scholar

Klein, P. 2008. ‘Contemporary responses to Agrippa's trilemma’, in The Oxford handbook of skepticism (ed.) Greco, J. (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Kloppenburg, J.R. Jr., 2005. First the seed: the political economy of plant biotechnology, edition (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press).Google Scholar

Kuhn, T.S. 2012. The structure of scientific revolutions, edition (Chicago: University of Chicago Press). First published 1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ladyman, J. 2001. Understanding philosophy of science (London: Routledge).Google Scholar

Lakatos, I. 1978. The methodology of scientific research programmes: volume 1, Philosophical papers (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Latour, B., and Woolgar, S.. 2013. Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press). First published 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laudan, L. 1981. ‘A confutation of convergent realism’, Philosophy of Science, 48, 19–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laudan, L. 1983. ‘The demise of the demarcation problem’, in Cohen, R.S. and Laudan, L., Physics, philosophy and psychoanalysis: essays in honor of Adolf Grünbaum, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science (Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 76), 111–127.Google Scholar

Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C. and Smith, N.. 2011. Climate change in the American mind: Americans’ global warming beliefs and attitudes in May 2011 (Yale University and George Mason University, Yale Project on Climate Change Communication).Google Scholar

Loftus, E. 1977. ‘Shifting human color memory’, Memory & Cognition, 5, 696–699.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Longino, H. 1990. Science as social knowledge (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

Magnus, P.D. 2010. ‘Inductions, red herrings, and the best explanation for the mixed record of science’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 61, 803–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maslin, M. 2009. Global warming: a very short introduction, edition (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Miller, K.R. 2008. Only a theory: evolution and the battle for America's soul (New York: Viking Penguin Books).Google Scholar

Mnookin, S. 2012. The panic virus: the true story behind the vaccine-autism controversy (New York: Simon & Schuster).Google Scholar

Mooney, C. 2006. The Republican war on science (Cambridge, MA: Basic Books).Google Scholar

Nattrass, N. 2012. The AIDS conspiracy: science fights back (New York: Columbia University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nestle, M. 2003. Safe food: the politics of food safety (Oakland: University of California Press).Google Scholar

Nicolia, A., Manzo, A., Veronesi, F. and Rosellini, D.. 2013. ‘An overview of the last 10 years of genetically engineered crop safety research’, Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 34, 77–88.Google ScholarPubMed

Nilsson, D., and Pelger, S.. 1994. ‘A pessimistic estimate of the time required for an eye to evolve’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 256, 53–58.Google ScholarPubMed

Norton, J. 2003. ‘A material theory of induction’, Philosophy of Science, 70, 647–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Numbers, R.L. 2006. The creationists: from scientific creationism to intelligent design, Expanded edition (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Offit, P.A. 2010. Autism's false prophets: bad science, risky medicine, and the search for a cure (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar

Okasha, S. 2002. Philosophy of science: a very short introduction (New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Okasha, S. 2005. ‘Does Hume's argument against induction rest on a quantifier-shift fallacy?’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 105, 253–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oreskes, N. 2004. ‘The scientific consensus on climate change’, Science, 306, 1686.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Oreskes, N., and Conway, E.. 2011. Merchants of doubt: how a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming (London: Bloomsbury Press).Google Scholar

Otto, S. 2011. Fool me twice: fighting the assault on science in America (Emmaus, PA: Rodale Books).Google Scholar

Pigliucci, M., and Boudry, M.. 2013. Philosophy of pseudoscience: reconsidering the demarcation problem (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pilkey, O., and Pilkey, K.. 2011. Global climate change: a primer (Durham, NC: Duke University Press Books).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Proctor, R. 2012. Golden holocaust: origins of the cigarette catastrophe and the case for abolition (Oakland, CA: University of California Press).Google Scholar

Pronin, E., Lin, D. and Ross, L.. 2002. ‘The bias blind spot: perceptions of bias in self versus others’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 369–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pronin, E., Gilovich, T. and Ross, L.. 2004. ‘Objectivity in the eye of the beholder: divergent perceptions of bias in self versus others’, Psychological Review, 111, 781–799.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Psillos, S. 1999. Scientific realism: how science tracks truth, Philosophical issues in science (London and New York: Routledge).Google Scholar

Quine, W.V.O. 1951. ‘Two dogmas of empiricism’, Philosophical Review, 60, 20–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rahmstorf, S., Foster, G. and Cazenave, A.. 2012. ‘Comparing climate projections to observations up to 2011’, Environmental Research Letters, 7, 044035.

Ruse, M., and Pennock, R.. 2008. But is it science? The philosophical question in the creation/evolution controversy, updated edition (New York: Prometheus Books).Google Scholar

Russell, B. 1999. The problems of philosophy (New York: Dover). Originally published in 1912.Google Scholar

Salmon, M.H. 2006. Introduction to logic and critical thinking, edition (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth).Google Scholar

Salmon, W. 1967. Foundations of scientific inference (Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sarkar, S. 2007. Doubting Darwin: creationist designs on evolution (Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell).Google Scholar

Schick, T., and Vaughn, L.. 2013. How to think about weird things: critical thinking for a new age, edition (New York: McGraw-Hill).Google Scholar

Schwab, I. 2011. Evolution's witness: how eyes evolved (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Schwarz, N., Skurnik, I., Yoon, C. and Park, D.. 2005. ‘How warnings about false claims become recommendations’, Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 713–724.Google Scholar

Scott, E.C. 2009. Evolution versus creationism: an introduction, edition (Oakland: University of California Press).Google Scholar

Shanks, N. 2007. God, the devil, and Darwin: a critique of intelligent design theory (New York, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Shermer, M. 2012. The believing brain: from ghosts and gods to politics and conspiracies – how we construct beliefs and reinforce them as truths (New York: St. Martin's Griffin).Google Scholar

Shome, D., and Marx, S.. 2009. The psychology of climate change communication: a guide for scientists, journalists, educators, political aides, and the interested public (New York: Center for Research on Environmental Decisions).Google Scholar

Shubin, N. 2009. Your inner fish: a journey into the 3.5-billion-year history of the human body (New York: Vintage).Google Scholar

Shulman, S., et al. 2012. Cooler smarter: practical steps for low-carbon living (Washington, DC: Island Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simmons, N., Seymour, K., Habersetzer, J. and Gunnell, G.. 2008. ‘Primitive Early Eocene bat from Wyoming and the evolution of flight and echolocation’, Nature, 451, 818–821.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Slovic, P. 1987. ‘Perception of risk’, Science, 236, 280–285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sober, E. 1988. Reconstructing the past (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar

Solomon, M. 2001. Social empiricism (Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books).Google Scholar

Stanford, P.K. 2006. Exceeding our grasp: science, history and the problem of unconceived alternatives (New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stanford, P.K. 2013. ‘Underdetermination of scientific theory’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter Edition), Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2013/entries/scientific-underdetermination/ >.

Stewart, C.N. 2003. Genetically modified planet: environmental impacts of genetically engineered plants (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Sutherland, S. 2007. Irrationality, edition (London: Pinter & Martin Ltd).Google Scholar

Svenson, O. 1981. ‘Are we all less risky and more skillful than our fellow drivers?’, Acta Psychologica, 47, 143–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Union of Concerned Scientists. 2012. A climate of corporate control: how corporations have influenced the dialogue on climate science and policy (Cambridge, MA: Union of Concerned Scientists).

Vickers, J. 2014. ‘The problem of induction’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall Edition), Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/induction-problem/ >.

Weart, S. 2008. The discovery of global warming: revised and expanded edition (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weaver, K., Garcia, S., Schwarz, N. and Miller, D.. 2007. ‘Inferring the popularity of an opinion from its familiarity: a repetitive voice can sound like a chorus’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 821–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weber, M. 2009. ‘The crux of crucial experiments: Duhem's problems and inference to the best explanation’, British Journal for Philosophy of Science, 60, 19–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whyte, J. 2004. Crimes against logic: exposing the bogus arguments of politicians, priests, journalists, and other serial offenders (New York: McGraw Hill).Google Scholar

Zammito, J.H. 2004. A nice derangement of epistemes: post-positivism in the study of science from Quine to Latour (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar