In 1885, Morris wrote an editorial response in Commonweal to some comments made by ‘a friend’, who had written in, ‘deprecating a forcible revolution; it would be better, he says, to obtain justice without violence, lest we should have violence without justice.’ Morris does not wholly accept this view:

Morris makes an important distinction here, between the hidden, coercive violence of ‘the system’ and the reactive violence of revolution. ‘The system’ that has made the poor miserable exercises what Pierre Bourdieu describes as ‘symbolic violence’, which is concerned with the social outcomes of coercive ideology, and results in both class inequality and physical suffering. Morris is willing to countenance violent revolution if necessary as both an inevitable result of and a necessary end to the misery and symbolic violence that he elsewhere attributes to ‘modern civilization’. This is a willingness borne out repeatedly in letters of the 1880s and 1890s, as well as in his fiction, poetry and political writing of this period.