Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T13:13:43.113Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

20 - Preoperative portal vein embolization

from Section IV - Organ-specific cancers – liver metastases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

David Li
Affiliation:
Weill Cornell Medical College
David C. Madoff
Affiliation:
Weill Cornell Medical College
Jean-Francois H. Geschwind
Affiliation:
Yale University School of Medicine, Connecticut
Michael C. Soulen
Affiliation:
Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia
Get access

Summary

With advances in perioperative care, major liver resections are being increasingly performed for primary and metastatic liver tumors. Although fatal liver failure and major technical complications are now rare after resection, complications associated with cholestasis, fluid retention, and impaired synthetic function still contribute to protracted recovery time and extended hospital stay. Although the risk for perioperative liver failure is multifactorial, one of the most important factors associated with this complication is the volume of functional liver remaining after surgery. Patients considered at high risk are those with normal underlying liver in whom more than 80% of the functional liver mass will be removed or those with chronic liver disease who undergo resection of more than 60% of their functional liver mass.

One strategy used to improve the safety of extensive liver surgery in patients with small remnant livers is preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE). PVE redirects portal flow to the intended future liver remnant (FLR) in an attempt to initiate hypertrophy of the non-embolized segments, and PVE has been shown to improve the functional reserve of the FLR before surgery. In appropriately selected patients, PVE can reduce perioperative morbidity and allow for safe, potentially curative hepatectomy for patients previously considered ineligible for resection based on anticipated small remnant livers. For this patient subset, PVE is now utilized as the standard of care at many comprehensive hepatobiliary centers prior to major hepatectomy.

The clinical use of PVE is based on experimental observations first reported in 1920 by Rous and Larimore, who studied the consequences of segmental portal venous occlusion in rabbits and found progressive atrophy of the hepatic segments with ligated portal veins and hypertrophy of the hepatic segments with patent portal veins. Later investigators reported clinical studies showing that portal vein or bile duct occlusion secondary to tumor invasion or ligation leads to ipsilateral liver atrophy (i.e., liver to be resected) and contralateral liver hypertrophy (i.e., liver to remain in situ after resection). In the mid-1980s, Kinoshita et al. used PVE to limit extension of segmental portal tumor thrombi from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for which transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) was ineffective. In 1990, Makuuchi et al. first reported the use of PVE solely to induce left-liver hypertrophy prior to major hepatic resection in 14 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Type
Chapter
Information
Interventional Oncology
Principles and Practice of Image-Guided Cancer Therapy
, pp. 176 - 192
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Tsao, JI, Loftus, JP, Nagorney, DM, Adson, MA, Ilstrup, DM. Trends in morbidity and mortality of hepatic resection for malignancy. A matched comparative analysis. Ann Surg 1994; 220 (2): 199–205.Google Scholar
2. Shirabe, K, Shimada, M, Gion, T, et al. Postoperative liver failure after major hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in the modern era with special reference to remnant liver volume. J Am Coll Surg 1999; 188 (3): 304–309.Google Scholar
3. Vauthey, JN, Chaoui, A, Do, KA, et al. Standardized measurement of the future liver remnant prior to extended liver resection: methodology and clinical associations. Surgery 2000; 127 (5): 512–519.Google Scholar
4. Shoup, M, Gonen, M, D'Angelica, M, et al. Volumetric analysis predicts hepatic dysfunction in patients undergoing major liver resection. J Gastrointest Surg 2003; 7 (3): 325–330.Google Scholar
5. Abdalla, EK, Barnett, CC, Doherty, D, Curley, SA, Vauthey, JN. Extended hepatectomy in patients with hepatobiliary malignancies with and without preoperative portal vein embolization. Arch Surg 2002; 137 (6): 675–680; discussion 680–681.Google Scholar
6. May, BJ, Talenfeld, AD, Madoff, DC. Update on portal vein embolization: evidence-based outcomes, controversies, and novel strategies. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 2013; 24 (2): 241–254.Google Scholar
7. Azoulay, D, Castaing, D, Smail, A, et al. Resection of nonresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer after percutaneous portal vein embolization. Ann Surg 2000; 231 (4): 480–486.Google Scholar
8. Kubota, K, Makuuchi, M, Kusaka, K, et al. Measurement of liver volume and hepatic functional reserve as a guide to decision-making in resectional surgery for hepatic tumors. Hepatology 1997; 26 (5): 1176–1181.Google Scholar
9. Makuuchi, M, Thai, BL, Takayasu, K, et al. Preoperative portal embolization to increase safety of major hepatectomy for hilar bile duct carcinoma: a preliminary report. Surgery 1990; 107 (5): 521–527.Google Scholar
10. Vauthey, JN, Pawlik, TM, Abdalla, EK, et al. Is extended hepatectomy for hepatobiliary malignancy justified? Ann Surg 2004; 239 (5): 722–730; discussion 730–732.Google Scholar
11. Baere, T de, Roche, A, Vavasseur, D, et al. Portal vein embolization: utility for inducing left hepatic lobe hypertrophy before surgery. Radiology 1993; 188 (1): 73–77.Google Scholar
12. Nagino, M, Nimura, Y, Kamiya, J, et al. Right or left trisegment portal vein embolization before hepatic trisegmentectomy for hilar bile duct carcinoma. Surgery 1995; 117 (6): 677–681.Google Scholar
13. Nagino, M, Kamiya, J, Kanai, M, et al. Right trisegment portal vein embolization for biliary tract carcinoma: technique and clinical utility. Surgery 2000; 127 (2): 155–160.Google Scholar
14. Vauthey, JN, Abdalla, EK, Doherty, DA, et al. Body surface area and body weight predict total liver volume in Western adults. Liver Transplantation 2002; 8 (3): 233–240.Google Scholar
15. Madoff, DC, Abdalla, EK, Vauthey, JN. Portal vein embolization in preparation for major hepatic resection: evolution of a new standard of care. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 2005; 16 (6): 779–790.Google Scholar
16. Rous, P, Larimore, LD. Relation of the portal blood to liver maintenance: a demonstration of liver atrophy conditional on compensation. J Exp Med 1920; 31 (5): 609–632.Google Scholar
17. Bax, HR, Mansens, BJ, Schalm, L. Atrophy of the liver after occlusion of the bile ducts or portal vein and compensatory hypertrophy of the unoccluded portion and its clinical importance. Gastroenterology 1956; 31 (2): 131–155.Google Scholar
18. Honjo, I, Suzuki, T, Ozawa, K, Takasan, H, Kitamura, O. Ligation of a branch of the portal vein for carcinoma of the liver. Am J Surg 1975; 130 (3): 296–302.Google Scholar
19. Takayasu, K, Muramatsu, Y, Shima, Y, et al. Hepatic lobar atrophy following obstruction of the ipsilateral portal vein from hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Radiology 1986; 160 (2): 389–393.Google Scholar
20. Kinoshita, H, Sakai, K, Hirohashi, K, et al. Preoperative portal vein embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Surg 1986; 10 (5): 803–808.Google Scholar
21. Koniaris, LG, McKillop, IH, Schwartz, SI, Zimmers, TA. Liver regeneration. J Am Coll Surg 2003; 197 (4): 634–659.Google Scholar
22. Ponfick, V. Ueber Leberresection und Leberreaction. Verhandl Deutsch Gesellsch 1890; 19 (28).Google Scholar
23. Michalopoulos, GK, DeFrances, MC. Liver regeneration. Science 1997; 276 (5309): 60–66.Google Scholar
24. Black, DM, Behrns, KE. A scientist revisits the atrophy–hypertrophy complex: hepatic apoptosis and regeneration. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2002; 11 (4): 849–864.Google Scholar
25. Lee, KC, Kinoshita, H, Hirohashi, K, Kubo, S, Iwasa, R. Extension of surgical indications for hepatocellular carcinoma by portal vein embolization. World J Surg 1993; 17 (1): 109–115.Google Scholar
26. Takeuchi, E, Nimura, Y, Mizuno, S, et al. Ligation of portal vein branch induces DNA polymerases alpha, delta, and epsilon in nonligated lobes. J Surg Res 1996; 65 (1): 15–24.Google Scholar
27. Mizuno, S, Nimura, Y, Suzuki, H, Yoshida, S. Portal vein branch occlusion induces cell proliferation of cholestatic rat liver. J Surg Res 1996; 60 (1): 249–257.Google Scholar
28. Kim, RD, Stein, GS, Chari, RS. Impact of cell swelling on proliferative signal transduction in the liver. J Cell Biochem 2001; 83 (1): 56–69.Google Scholar
29. Nagy, P, Teramoto, T, Factor, VM, et al. Reconstitution of liver mass via cellular hypertrophy in the rat. Hepatology 2001; 33 (2): 339–345.Google Scholar
30. Komori, K, Nagino, M, Nimura, Y. Hepatocyte morphology and kinetics after portal vein embolization. Br J Surg 2006; 93 (6): 745–751.Google Scholar
31. Starzl, TE, Francavilla, A, Porter, KA, Benichou, J, Jones, AF. The effect of splanchnic viscera removal upon canine liver regeneration. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1978; 147 (2): 193–207.Google Scholar
32. Nagino, M, Nimura, Y, Kamiya, J, et al. Changes in hepatic lobe volume in biliary tract cancer patients after right portal vein embolization. Hepatology 1995; 21 (2): 434–439.Google Scholar
33. Kock, NG, Hahnloser, P, Roding, B, Schenk, WG, Jr. Interaction between portal venous and hepatic arterial blood flow: an experimental study in the dog. Surgery 1972; 72 (3): 414–419.Google Scholar
34. Michalopoulos, GK, Zarnegav, R. Hepatocyte growth factor. Hepatology 1992; 15 (1): 149–155.Google Scholar
35. Ribero, D, Abdalla, EK, Madoff, DC, et al. Portal vein embolization before major hepatectomy and its effects on regeneration, resectability and outcome. Br J Surg 2007; 94 (11): 1386–1394.Google Scholar
36. Tashiro, S. Mechanism of liver regeneration after liver resection and portal vein embolization (ligation) is different? J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat Surg 2009; 16 (3): 292–299.Google Scholar
37. Yamanaka, N, Okamoto, E, Kawamura, E, et al. Dynamics of normal and injured human liver regeneration after hepatectomy as assessed on the basis of computed tomography and liver function. Hepatology 1993; 18 (1): 79–85.Google Scholar
38. Duncan, AW, Soto-Gutierrez, A. Liver repopulation and regeneration: new approaches to old questions. Curr Opin Organ Transpl 2013; 18 (2): 197–202.Google Scholar
39. Anderson, CD, Meranze, S, Bream, P, Jr., et al. Contralateral portal vein embolization for hepatectomy in the setting of hepatic steatosis. Am Surg 2004; 70 (7): 609–612.Google Scholar
40. DeAngelis, RA, Markiewski, MM, Taub, R, Lambris, JD. A high-fat diet impairs liver regeneration in C57BL/6 mice through overexpression of the NF-kappaB inhibitor, IkappaBalpha. Hepatology 2005; 42 (5): 1148–1157.Google Scholar
41. Shimamura, T, Nakajima, Y, Une, Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of preoperative percutaneous transhepatic portal embolization with absolute ethanol: a clinical study. Surgery 1997; 121 (2): 135–141.Google Scholar
42. Baere, T de, Roche, A, Elias, D, et al. Preoperative portal vein embolization for extension of hepatectomy indications. Hepatology 1996; 24 (6): 1386–1391.Google Scholar
43. Imamura, H, Shimada, R, Kubota, M, et al. Preoperative portal vein embolization: an audit of 84 patients. Hepatology 1999; 29 (4): 1099–1105.Google Scholar
44. Wakabayashi, H, Okada, S, Maeba, T, Maeta, H. Effect of preoperative portal vein embolization on major hepatectomy for advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinomas in injured livers: a preliminary report. Surg Today 1997; 27 (5): 403–410.Google Scholar
45. Shibayama, Y, Hashimoto, K, Nakata, K. Recovery from hepatic necrosis following acute portal vein embolism with special reference to reconstruction of occluded vessels. J Pathol 1991; 165 (3): 255–261.Google Scholar
46. Duncan, JR, Hicks, ME, Cai, SR, Brunt, EM, Ponder, KP. Embolization of portal vein branches induces hepatocyte replication in swine: a potential step in hepatic gene therapy. Radiology 1999; 210 (2): 467–477.Google Scholar
47. Ikeda, K, Kinoshita, H, Hirohashi, K, Kubo, S, Kaneda, K. The ultrastructure, kinetics and intralobular distribution of apoptotic hepatocytes after portal branch ligation with special reference to their relationship to necrotic hepatocytes. Arch Histol Cytol 1995; 58 (2): 171–184.Google Scholar
48. Abdalla, EK, Hicks, ME, Vauthey, JN. Portal vein embolization: rationale, technique and future prospects. Br J Surg 2001; 88 (2): 165–175.Google Scholar
49. Goto, Y, Nagino, M, Nimura, Y. Doppler estimation of portal blood flow after percutaneous transhepatic portal vein embolization. Ann Surg 1998; 228 (2): 209–213.Google Scholar
50. Johnson, TN, Tucker, GT, Tanner, MS, Rostami-Hodjegan, A. Changes in liver volume from birth to adulthood: a meta-analysis. Liver Transplantation 2005; 11 (12): 1481–1493.Google Scholar
51. Soyer, P, Roche, A, Elias, D, Levesque, M. Hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: influence of hepatic volumetric analysis on surgical decision making. Radiology 1992; 184 (3): 695–697.Google Scholar
52. Ribero, D, Chun, YS, Vauthey, JN. Standardized liver volumetry for portal vein embolization. Semin Intervent Radiol 2008; 25 (2): 104–109.Google Scholar
53. Ribero, D, Amisano, M, Bertuzzo, F, et al. Measured versus estimated total liver volume to preoperatively assess the adequacy of the future liver remnant: which method should we use? Ann Surg 2013; 258 (5): 801–806.Google Scholar
54. Chun, YS, Ribero, D, Abdalla, EK, et al. Comparison of two methods of future liver remnant volume measurement. J Gastrointest Surg 2008; 12 (1): 123–128.Google Scholar
55. Shah, A, Goffette, P, Hubert, C, et al. Comparison of different methods to quantify future liver remnants after preoperative portal vein embolization to predict postoperative liver failure. Hepatogastroenterology 2011; 58 (105): 109–114.Google Scholar
56. Seyama, Y, Kokudo, N. Assessment of liver function for safe hepatic resection. Hepatol Res 2009; 39 (2): 107–116.Google Scholar
57. Makuuchi, M, Kosuge, T, Takayama, T, et al. Surgery for small liver cancers. Semin Surg Oncol 1993; 9 (4): 298–304.Google Scholar
58. Mihara, K, Sugiura, T, Okamura, Y, et al. A predictive factor of insufficient liver regeneration after preoperative portal vein embolization. Eur Surg Res 2013; 51 (3–4): 118–128.Google Scholar
59. Shindoh, J, Truty, MJ, Aloia, TA, et al. Kinetic growth rate after portal vein embolization predicts posthepatectomy outcomes: toward zero liver-related mortality in patients with colorectal liver metastases and small future liver remnant. J Am Coll Surg 2013; 216 (2): 201–209.Google Scholar
60. Denys, AL, Abehsera, M, Sauvanet, A, et al. Failure of right portal vein ligation to induce left lobe hypertrophy due to intrahepatic portoportal collaterals: successful treatment with portal vein embolization. Am J Roentgenol AJR 1999; 173 (3): 633–635.Google Scholar
61. Nagino, M, Nimura, Y, Kamiya, J, Kondo, S, Kanai, M. Selective percutaneous transhepatic embolization of the portal vein in preparation for extensive liver resection: the ipsilateral approach. Radiology 1996; 200 (2): 559–563.Google Scholar
62. Madoff, DC, Abdalla, EK, Gupta, S, et al. Transhepatic ipsilateral right portal vein embolization extended to segment IV: improving hypertrophy and resection outcomes with spherical particles and coils. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 2005; 16 (2): 215–225.Google Scholar
63. Madoff, DC, Hicks, ME, Abdalla, EK, Morris, JS, Vauthey, JN. Portal vein embolization with polyvinyl alcohol particles and coils in preparation for major liver resection for hepatobiliary malignancy: safety and effectiveness – study in 26 patients. Radiology 2003; 227 (1): 251–260.Google Scholar
64. Madoff, DC, Hicks, ME, Vauthey, JN, et al. Transhepatic portal vein embolization: anatomy, indications, and technical considerations. Radiographics 2002; 22 (5): 1063–1076.Google Scholar
65. Kodama, Y, Shimizu, T, Endo, H, Miyamoto, N, Miyasaka, K. Complications of percutaneous transhepatic portal vein embolization. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 2002; 13 (12): 1233–1237.Google Scholar
66. Stefano, DR Di, Baere, T de, Denys, A, et al. Preoperative percutaneous portal vein embolization: evaluation of adverse events in 188 patients. Radiology 2005; 234 (2): 625–630.Google Scholar
67. Denys, A, Madoff, DC, Doenz, F, et al. Indications for and limitations of portal vein embolization before major hepatic resection for hepatobiliary malignancy. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2002; 11 (4): 955–968.Google Scholar
68. Azoulay, D, Raccuia, JS, Castaing, D, Bismuth, H. Right portal vein embolization in preparation for major hepatic resection. J Am Coll Surg 1995; 181 (3): 266–269.Google Scholar
69. Perarnau, JM, Daradkeh, S, Johann, M, et al. Transjugular preoperative portal embolization (TJPE) a pilot study. Hepatogastroenterology 2003; 50 (51): 610–613.Google Scholar
70. Gruttadauria, S, Luca, A, Mandala, L, Miraglia, R, Gridelli, B. Sequential preoperative ipsilateral portal and arterial embolization in patients with colorectal liver metastases. World J Surg 2006; 30 (4): 576–578.Google Scholar
71. Nagino, M, Kanai, M, Morioka, A, et al. Portal and arterial embolization before extensive liver resection in patients with markedly poor functional reserve. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 2000; 11 (8): 1063–1068.Google Scholar
72. Denecke, T, Seehofer, D, Steffen, IG, et al. Arterial versus portal venous embolization for induction of hepatic hypertrophy before extended right hemihepatectomy in hilar cholangiocarcinomas: a prospective randomized study. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 2011; 22 (9): 1254–1262.Google Scholar
73. Aoki, T, Imamura, H, Hasegawa, K, et al. Sequential preoperative arterial and portal venous embolizations in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Arch Surg 2004; 139 (7): 766–774.Google Scholar
74. Ogata, S, Belghiti, J, Farges, O, et al. Sequential arterial and portal vein embolizations before right hepatectomy in patients with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg 2006; 93 (9): 1091–1098.Google Scholar
75. Capussotti, L, Muratore, A, Ferrero, A, et al. Extension of right portal vein embolization to segment IV portal branches. Arch Surg 2005; 140 (11): 1100–1103.Google Scholar
76. Gulik, TM Van, den Esschert, JW Van, Graaf, W de, et al. Controversies in the use of portal vein embolization. Digest Surg 2008; 25 (6): 436–444.Google Scholar
77. Kishi, Y, Madoff, DC, Abdalla, EK, et al. Is embolization of segment 4 portal veins before extended right hepatectomy justified? Surgery 2008; 144 (5): 744–751.Google Scholar
78. Mueller, L, Hillert, C, Moller, L, et al. Major hepatectomy for colorectal metastases: is preoperative portal occlusion an oncological risk factor? Ann Surg Oncol 2008; 15 (7): 1908–1917.Google Scholar
79. Lienden, KP Van, den Esschert, JW Van, Graaf, W de, et al. Portal vein embolization before liver resection: a systematic review. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2013; 36 (1): 25–34.Google Scholar
80. Guiu, B, Bize, P, Gunthern, D, et al. Portal vein embolization before right hepatectomy: improved results using n-butyl-cyanoacrylate compared to microparticles plus coils. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2013; 36 (5): 1306–1312.Google Scholar
81. Matsuoka, T, Nakatsuka, H, Nakamura, K, et al. [Long-term embolization of the portal vein with isobutyl-2-cyanoacrylate in hepatoma.] Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai zasshi. Nippon Acta Radiol 1986; 46 (1): 72–74.Google Scholar
82. Bent, CL, Low, D, Matson, MB, Renfrew, I, Fotheringham, T. Portal vein embolization using a nitinol plug (Amplatzer vascular plug) in combination with histoacryl glue and iodinized oil: adequate hypertrophy with a reduced risk of nontarget embolization. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2009; 32 (3): 471–477.Google Scholar
83. Cazejust, J, Bessoud, B, Bail, M Le, Menu, Y. Preoperative portal vein embolization with a combination of trisacryl microspheres, gelfoam and coils. Diagn Interv Imaging 2013;Google Scholar
84. Geisel, D, Malinowski, M, Powerski, MJ, et al. Improved hypertrophy of future remnant liver after portal vein embolization with plugs, coils and particles. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2013; 96 (1): 57–64.Google Scholar
85. Angle, JF, Siddiqi, NH, Wallace, MJ, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous transcatheter embolization: Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 2010; 21 (10): 1479–1486.Google Scholar
86. Denys, A, Bize, P, Demartines, N, Deschamps, F, Baere, T. de Quality improvement for portal vein embolization. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2010; 33 (3): 452–456.Google Scholar
87. Abulkhir, A, Limongelli, P, Healey, AJ, et al. Preoperative portal vein embolization for major liver resection: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2008; 247 (1): 49–57.Google Scholar
88. Thakrar, PD, Madoff, DC. Preoperative portal vein embolization: an approach to improve the safety of major hepatic resection. Semin Roentgenol 2011; 46 (2): 142–153.Google Scholar
89. Abdalla, EK, Denys, A, Chevalier, P, Nemr, RA, Vauthey, JN. Total and segmental liver volume variations: implications for liver surgery. Surgery 2004; 135 (4): 404–410.Google Scholar
90. Leelaudomlipi, S, Sugawara, Y, Kaneko, J, et al. Volumetric analysis of liver segments in 155 living donors. Liver Transplantation 2002; 8 (7): 612–614.Google Scholar
91. Nzeako, UC, Goodman, ZD, Ishak, KG. Hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic and noncirrhotic livers. A clinico-histopathologic study of 804 North American patients. Am J Clin Pathol 1996; 105 (1): 65–75.Google Scholar
92. Kishi, Y, Abdalla, EK, Chun, YS, et al. Three hundred and one consecutive extended right hepatectomies: evaluation of outcome based on systematic liver volumetry. Ann Surg 2009; 250 (4): 540–548.Google Scholar
93. Farges, O, Belghiti, J, Kianmanesh, R, et al. Portal vein embolization before right hepatectomy: prospective clinical trial. Ann Surg 2003; 237 (2): 208–217.Google Scholar
94. Kooby, DA, Fong, Y, Suriawinata, A, et al. Impact of steatosis on perioperative outcome following hepatic resection. J Gastrointest Surg 2003; 7 (8): 1034–1044.Google Scholar
95. Azoulay, D, Castaing, D, Krissat, J, et al. Percutaneous portal vein embolization increases the feasibility and safety of major liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in injured liver. Ann Surg 2000; 232 (5): 665–672.Google Scholar
96. Tanaka, H, Hirohashi, K, Kubo, S, et al. Preoperative portal vein embolization improves prognosis after right hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with impaired hepatic function. Br J Surg 2000; 87 (7): 879–882.Google Scholar
97. Elias, D, Baere, T de, Roche, A, et al. During liver regeneration following right portal embolization the growth rate of liver metastases is more rapid than that of the liver parenchyma. Br J Surg 1999; 86 (6): 784–788.Google Scholar
98. Kokudo, N, Tada, K, Seki, M, et al. Proliferative activity of intrahepatic colorectal metastases after preoperative hemihepatic portal vein embolization. Hepatology 2001; 34 (2): 267–272.Google Scholar
99. Hayashi, S, Baba, Y, Ueno, K, et al. Acceleration of primary liver tumor growth rate in embolized hepatic lobe after portal vein embolization. Acta Radiol 2007; 48 (7): 721–727.Google Scholar
100. Simoneau, E, Aljiffry, M, Salman, A, et al. Portal vein embolization stimulates tumour growth in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases. HPB 2012; 14 (7): 461–468.Google Scholar
101. Brouquet, A, Abdalla, EK, Kopetz, S, et al. High survival rate after two-stage resection of advanced colorectal liver metastases: response-based selection and complete resection define outcome. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29 (8): 1083–1090.Google Scholar
102. Narita, M, Oussoultzoglou, E, Jaeck, D, et al. Two-stage hepatectomy for multiple bilobar colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg 2011; 98 (10): 1463–1475.Google Scholar
103. Pawlik, TM, Olino, K, Gleisner, AL, et al. Preoperative chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases: impact on hepatic histology and postoperative outcome. J Gastrointest Surg 2007; 11 (7): 860–868.Google Scholar
104. Vauthey, JN, Pawlik, TM, Ribero, D, et al. Chemotherapy regimen predicts steatohepatitis and an increase in 90-day mortality after surgery for hepatic colorectal metastases. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24 (13): 2065–2072.Google Scholar
105. Shindoh, J, Tzeng, CW, Aloia, TA, et al. Optimal future liver remnant in patients treated with extensive preoperative chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 2013; 20 (8): 2493–2500.Google Scholar
106. Zorzi, D, Chun, YS, Madoff, DC, Abdalla, EK, Vauthey, JN. Chemotherapy with bevacizumab does not affect liver regeneration after portal vein embolization in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 2008; 15 (10): 2765–2772.Google Scholar
107. Covey, AM, Brown, KT, Jarnagin, WR, et al. Combined portal vein embolization and neoadjuvant chemotherapy as a treatment strategy for resectable hepatic colorectal metastases. Ann Surg 2008; 247 (3): 451–455.Google Scholar
108. Muratore, A, Zimmitti, G, Ribero, D, et al. Chemotherapy between the first and second stages of a two-stage hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases: should we routinely recommend it? Ann Surg Oncol 2012; 19 (4): 1310–1315.Google Scholar
109. Fischer, C, Melstrom, LG, Arnaoutakis, D, et al. Chemotherapy after portal vein embolization to protect against tumor growth during liver hypertrophy before hepatectomy. JAMA Surg 2013; 148 (12): 1103–1108.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×