Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T10:12:30.428Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Selected Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2015

Laura I Appleman
Laura I Appleman
Affiliation:
Willamette University College of Law
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Defending the Jury
Crime, Community, and the Constitution
 , pp. 223 - 232
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramson, Jeffrey, We, the Jury: The Jury system and the ideal of Democracy (2001).
Alfieri, Anthony V., Community Prosecutors, 90 Cal. L. Rev. 1465 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alschuler, Albert W., The Changing Plea Bargaining Debate, 69 Cal. L. Rev. 652 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alschuler, Albert W., Plea Bargaining and Its History, 13 Law & Soc’y211 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alschuler, Albert W., The Defense Attorney’s Role in Plea Bargaining, 84 Yale L.J. 1179 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alschuler, Albert W., The Trial Judge’s Role in Plea Bargaining, 76 Colum. L. Rev. 1059 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alschuler, Albert W., The Prosecutor’s Role in Plea Bargaining, 36 U. Chi. L. Rev. 50 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alschuler, Albert W. & Schulhofer, Stephen J., Antiquated Procedures or Bedrock Rights? A Response to Professors Meares and Kahan, 1998 U. Chi. Legal F. 215, 216 (1998).Google Scholar
Amar, Ahkil Reed, America’s Unwritten Constitution: The Precedents and Principles We Live By (2013).
Amar, Ahkil Reed, The Bill of Rights: Creation and Reconstruction (1998).
Amar, Ahkil Reed, The Constitution and Criminal Procedure (1998).
Amar, Ahkil Reed, The Bill of Rights as a Constitution, 100 Yale L.J. 1131 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andenaes, Johannes, Punishment and Deterrence (1974).
Ashworth, Andrew, Victim Impact Statements and Sentencing, Crim. L. Rev. 498 (1993).Google Scholar
Bamonte, Thomas J., The Viability of Morrisey v. Brewer and the Due Process Rights of Parolees and Other Conditional Releasees, 18 S. Ill. U. L.J. 121 (1993).Google Scholar
Bandes, Susan, Empathy, Narrative and Victim Impact Statements, 63 U. Chi. L. Rev. 361 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baradaran, Shima & McIntyre, Frank, Race, Prediction & Pretrial Detention, 10 J. Empirical Legal Stud. 741 (2014).Google Scholar
Baradaran, Shima & McIntyre, Frank, Predicting Violence, 90 Tex. L. Rev. 497 (2012).Google Scholar
Barkow, Rachel E., The Ascent of the Administrative State and the Demise of Mercy, 121 Harv. L. Rev. 1332 (2008).Google Scholar
Barkow, Rachel E., Federalism and the Politics of Sentencing, 105 Colum. L. Rev. 1276 (2005).Google Scholar
Barkow, Rachel E., Recharging the Jury: The Criminal Jury’s Constitutional Role in an Era of Mandatory Sentencing, 152 U. Pa. L. Rev. 33 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barron, David, The Promise of Cooley’s City: Traces of Local Constitutionalism, 147 U. Pa. L. Rev. 487 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barsumian, Todd, Note, Bail Bondsmen and Bounty Hunters: Re-Examining the Right to Recapture, 47 Drake L. Rev. 877, 887–88 (1999).Google Scholar
Beccaria, Cesare, An Essay on Crimes and Punishments (Philadelphia, R. Bell 1778).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, Greg & Fox, Audrey, From the Margins to the Mainstream: Community Justice at the Crossroads, 22 Jus. Sys. J. 189 (2001).Google Scholar
Bibas, Stephanos, The Machinery of Criminal Justice (2012).
Bibas, Stephanos, Plea Bargaining Outside the Shadow of Trial, 117 Harv. L. Rev. 2464 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bibas, Stephanos, Harmonizing Substantive-Criminal-Law Values and Criminal Procedure: The Case of Alford and Nolo Contendere Pleas, 88 Cornell L. Rev. 1361 (2003).Google Scholar
Bibas, Stephanos, The Real World Shift in Criminal Procedure, 93 Nw. U. L. Rev. 789 (2003).Google Scholar
Bibas, Stephanos & Bierschbach, Richard A., Integrating Remorse and Apology into Criminal Procedure, 114 Yale L.J. 85 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billings, Warren M., Law in Colonial America: The Reassessment of Early American Legal History, 81 Mich. L. Rev. 953 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackstone, William, Commentaries on the Laws of England (1765).
Blinka, Daniel D., Jefferson and Juries: The Problem of Law, Reason, and Politics in the New Republic, 47 Am. J. of Legal Hist. 35 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodenhamer, David J., Fair Trial: Rights of the Accused in American History 86 (1992).
Boorstin, Daniel J., The Americans: The Colonial Experience 27 (1958).
Bowers, Josh, Punishing the Innocent, 156 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1117 (2008).Google Scholar
Bowers, Josh & Robinson, Paul H., Perceptions of Fairness and Justice: The Shared Aims and Occasional Conflicts of Legitimacy and Moral Credibility, 47 Wake Forest L. Rev. 211 (2012).Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John, Holism, Justice and Atonement, 2003 Utah L. Rev. 389.Google Scholar
Brenner, Susan W., Towards a Criminal Law for Cyberspace: Distributed Security, 10 Boston U. J. of Science & Tech. L. 1, 65 (2004).Google Scholar
Brown, Darryl, The Perverse Effects of Efficiency in Criminal Process, 81 Va. L. Rev. 183 (2014).Google Scholar
Burke, Alafair & Green, Bruce, The Community Prosecutor: Questions of Professional Discretion, 47 Wake Forest L. Rev. 285 (2012).Google Scholar
Butler, Paul, Racially Based Jury Nullification: Black Power in the Criminal Justice System, 105 Yale L. J. 677 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Jenny, Nullification as Law, 102 Geo. L. J. 579 (2014).Google Scholar
Chablani, Sanjay K., Re-Framing the ‘Fair Cross-Section’ Requirement, 13 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 931 (2011).Google Scholar
Chanenson, Steven L., Guidance from Above and Beyond, 58 Stan. L. Rev. 175 (2005).Google Scholar
Chanenson, Steven L., The Next Era of Sentencing Reform, 54 Emory L. J.377 (2005).Google Scholar
Coke, Sir Edward, Institutes of the Laws of England (19th ed., Garland Publishing 1979) (1644).Google Scholar
Colquitt, Joseph A., Ad Hoc Plea Bargaining, 75 Tul. L. Rev. 695, 740 (2001).Google Scholar
Connor, Henry G., The Constitutional Right to a Trial by a Jury of the Vicinage, 57 U. Pa. L. Rev. 197 (1909).Google Scholar
Cooter, Robert, Expressive Law and Economics, 27 J. Legal Stud. 585 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dancig-Rosenberg, Hadar & Gal, Tali, Restorative Criminal Justice, 34 Cardozo L. Rev. 2313 (2013).Google Scholar
Dolinko, David, The Theory and Jurisprudence of Restorative Justice, 2003 Utah L. Rev. 319.Google Scholar
Dubber, Markus D., American Plea Bargains, German Lay Judges, and the Crisis of Criminal Procedure, 49 Stan. L. Rev. 547 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duff, R. A., Penal Communications: Recent Work in the Philosophy of Punishment, in Crime and Justice: A Review of Research (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duff, R. A., Punishment, Communication, and Community (Oxford 2001).Google Scholar
English Bill of Rights (Dec. 16, 1689).
Fagan, Jeffrey & Meares, Tracey L., Punishment, Deterrence and Social Control: The Paradox of Punishment in Minority Communities, 6 Ohio St. J. Crim. L. 173 (2008).Google Scholar
Fairfax, Roger A., Jury, Grand 2.0: Modern Perspectives on the Grand Jury (2010).
Fairfax, Roger A., Grand Jury Discretion and Constitutional Design, 93 Cornell L. Rev. 703 (2008).Google Scholar
Fairfax, Roger A., The Grand Jury’s Jurisdictional Heritage, 91 Minn. L. Rev. 398 (2006).Google Scholar
Ferguson, Andrew G., The Jury as Constitutional Identity, 47 U.C. Davis1105 (2014).Google Scholar
Fischer, George, Plea Bargaining’s Triumph (2003).
Fissell, Brenner M., Abstract Risk and the Politics of the Criminal Law, 51 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 657 (2014).Google Scholar
Forde-Mazrui, Kim, Jural Districting: Selecting Impartial Juries Through Community Representation, 52 Vand. L. Rev. 353 (1999).Google Scholar
Freeland, Stephen N., Note, The Invisible Badge: Why Bounty Hunters Should Be Regarded as State Actors Under the Symbiotic Relationship Test, 49 Washburn L.J. 201 (2010).Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence M., Crime and Punishment in American History (1993).
Frug, Jerry, The Geography of Community, 48 Stanford L. Rev. 1047 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frug, Jerry, Decentering Decentralization, 60 U. Chi. L. Rev. 253 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Brandon L., Convicting the Innocent: Where Criminal Prosecutions Go Wrong (2011).
Garvey, Stephen P., Is It Wrong to Commute Death Row? Retribution, Atonement and Mercy, 82 N. Carolina L. Rev. 1319 (2004).Google Scholar
Garvey, Stephen P., Punishment as Atonement, 46 UCLA L. Rev. 1801 (1999).Google Scholar
Gastil, John, Perry Dress, Phil Weiser & Cindy Simmons, The Jury And Democracy: How Jury Deliberation Promotes Civic Engagement And Political Participation (2010).
Goebel, Julius, King’s Law and Local Custom in 17th Century New England, 31 Colum. L. Rev. 416 (1931).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Abraham S., Converging Criminal Justice Systems: Guilty Pleas and the Public Interest, 49 S.M.U. L. Rev. 567 (1996).Google Scholar
Gottfredson, Michael R. & Gottfredson, Don M., Decisionmaking in Criminal Justice: Towards the Rational Exercise of Discretion (1980).
Gottschalk, Marie, The Prison and the Gallows: The Politics of Mass Incarceration in America (2006).
Greenberg, Douglas, Crime, Law Enforcement, and Social Control in Colonial America, 26 Am. J. Legal Hist. 293 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruber, Aya, A Distributive Theory of Criminal Law, 52 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1 (2010).Google Scholar
Guthrie, Chris, Misjudging, 7 Nev. L. Rev. 420 (2007).Google Scholar
Hale, Matthew, The History of the Common Law of England (1713).
Haley, John O., Beyond Retribution: An Integrated Approach to Restorative Justice, 36 Wash. U. L & Pol’y1 (2011).Google Scholar
Hall, Kermit L., Finkelman, Paul & Ely, James W., American Legal History (2010).
Hampton, Jean, Correcting Harms versus Righting Wrongs: The Goal of Retribution, 39 UCLA L. Rev. 1659 (1992).Google Scholar
Hampton, Jean, A New Theory of Retribution, in Liability and Responsibility: Essays in Law and Morals 377 (Frey, R. G. & Morris, Christopher W., eds., 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hans, Valerie P., Introduction: Citizens as Legal Decision Makers: An International Perspective, 40 Cornell Int’l L.J. 303 (2007).Google Scholar
Hawkins, Keith, Assessing Evil: Decision Behavior and Parole Board Justice, 23 British J. of Crim. 102 (1983).Google Scholar
Herman, G. Nicholas, Plea Bargaining 26 (2004).
Howe, Mark DeWolfe, Juries as Judges of Criminal Law, 52 Harv. L. Rev. 582 (1939).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huighens, Kyron, Liberalism, Normative Expectations, and the Mechanics of Fault, 69 Mod. L. Rev. 462, 477 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Michael, Downsizing Prisons: How to Reduce Crime and End Mass Incarceration (1995).
Johnson, Marcia & Johnson, Luckett A., Bail: Reforming Policies to Address Overcrowded Jails, the Impact of Race on Detention, and Community Revival in Harris County, Texas, 7 Nw. J. of L. & Soc. Pol’y42 (2012).Google Scholar
Kalven, Harry, The Dignity of the Civil Jury, 50 Va. L. Rev. 1055 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, The Philosophy Of Law (1887).
Katyal, Neal K., Digital Architecture as Crime Control, 112 Yale L.J. 2261 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katyal, Neal K., Criminal Law in Cyberspace, 149 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1003 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Nancy J., Priceless Process: Nonnegotiable Features of Criminal Litigation, 47 UCLA L. Rev. 113 (1999).Google Scholar
King, Nancy J., Silencing Nullification: Advocacy Inside the Jury Room and Outside the Courtroom, 65 U. Chi. L. Rev. 433 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Nancy J., Soulé, David A., Steen, Sara & Weidner, Robert R., When Process Affects Punishment: Differences in Sentences After Guilty Plea, Bench Trial, and Jury Trial in Five Guidelines States, 105 Colum. L. Rev. 959 (2005).Google Scholar
King, Nancy J. & Noble, Roosevelt L., Jury Sentencing in Non-Capital Cases: Comparing Severity and Variance with Judicial Sentences in Two States, 2 J. Empirical Leg. Stud. 331 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kipnis, Kenneth, Plea Bargaining, A Critic’s Rejoinder, 13 Law & Soc’y Rev. 555 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Susan R., Enhancing the Judicial Role in Criminal Plea and Sentencing Bargaining, 84 Tex. L. Rev. 2023 (2006).Google Scholar
Klingele, Cecilia, The Role of Sentencing Commissions in the Imposition and Enforcement of Release Conditions, 26 Fed. Sent. Rep. 191 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobil, Daniel T., The Quality of Mercy Strained: Wresting the Pardoning Power from the King, 69 Tex. L. Rev. 569 (1991).Google Scholar
Kollock, Peter & Smith, Marc A., Communities in Cyberspace (1998).
LaCroix, Alison, The Ideological Origins of American Federalism (2010).
Langbein, John H., The Origins of Adversary Criminal Trial (2003).
Langbein, John H., On the Myth of Written Constitutions: The Disappearance of Criminal Jury Trial, 15 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol’y119, 120 (1992).Google Scholar
Langbein, John H., Shaping the Eighteenth-Century Criminal Trial: A View from the Ryder Sources, 50 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langbein, John H., Understanding the Short History of Plea Bargaining, 13 Law & Soc’y Rev. 261 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langbein, John H., Land Without Plea Bargaining: How the Germans Do It, 78 Mich. L. Rev. 204 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langer, Máximo, Rethinking Plea Bargaining: The Practice and Reform of Prosecutorial Adjudication in American Criminal Procedure, 33 Am. J. Crim. L. 223 (2006).Google Scholar
Langhofer, Kory A., Comment, Unaccountable at the Founding: The Originalist Case for Anonymous Juries, 115 Yale L.J. 1823 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanni, Adriaan, The Future of Community Justice, 40 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 359 (2005).Google Scholar
Leipold, Andrew, Why Are Federal Judges So Acquittal Prone? 83 Wash. U. L.Q. 151 (2005).Google Scholar
Lepore, Jill, New York Burning: Liberty, Slavery and Conspiracy in Eighteenth-Century Manhattan (Knopf: 2005).
Liu, Jessie K., Victimhood, 71 Mo. L. Rev. 115 (2006).Google Scholar
Logan, Wayne A., The Shadow Criminal Law of Municipal Governance, 62 Ohio St. L. J. 1409, (2001).Google Scholar
Logan, Wayne A., Through the Past Darkly: A Survey of the Uses and Abuses of Victim Impact Evidence in Capital Trials, 41 Ariz. L. Rev. 143 (1999).Google Scholar
Marder, Nancy S., The Myth of the Nullifying Jury, 93 Nw. U. L. Rev. 877 (1999).Google Scholar
Marder, Nancy S., Beyond Gender: Peremptory Challenges and the Roles of the Jury, 73 Tex. L. Rev. 1041 (1995).Google Scholar
McManus, Edgar J., Law and Liberty in Early New England: Criminal Justice and Due Process, 1620–1692 (1993).
Meares, Tracy L., Rewards for Good Behavior: Influencing Prosecutorial Discretion and Conduct with Financial Incentives, 64 Fordham L. Rev. 851 (1995).Google Scholar
Meares, Tracey L. & Kahan, Dan M., Black, White and Gray: A Reply to Alschuler and Schulhofer, 1998 U. Chi. Legal F. 245 (1998).Google Scholar
Meyer, Linda Ross, The Justice of Mercy (2013).
Minton, Todd D., U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Jail Inmates at Midyear 2011 – Statistical Tables 1 (2011).
Moore, Michael, Placing Blame: A General Theory of the Criminal Law 91 (1997).
Morris, Herbert, Persons and Punishment, inOn Guilt And Innocence, Essays in Legal Philosophy And Moral Psychology31−58 (1976).Google Scholar
Morris, Norval, The Future of Imprisonment (1974).
Murphy, Jeffrie G. and Jean Hampton, Forgiveness And Mercy (1988).
Myers, Bryan and Green, Edith, The Prejudicial Nature of Victim Impact Statements, 10 Psychol. Pub. Pol’y492 (2004).Google Scholar
Nelson, William, The Common Law in Colonial America: Volume II: The Middle Colonies and the Carolinas, 1660–1730 (2012).
Nelson, William, Americanization of the Common Law: The Impact of Legal Change on Massachusetts Society, 1760–1830 (1994).
Nelson, William E. & Palmer, Robert C., Liberty and Community: Constitution and Rights in the Early American Republic (1987).
New York Charter of Liberties (1663).
O’Hear, Michael, What’s Good About Trials? 156 U. Pa. L. Rev. Pennumbra209 (2007).Google Scholar
Oldenquist, Andrew, An Explanation of Retribution, 85 J. Phil. 464 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pole, J. R., Reflections on American Law and the American Revolution, 50 Wm. & Mary Q. 123 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, Jacqueline, Bounty Hunters, Marshals, and Sheriffs: Forward to the Past (1998).Google Scholar
Posner, Eric A., ed., Social Norms, Nonlegal Sanctions, and the Law (2007).
Pretrial Justice Institute, January–December 2011 Annual Report (2011).
Rapaport, Elizabeth, Retribution and Redemption in the Operation of Executive Clemency, 74 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 1501 (2000).Google Scholar
Reitz, Kevin, The New Sentencing Conundrum: Policy and Constitutional Law at Cross-Purposes, 105 Colum. L. Rev. 1082 (2005).Google Scholar
Reitz, Kevin, Modeling Discretion in American Sentencing Systems, 20 Law & Pol’y389, 393 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Resnik, Judith, Managerial Judges, 96 Harv. L. Rev. 374 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbennolt, Jennifer K., Evaluating Juries by Comparison to Judges: A Benchmark for Judging? 32 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 469 (2005).Google Scholar
Robinson, Paul, Garvey, Stephen & Ferzan, Kimberly Kessler, eds., Criminal Law Conversations (2009).
Robinson, Paul H., Competing Conceptions of Modern Desert: Vengeful, Deontological, and Empirical, 67 Cambridge L.J. 145 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Paul H. & Kurzban, Robert, Concordance and Conflict in Intuitions of Justice, 91 Minn. L. Rev. 1829, 1846–92 (2007).Google Scholar
Robinson, Paul H. & Spellman, Barbara A., Sentencing Decisions: Matching the Decisionmaker to the Decision Nature, 105 Colum. L. Rev. 1124 (2005).Google Scholar
Rosen, Richard A., Disciplinary Sanctions Against Prosecutors for Brady Violations: A Paper Tiger, 65 N.C. L. Rev. 693 (1987).Google Scholar
Ryan, Meghan, Proximate Retribution, 48 Hous. L. Rev. 1049 (2012).Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick, On the Supposed Jury-Dependence of Evidence Law, 155 U. Pa. L. Rev. 165 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schragger, Richard C., The Limits of Localism, 100 Mich. L. Rev. 371, 372–73 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulhofer, Stephen, Plea Bargaining as Disaster, 101 Yale L.J. 1979 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott-Hayward, Christine S., Shadow Sentencing: The Imposition of Federal Supervised Release, 18 Berkeley J. of Crim. L. 181 (2013).Google Scholar
Simon, Jonathan, Governing Through Crime: How the War on Crime Transformed American Democracy and Created a Culture of Fear (2007).
Slobogin, Christopher, A Jurisprudence of Dangerousness, 98 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1, 2 (2003).Google Scholar
Smith, Stephen, Localism and Capital Punishment, 64 Vanderbilt L. Rev. En Banc105 (2011).Google Scholar
Stephen, James Fitzjames, 2 A History Of The Criminal Law Of England (1883).
Stimson, Shannon C., The American Revolution in the Law: Anglo-American Jurisprudence before John Marshall 59–61 (1990).
Stith, Kate & Cabranes, Jose, Fear of Judging: Sentencing Guidelines in the Federal Courts (1998).
Stuntz, William J., The Collapse of American Criminal Justice (2011).
Stuntz, William J., Unequal Justice, 121 Harv. L. Rev. 1969, 1974 (2008).Google Scholar
Stuntz, William J., Plea Bargaining and Criminal Law’s Disappearing Shadow, 117 Harv. L. Rev. 2548 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, Dennis & Tifft, Larry, eds., Handbook of Restorative Justice: A Global Perspective (2006).
Sunstein, Cass R., Deliberative Trouble? Why Groups Go to Extremes, 110 Yale L.J. 71 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swire, Peter P., Elephants and Mice Revisited: Law and Choice of Law on the Internet, 153 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1975 (2005).Google Scholar
Tetlow, Tania, Discriminatory Acquittal, 18 Wm. & Mary Bill of Rights Q. 75 (2009).Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis, Democracy in America (Francis Bowen, trans., Knopf, Alfred A., 4th prtg. 1948) (1835).Google Scholar
Tonry, Michael, ed., The Future of Imprisonment (2004).
Tonry, Michael, Rethinking Unthinkable Punishment Practices in America, 46 UCLA L. Rev. 1451 (1999).Google Scholar
Toobin, Jeffrey, This Is My Jail, The New Yorker 26 (April 14, 2014).Google Scholar
Tulchin, Matthew T., An Analysis of the Development of the Jury’s Role in a New York Criminal Trial, 13 J.L. & Pol’y425 (2005).Google Scholar
Turner, Jenia, Jury Sentencing as Democratic Practice, 89 Va. L. Rev. 311 (2003).Google Scholar
U.S. Cont’l Cong., Journal of the Proceedings of the Congress, Held at Philadelphia, September 5, 1774 (Philadelphia, William and Thomas Bradford 1774).Google Scholar
von Hirsch, Andrew, Doing Justice: The Choice of Punishment (1976).
Washburn, Kevin, Restoring the Grand Jury, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 2333 (2008).Google Scholar
Weisberg, Robert, Excerpts from “The Future of American Sentencing: A National Roundtable on Blakely,” 2 Ohio St. J. Crim. L. 619 (2005).Google Scholar
Wells, Philip A., Shrinking the Internet, 5 NYU J. L. & Liberty531 (2010).Google Scholar
Wiseman, Samuel, Pretrial Detention and the Right to Be Monitored, 138 Yale L.J. 1118 (2014).Google Scholar
Wistrich, Andrew J., Guthrie, Chris & Rachlinski, Jeffrey J., Can Judges Ignore Inadmissible Information? The Difficulty of Deliberately Disregarding, 153 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1251 (2005).Google Scholar
Worrall, James L., Prosecution in America: A Historical and Comparative Account (2008).
Wright, Ron, Trial Distortion and the End of Innocence in Federal Criminal Justice, 154 U. Penn. L. Rev. 79 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Ron & Miller, Marc, The Screening/Bargaining Tradeoff, 55 Stan. L. Rev. 29, 30 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yellen, David, Probation Officers Look at Plea Bargaining, and Do Not Like What They See, 8 Fed. Sent’g Rep. 339 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimring, Franklin E. & Hawkins, Gordon, Dangerousness and Criminal Justice, 85 Mich. L. Rev. 481 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×