Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T21:56:01.070Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - GWAS: a milestone in the road from genotypes to phenotypes

from Part I - Genome-wide association studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2015

By
Urko M. Marigorta ,
Juan Antonio Rodriguez  and
Arcadi Navarro
Edited by
Krishnarao Appasani
Foreword by
Stephen W. Scherer  and
Peter M. Visscher
Urko M. Marigorta
Affiliation:
Universitat Pompeu Fabra
Juan Antonio Rodriguez
Affiliation:
Universitat Pompeu Fabra
Arcadi Navarro
Affiliation:
Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Biomedical Research Park
Krishnarao Appasani
Affiliation:
GeneExpression Systems, Inc., Massachusetts
Stephen W. Scherer
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Peter M. Visscher
Affiliation:
University of Queensland
Get access

Summary

Introduction: phenotypes and genetic variation

Phenotypes are composites of the observable traits of organisms and living individuals that originate from the expression of the instructions recorded in the organism's DNA under the influence of environmental factors. Researchers working in such disparate fields as livestock selection, medical genetics, behavioral economics, or evolutionary biology need to understand the genetic basis of phenotypes. For instance, plant breeders aim to predict traits such as crop response to fertilizers (Hospital, 2009); clinical geneticists intend to trace genetic mutations that result in diseases – abnormal phenotypes characterized by pathology (Sullivan et al., 2012); behavioral economists try to understand the genetic underpinnings of human behavioral variation (Navarro, 2009); and evolutionary biologists try to detect the molecular signature of natural selection in genes related to adaptive traits, such as lactase persistence (Hurst, 2009).

Despite its outstanding scientific and economic interest, studying the genetics of phenotypes is not devoid of complexities. Most traits, such as human height, tend to present continuous variation across individuals. This is because they are controlled by large numbers of genes and each causal variant explains but a tiny fraction of the overall phenotypic variation. In this regard, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have arisen as one of the most powerful tools to unravel the alleles that underlie individual phenotypic variation. This chapter reviews the bases of the study of the genetics of polygenic traits and provides a brief historical account of the developments in the field until the current wave of GWAS.

The study of the genetic architecture of phenotypes

Forces shaping human genetic variation

Many different tools of statistical genomics, including GWAS, have been designed with the aim of mapping phenotype diversity to the underlying causal genetic factors that vary across individuals. The two main forces increasing genetic diversity in human genomes are mutation and recombination. Additional forces, such as genetic drift and natural selection, govern the fate of extant genetic variation in populations. Together, all of them shape the degree of phenotypic variability present across humans.

Two major classes of genetic variation can be distinguished in our genomes according to their size: point mutations, and structural variation (Frazer et al., 2009). Point mutations are substitutions of a single base and are known as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs).

Type
Chapter
Information
Genome-Wide Association Studies
From Polymorphism to Personalized Medicine
 , pp. 12 - 25
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adeyemo, A. and Rotimi, C. (2009). Genetic variants associated with complex human diseases show wide variation across multiple populations. Publ. Health Genom., 13, 72–79.Google ScholarPubMed
Balding, D.J., Bishop, M. and Cannings, C. (2007). Handbook of Statistical Genetics. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodmer, W. and Bonilla, C. (2008). Common and rare variants in multifactorial susceptibility to common diseases. Nature Genet., 40, 695–701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boomsma, D., Busjahn, A. and Peltonen, L. (2002). Classical twin studies and beyond. Nature Rev. Genet., 3, 872–882.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Botstein, D. and Risch, N. (2003). Discovering genotypes underlying human phenotypes: past successes for Mendelian disease, future approaches for complex disease. Nature Genet., 33(Suppl), 228–237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Botstein, D., White, R.L., Skolnick, M. and Davis, R. W. (1980). Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 32, 314–331.Google ScholarPubMed
Bouchard, T.J. Jr. and McGue, M. (2003). Genetic and environmental influences on human psychological differences. J. Neurobiol., 54, 4–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burga, A. and Lehner, B. (2012). Beyond genotype to phenotype: why the phenotype of an individual cannot always be predicted from their genome sequence and the environment that they experience. FEBS J., 279, 3765–3775.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chakravarti, A. (1999). Population genetics – making sense out of sequence. Nature Genet., 21, 56–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chanock, S.J., Manolio, T., Boehnke, M., et al. (2007). Replicating genotype–phenotype associations. Nature, 447, 655–660.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarke, G.M., Anderson, C.A., Pettersson, F.H., et al. (2011). Basic statistical analysis in genetic case-control studies. Nature Protoc., 6, 121–133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daly, M.J., Rioux, J.D., Schaffner, S.F., Hudson, T.J. and Lander, E.S. (2001). High-resolution haplotype structure in the human genome. Nature Genet., 29, 229–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Bakker, P.I., Yelensky, R., Pe'er, I., et al. (2005). Efficiency and power in genetic association studies. Nature Genet., 37, 1217–1223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devlin, B. and Roeder, K. (1999). Genomic control for association studies. Biometrics, 55, 997–1004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dewan, A., Liu, M., Hartman, S., et al. (2006). HTRA1 promoter polymorphism in wet age-related macular degeneration. Science, 314, 989–992.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eichler, E.E., Flint, J., Gibson, G., et al. (2010). Missing heritability and strategies for finding the underlying causes of complex disease. Nature Rev. Genet., 11, 446–450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, D.M., Visscher, P.M. and Wray, N.R. (2009). Harnessing the information contained within genome-wide association studies to improve individual prediction of complex disease risk. Hum. Mol. Genet., 18, 3525–3531.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feldman, M.W. and Lewontin, R.C. (1975). The heritability hang-up. Science, 190, 1163–1168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frazer, K.A., Murray, S.S., Schork, N.J. and Topol, E.J. (2009). Human genetic variation and its contribution to complex traits. Nature Rev. Genet., 10, 241–251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fu, J., Festen, E.A. and Wijmenga, C. (2011). Multi-ethnic studies in complex traits. Hum. Mol. Genet., 20, R206–213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gabriel, S.B., Schaffner, S.F., Nguyen, H., et al. (2002). The structure of haplotype blocks in the human genome. Science, 296, 2225–2229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, G. (2012). Rare and common variants: twenty arguments. Nature Rev. Genet., 13, 135–145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goddard, M. (2009). Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response. Genetica, 136, 245–257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldstein, D.B. (2009). Common genetic variation and human traits. New Engl. J. Med., 360, 1696–1698.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldstein, D.B. and Chikhi, L. (2002). Human migrations and population structure: what we know and why it matters. Annu. Rev. Genom. Hum. Genet., 3, 129–152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gravel, S., Henn, B.M., Gutenkunst, R.N., et al. (2011). Demographic history and rare allele sharing among human populations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 108, 11983–11988.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hindorff, L.A., MacArthur, J., (European Bioinformatics Institute), Wise, A., et al. (2009) A Catalog of Published Genome-Wide Association Studies. www.genome.gov/gwastudies.
Hindorff, L.A., Sethupathy, P., Junkins, H.A., et al. (2009). Potential etiologic and functional implications of genome-wide association loci for human diseases and traits. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 9362–9367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirschhorn, J.N. and Altshuler, D. (2002). Once and again-issues surrounding replication in genetic association studies. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 87, 4438–4441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hospital, F. (2009). Challenges for effective marker-assisted selection in plants. Genetica, 136, 303–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hurst, L.D. (2009). Fundamental concepts in genetics: genetics and the understanding of selection. Nature Rev. Genet., 10, 83–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ioannidis, J.P., Ntzani, E.E., Trikalinos, T.A. and Contopoulos-Ioannidis, D.G. (2001). Replication validity of genetic association studies. Nature Genet., 29, 306–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jakobsdottir, J., Gorin, M.B., Conley, Y.P., Ferrell, R.E. and Weeks, D.E. (2009). Interpretation of genetic association studies: markers with replicated highly significant odds ratios may be poor classifiers. PLoS Genet., 5, e1000337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jelier, R., Semple, J.I., Garcia-Verdugo, R. and Lehner, B. (2011). Predicting phenotypic variation in yeast from individual genome sequences. Nature Genet., 43, 1270–1274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keinan, A. and Clark, A.G. (2012). Recent explosive human population growth has resulted in an excess of rare genetic variants. Science, 336, 740–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, R.J., Zeiss, C., Chew, E.Y., et al. (2005). Complement factor H polymorphism in age-related macular degeneration. Science, 308, 385–389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kraft, P., Wacholder, S., Cornelis, M.C., et al. (2009). Beyond odds ratios – communicating disease risk based on genetic profiles. Nature Rev. Genet., 10, 264–269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kruglyak, L. 1999. Prospects for whole-genome linkage disequilibrium mapping of common disease genes. Nature Genet., 22, 139–144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lander, E.S. (1996). The new genomics: global views of biology. Science, 274, 536–539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lander, E.S. (2011). Initial impact of the sequencing of the human genome. Nature, 470, 187–197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lango Allen, H., Estrada, K., Lettre, G., et al. (2010). Hundreds of variants clustered in genomic loci and biological pathways affect human height. Nature, 467, 832–838.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, S.H., Van Der Werf, J.H., Hayes, B.J., Goddard, M.E. and Visscher, P.M. (2008). Predicting unobserved phenotypes for complex traits from whole-genome SNP data. PLoS Genet., 4, e1000231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maher, B. (2008). Personal genomes: the case of the missing heritability. Nature, 456, 18–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manolio, T.A., Collins, F.S., Cox, N.J., et al. (2009). Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases. Nature, 461, 747–753.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marigorta, U.M. and Navarro, A. (2013). High trans-ethnic replicability of GWAS results implies common causal variants. PLoS Genet., 9, e1003566.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marigorta, U.M., Lao, O., Casals, F., et al. (2011). Recent human evolution has shaped geographical differences in susceptibility to disease. BMC Genom., 12, 55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCarthy, M.I., Abecasis, G.R., Cardon, L.R., et al. (2008). Genome-wide association studies for complex traits: consensus, uncertainty and challenges. Nature Rev. Genet., 9, 356–369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Myers, S., Bottolo, L., Freeman, C., McVean, G. and Donnelly, P. (2005). A fine-scale map of recombination rates and hotspots across the human genome. Science, 310, 321–324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Navarro, A. (2009). Genoeconomics: promises and caveats for a new field. Ann. NY Acad. Sci., 1167, 57–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicolae, D.L., Gamazon, E., Zhang, W., et al. (2010). Trait-associated SNPs are more likely to be eQTLs: annotation to enhance discovery from GWAS. PLoS Genet., 6, e1000888.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Park, J.H., Gail, M.H., Weinberg, C.R., et al. (2011). Distribution of allele frequencies and effect sizes and their interrelationships for common genetic susceptibility variants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 108, 18026–18031.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pritchard, J.K. (2001). Are rare variants responsible for susceptibility to complex diseases?Am. J. Hum. Genet., 69, 124–137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pritchard, J.K., Stephens, M., Rosenberg, N.A. and Donnelly, P. (2000). Association mapping in structured populations. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 67, 170–181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reich, D.E. and Lander, E.S. (2001). On the allelic spectrum of human disease. Trends Genet., 17, 502–510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Risch, N. and Merikangas, K. (1996). The future of genetic studies of complex human diseases. Science, 273, 1516–1517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenberg, N.A., Pritchard, J.K., Weber, J.L., et al. (2002). Genetic structure of human populations. Science, 298, 2381–2385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenberg, N.A., Huang, L., Jewett, E.M., et al. (2010). Genome-wide association studies in diverse populations. Nature Rev. Genet., 11, 356–366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothman, K.J. (2002). Epidemiology: An Introduction, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Schlosstein, L., Terasaki, P.I., Bluestone, R. and Pearson, C.M. (1973). High association of an HL-A antigen, W27, with ankylosing spondylitis. New Engl. J. Med., 288, 704–706.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scurrah, K., Gurrin, L., Palmer, L. and Burton, P. (2005). Estimation of genetic and environmental factors for binary traits using family data. Stat. Med., 24, 1613–1617; author reply 1617–1618.Google ScholarPubMed
Slatkin, M. (2008). Linkage disequilibrium – understanding the evolutionary past and mapping the medical future. Nature Rev. Genet., 9, 477–485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sullivan, P.F., Daly, M.J. and O'Donovan, M. (2012). Genetic architectures of psychiatric disorders: the emerging picture and its implications. Nature Rev. Genet., 13, 537–551.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
The International HapMap 3 Consortium (2009). Integrating common and rare genetic variation in diverse human populations. Nature, 467, 52–58.
The Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium (2007). Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls. Nature, 447, 661–678.
Thomas, D.C. (2004). Statistical Methods in Genetic Epidemiology, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Visscher, P.M., Hill, W.G. and Wray, N.R. (2008). Heritability in the genomics era – concepts and misconceptions. Nature Rev. Genet., 9, 255–266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Visscher, P.M., McEvoy, B. and Yang, J. (2010). From Galton to GWAS: quantitative genetics of human height. Genet. Res. (Camb.), 92, 371–379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Visscher, P.M., Brown, M.A., McCarthy, M.I. and Yang, J. (2012). Five years of GWAS discovery. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 90, 7–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiss, K.M. and Terwilliger, J.D. (2000). How many diseases does it take to map a gene with SNPs?Nature Genet., 26, 151–157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Welter, D., MacArthur, J., Morales, J., et al. (2014). The NHGRI GWAS Catalog, a curated resource of SNP-trait associations. Nucl. Acids Res., Jan; 42, (Database issue); D1001–D1006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wray, N.R. and Visscher, P.M. (2010). Narrowing the boundaries of the genetic architecture of schizophrenia. Schizophr. Bull., 36, 14–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, J., Benyamin, B., McEvoy, B.P., et al. (2010). Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height. Nature Genet., 42, 565–569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ziegler, A., Konig, I.K. and Pahlke, F. (2010). A Statistical Approach to Genetic Epidemiology, Wiley VCH, Weinheim.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×