Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-z8dg2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-05T22:17:40.659Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Redirecting biodiversity change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Charles Perrings
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Get access

Summary

Assembling the pieces of the problem

I began writing this book in the small Galician town of Baiona where, on March 1, 1493, the arrival of the caravel Pinta from the Americas completed the initial stage of the Columbian exchange. It happens that I am back in Baiona as I write this final chapter – pulling together my conclusions about what it will take to redirect biodiversity change. I stated in the introduction to the book that this is by far the most significant environmental problem confronting humanity: that it dwarfs climate change; freshwater scarcity; soil, water, and air pollution; or any other of the environmental issues currently attracting attention. This is not due to any apocalyptic vision of the future, but to the observation that biodiversity change affects the quality of our lives in more ways, and more deeply, than any other environmental problem. The reason we are concerned about climate change, for example, is the effect it will have on life expectancy, health, and nutrition via its impacts on the species that determine these things. The reason we are concerned about freshwater lies in the importance of water for all of the species on which we depend. The reason we are concerned about pollution is the effect it has on the relative abundance of organisms in aquatic, terrestrial, and marine systems that directly support services we value.

Biodiversity change affects our ability to cope with the impact of changing environmental conditions. It may well be that our capacity to adapt to altered conditions is increased because of the scope for genetic engineering, but the scope for genetic engineering is itself constrained by the existing stock of genetic material in exactly the same way as traditional plant or animal breeding. Today’s biodiversity is what provides the raw material for the evolution of all life on earth, whether inside or outside the production landscapes we have made for ourselves. Our short-term interest lies in the scope biodiversity offers for success-ful adaptation to changing environmental conditions in the space of a generation or two. Given the fact that we happen to find ourselves at an unusually stable moment in the world’s climatic history, however, we also have a longer-term interest in maintaining our capacity to accommodate much greater environmental change.

Type
Chapter
Information
Our Uncommon Heritage
Biodiversity Change, Ecosystem Services, and Human Wellbeing
, pp. 464 - 490
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, W. M., Aveling, R., Brockington, D., Dickson, B., Elliott, J., Hutton, J., Roe, D., Vira, B. and Wolmer, W. (2004) Biodiversity conservation and the eradication of poverty. Science, 306, 1146–1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anthoff, D. and Hahn, R. (2010) Government failure and market failure: on the inefficiency of environmental and energy policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 26, 197–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Association of National Park Authorities (2012) National Parks: Britain’s Breathing Spaces. Available at (accessed 2012).
Barde, J.-P. and Honkatukia, O. (2004) Environmentally harmful subsidies. The International Yearbook of Environmental and Resource Economics 2004/2005 (ed. Tietenberg, T. and Folmer, H.), pp. 254–288. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.Google Scholar
Brousseau, E., Dedeurwaerdere, T., Jouvet, P.-A. and Willinger, M. (eds.) (2012) Global Environmental Commons: Analytical and Political Challenges in Building Governance Mechanisms. Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Brown, D., Seymour, F. and Peskett, L. (2008) How do we achieve REDD co-benefits and avoid doing harm? Moving ahead with REDD: Issues, Options and Implications (ed. Angelsen, A.), pp. 107–118. CIFOR, Bogor.Google Scholar
Cernea, M. M. and Schmidt-Soltau, K. (2006) Poverty risks and national parks: policy issues in conservation and resettlement. World Development, 34, 1808–1830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, R. (1960) The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costello, C., Gaines, S. D. and Lynham, J. (2008) Can catch shares prevent fisheries collapse? Science, 321, 1678–1681.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Díaz, S., Hector, A. and Wardle, D. A. (2009) Biodiversity in forest carbon sequestration initiatives: not just a side benefit. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 1, 55–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodds, W. K. (2006) Nutrients and the dead zone: the link between nutrient ratios and dissolved oxygen in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 4, 211–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferraro, P. J., Hanauer, M. M. and Sims, K. R. E. (2011) Conditions associated with protected area success in conservation and poverty reduction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 13913–13918.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grotius, H. (1916 [1608]) The Freedom of the Seas, or the Right Which Belongs to the Dutch to take part in the East Indian Trade (trans. Van Deman Magoffin, Ralph). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Imai, N., Samejima, H., Langner, A., Ong, R. C., Kita, S., Titin, J., Chung, A. Y., Lagan, P., Lee, Y. F. and Kitayama, K. (2009) Co-benefits of sustainable forest management in biodiversity conservation and carbon sequestration. PLoS One, 4, e8267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, L. E., Pascual, U., Brussaard, L., de Ruiter, P. and Bawa, K. S. (2007a) Biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: investing without losing interest. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 121, 193–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, L. E., Brussaard, L., de Ruiter, P. C., Pascual, U., Perrings, C. and Bawa, K. (2007b) Agrobiodiversity. Encyclopedia of Biodiversity (ed. Simon, A. L.), pp. 1–13. Elsevier, New York.Google Scholar
Jackson, R. B., Jobbagy, E. G., Avissar, R., Roy, S. B., Barrett, D. J., Cook, C. W., Farley, K. A., le Maitre, D. C., McCarl, B. A. and Murray, B. C. (2005) Trading water for carbon with biological carbon sequestration. Science, 310, 1944–1947.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Long, A. (2009) Taking adaptation value seriously: designing REDD to protect biodiversity. Carbon and Climate Law Review, 3, 314–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, N. and Kent, J. (2001) Perverse Subsidies: How Tax Dollars Can Undercut the Environment and the Economy. Island Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Nelson, E., Mendoza, G., Regetz, J., Polasky, S., Tallis, H., Cameron, D. R., Chan, K. M. A., Daily, G. C., Goldstein, J., Kareiva, P. M., Lonsdorf, E., Naidoo, R., Ricketts, T. H. and Shaw, M. R. (2009) Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7, 4–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD (2004) Recommendation of the Council on the Use of Economic Instruments in Promoting the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Biodiversity. OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
Panayotou, T. (1995) Economic instruments for environmental management and sustainable development. Environmental Economics Series Paper no. 16. United Nations Environment Programme Consultative Expert Group Meeting on the Use and Application of Economic Policy Instruments for Environmental Management and Sustainable Development, Nairobi.Google Scholar
Pearce, D. W. (2003) Environmentally harmful subsidies: barriers to sustainable development. Environmentally Harmful Subsidies: Policy Issues and Challenges (ed. OECD), pp. 9–30. OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
Pearce, D. W. and Warford, J. J. (1993) World Without End: Economics, Environment, and Sustainable Development. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Perrings, C., Dehnen-Schmutz, K., Touza, J. and Williamson, M. (2005) How to manage biological invasions under globalization. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20, 212–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perrings, C., Jackson, L., Bawa, K., Brussaard, L., Brush, S., Gavin, T., Papa, R., Pascual, U. and De Ruiter, P. (2006) Biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: saving natural capital without losing interest. Conservation Biology, 20, 263–264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pigou, A. C. (1920) The Economics of Welfare. Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Shackelford, S. J. (2008) The tragedy of the common heritage of mankind. Stanford Environmental Law Journal, 27, 102–157.Google Scholar
Stavins, R. N. (2003) Experience with market-based environmental policy instruments. Handbook of Environmental Economics (ed. Mäler, K.-G. and Vincent, J. R.), pp. 355–435. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Sumaila, U. R., Khan, A. J., Dyck, A., Watson, R., Munro, G., Tydemers, P. and Pauly, D. (2010) A bottom-up re-estimation of global fisheries subsidies. Journal of Bioeconomics, 12, 201–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tietenberg, T. (1990) Economic instruments for environmental regulation. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 6, 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Beers, C. and van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2009) Environmental harm of hidden subsidies: global warming and acidification. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 38, 339–341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wells, M. P. and Brandon, K. (1992) People and Parks: Linking Protected Areas with Local Communities. World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Wells, M. P., McShane, T. O., Dublin, H. T., O’Connor, S. and Redford, K. H. (2004) The future of integrated conservation and development projects: building on what works. Getting Biodiversity Projects to Work: Towards more Effective Conservation and Development (ed. Mcshane, T. O. and Wells, M. P.), pp. 397–422. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Worm, B., Hilborn, R., Baum, J. K., Branch, T. A., Collie, J. S., Costello, C., Fogarty, M. J., Fulton, E. A., Hutchings, J. A., Jennings, S., Jensen, O. P., Lotze, H. K., Mace, P. A., McClanahan, T. R., Minto, C., Palumbi, S. R., Parma, A. M., Ricard, D., Watson, R. and Zeller, D. (2009) Rebuilding global fisheries. Science, 325, 578–585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×