Adamov, Evgeniĭ Aleksandrovich (ed.). Konstantinopol’ i prolivy po sekretnym dokumentam b. ministerstva inostrannykh del, 2 vols. Moscow: Izdanie Litizdat NKID, 1925.

Afflerbach, Holger. “The Topos of Improbable War in Europe before 1914,” in Afflerbach, Holger and Stevenson, David (eds.), An Improbable War? The Outbreak of World War I and European Political Culture before 1914. New York: Berghahn, 2007, pp. 161–182.Google Scholar

Afflerbach, Holger. Der Dreibund: Europäische Großmacht- und Allianzpolitik vor dem Ersten Weltkrieg. Vienna: Böhlau, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Afflerbach, Holger and Stevenson, David (eds.). An Improbable War? The Outbreak of World War I and European Political Culture. New York: Berghahn, 2007.

Albertini, LuigiThe Origins of the War of 1914, trans. and ed. Massey, Isabella M., 3 vols. London: Oxford University Press, 1952–1957.Google Scholar

Alexandre, General R.Avec Joffre d’Agadir à Verdun. Paris: Éditions Berger-Levrault, 1932.Google Scholar

Allain, Jean Claude. Joseph Caillaux: le défi victorieux. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale, 1978.Google Scholar

Allison, Graham. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis, New York: Little, Brown, 1971.Google Scholar

Amson, Daniel. Poincaré l’acharné de la politique. Paris: Tallandier, 1997.Google Scholar

Anderson, Matthew S.The Eastern Question, 1774–1923. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrew, C. M. “France and the German Menace,” in May, Ernest (ed.), Knowing One’s Enemies: Intelligence Assessment before the Two World Wars. Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Angelow, Jürgen. Der Weg in die Urkatastrophe: Der Zerfall des Alten Europa 1900–1914. Berlin: be.bra verlag, 2010.Google Scholar

Angelow, Jürgen. Kalkül und Prestige: Der Zweibund am Vorabend des Ersten Weltkrieges. Cologne: Böhlau, 2000.Google Scholar

Ascher, Abraham. P. A. Stolypin: The Search for Stability in Late Imperial Russia. Stanford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Astafiev, I. I.Russko–Germanskie Diplomaticheskie Otosheni’ia, 1905–1914: Ot Portsmutskogo Mira do Potsdamskogo Soglashenia. Moscow: n.p. 1972.Google Scholar

Bark, P. L. “Iul’skie dni 1914 goda: nachalo velikoi voiny,” Vozrozhdenie 91 (1959): 17–45.Google Scholar

Barnes, Harry Elmer. The Genesis of the World War, 2nd edn. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1927.Google Scholar

Barros, Andrew and Guelton, Frédéric. “Les imprévus de l’histoire instrumentalisée: le livre jaune de 1914 et les documents diplomatiques français sur les origines de la Grande Guerre, 1914–1928,” Guerres mondiales et conflits contemporains, 2006.Google Scholar

Bartlett, C. J.Peace, War, and the European Powers, 1814–1914. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Basily, Nicolas. Memoirs: Diplomat of Imperial Russia, 1903–1917. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press, 1973.Google Scholar

Baumgart, Winfried. Europäisches Konzert und nationale Bewegung. Internationale Beziehungen 1830–1878. Paderborn: Schöningh, 1999.Google Scholar

Becker, Jean-Jacques. 1914: Comment les français sont entrés dans la guerre. Paris: Presses de la Fondation nationale des sciences politiques, 1977.Google Scholar

Berghahn, Volker R.Germany and the Approach of War in 1914. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1973 (2nd edn. London: Macmillan, 1993).Google Scholar

Bestuzhev, Igor V.Bor’ba v Rossii po voprosam vneshnei politiki 1906–1910. Moscow: Nauka, 1961.Google Scholar

Bismarck, Otto. Gesammelte Werke, 1874–1876, ed. Rainer, Bendick. Paderborn: Schöningh, 2005.Google Scholar

Bittner, Ludwig, Pribram, Alfred F., Srbik, Heinrich, and Uebersberger, Hans (eds.). Österreich-Ungarns Außenpolitik von der Bosnischen Krise bis zum Kriegsausbruch, 9 vols. Vienna: Österreichischer Bundesverlag für Unterricht, Wissenschaft & Kunst, 1930.

Bled, Jean-Paul, François-Joseph. Paris: Fayard, 1987.Google Scholar

Bobroff, Ronald P.Roads to Glory: Late Imperial Russia and the Turkish Straits. London: I. B. Tauris, 2006.Google Scholar

Bosworth, R. J. B. “Italy and the End of the Ottoman Empire,” in Kent, Marion (ed.), The Great Powers and the End of the Ottoman Empire. London: Allen & Unwin, 1984, pp. 51–72.Google Scholar

Bosworth, R. J. B.Italy, the Least of the Great Powers: Italian Foreign Policy before the First World War. Cambridge University Press, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bovykin, Valeriĭ I.Iz istorii voznikno veniia pervoi mirovoi voiny (Otnosheniia Rossii i Frantsii 1912–1914 kummun period after im. 1914 gg.). Moscow: Izd-vo Mosk. universiteta, 1961.Google Scholar

Bremer, Stuart A. “Advancing the Scientific Study of War,” in Bremer, Stuart A. and Cusack, Thomas R. (eds.), The Process of War: Advancing the Scientific Study of War. Amsterdam: Gordon & Breach, 1995, pp. 1–34.Google Scholar

Brett, Maurice V. (ed.). Journals and Letters of Reginald Viscount Esher, 4 vols. London: Nicholson & Watson, 1934–1938.

Bridge, F. R.The Habsburg Monarchy among the Great Powers, 1815–1918. New York: Berg, 1990.Google Scholar

Bridge, F. R.Great Britain and Austria-Hungary, 1906–1914: A Diplomatic History. London: Littlehampton Book Services, 1972.Google Scholar

Brock, Michael. “Britain Enters the War,” in Evans, R. J. W. and von Strandmann, Hartmut P. (eds.), The Coming of the First World War. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988, pp. 145–178.Google Scholar

Brose, Eric Dorn. A History of the Great War: World War One and the International Crisis of the Early Twentieth Century. Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Brown, Michael E., Coté, Jr. Owen R., Lynn-Jones, Sean M., and Miller, Steven E. (eds.). Offense, Defense, and War. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004.

Buchanan, George. My Mission to Russia, vol. 1. Boston, MA: Little, Brown, 1923.Google Scholar

Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce. The War Trap. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Caldwell, C. E.Field-Marshal Sir Henry Wilson: His Life and Diaries, 2 vols. London: Cassell, 1927.Google Scholar

Canis, Konrad. Der Weg in den Abgrund: Deutsche Außenpolitik 1902–1914. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh, 2011.Google Scholar

Carter, Miranda. George, Nicholas and Wilhelm: Three Royal Cousins and the Road to World War I. New York: Random House, 2009.Google Scholar

Choucri, Nazli and North, Robert C.. Nations in Conflict. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman, 1975.Google Scholar

Christensen, Thomas J. and Snyder, Jack. “Chain Gangs and Passed Bucks,” International Organization 44(2) (1990): 137–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, Christopher. The Sleepwalkers: How Europe Went to War in 1914. New York and London: HarperCollins and Allen Lane, 2012/2013.Google Scholar

Clark, Christopher. Kaiser Wilhelm II: Profiles in Power. London: Longman, 2000.Google Scholar

Colaresi, Michael P., Rasler, Karen, and Thompson, William R.. Strategic Rivalry: Space, Position and Conflict Escalation in World Politics. Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Conze, Eckart. “‘Wer von Europa spricht, hat unrecht’: Aufstieg und Verfall des vertraglichen multilateralismus im Europäischen Staatensystem des 19. Jahrhunderts,” Historisches Jahrbuch 121 (2001): 214–241.Google Scholar

Copeland, Dale C. “A Tragic Choice: Japanese Preventive Motivations and the Origins of the Pacific War,” International Interactions 37(1) (2011): 116–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copeland, Dale C.The Origins of Major War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Cornwall, Mark. “Serbia,” in Wilson, Keith (ed.), Decisions for War, 1914. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1995, pp. 55–96.Google Scholar

Craig, Gordon A.The Politics of the Prussian Army, 1640–1945. Oxford University Press, 1955.Google Scholar

Dedijer, Vladimir. The Road to Sarajevo. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1966.Google Scholar

DiCicco, Jonathan M. and Levy, Jack S.. “Power Shifts and Problem Shifts: The Evolution of the Power Transition Research Program,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 43(6) (1999): 675–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diehl, Paul F. and Goertz, Gary. War and Peace in International Rivalry. University of Michigan Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doering-Manteuffel, Anselm. “Internationale Geschichte als Systemgeschichte des 19. und 20. Janhrhunderts,” in Loth, Wilfried and Osterhammel, Jürgen (eds.), Internationale Geschichte: Themen–Ergebnisse–Aussichten. Munich: Oldenbourg, 2000.Google Scholar

Doughty, Robert A.Pyrrhic Victory: French Strategy and Operations in the Great War. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duroselle, J-B. “Preface,” in Soutou, Georges-Henri, L’or et le sang. Les buts de guerre économiques de la première guerre mondiale. Paris: Fayard, 1989.Google Scholar

Eichengreen, Barry J.Golden Fetters: The Gold Standard and the Great Depression, 1919–1939. Oxford University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ekstein, Michael G. “Great Britain and the Triple Entente on the Eve of the Sarajevo Crisis,” in Hinsley, F. H. (ed.), British Foreign Policy under Sir Edward Grey. Cambridge University Press, 1977, pp. 342–348.Google Scholar

Elman, Colin and Elman, Miriam Fendius. “Introduction: Negotiating International History and Politics,” in Elman, Colin and Elman, Miriam Fendius (eds.), Bridges and Boundaries: Historians, Political Scientists and the Study of International Relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001, pp. 1–36.Google Scholar

Epkenhans, Michael. “Was a Peaceful Outcome Thinkable? The Naval Race before 1914,” in Afflerbach, Holger and Stevenson, David (eds.), An Improbable War? The Outbreak of World War I and European Political Culture before 1914. New York: Berghahn, 2007, pp. 113–129.Google Scholar

Fallodon, Viscount Grey of. Twenty-Five Years, 1892–1916. New York: Stokes, 1925.Google Scholar

Fay, Sidney B.The Origins of the World War, 2 vols., rev. 2nd edn. New York: Macmillan, 1930.Google Scholar

Fay, Sidney B.The Origins of the World War, 2 vols. New York: Macmillan, [1928] 1966.Google Scholar

Fearon, James D. “Rationalist Explanations for War,” International Organization 49(3) (1995): 379–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fellner, Fritz. “Die ‘Mission Hoyos’” [1976] and “Zwischen Kriegsbegeisterung und Resignation – ein Memorandum des Sektionschefs Forgách von Jänner 1915” [1975], in Maschl, Heidrun and Mazohl-Wallnig, Brigitte (eds.), Vom Dreibund zum Völkerbund: Studien zur Geschichte der internationalen Beziehungen, 1882–1919. Vienna: Verlag für Geschichte und Politik, 1994, pp. 112–141 and 142–154.Google Scholar

Fellner, Fritz. (ed.). Schicksaljahre Österreichs, 1908–1919: Das politische Tagebuch Josef Redlichs, 2 vols. Graz: Böhlau, 1953.

Ferguson, Niall. “Virtual History: Toward a ‘Chaotic’ Theory of the Past,” in Ferguson, Niall (ed.), Virtual History: Alternatives and Counterfactuals. New York: Basic Books, 1999, pp. 1–90.Google Scholar

Ferguson, Niall. The Pity of War: Explaining World War I. New York: Basic Books, 1999.Google Scholar

Ferguson, Niall. “Public Finance and National Security: The Domestic Origins of the First World War Revisited,” Past and Present 142(1) (1994): 141–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischer, Fritz. Krieg der Illusionen: Die deutsche Politik von 1911 bis 1914. Düsseldorf: Droste, 1969; translated as War of Illusions: German Policies from 1911 to 1914, trans. Marian Jackson. New York: W. W. Norton, 1975.Google Scholar

Fischer, Fritz. Griff nach der Weltmacht. Düsseldorf: Droste, 1961; English edition: Germany’s Aims in the First World War. New York: W. W. Norton, 1967.Google Scholar

Fischer, Fritz. Griff nach der Weltmacht: Die Kriegsziele des Kaiswerlichen Deutschland, 1914/18, 3rd edn. Düsseldorf: Droste, 1964.Google Scholar

Fisher, H. H. (ed.). Out of My Past: The Memoirs of Count Kokovtsov, trans. Matveev, Laura. Stanford University Press, 1935.Google Scholar

Flood, P. J.France 1914 –18: Public Opinion and the War Effort. London: Macmillan, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foley, Robert (ed.). Alfred von Schlieffen’s Military Writings. Routledge: London, 2002.

Förster, Stig. “Im Reich des Absurden: Die Ursachen des Ersten Weltkrieges,” in Wegner, Bern, Hansen, Ernst Willi, Rehwinkel, Kerstin, and Reiss, Matthias (eds.), Wie Kriege entstehen: Zum historischen Hintergrund von Staatenpolitik. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh, 2000, pp. 211–252.Google Scholar

Förster, Stig. “Dreams and Nightmares: German Military Leadership and the Images of Future Warfare, 1871–1914,” in Boemeke, Manfred F., Chickering, Roger, and Förster, Stig (eds.), Anticipating Total War: The German and American Experiences, 1871–1914. Washington, DC: German Historical Institute, 1999, pp. 343–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Förster, Stig. “Der deutsche Generalstab und die Illusion des kurzen Krieges, 1871–1914. Metakritik eines Mythos,” Militärgeschichtliche Mitteilungen 54(10) (1995): 61–95.Google Scholar

Förster, Stig. Der doppelte Militarismus: Die deutsche Rüstungspolitik zwischen Status-Quo- Sicherung und Aggression. Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1985.Google Scholar

Frantz, Günther. Russlands Eintritt in den Weltkrieg: Der Ausbau der russischen Wehrmacht und ihr Einsatz bei Kriegsausbruch. Berlin: Deutsche Verlagsgesellschaft für Politik & Geschichte, 1924.Google Scholar

Fromkin, David. Europe’s Last Summer: Who Started the Great War?New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2004.Google Scholar

Fuller, William C.Strategy and Power in Russia, 1600–1914. New York: Free Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Fuller, William C. “The Russian Empire,” in May, Ernest R. (ed.), Knowing One’s Enemies: Intelligence Assessment before the Two World Wars. Princeton University Press, 1984, pp. 98–126.Google Scholar

Gatrell, Peter. “Poor Russia, Poor Show: Mobilising a Backward Economy for War 1914–1917,” in Broadberry, Stephen and Harrison, Mark (eds.), The Economics of World War I. Cambridge University Press, 2005, pp. 235–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gatrell, Peter. Government, Industry and Rearmament in Russia, 1900–1914: The Last Argument of Tsarism. Cambridge University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geiss, Imanuel. “Kurt Riezler und der erste Weltkrieg,” in Geiss, Imanuel, Fischer, Fritz, and Wendt, Bernd Jürgen (eds.), Deutschland und die Weltpolitik des 19. und 20. Jahrhundert. Düsseldorf: Bertelsmann Universitätsverlag, 1973, p. 401.Google Scholar

Geiss, Imanuel. (ed.). July 1914: The Outbreak of the First World War: Selected Documents. New York: Scribner, 1967.Google Scholar

Geiss, Imanuel. (ed.). Julikrise und Kreigsausbruch 1914, 2 vols. Hanover: Verlag für Literatur & Zeitgeschenen, 1964.Google Scholar

George, Alexander L. (ed.). Avoiding Inadvertent War: Problems of Crisis Management. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1991.

George, Alexander L. and Bennett, Andrew. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005.Google Scholar

George, Alexander L. and Smoke, Richard. Deterrence in American Foreign Policy: Theory and Practice. New York: Columbia University Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Geyer, Dietrich. Der Russisiche Imperialismus: Studien über den Zusammenhang von Innerer und Auswärtiger Politik, 1860–1914. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1977; translated as Russian Imperialism: The Interaction of Domestic and Foreign Policy, 1860–1914, trans. Bruce Little. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilbert, Arthur N. and Lauren, Paul Gordon. “Crisis Management: An Assessment and a Critique,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 24(4) (1980): 641–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilpin, Robert. War and Change in World Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Girault, René. Emprunts russes et investissements français en Russie, 1887–1914. Paris: Colin, 1973.Google Scholar

Glaser, Charles. Rational Theory of International Politics. Princeton University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Godfrey, John F.Capitalism at War: Industrial Policy and Bureaucracy in France 1914–1918. Oxford: Berg, 1987.Google Scholar

Goertz, Gary and Levy, Jack S.. “Causal Explanation, Necessary Conditions, and Case Studies,” in Goertz, Gary and Levy, Jack S. (eds.), Explaining War and Peace: Case Studies and Necessary Condition Counterfactuals. London: Routledge, 2007, pp. 9–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gooch, George P.Franco-German Relations, 1871–1914. London: Longman, Green, 1923.Google Scholar

Gooch, George P., Temperley, Harold, and Penson, Lillian (eds.). British Documents on the Origins of the War 1898–1914, 11 vols. London: HMSO, 1926–1938.

Gordon, Michael. “Domestic Conflict and the Origins of the First World War,” Journal of Modern History 46(2) (1974): 191–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gregory, Paul R.Russian National Income, 1885–1913. Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Gutsche, Willibald. Aufstieg und Fall eines kaiserlichen Reichskanzlers: Theobald von Bethmann Hollweg, 1856–1921. Ein politisches Lebensbild. East Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1973.Google Scholar

Haber, Stephen, Kennedy, David M., and Krasner, Stephen D.. “Brothers Under the Skin: Diplomatic History and International Relations,” International Security 22(1) (1997): 34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halfond, Irwin. Maurice Paléologue: The Diplomat, the Writer, the Man, and the Third French Republic. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 2007.Google Scholar

Hall, Richard. The Balkan Wars, 1912–1913: Prelude to the First World War. London: Routledge, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halpern, Paul G.The Mediterranean Naval Situation 1908–1914. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Hamilton, Richard F. and Herwig, Holger H. (eds.). The Origins of the First World War. Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRef

Hamilton, Richard F. and Herwig, Holger H. (eds.). War Planning 1914. Cambridge University Press, 2010.

Harris, J. Paul. “Great Britain,” in Hamilton, Richard F. and Herwig, Holger H. (eds.), The Origins of World War I. Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp. 266–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayne, M. B.The French Foreign Office and the Origins of the First World War. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Helmreich, E. C.The Diplomacy of the Balkan Wars, 1912–1913. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1938.Google Scholar

Herrmann, David G.The Arming of Europe and the Making of the First World War. Princeton University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Herwig, Holger H. “Germany,” in Hamilton, Richard F. and Herwig, Holger H. (eds.), The Origins of World War I. Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp. 150–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herwig, Holger H. “Why Did It Happen?” in Hamilton, Richard F. and Herwig, Holger H. (eds.), The Origins of World War I. Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp. 443–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herwig, Holger H.The First World War: Germany and Austria-Hungary, 1914–1918. London: Arnold, 1997.Google Scholar

Herwig, Holger H. “Strategic Uncertainties of a Nation-State: Prussia–Germany, 1871–1918,” in Murray, Williamson, Knox, MacGregor, and Bernstein, Alvin (eds.), The Making of Strategy: Rulers, States, and War. Cambridge University Press, 1994, pp. 242–277.Google Scholar

Hewitson, Mark. Germany and the Causes of the First World War. Oxford: Berg, 2004.Google Scholar

Hildebrand, Klaus. Das Vergangene Reich: Deutsche Außenpolitik zwischen Bismarck und Hitler. Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt, 1995.Google Scholar

Hillgruber, Andreas. Deutsche Großmacht- und Weltpolitik im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert. Düsseldorf: Droste, 1979.Google Scholar

Höbelt, Lothar. Franz Joseph I. Der Kaiser und sein Reich: Eine politische Geschichte. Vienna: Böhlau, 2009.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Dieter. Der Sprung ins Dunkle: Oder Wie der 1. Weltkrieg entfesselt Wurde. Leipzig: Militzke, 2010.Google Scholar

Höhne, Heinz. Der Krieg im Dunkeln: Macht und Einfluß der deutschen und russischen Geheimdienste. Munich: C. Bertelsmann, 1985.Google Scholar

Holsti, Ole R. “Historians, Social Scientists, and Crisis Management: An Alternative View,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 24(4) (1980): 665–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holsti, Ole R.Crisis, Escalation, War. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hopman, Albert. Das ereignisreiche Leben eines “Wilhelminers”: Tagebücher, Briefe, Aufzeichnungen 1901 bis 1920, ed. Epkenhans, Michael. Munich: Oldenbourg, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horn, Martin. Britain, France, and the Financing of the First World War. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Horne, John. Labour at War: France and Britain, 1914–1918. Oxford University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hosking, Geoffrey A.The Russian Constitutional Experiment: Government and Duma, 1907–1914. Cambridge University Press, 1973.Google Scholar

Hötzendorf, Franz Conrad. Aus meiner Dienstzeit, 1906–1918, 5 vols. Vienna: Rikola, 1921–1925.Google Scholar

Howard, Michael. Clausewitz: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huddy, Leonie, Sears, David O., and Levy, Jack S. (eds.). Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, 2013.CrossRef

Imlay, Talbot and Horn, Martin. “Thinking about War: French Financial Preparations and the Coming of the Two World Wars,” International History Review 27(4) (2005): 709–753.Google Scholar

Janorschke, Johannes. Bismarck, Europa, und die “Krieg in Sicht”-Krise von 1875. Paderborn: Schöningh, 2010.Google Scholar

Jarausch, Konrad H. “Statesmen versus Structure: Germany’s Role in the Outbreak of World War One Reconsidered,” Laurentian University Review 5(3) (1973): 133–160.Google Scholar

Jarausch, Konrad H.The Enigmatic Chancellor: Bethmann-Hollweg and the Hubris of Imperial Germany. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1973.Google Scholar

Jarausch, Konrad H. “The Illusion of Limited War: Chancellor Bethmann-Hollweg’s Calculated Risk, July 1914,” Central European History 2(1) (1969): 48–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jeismann, Karl-Ernst. Das Problem des Präventivkrieges im europäischen Staatensystem mit besonderem Blick auf die Bismarckzeit. Freiburg: Alber, 1957.Google Scholar

Jelavich, Barbara. Russia’s Balkan Entanglements, 1806–1914. Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Jelavich, Barbara. “What the Habsburg Government Knew about the Black Hand,” Austrian History Yearbook 22(10) (1991): 131–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jeřábek, Rudolf. Potiorek: General im Schatten von Sarajevo. Graz: Verlag Styria, 1991.Google Scholar

Jervis, Robert. System Effects: Complexity in Political and Social Life. Princeton University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Jervis, Robert. “Cooperation under the Security Dilemma,” World Politics 30(2) (1978): 167–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jervis, Robert. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton University Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Joffre, Marshal Joseph. Mémoires du Maréchal Joffre 1910–1917. Paris: Plon, 1932, vol. 1, pp. 216–218.Google Scholar

Joll, James. The Origins of the First World War. New York: Longman, 1984.Google Scholar

Joly, Bertrand. “La France et la revanche, 1871–1914,” Revue d’histoire moderne et contemporaine 46(2) (1999): 325–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahneman, Daniel. “The Surety of Fools,” New York Times Magazine, October 23, 2011, pp. 30–33, 62.Google Scholar

Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 2011.Google Scholar

Kahneman, Daniel and Renshon, Jonathan. “Why Hawks Win,” Foreign Policy 158 (2007): 34–38.Google Scholar

Kaiser, David E. “Germany and the Origins of the First World War,” Journal of Modern History 55(3) (1983): 442–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keiger, John F. V.France and the World since 1870. London: Arnold, 2001.Google Scholar

Keiger, John F. V.Raymond Poincaré. Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keiger, John F. V. “France,” in Wilson, Keith (ed.), Decisions for War, 1914. New York: St Martin’s Press, 1995, pp. 121–149.Google Scholar

Keiger, John F. V.France and the Origins of the First World War. London: Macmillan, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennan, George F.The Decline of Bismarck’s European Order: Franco-Russian Relations, 1875–1890. Princeton University Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Kennedy, Paul M.The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000. New York: Random House, 1987.Google Scholar

Kennedy, Paul M. “The First World War and the International Power System,” International Security 9(1) (1984): 7–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennedy, Paul M.The Rise of the Anglo-German Naval Rivalry, 1860–1914. London: Allen & Unwin, 1982.Google Scholar

Kennedy, Paul M.The Rise of Anglo-German Antagonism, 1860–1914. London: Allen & Unwin, 1980.Google Scholar

Kennedy, Paul M. (ed.). The War Plans of the Great Powers, 1880–1914. Boston, MA: Allen & Unwin, 1979.

Keylor, William. “Versailles and International Diplomacy,” in Boemeke, Manfred F., Feldman, Gerald D., and Glaser, Elisabeth (eds.), The Treaty of Versailles: A Reassessment after 75 Years. Cambridge University Press, 1998, pp. 469–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kiesling, Eugenia. “France,” in Hamilton, Richard F. and Herwig, Holger (eds.), The Origins of World War I. Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Kießling, Friedrich, Gegen den “Großen Krieg”? Entspannung in den internationalen Beziehungen, 1911–1914. Munich: Oldenbourg, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kloster, Walter. Der deutsche Generalstab und der Präventivkriegsgedanke. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1932.Google Scholar

Koch, H. W. (ed.). The Origins of the First World War, 2nd edn. London: Macmillan, 1984.CrossRef

Kokovtsov, Vladimir N.Iz moego prozhlogo. Vospominaniia. 1903–1919 gg., 2 vols. Moscow: Nauka, 1992.Google Scholar

Korelin, A. P. (ed.) (for Rossiskaya Akademiya Nauk/Institut Rossiiskoi Istorii). Rossiya 1913 God: Statistiko-dokumental’nyi Spravochnik. St. Petersburg: Blits, 1995.

Kriegel, A. and Becker, J-J.. 1914: La guerre et le mouvement ouvrier français. Paris: Armand Colin, 1964.Google Scholar

Krivoshein, K. A.A. V. Krivoshein (1857–1921 g.). Ego znachenie v istorii Rossii nachala XX veka. Paris: P.I.U.F., 1973.Google Scholar

Kronenbitter, Günther. “Krieg im Frieden”: Die Führung der k.u.k. Armee und die Großmachtpolitik Österreich-Ungarns, 1906–1914. Munich: Oldenbourg, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krüger, Peter. “Von Bismarck zu Hitler? Die Agonie des Europäischen Staatensystems 1938/1939,” in Krüger, Peter (ed.), Kontinuität und Wandel in der Staatenordnung der Neuzeit. Marburg: Hitzeroth, 1991, pp. 69–85.Google Scholar

Krumeich, Gerd. Armaments and Politics in France on the Eve of the First World War. Oxford: Berg, 1984.Google Scholar

Lambert, Nicholas A.Planning Armageddon: British Economic Warfare and the First World War. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lambert, Nicholas A.Sir John Fisher’s Naval Revolution. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Langdon, John. July 1914: The Long Debate, 1918–1990. New York: Berg, 1991.Google Scholar

Lappenküper, Ulrich. Die Mission Radowitz: Untersuchungen zur Rußlandspolitik Otto von Bismarcks 1871–1875. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1990.Google Scholar

Lebow, Richard N. “Franz Ferdinand Found Alive: World War I Unnecessary,” in Forbidden Fruit: Counterfactuals and International Relations. Princeton University Press, 2010, ch. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lebow, Richard N.A Cultural Theory of International Relations. Cambridge University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lebow, Richard N. “Contingency, Catalysts, and Nonlinear Change: The Origins of World War I,” in Goertz, Gary and Levy, Jack S. (eds.), Explaining War: Case Studies and Necessary Condition Counterfactuals. London: Routledge, 2007, pp. 85–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lebow, Richard N. “Contingency Catalysts and International System Change,” Political Science Quarterly 115(4) (2000): 591–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lebow, Richard N. “Windows of Opportunity: Do States Jump through Them?” International Security 9(1) (1984): 147–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lebow, Richard N.Between Peace and War. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

LeDonne, John P.The Russian Empire and the World, 1700–1917: The Geopolitics of Expansion and Contraction. Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Lemke, Doug. Regions of War and Peace. Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lepsius, Johannes, Mendelssohn-Bartholdy, Albrecht, and Thimme, Friedrich (eds.). Die Grosse Politik der Europäischen Kabinette, 1871–1914, 40 vols. Berlin: Deutsche Verlagsgesellschaft für Politik & Geschichte, 1922–1927.

Leslie, John. “The Antecedents of Austria-Hungary’s War Aims: Policies and Policy-Makers in Vienna and Budapest before and during 1914,” in Springer, Elisabeth and Kammerhold, Leopold (eds.), Archiv und Forschung: Das Haus-, Hof- und Staatsarchiv in seiner Bedeutung für die Geschichte Österreichs und Europas. Vienna: Verlag für Geschichte & Politik, 1993, pp. 307–394.Google Scholar

Leslie, John. “Österreich-Ungarn vor dem Kriegsausbruch: Der Ballhausplatz in Wien im Juli 1914 aus der Sicht eines Österreichisch-Ungarischen Diplomaten,” in Melville, Ralph, Scharf, Claus, Vogt, Martin, and Wengenroth, Ulrich (eds.), Deutschland und Europa in der Neuzeit. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 1988, pp. 661–684.Google Scholar

Levy, Jack S. “The Initiation and Spread of the First World War: Interdependent Decisions,” Foreign Policy Analysis 7(2) (2011): 183–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levy, Jack S. “Preventive War: Concept and Propositions,” International Interactions 37(1) (2011): 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levy, Jack S. “Counterfactuals and Case Studies,” in Box-Steffensmeier, Janet, Brady, Henry, and Collier, David (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. Oxford University Press, 2008, pp. 627–644.Google Scholar

Levy, Jack S. “Preventive War and Democratic Politics,” Presidential Address to the International Studies Association, International Studies Quarterly 52(1) (2008): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levy, Jack S. “The Role of Necessary Conditions in the Outbreak of World War I,” in Goertz, Gary and Levy, Jack S. (eds.), Explaining War and Peace: Case Studies and Necessary Condition Counterfactuals. London: Routledge, 2007, pp. 47–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levy, Jack S. “Political Psychology and Foreign Policy,” in Sears, David O., Huddy, Leonie, and Jervis, Robert (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003, pp. 253–284.Google Scholar

Levy, Jack S. “Explaining Events and Developing Theories: History, Political Science, and the Analysis of International Relations,” in Elman, Colin and Elman, Miriam Fendius (eds.), Bridges and Boundaries: Historians, Political Scientists, and the Study of International Relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001, pp. 39–84.Google Scholar

Levy, Jack S. “Prospect Theory, Rational Choice, and International Relations,” International Studies Quarterly 41(1) (1997): 87–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levy, Jack S. “Preferences, Constraints, and Choices in July 1914,” International Security 15(3) (1990/1): 151–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levy, Jack S. “The Diversionary Theory of War: A Critique,” in Midlarsky, Manus I. (ed.), Handbook of War Studies. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman, 1989, pp. 259–288.Google Scholar

Levy, Jack S. “Declining Power and the Preventive Motivation for War,” World Politics 40(1) (1987): 82–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levy, Jack S. “Organizational Routines and the Causes of War,” International Studies Quarterly 30(2) (1986): 193–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levy, Jack S. and Gochal, Joseph R.. “Democracy and Preventive War: Israel and the 1956 Sinai Campaign,” Security Studies 11(2) (2001/2): 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levy, Jack S. and Thompson, William R.. Causes of War. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.Google Scholar

Levy, Jack S., Christenson, Thomas J., and Trachtenberg, Marc. “Correspondence: Mobilization and Inadvertence in the July Crisis,” International Security 16(1) (1991): 189–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lieber, Keir A. “The New History of World War I and What it Means for International Relations Theory,” International Security 32(2) (2007): 155–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lieber, Keir A.War and the Engineers: The Primacy of Politics over Technology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Lieven, Dominic. Nicholas II: Emperor of All the Russias. London: Pimlico, 1993.Google Scholar

Lieven, Dominic. Russia and the Origins of the First World War. New York: Macmillan, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lieven, Dominic. “Pro-Germans and Russian Foreign Policy, 1890–1914,” International History Review 2(1) (1980): 34–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lindblom, Charles E. “The Science of Muddling Through,” Public Administration Review 19(2) (1959): 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lindemann, Thomas. Die Macht der Perzeptionen und Perzeptionen von Mächten. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2000.Google Scholar

Lloyd George, David. War Memoirs, 2 vols. London: Odhams Press, 1938.Google Scholar

Lobell, Steven E. “Bringing Balancing Back In: Britain’s Targeted Balancing, 1936–1939,” Journal of Strategic Studies 35(6) (2012): 747–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Louis, Georges. Les carnets de Georges Louis, 1908–1917, 2 vols. Paris: F. Rieder, 1926.Google Scholar

Luneva, Iu. V.Bosfor i Dardanelly: Tainye provokatsii nakanune Pervoi mirovoi voiny 1907–1914. Moscow: Kvadriga, 2010.Google Scholar

Lustick, Ian. “History, Historiography, and Political Science: Multiple Historical Records and the Problem of Selection Bias,” American Political Science Review 90(3) (1996): 605–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lynn, John. “The Embattled Future of Academic Military History,” Journal of Military History 61(4) (1997): 777–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lynn-Jones, Sean M. “Detente and Deterrence: Anglo-German Relations, 1911–1914,” International Security 11(2) (1986): 121–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacKenzie, David. The “Black Hand” on Trial: Salonika, 1917. New York: East European Monographs, 1995.Google Scholar

MacKenzie, David. Apis, the Congenial Conspirator: The Life of Colonel Dragutin Dimitrijević. Boulder, CO: East European Monographs, 1989.Google Scholar

McDonald, David MacLaren. United Government and Foreign Policy in Russia, 1900–1914. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McDonald, Patrick J.The Invisible Hand of Peace: Capitalism, The War Machine, and International Relations Theory. Cambridge University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McMeekin, Sean. July 1914: Countdown to War. New York: Basic Books, 2013.Google Scholar

McMeekin, Sean. The Russian Origins of the First World War. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mandelstam, Andrei N. “La politique russe d’accès à la Méditerranée au XXe siècle,” Recueil des Cours 47 (1934): 603–802.Google Scholar

Mansbach, Richard W. and Vasquez, John A.. In Search of Theory: A New Paradigm for Global Politics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Maoz, Zeev, Terris, Lesley C., Kuperman, Ranan D., and Talmud, Ilan, “What is the Enemy of My Enemy? Causes and Consequences of Imbalanced International Relations,” Journal of Politics 69(1) (2007): 100–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marder, Arthur (ed.). Fear God and Dread Nought: The Correspondence of the Admiral of the Fleet Lord Fisher of Kilverstone, 3 vols. London: Jonathan Cape, 1952–1959.

Marks, Sally. “Smoke-filled Rooms and the Galerie des Glaces,” in Boemeke, Manfred, Feldman, Gerald, and Glaser, Elisabeth (eds.), The Treaty of Versailles: A Reassessment after 75 Years. Cambridge University Press, 1998, pp. 337–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marshall, Alex. “Russian Military Intelligence, 1905–1917: The Untold Story behind Tsarist Russia in the First World War,” War in History 11(4) (2004): 393–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maurer, John. “Field Marshal Conrad von Hötzendorf and the Outbreak of the First World War,” in Otte, T. G. and Pagedas, Constantine A. (eds.), Personalities, War, and Diplomacy: Essays in International History. London: Frank Cass, 1997, pp. 38–65.Google Scholar

Maurer, John. The Outbreak of the First World War: Strategic Planning, Crisis Decision-Making and Deterrence Failure. Westport, CT: Praeger, 1995.Google Scholar

Mayeur, Jean Marie. La vie politique sous la Troisième République. Paris: Seuil, 1984.Google Scholar

Menning, Bruce W. “The Mobilization Crises of 1912 and 1914 in Russian Perspective: Neglected and Overlooked Linkages,” forthcoming.

Menning, Bruce W. “War Planning and Initial Operations in the Russian Context,” in Hamilton, Richard F. and Herwig, Holger H. (eds.), War Planning 1914. Cambridge University Press, 2010, pp. 80–142.Google Scholar

Menning, Bruce W. “Pieces of the Puzzle: The Role of Iu. N. Danilov and M. V. Alekseev in Russian War Planning before 1914,” International History Review 25(4) (2003): 775–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meyer-Arndt, Lüder. Die Julikrise 1914: Wie Deutschland in den Ersten Weltkrieg stolperte. Cologne: Böhlau, 2006.Google Scholar

Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniia v Epokhu Imperializma, 3rd series. Moscow: Gos. sots., 1931–1940.

Midlarsky, Manus I.The Onset of World War. Boston, MA: Allen & Unwin, 1988.Google Scholar

Miquel, Pierre. Poincaré. Paris: Fayard, 1984.Google Scholar

Mombauer, Annika. “The Fischer Controversy, Documents, and the ‘Truth’ about the Origins of the First World War,” Journal of Contemporary History 48(2) (2013): 290–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mombauer, Annika. The Origins of the First World War: Diplomatic and Military Documents. Manchester University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Mombauer, Annika. (ed.). “Special Issue: The Fischer Controversy after 50 Years,” Journal of Contemporary History 48(2) (2013): 231–417.CrossRef

Mombauer, Annika. “German War Plans,” in Hamilton, Richard F. and Herwig, Holger H. (eds.), War Planning 1914. Cambridge University Press, 2010, pp. 48–79.Google Scholar

Mombauer, Annika. “The First World War, Avoidable, Improbable or Desirable? Recent Interpretations on War Guilt and the War’s Origins,” Germany History 25(1) (2007): 78–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mombauer, Annika. “Of War Plans and War Guilt: The Debate Surrounding the Schlieffen Plan,” Journal of Strategic Studies 28(5) (2005): 857–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mombauer, Annika. The Origins of the First World War: Controversies and Consensus. New York: Longman, 2002.Google Scholar

Mombauer, Annika. Helmuth von Moltke and the Origins of the First World War. Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mommsen, Wolfgang J. “Max Weber and the Peace Treaty of Versailles,” in Boemeke, Manfred F., Feldman, Gerald D., and Glaser, Elisabeth (eds.), The Treaty of Versailles: A Reassessment after 75 Years. Cambridge University Press, 1998, pp. 535–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mommsen, Wolfgang J. “Domestic Factors in German Foreign Policy before 1914,” in Mommsen, Wolfgang J. (ed.), Imperial Germany, 1867–1914. London: Arnold, 1995.Google Scholar

Mommsen, Wolfgang J. “Domestic Factors in German Foreign Policy before 1914,” Central European History 6(1) (1973): 3–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montgelas, Max and Schücking, Walter (eds.). Outbreak of the World War: German Documents, 4 vols., collected by Kautsky, Karl. New York: Oxford University Press, 1919; trans. in one volume, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1924.Google Scholar

Moran, Daniel. Strategic Insights: Preventive War and the Crisis of July 1914. Monterey, CA: Center of Contemporary Conflict, 2002.Google Scholar

Morgenthau, Hans J.Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, rev. 5th edn. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1978.

Moritz, Albrecht. Das Problem des Präventivkrieges in der deutschen Politik während der erstern Marokkokrise. Bern: Peter Lang, 1974.Google Scholar

Most, Benjamin and Starr, Harvey. “International Relations Theory, Foreign Policy Substitutability and ‘Nice’ Laws,” World Politics 36(3) (1984): 383–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mulligan, William. The Origins of the First World War. Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Musulin, Alexander. Das Haus am Ballplatz: Erinnerungen eines österreich-ungarischen Diplomaten. Munich: Verlag für Kulturpolitik, 1924.Google Scholar

Neiberg, Michael S.Dance of the Furies: Europe and the Outbreak of World War I. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neilson, Keith. Britain and the Last Tsar: British Policy towards Russia, 1894–1917. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neilson, Keith. “‘My Beloved Russians’: Sir Arthur Nicolson and Russia, 1906–1914,” International History Review 9(4) (1987): 521–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neitzel, Sönke. Kriegsausbruch: Deutschlands Weg in die Katastrophe. Munich: Pendo, 2002.Google Scholar

Nichols, Thomas N. “Anarchy and World Order in the New Age of Prevention,” World Policy Journal 22(3) (2005): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nicolson, Harold. Lord Carnock: A Study in the Old Diplomacy. London: Constable, 1937.Google Scholar

Offer, Avner. “Going to War in 1914: A Matter of Honor?” Politics & Society 23(2) (1995): 213–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Organski, A. F. K. and Kugler, Jacek. The War Ledger. University of Chicago Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Otte, T. G. “Détente 1914: Sir William Tyrrell’s Secret Mission to Germany,” Historical Journal 56(4) (2013): 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Otte, Thomas G.The Foreign Office Mind: The Making of British Foreign Policy, 1865–1914. Cambridge University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paléologue, Maurice, Au quai d’Orsay à la veille de la tourmente: Journal 1913–1914. Paris: Plon, 1947.Google Scholar

Palmer, Robert R.A History of the Modern World. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1951.Google Scholar

Perrow, Charles. Normal Accidents: Living with High Risk Technologies. New York: Basic Books, 1984.Google Scholar

Poincaré, Raymond. Au service de la France, 7 vols. Paris: Plon, 1928.Google Scholar

Pokrovskii, Mikhail N. (ed.). Die International Beziehungen im Zeitalter des Imperialismus, 3rd series, 4 vols. Berlin: Reimar Hobbing, 1939–1943.

Pokrovskii, Mikhail N.Vneshniaia politika Rossii v XX veke: populiarnyi ocherk. Moscow: Izd-vo Kommun. Un-ta im IA. M. Sverdlova, 1926.Google Scholar

Radziwill, Marie. Briefe vom deutschen Kaiserhof, 1889–1915. Berlin: Ullstein, 1936.Google Scholar

Ralston, David R.The Army of the Republic: The Military and the Political Evolution of France, 1871–1914. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Rasler, Karen and Thompson, William R.. The Great Powers and Global Struggle, 1490–1990. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky, 1994.Google Scholar

Rasler, Karen and Thompson, William R.. “Global Wars, Public Debts and the Long Cycle,” World Politics 35(4) (1983): 489–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rauchensteiner, Manfred. Der Tod des Doppeladlers: Österreich-Ungarn und der Erste Weltkrieg. Graz: Styria Verlag, 1993.Google Scholar

Rauh, M. “Die britisch–russische Marinekonvention von 1914 und der Ausbruch des Ersten Weltkriegs,” Militärgeschichtliche Mitteilungen 47(10) (1987): 37–62.Google Scholar

Reichsarchiv, . Der Weltkrieg, 1914–1918, vol. 1: Kriegsrüstung und Kriegswirtschaft. Berlin: Mittler, 1930.Google Scholar

Reiter, Dan. “Exploding the Powder Keg Myth: Preemptive Wars Almost Never Happen,” International Security 20(2) (1995): 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Renouvin, Pierre. Les origines immédiates de la guerre, 28 juin–4 août 1914. Paris: Costes, 1924.Google Scholar

Renshon, Jonathan B.Why Leaders Choose War: The Psychology of Prevention. Westport, CT: Praeger, 2006.Google Scholar

Reynolds, Michael A.Shattering Empires: The Clash and Collapse of the Ottoman and Russian Empires 1908–1918. Cambridge University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ribot, A. (ed.). Journal d’Alexandre Ribot et correspondances inédites, 1914–22. Paris: Plon, 1936.

Rich, David A. “Russia,” in Hamilton, Richard F. and Herwig, Holger H. (eds.), The Origins of World War I. Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp. 188–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Richardson, James L.Crisis Diplomacy: The Great Powers since the Mid-Nineteenth Century. Cambridge University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rider, Toby J. “Understanding Arms Races Onset: Rivalry, Threat, and Territorial Competition,” Journal of Politics 71(2) (2009): 693–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rider, Toby J., Findley, Michael, and Diehl, Paul F.. “Just Part of the Game? Arms Races, Rivalry and War,” Journal of Peace Research 48(1) (2011): 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Riezler, K.Tagebücher, Aufsätze, Dokumente, ed. Erdmann, Karl D.. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1972.Google Scholar

Ripsman, Norrin M. and Levy, Jack S.. “The Preventive War that Never Happened: Britain, France, and the Rise of Germany in the 1930s,” Security Studies 16(1) (2007): 32–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ritter, Gerhard. The Sword and the Scepter, 4 vols., trans. Norden, Heins. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Ritter, Gerhard. The Schlieffen Plan: Critique of a Myth. New York: Praeger, 1958.Google Scholar

Robbins, Keith.Sir Edward Grey. London: Cassell, 1971.Google Scholar

Röhl, John C. G.Wilhelm II: Der Weg in den Abgrund 1900–1941. Munich: C. H. Beck, 2008.Google Scholar

Röhl, John C. G. “The Curious Case of the Kaiser’s Disappearing War Guilt: Wilhelm II in July 1914,” in Afflerbach, Holger and Stevenson, David (eds.), An Improbable War? The Outbreak of World War I and European Political Culture before 1914. New York: Berghahn, 2007, pp. 75–95.Google Scholar

Röhl, John C. G.The Kaiser and His Court: Wilhelm II and the Government of Germany. Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Röhl, John C. G. “Germany,” in Wilson, Keith (ed.), Decisions for War, 1914. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Röhl, John C. G. “V. Admiral Müller and the Approach of War,” Historical Journal 12(4) (1969): 651–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ropponen, Risto. Die Kraft Russlands. Helsinki: Turku, 1968.Google Scholar

Rose, Andreas. Zwischen Empire und Kontinent. Britische Außenpolitik vor dem Ersten Weltkrieg. Munich: Oldenbourg, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rossos, Andrew. Russia and the Balkans: Inter-Balkan Rivalries and Russian Foreign Policy 1908–1914. University of Toronto Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Rowe, David M. “The Tragedy of Liberalism: How Globalization Caused the First World War,” Security Studies 14(3) (2005): 407–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rüger, Jan. “Review Article: Revisiting the Anglo-German Antagonism,” Journal of Modern History 83(3) (2011): 579–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Russett, Bruce. “Cause, Surprise and No Escape,” Journal of Politics 24(1) (1962): 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sagan, Scott D. “1914 Revisited: Allies, Offense, and Instability,” International Security 11(2) (1986): 151–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sample, Susan G. “Military Buildups: Arming and War,” in Vasquez, John (ed.), What do We Know about War?Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2000, pp. 165–195.Google Scholar

Sanborn, Joshua. “Russian Historiography on the Origins of the First World War since the Fischer Controversy,” Journal of Contemporary History 48(2) (2013): 350–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sazonov, Sergei D.Fateful Years, 1906–1916. New York: Stokes, 1928.Google Scholar

Schaepdrijver, Sophie. La Belgique et la Première Guerre mondiale. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 2004.Google Scholar

Schilling, M. F.How the War Began in 1914. London: Allen & Unwin, 1925.Google Scholar

Schlieffen, Alfred. “War Today,” in Foley, Robert (ed.), Alfred von Schlieffen’s Military Writings. London: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar

Schmid, Michael. Der “Eiserne Kanzler” und die Generäle: Deutsche Rüstungspolitik in der Ära Bismarck 1871–1890. Paderborn: Schöningh, 2003.Google Scholar

Schmidt, Stefan. Frankreichs Außenpolitik in der Julikrise 1914: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des Ausbruchs des Ersten Weltkrieges. Munich: Oldenbourg, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmitt, Bernadotte E.The Coming of the War 1914, 2 vols. New York: Charles Scribner, 1930.Google Scholar

Schneider, Irmin. Die deutsche Russlandpolitik, 1890–1900. Paderborn: F. Schöningh, 2003.Google Scholar

Schoen, Wilhelm E.. Erlebtes: Beiträge zur politischen Geschichte der neuesten Zeit. Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt, 1921.Google Scholar

Schöllgen, Gregor. Imperialismus und Gleichgewicht: Deutschland, England und die orientalische Frage. Munich: Oldenbourg, 1992.Google Scholar

Schröder, Stephen. Die englisch–russische Marinekonvention: Das deutsche Reich und die Flottenverhandlungen der Tripleentente am Vorabend des Ersten Weltkrieges. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2006.Google Scholar

Schroeder, Paul W. “Preventive Wars to Restore and Stabilize the International System,” International Interactions 37(1) (2011): 96–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schroeder, Paul W. “Necessary Conditions and World War I as an Unavoidable War,” in Goertz, Gary and Levy, Jack S. (eds.), Explaining War and Peace: Case Studies and Necessary Condition Counterfactuals. London: Routledge, 2007, pp. 113–145.Google Scholar

Schroeder, Paul W. “Stealing Horses to Great Applause: Austria-Hungary’s Decision in 1914 in System Perspective,” in Afflerbach, Holger and Stevenson, David (eds.), An Improbable War? The Outbreak of World War I and European Political Culture. New York: Berghahn, 2007, pp. 17–42.Google Scholar

Schroeder, Paul W. “The Life and Death of a Long Peace, 1763–1914,” in Vayrynen, Raimo (ed.), The Waning of Major War: Contrary Views. London: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar

Schroeder, Paul W.Systems, Stability, and Statecraft: Essays on the International History of Modern Europe, eds. and Introduction Wetzel, David, Jervis, Robert, and Levy, Jack S.. New York: Palgrave, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schroeder, Paul W. “A Pointless Enduring Rivalry: France and the Habsburg Monarchy, 1715–1918,” in Thompson, William R. (ed.), Great Power Rivalries. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 1999, pp. 60–85.Google Scholar

Schroeder, Paul W. “World War I as Galloping Gertie: A Reply to Joachim Remak,” Journal of Modern History 44(3) (1972): 319–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schulin, E. “Walther Rathenaus Diotima: Lili Deutsch, ihre Familie und der Kreis um Gerhart Hauptmann,” in Wilderotter, H. (ed.), Die Extreme berühren sich: Walther Rathenau, 1867–1922. Berlin, Argon Verlag, 1994, pp. 55–66.Google Scholar

Schulte, B. F. “Neue Dokumente zu Kriegsausbruch und Kriegsverlauf,” Militärgeschichtliche Mitteilungen 25 (1979): 123–186.Google Scholar

Seligmann, Matthew S.The Royal Navy and the German Threat, 1901–1914: Admiralty Plans to Protect British Trade in a War Against Germany. Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Senese, Paul D. and Vasquez, John A.. The Steps to War: An Empirical Study. Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Serra, Enrico. “Lettres de Jules Cambon à Alberto Pansa,” Revue d’histoire diplomatique 116(1) (2002): 88.Google Scholar

Shatsillo, Kornelii F.Russkii imperializm i razvitie flota nakanune pervoi mirovoi voiny 1906–1914. Moscow: Nauka, 1968.Google Scholar

Shea, Patrick. “Financing Victory: Sovereign Credit, Democracy, and War,” Journal of Conflict Resolution (2013): .

Siegel, Jennifer. Endgame: Britain, Russia, and the Final Struggle for Central Asia. London: I. B. Tauris, 2002.Google Scholar

Silverstone, Scott A.Preventive War and American Democracy. New York: Routledge, 2007.Google Scholar

Smith, Woodruff D.The Ideological Origins of Nazi Imperialism. Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Snyder, JackMyths of Empire. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Snyder, Jack N. “Perceptions of the Security Dilemma in 1914,” in Jervis, Robert, Lebow, Richard Ned, and Gross, Janice (eds.), Psychology and Deterrence. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1985, pp. 153–179.Google Scholar

Snyder, Jack N. “Civil–Military Relations and the Cult of the Offensive, 1914 and 1984,” International Security 9(1) (1984): 20–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Snyder, Jack N.The Ideology of the Offensive: Military Decision Making and the Disasters of 1914. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Snyder, Jack and Lieber, Keir A.. “Correspondence: Defensive Realism and the ‘New’ History of World War I,” International Security 33(1) (2008): 174–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sondhaus, Lawrence. Franz Conrad von Hötzendorf: Architect of the Apocalypse. Boston, MA: Humanities Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Soroka, Marina E.Britain, Russia and the Road to the First World War: The Fateful Embassy of Count Aleksandr Benckendorff 1903–1916. Farnham: Ashgate, 2011.Google Scholar

Spaulding, Robert Mark. Osthandel and Ostpolitik: German Foreign Trade Policies in Eastern Europe from Bismarck to Adenauer. Providence, RI: Berghahn, 1997.Google Scholar

Steinberg, Jonathan. “The Copenhagen Complex,” Journal of Contemporary History 1(3) (1966): 23–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steiner, Zara S.The Lights That Failed: European International History, 1919–1933. Oxford University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steiner, Zara and Neilson, Keith. Britain and the Origins of the First World War, 2nd edn. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stengers, Jean. “1914: The Safety of Ciphers and the Outbreak of the First World War,” in Andrew, Christopher and Noakes, Jeremy (eds.), Intelligence and International Relations. University of Exeter Press, 1987, pp. 29–48.Google Scholar

Stevenson, David. “From Balkan Conflict to Global Conflict: The Spread of the First World War,” Foreign Policy Analysis 7(2) (2011): 169–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stevenson, David. “Was a Peaceful Outcome Thinkable? The European Land Armaments Race before 1914,” in Afflerbach, Holger and Stevenson, David (eds.), An Improbable War? The Outbreak of World War I and European Political Culture before 1914. New York: Berghahn, 2007, pp. 130–148.Google Scholar

Stevenson, David. Cataclysm: The First World War as Political Tragedy. New York: Basic Books, 2004.Google Scholar

Stevenson, David. “Militarization and Diplomacy in Europe before 1914,” International Security 22(1) (1997): 125–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stevenson, David. Armaments and the Coming of War: Europe, 1904–1914. Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Stieve, F. (ed.). Der diplomatische Schriftwechsel Iswolskis, 1911–1914, 4 vols. Berlin: Deutsche Verlagsgsellschaft für Politik & Geschichte, 1925.

Stone, James. The War Scare of 1875: Bismarck and Europe in the mid-1870s. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 2010.Google Scholar

Stone, Norman. The Eastern Front, 1914–1917. New York: Scribner, 1975.Google Scholar

Strachan, Hew. “Preemption and Prevention in Historical Perspective,” in Shue, Henry and Rodin, David (eds.), Preemption: Military Action and Moral Justification. Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Strachan, Hew. The Outbreak of the First World War. Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Strachan, Hew. The First World War, vol. 1: To Arms. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Strandmann, Hartmut P.. “Germany and the Coming of the War,” in Evans, R. J. W. and von Strandmann, Hartmut P. (eds.), The Coming of the First World War. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988, pp. 140–159.Google Scholar

Strandmann, Hartmut P.. (ed.). Walther Rathenau: Tagebuch, 1907–1922. Düsseldorf: Droste, 1967.

Streich, Philip and Levy, Jack S.. “Time Horizons, Discounting, and Intertemporal Choice,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 51(2) (2007): 199–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Szilassy, Julius. Der Untergang der Donau-Monarchie: Diplomatische Erinnerungen. Vienna: Neues Vaterland, 1921.Google Scholar

Tammen, Ronald L., Kugler, Jacek, Lemke, Douglas, Asharabati, Carole, Efird, Brian, and Organski, A. F. K., Power Transitions: Strategies for the 21st Century. New York: Chatham House, 2000.Google Scholar

Taylor, A. J. P.The Struggle for Mastery in Europe, 1848–1918. Oxford University Press, 1954.Google Scholar

Tetlock, Philip E. and Belkin, Aaron (eds.). Counterfactual Thought Experiments in International Relations: Logical, Methodological, and Psychological Perspectives. Princeton University Press, 1996.

Thompson, William R. “Powder Kegs, Sparks and World War I,” in Goertz, Gary and Levy, Jack S. (eds.), Explaining War and Peace: Case Studies and Necessary Condition Counterfactuals. London: Routledge, 2007, pp. 147–193.Google Scholar

Thompson, William R. “A Streetcar Named Sarajevo: Catalysts, Multiple Causation Chains, and Rivalry Structures,” International Studies Quarterly 47(3) (2003): 453–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thompson, William R. “Identifying Rivals and Rivalries in World Politics,” International Studies Quarterly 45(4) (2001): 557–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thompson, William R. (ed.). Great Power Rivalries. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 1999.

Thompson, William R.On Global War: Historical-Structural Approaches to World Politics. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 1988.

Thompson, William R. and Dreyer, David R.. Handbook of International Rivalries, 1494–2010. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Trachtenberg, Marc. History and Strategy. Princeton University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Trachtenberg, Marc. “The Meaning of Mobilization,” in Miller, Steven E., Lynn-Jones, Sean M., and Van Evera, Stephen (eds.), Military Strategy and the Origins of the First World War. Princeton University Press, 1991, pp. 195–225.Google Scholar

Trachtenberg, Marc. “The Meaning of Mobilization in 1914,” International Security 15(3) (1990/1): 120–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trumpener, Ulrich. “War Premeditated? German Intelligence Operations in July 1914,” Central European History 9(1) (1976): 58–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tuchman, Barbara. The Guns of August. New York: Macmillan, 1962.Google Scholar

Tunstall, Graydon A. “Austria-Hungary,” in Hamilton, Richard F. and Herwig, Holger H. (eds.), The Origins of World War I. Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp. 112–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turner, L. C. F. “The Russian Mobilisation in 1914,” in Kennedy, Paul (ed.), The War Plans of the Great Powers, 1880–1914. Boston, MA: Allen & Unwin, 1979, pp. 252–268.Google Scholar

Turner, L. C. F. “The Russian Mobilization in 1914,” Journal of Contemporary History 3(1) (1968): 65–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Valeriano, Brandon and Vasquez, John A.. “Identifying and Classifying Complex Wars,” International Studies Quarterly 54(2) (2008): 561–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Evera, Stephen. Causes of War: Power and the Roots of Conflict. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Evera, Stephen. “The Cult of the Offensive and the Origins of the First World War,” in Miller, Steven E., Lynn-Jones, Sean M., and Van Evera, Stephen (eds.), Military Strategy and the Origins of the First World War. Princeton University Press, 1991, pp. 59–108.Google Scholar

Evera, Stephen. “The Cult of the Offensive and the Origins of the First World War,” International Security 9(1) (1984): 58–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vasquez, John A.The War Puzzle Revisited. Cambridge University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vasquez, John A.The War Puzzle. Cambridge University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vasquez, John A., Diehl, Paul F., Flint, Colin, and Scheffran, Jürgen. “Forum on the Spread of War, 1914–1917: A Dialogue between Political Scientists and Historians,” Foreign Policy Analysis 7(2) (2011): 139–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vasquez, John A., Diehl, Paul F., Flint, Colin, Scheffran, Jürgen, Chi, Sang-Hyun, and Rider, Toby J.. “The ConflictSpace of Cataclysm: The International System and the Spread of War 1914–1917,” Foreign Policy Analysis 7(2) (2011): 143–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Verner, Andrew. The Crisis of Russian Autocracy: Nicholas II and the 1905 Revolution. Princeton University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Vogel, Barbara. Deutsche Rußlandpolitik: Das Scheitern der deutschen Weltpolitik unter Bülow, 1900–1906. Düsseldorf: Bertelsmann Universitätsverlag, 1973.Google Scholar

Vietsch, Eberhard. Bethmann Hollweg: Staatsmann zwischen Macht und Ethos. Boppard: Boldt, 1969.Google Scholar

Waltz, Kenneth N.Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1979.Google Scholar

Wayman, Frank W. “Bipolarity, Multipolarity, and the Threat of War,” in Sabrosky, Alan N. (ed.), Polarity and War: The Changing Structure of International Conflict. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1985, pp. 115–144.Google Scholar

Weinroth, H. S. “British Radicals and the Balance of Power, 1902–1914,” Historical Journal 13(4) (1970): 653–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weitsman, Patricia A.Dangerous Alliances: Proponents of Peace, Weapons of War. Stanford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Williamson, Samuel R. “General Henry Wilson, Ireland, and the Great War,” in Louis, Wm. Roger (ed.). Resurgent Adventures with Britannia: Personalities, Politics and Culture in Britain. London: I. B. Tauris, 2011, pp. 91–105.Google Scholar

Williamson, Samuel R. “Austria-Hungary and the Coming of the First World War,” in May, Ernest R., Rosecrance, Richard, and Steiner, Zara (eds.), History and Neorealism. Cambridge University Press, 2010, pp. 103–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williamson, Samuel R. “Leopold Count Berchtold: The Man Who Could Have Prevented the Great War,” in Bischof, Günter, Plasser, Fritz, and Berger, Peter (eds.), From Empire to Republic: Post-World War I Austria. University of New Orleans Press, 2010, pp. 24–51.Google Scholar

Williamson, Samuel R. “Aggressive and Defensive Aims of Political Elites? Austro-Hungarian Policy in 1914,” in Afflerbach, Holger and Stevenson, David (eds.), An Improbable War? The Outbreak of World War I and European Political Culture before 1914. New York: Berghahn, 2007, pp. 61–74.Google Scholar

Williamson, Samuel R. “Confrontation with Serbia: The Consequences of Vienna’s Failure to Achieve Surprise in July 1914,” Mitteilungen des Österreichischen Staatsarchivs (1993): 167–177.Google Scholar

Williamson, Samuel R.Austria-Hungary and the Origins of the First World War. New York: Macmillan, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williamson, Samuel R. “Military Dimensions of Habsburg–Romanov Relations during the Era of the Balkan Wars,” in Király, Béla K. and Djordjevic, Dimitrije (eds.), East Central European Society and the Balkan Wars. New York: Columbia University Press, 1987, pp. 317–337.Google Scholar

Williamson, Samuel R. “Theories of Organizational Process and Foreign Policy Outcomes,” in Lauren, Paul G. (ed.), Diplomatic History: New Approaches. New York: Free Press, 1979, pp. 137–161.Google Scholar

Williamson, Samuel R.The Politics of Grand Strategy: Britain and France Prepare for War, 1904–1914. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1969 (reprinted London: Ashfield, 1990).Google Scholar

Williamson, Samuel R. and May, Ernest R.. “An Identity of Opinions: Historians and July 1914,” Journal of Modern History 79(2) (2007): 335–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williamson, Samuel R. and Van Wyk, Russel (eds.). July 1914: Soldiers, Statesmen and the Coming of the Great War: A Brief Documentary History. Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2003.

Wilson, Keith M. (ed.). Decisions for War, 1914. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1995.

Wilson, Keith M.The Policy of the Ententes: Essays in the Determinants of British Foreign Policy. Cambridge University Press, 1985.CrossRef

Wohlforth, William C. “The Perception of Power: Russia in the Pre-1914 Balance,” World Politics 39(3) (1987): 353–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wolff, Theodor. Tagebücher 1914–1919, ed. Sösemann, Bernd. Boppard: Harald Boldt, 1984.Google Scholar

Würthle, Friedrich. “Dokumente zum Sarajevoprozess,” Mitteilungen des Österreichischen Staatsarchivs, Erganzungsband 9. Vienna, 1978.Google Scholar

Würthle, Friedrich. Die Spur führt nach Belgrad: Die Hintergründe des Dramas von Sarajevo 1914. Vienna: Fritz Molden, 1975.Google Scholar

Yamamoto, Yoshinobu and Bremer, Stuart A.. “Wider Wars and Restless Nights: Major Power Intervention in Ongoing War,” in Singer, J. David (ed.), The Correlates of War: vol. 2: Testing some Realpolitik Models. New York: Free Press, 1980, pp. 199–229.Google Scholar

Zagare, Frank C.The Games of July: Explaining the Great War. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zakher, Ia. “Konstantinopol’ i prolivy,” Krasnyi arkhiv 6 (1924): 48–76, 7 (1924): 32–54.Google Scholar

Zechlin, Egmont. Krieg und Kriegsrisiko: zur deutschen Politik im Ersten Weltkrieg. Düsseldorf: Droste, 1979.Google Scholar

Zeman, Zbyněk Anthony Bohuslav, “The Balkans and the Coming of War,” in Evans, R. J. W. and von Strandmann, Hartmut P. (eds.), The Coming of the First World War. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988, pp. 19–32.Google Scholar

Zernack, K. “Das preußische Königstum, und die polnische Republik im europäischen Mächtesystem des 18. Jahrhundert,” in Fischer, Wolfram and Müller, Michael G. (eds.), Preußen–Deutschland–Polen: Aufsätze zur Geschichte der deutsch–polnischen Beziehungen. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1991.Google Scholar

Zuber, Terence. Inventing the Schlieffen Plan: German War Planning 1871–1914. Oxford University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zuber, Terence. “The Schlieffen Plan Reconsidered,” War in History 6(3) (1999): 262–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar