Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T13:04:02.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2013

Natalie Schilling
Affiliation:
Georgetown University, Washington DC
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adger, Carolyn Temple and Schilling-Estes, Natalie 2003. African American English: Structure and Clinical Implications. Rockville, MD: American Speech–Language–Hearing Association.Google Scholar
Allen, Harold B. (ed.) 1973. The Linguistic Atlas of the Upper Midwest. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Ash, Sharon 2003. A National Survey of North American Dialects. Publication of the American Dialect Society 88(1): 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter (ed.) 2007. Style and Social Identities: Alternative Approaches to Linguistic Heterogeneity. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bailey, Guy and Bernstein, Cynthia 1989. Methodology for a Phonological Survey of Texas. Journal of English Linguistics 22: 6–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Guy and Tillery, Jan 2004. Some Sources of Divergent Data in Sociolinguistics. In Fought, Carmen (ed.), Sociolinguistic Variation: Critical Reflections. Oxford University Press, 11–30.Google Scholar
Bailey, Guy, Wikle, Tom, Tillery, Jan, and Sand, Lori 1991. The Apparent Time Construct. Language Variation and Change 3: 241–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Guy, Tillery, Jan, and Wikle, Tom 1997a. Methodology of a Survey of Oklahoma Dialects. SECOL Review 21: 1–30.Google Scholar
Bailey, Guy, Wikle, Tom, and Tillery, Jan 1997b. The Effects of Methods on Results in Dialectology. English World-Wide 18: 35–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bamberger, Robert and Brylawski, Samuel 2010. The State of Recorded Sound Preservation in the United States: A National Legacy at Risk in the Digital Age. Washington, DC: National Recording Preservation Board.Google Scholar
Barrett, Rusty 1995. “Supermodels of the World, Unite!”: Political Economy and the Language of Performance among African American Drag Queens. In Leap, William (ed.), Beyond the Lavender Lexicon: Authenticity, Imagination, and Appropriation in Lesbian and Gay Languages. Newark, NJ: Gordon and Breach, 203–223.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie 2002. Inferring Variation and Change from Public Corpora. In Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, Peter, and Schilling-Estes, Natalie (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 97–114.Google Scholar
Baugh, John 2003. Linguistic Profiling. In Makoni, Sinfree, Smitherman, Geneva, and Ball, Arnetha F. (eds.), Black Linguistics: Language, Society and Politics in Africa and the Americas. London/New York: Routledge, 155–168.Google Scholar
Becker, A. L. 1995. Beyond Translation: Toward Modern Philology. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Allan 1984. Language Style as Audience Design. Language in Society 13: 145–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Allan 2001. Back in Style: Reworking Audience Design. In Eckert, Penelope and Rickford, John (eds.), Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge University Press, 139–169.Google Scholar
Bell, Allan and Johnson, Gary 1997. Towards a Sociolinguistics of Style. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4(1): 1–21.Google Scholar
Benor, Sarah 2001. The Learned /T/: Phonological Variation in Orthodox Jewish English. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics (Selected Papers from New Ways of Analyzing Variation 29) 7: 1–16.Google Scholar
Benor, Sarah 2004. Talmid Chachams and Tsedeykeses: Language, Learnedness, and Masculinity among Orthodox Jews. Jewish Social Studies 11: 147–170.Google Scholar
Bernard, H. Russell 2006. Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. 4th edn. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Basil 1961. Social Class and Linguistic Development: A Theory of Social Learning. In Halsey, A. H, Floud, J., and Anderson, C. A. (eds.), Education, Economy and Society. New York: Free Press, 288–314.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Basil 1972. A Critique of the Concept of Compensatory Education. In Cazden, C., John, Vera, and Hymes, Dell (eds.), Functions of Language in the Classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Bickerton, Derek 1980. What Happens When We Switch?York Papers in Linguistics 9: 41–56.Google Scholar
Bird, Steven and Simons, Gary 2003. Seven Dimensions of Portability for Language Documentation and Description. Language 79(3): 557–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, Renee and Josey, Meredith 2003. The /ay/ Diphthong in a Martha’s Vineyard Community: What can we Say 40 Years after Labov?Language in Society 32(4): 451–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanton, Phyllis and Waters, Karen 1996. The Ocracoke Brogue. Raleigh: North Carolina Language and Life Project.Google Scholar
Blom, Jan-Petter and Gumperz, John 1972. Social Meaning in Linguistic Structures. In Gumperz, John and Hymes, Dell (eds.), Directions in Sociolinguistics. New York: Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul and Weenink, David 2012. Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer. .
Bourhis, Richard and Giles, Howard 1976. The Language of Co-Operation in Wales: A Field Study. Language Sciences 42: 13–16.Google Scholar
Bourhis, Richard, Giles, Howard, and Lambert, Wallace E. 1975. Social Consequences of Accommodating One’s Style of Speech: A Cross-National Investigation. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 6: 11–32.Google Scholar
Briggs, Charles L. 1986. Learning How to Ask: A Sociolinguistic Appraisal of the Role of the Interview in Social Science Research. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary 1996. Geek the Girl: Language, Femininity, and Female Nerds. In Ahlers, Jocelyn, Bilmes, Leela, Chen, Melinda, Oliver, Monica, Warner, Natasha, and Wertheim, Suzanne (eds.), Gender and Belief Systems. Berkeley Women and Language Group, 119–132.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary 1999. Why Be Normal? Language and Identity Practices in a Community of Nerd Girls. Language in Society 28: 203–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary 2001. The Whiteness of Nerds: Superstandard English and Racial Markedness. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 11: 84–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary 2003. Sociolinguistic Nostalgia and the Authentication of Identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics 7(3): 398–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary 2011. White Kids: Language, Race, and Styles of Youth Identity. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Butters, Ronald R. 2000. “What is about to Take Place is a Murder”: Construing the Racist Subtext in a Small-Town Virginia Courtroom. In Griffin, Peg, Peyton, Joy, Wolfram, Walt, and Fasold, Ralph (eds.), Language in Action: New Studies of Language and Society. New York: Hampton, 362–389.Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah, Frazer, Elizabeth, Harvey, Penelope, Rampton, Ben, and Richardson, Kay (eds.) 1992. Researching Language: Issues of Power and Method. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah, Frazer, Elizabeth, Harvey, Penelope, Rampton, Ben, and Richardson, Kay 1993. Ethics, Advocacy and Empowerment: Issues of Method in Researching Language. Language and Communication 13(2): 81–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn 2010. Sociolinguistics and Perception. Language and Linguistics Compass 4(6): 377–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannadine, David 1988. Class in Britain. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Cedergren, Henrietta 1973. The Interplay of Social and Linguistic Factors in Panama. PhD, Cornell University.
Cedergren, Henrietta 1984. Panama Revisited: Sound Change in Real Time. New Ways of Analyzing Variation (NWAV) 13. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K. and Trudgill, Peter 1998. Dialectology. 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny 1982. Variation in an English Dialect: A Sociolinguistic Study. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas 1980. Style-Shifting in a Cardiff Work Setting. Language in Society 9(1): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas 1984. Accommodation at Work: Some Phonological Data and Their Implications. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 46: 49–70.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas 2001a. Dialect Stylization in Radio Talk. Language in Society 30(3): 345–375.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas 2001b. Language, Situation and the Relational Self. In Eckert, Penelope and Rickford, John (eds.), Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge University Press, 185–210.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas 2007. Style: Language Variation and Identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cukor-Avila, Patricia and Bailey, Guy 2013. Real and Apparent Time. In Chambers, J. K. and Schilling, Natalie (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. 2nd edn. Malden/Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cutillas-Espinosa, Juan Antonio, Hernández-Campoy, Juan Manuel, and Schilling-Estes, Natalie 2010. Hyper-Vernacularisation and Speaker Design: A Case Study. Folia Linguistica 44(1): 31–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, Cecilia A. 1999. Yorkville Crossing: White Teens, Hip Hop, and African American English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 3(4): 428–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Bronwyn and Harré, Rom 1990. Positioning: The Social Construction of Selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 20: 43–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas-Cowie, Ellen 1978. Linguistic Code-Switching in a Northern Irish Village: Social Interaction and Social Ambition. In Trudgill, Peter (ed.), Sociolinguistic Patterns in British English. London: Edward Arnold, 37–51.Google Scholar
Drager, Katie 2010. Sociophonetic Variation in Speaker Perception. Language and Linguistics Compass 4: 473–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bois, Du, John, W. 2007. The Stance Triangle. In Englebretson, Robert (ed.), Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 139–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro 1997. Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope 1989. Jocks and Burnouts: Social Identity in the High School. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope 1997. Age as a Sociolinguistic Variable. In Coulmas, Florian (ed.), The Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Oxford/Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, 151–167.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope 1998. Vowels and Nail Polish: The Emergence of Linguistic Style in the Preadolescent Heterosexual Marketplace. 1996. Berkeley Women and Language Conference, Berkeley, CA, Berkeley Women and Language Group.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope 2000. Linguistic Variation as Social Practice. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope 2001. Style and Social Meaning. In Eckert, Penelope and Rickford, John R. (eds.), Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge University Press, 119–126.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope 2003. Elephants in the Room. Journal of Sociolinguistics 7(3): 392–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, PenelopeEckert, Penelope 2005. Three Waves of Variation Study: The Emergence of Meaning in the Study of Variation, manuscript.
Eckert, Penelope 2008. Variation and the Indexical Field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4): 453–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope 2012. Three Waves of Variation Study: The Emergence of Meaning in the Study of Variation. Annual Review of Anthropology 41: 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope and McConnell-Ginet, Sally 1992. Think Practically and Look Locally: Language and Gender as Community-based Practice. Annual Review of Anthropology 21: 461–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope and Rickford, John R. (eds.) 2001. Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Erickson, Frederick 1986. Qualitative Methods in Research on Teaching. In Wittrock, Merlin C (ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching. New York: Macmillan, 119–161.Google Scholar
Fasold, Ralph 1972. Tense Marking in Black English: A Linguistic and Social Analysis. Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Fasold, Ralph 1984. The Sociolinguistics of Society. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Feagin, Crawford 2013. Entering the Community: Fieldwork. In Chambers, J. K. and Schilling, Natalie (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. 2nd edn. Malden/Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fuller, Janet M. 1997. Pennsylvania Dutch with a Southern Touch: A Theoretical Model of Language Contact and Change. PhD, University of South Carolina.
Gal, Susan 1979. Language Shift: Social Determinants of Linguistic Change in Bilingual Austria. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, Peter 2010. Attitudes to Language. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giles, Howard, Coupland, Nikolas, and Coupland, Justine 1991. Accommodation Theory: Communication, Context, and Consequence. In Giles, Howard, Coupland, Nikolas, and Coupland, Justine (eds.), Contexts of Accommodation: Developments in Applied Sociolinguistics. Cambridge University Press, 1–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving 1963. Behavior in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving 1974. Frame Analysis. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving 1981. Footing. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 124–159.Google Scholar
Graff, David, Labov, William, and Harris, Wendell A. 1986. Testing Listeners’ Reactions to Phonological Markers of Ethnic Identity: A New Method for Sociolinguistic Research. In Sankoff, David (ed.), Diversity and Diachrony. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grieser, Jessica 2012. [T]inking About Takoma: Race, Style, and Identity at DC’s Border. Symposium About Language and Society – Austin (SALSA) 20. Austin, TX.Google Scholar
Grimes, Drew 2004. Celebrating Muzel Bryant. Raleigh: North Carolina Language and Life Project.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J. 1982. Fact and Inference in Courtroom Testimony. In Gumperz, John J. (ed.), Language and Social Identity. Cambridge University Press, 163–195.Google Scholar
Harré, Rom and van Langenhove, Luk 1999. Positioning Theory. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hewitt, Roger 1982. White Adolescent Creole Users and the Politics of Friendship. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 3(3): 217–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hindle, Donald M. 1979. The Social and Situational Conditioning of Phonetic Variation. PhD, University of Pennsylvania.
Hoffman, Michol F. and Walker, James A. 2010. Ethnolects and the City: Ethnic Orientation and Linguistic Variation in Toronto English. Language Variation and Change 22: 37–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. 1987. Emergent Grammar. 13th Annual Meeting, Berkeley Linguistic Society, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Horvath, Barbara 1985. Variation in Australian English. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hutcheson, Neal 2001. Indian by Birth: The Lumbee Dialect. Raleigh: North Carolina Language and Life Project.Google Scholar
Hutcheson, Neal 2003. Celebrating Princeville. Raleigh: North Carolina Language and Life Project.Google Scholar
Hutcheson, Neal 2004. Mountain Talk. Raleigh: North Carolina Language and Life Project.Google Scholar
Hutcheson, Neal 2005. Voices of North Carolina. Raleigh: North Carolina Language and Life Project.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell 1974. Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith 2001. “Style” as Distinctiveness: The Culture and Ideology of Linguistic Differentiation. In Eckert, Penelope and Rickford, John (eds.), Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge University Press, 21–43.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Alexandra M. (ed.) 2009. Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jamsu, Jermay, Callier, Patrick, and Lee, Jinsok 2010. A Diachronic Study of Monophthongization in Washington, DC. New Ways of Analyzing Variation (NWAV) 38. Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
Jamsu Reynolds, Jermay, 2012. Language Variation and Change in an Amdo Tibetan Village: Gender, Education and Resistance. PhD, Georgetown University.
Johnson, Keith 2012. Acoustic and Auditory Phonetics. 3rd edn. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara 1996. The Linguistic Individual: Self-Expression in Language and Linguistics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara 1999. Uses of Southern-Sounding Speech by Contemporary Texas Women. Journal of Sociolinguistics 3(4): 505–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara 2000a. Qualitative Methods in Sociolinguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara 2000b. The Individual Voice in Language. Annual Review of Anthropology 29: 405–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara and Bean, Judith Mattson 1997. Self-Expression and Linguistic Variation. Language in Society 26: 221–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara and Kiesling, Scott 2008. Indexicality and Experience: Exploring the Meanings of /aw/- Monophthongization in Pittsburgh. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12: 5–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Josey, Meredith 2004. A Sociolinguistic Study of Phonetic Variation and Change on the Island of Martha’s Vineyard. PhD, New York University.
Kendall, Tyler 2007. Enhancing Sociolinguistic Data Collections: The North Carolina Sociolinguistic Archive and Analysis Project. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 13(2): 15–26.Google Scholar
Kendall, Tyler 2008. On the History and Future of Sociolinguistic Data. Language and Linguistics Compass 2(2): 332–351.Google Scholar
Kendall, Tyler 2013. Data in the Study of Language Variation and Change. In Chambers, J. K. and Schilling, Natalie (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. 2nd edn. Malden/Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kerswill, Paul 1996. Children, Adolescents, and Language Change. Language Variation and Change 8: 177–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerswill, Paul 2013. Koineization. In Chambers, J. K. and Schilling, Natalie (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. 2nd edn. Malden/Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kerswill, Paul and Williams, Ann 2000. Creating a New Town Koine: Children and Language Change in Milton Keynes. Language in Society 29: 65–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerswill, Paul and Williams, Ann 2002. “Salience” as an Explanatory Factor in Language Change: Evidence from Dialect Levelling in Urban England. In Jones, Mari C. and Esch, Edith (eds.), Language Change: The Interplay of Internal, External, and Extralinguistic Factors. New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 84–110.Google Scholar
Kiesling, Scott 1998. Men’s Identities and Sociolinguistic Variation: The Case of Fraternity Men. Journal of Sociolinguistics 2(1): 69–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiesling, Scott 2009. Style as Stance: Stance as the Explanation for Patterns of Sociolinguistic Variation. In Jaffe, Alexandra (ed.), Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Oxford University Press, 171–194.Google Scholar
Kretzschmar, William A. 1994. Handbook of the Linguistic Atlas of the Middle and South Atlantic States. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kurath, Hans. 1949. Word Geography of the Eastern United States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Labov, William 1963. The Social Motivation of a Sound Change. Word 19: 273–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, William 1969. The Logic of Non-standard English. In James E, Alatis (ed.), Georgetown Monograph on Languages and Linguistics 22. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1–44.Google Scholar
Labov, William 1972a. Some Principles of Linguistic Methodology. Language in Society 1: 97–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William 1972b. Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William 1972c. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William 1982. Objectivity and Commitment in Linguistic Science: The Case of the Black English Trial in Ann Arbor. Language in Society 11: 165–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William 1984. Field Methods of the Project on Linguistic Change and Variation. In Baugh, John and Sherzer, Joel (eds.), Language in Use. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 28–53.Google Scholar
Labov, William 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change Volume I: Internal Factors. Malden/Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William 2001a. Applying Our Knowledge of African American English to the Problem of Raising Reading Levels in Inner-City Schools. In Lanehart, Sonja (ed.), African American English: State of the Art. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 299–318.Google Scholar
Labov, William 2001b. The Anatomy of Style-Shifting. In Eckert, Penelope and Rickford, John R. (eds.), Style and Socioinguistic Variation. Cambridge University Press, 85–108.Google Scholar
Labov, William 2006. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William 2008. Unendangered Dialect, Endangered People. In King, Kendall A., Schilling-Estes, Natalie, Fogle, Lyn, Jackie Lou, Jia, and Soukup, Barbara (eds.), Sustaining Linguistic Diversity: Endangered and Minority Languages and Language Varieties. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 219–238.Google Scholar
Labov, William and Harris, Wendell A. 1986. De Facto Segregation of Black and White Vernaculars. In Sankoff, David (ed.), Diversity and Diachrony. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1–24.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Ash, Sharon, Baranowski, Maciej, Nagy, Naomi, Ravindranath, Maya, and Weldon, Tracy 2006a. Listeners’ Sensitivity to the Frequency of Sociolinguistic Variables. In Michael L. Friesner and Maya Ravindranath (eds.), Penn Working Papers in Linguistics: Selected Papers from NWAV 34, Volume 12.2. Philadelphia: Penn Linguistics Club, 105–129.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Ash, Sharon, and Boberg, Charles (eds.) 2006b. The Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, Phonology and Sound Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter 1993. A Course in Phonetics. 3rd edn. Fort Worth: Harcourt, Brace, and Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter and Johnson, Keith 2010. A Course in Phonetics (with CD-ROM). 6th edn. London: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Lambert, Wallace E., Hodgson, R. C., Gardner, R. C., and Fillenbaum, S. 1960. Evaluational Reactions to Spoken Language. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 60: 44–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lave, Jean and Wenger, Etienne 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Le, Robert, B. and Tabouret-Keller, Andrée 1985. Acts of Identity: Creole-Based Approaches to Language and Ethnicity. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Sinae 2011. High and Mid-Back Vowel Fronting in Washington, DC, Metropolitan Area. New Ways of Analyzing Variation (NWAV) 40. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Lippi-Green, Rosina 1994. Accent, Standard Language Ideology, and Discriminatory Pretext in the Courts. Language in Society 23: 163–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippi-Green, Rosina L. 1989. Social Network Integration and Language Change in Progress in a Rural Alpine Village. Language in Society 18: 213–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locklear, Hayes Alan, Wolfram, Walt, Schilling-Estes, Natalie, and Dannenberg, Clare J. 1996. A Dialect Dictionary of Lumbee English. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Language and Life Project.Google Scholar
Lou, Jia Jackie 2009. Situating Linguistic Landscape in Time and Space: A Multidimensional Study of the Linguistic Construction of Washington, DC, Chinatown. PhD, Georgetown University.
Lou, Jia Jackie 2010a. Chinese on the Side: The Marginalization of Chinese in the Linguistic and Social Landscapes of Washington, DC, Chinatown. In Shohamy, Elana, Barni, Monica, and Ben-Rafael, Eli (eds.), Linguistic Landscape in the City. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 96–114.Google Scholar
Lou, Jia Jackie 2010b. Chinatown Transformed: Ideology, Power, and Resources in Narrative Place-Making. Discourse Studies 12(5): 625–647.Google Scholar
Lucas, Ceil, Bayley, Robert, and Valli, Clayton 2001. Sociolinguistic Variation in American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macaulay, Ronald K. S. 1977. Language, Social Class, and Education: A Glasgow Study. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Ronald K. S. 2002. Extremely Interesting, Very Interesting, or only Quite Interesting? Adverbs and Social Class. Journal of Sociolinguistics 6: 398–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macaulay, Ronald K. S. 2009. Quantitative Methods in Sociolinguistics. PalgraveMacmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallinson, Christine and Childs, Becky 2004. African American English in Appalachia: Dialect Accommodation and Substrate Influence. English World-Wide 25: 27–50.Google Scholar
Mallinson, Christine and Childs, Becky 2007. Communities of Practice in Sociolinguistic Description: Analyzing Language and Identity Practices among Black Women in Appalachia. Gender and Language 1(2): 173–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsuda, Mari J. 1991. Voices of America: Accent, Antidiscrimination Law, and a Jurisprudence for the Last Reconstruction. The Yale Law Journal 100(5): 1329–1407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDavid, Raven I., Jr. and O’Cain, Raymond K (eds.) 1980. Linguistic Atlas of the Middle and South Atlantic States. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McFadden, Jennifer L. 2011. Indexicality and Sociolocation in a Bangladeshi Market: A Sociolinguistic Ethnography. PhD, Georgetown University.
Milroy, James 1981. Regional Accents of English: Belfast. Dundonald, Belfast: Blackstaff Press.Google Scholar
Milroy, James and Milroy, Lesley 1985. Linguistic Change, Social Network and Speaker Innovation. Journal of Linguistics 21: 339–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, Lesley 1980. Language and Social Networks. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Milroy, Lesley 1987. Observing and Analysing Natural Language. Malden/Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Milroy, Lesley and Gordon, Matthew 2003. Sociolinguistics: Method and Interpretation. Malden MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modan, Gabriella Gahlia 2007. Turf Wars: Discourse, Diversity, and the Politics of Place. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, Michael 2000. Isolation as a Linguistic Construct. Southern Journal of Linguistics 24: 41–53.Google Scholar
Neuman, W. Lawrence 1997. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. 3rd edn. Boston: Allen & Bacon.Google Scholar
Nichols, Patricia C. 1983. Linguistic Options and Choices for Black Women in the Rural South. In Thorne, Barrie, Kramarae, Cheris, and Henley, Nancy (eds.), Language, Gender and Society. Cambridge, MA: Newbury House, 54–68.Google Scholar
Niedzielski, Nancy 1999. The Effect of Social Information on the Perception of Sociolinguistic Variables. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18: 62–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, Rasmus 2010. “I Ain’t Never Been Charged with Nothing!”: The Use of Falsetto Speech as a Linguistic Strategy of Indignation. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 15(2): 111–121.Google Scholar
Nylund, Anastasia 2010. Styling “Factualness” in Interaction: The Intersection of Stop Release and Velar (-ing). Sociolinguistics Symposium 18. Southampton, UK.Google Scholar
Nylund, Anastasia 2011. Connecting Discourses of Language and Place in Washington, DC. Texas Linguistics Forum 54: 120–130.Google Scholar
Nylund, Anastasia 2012. L-Vocalization in Washington, DC: Understanding Regional and Ethnoracial Identities in a Contested City. Annual meeting of the American Dialect Society. Portland, OR.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor 1992. Indexing Gender. In Duranti, Alessandro and Goodwin, Charles (eds.), Rethinking Context. Cambridge University Press, 335–358.Google Scholar
Parrott, Jeffrey K. 2002. Dialect Death and Morpho-Syntactic Change: Smith Island Weak Expletive “It.” University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics: Selected Papers from NWAV 30 8.Google Scholar
Patrick, Peter L. 2002. The Speech Community. In Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, Peter, and Schilling-Estes, Natalie (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 573–597.Google Scholar
Pederson, Lee, McDaniel, Susan Leas, Bailey, Guy, and Bassett, Marvin (eds.) 1986. Linguistic Atlas of the Gulf States. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Plichta, Bartłomiej. “Akustyk.” .
Plichta, Bartłomiej, Preston, Dennis R, and Rakerd, Brad 2005. The /ay/s Have It. Acta Linguistica Hafniensa 37: 107–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podesva, Robert J. 2004. On Constructing Social Meaning with Stop Release Bursts. Sociolinguistics Symposium 15. Newcastle upon Tyne.Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert J. 2006. Phonetic Detail in Sociolinguistic Variation: Its Linguistic Significance and Role in the Construction of Social Meaning. PhD, Stanford University.
Podesva, Robert J. 2007. Phonation Type as a Stylistic Variable: The Use of Falsetto in Constructing a Persona. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11(4): 478–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podesva, Robert J. 2008. Linking Phonological Variation to Discourses of Race and Place in DC. Annual meeting of the American Anthropological Association. San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert J. and Lee, Sinae 2010. Voice Quality Variation and Gender in Washington, DC. New Ways of Analyzing Variation (NWAV) 39. San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert J., Roberts, Sarah, and Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn 2002. Sharing Resources and Indexing Meanings in the Production of Gay Styles. In Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn, Podesva, Robert J., Roberts, Sarah, and Wong, Andrew (eds.), Language and Sexuality: Contesting Meaning in Theory and Practice. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 175–189.Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert J., Jamsu, Jermay, Callier, Patrick, and Heitman, Jessica forthcoming. Constraints on the Social Meaning of Released /t/: A Production and Perception Study of U.S. Politicians. Language Variation and Change.
Pope, Jennifer, Meyerhoff, Miriam, and Robert Ladd, D. 2007. Forty Years of Language Change on Martha’s Vineyard. Language 83: 615–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 2013. Language with an Attitude. In Chambers, J. K. and Schilling, Natalie (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. 2nd edn. Malden/Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Purnell, Thomas, Idsardi, William, and Baugh, John 1999. Perceptual and Phonetic Experiments on American English Dialect Identification. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18(1): 10–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Queen, Robin 2007. Sociolinguistic Horizons: Language and Sexuality. Language and Linguistics Compass 1(4): 314–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rampton, Ben 1995. Crossing: Language and Ethnicity among Adolescents. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rampton, Ben 1999. Styling the Other: Introduction. Journal of Sociolinguistics 3(4): 421–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reaser, Jeffrey 2006. The Effect of Dialect Awareness on Adolescent Knowledge and Attitudes. PhD, Duke University.
Renn, Jennifer and Michael Terry, J. 2009. Operationalizing Style: Quantifying the Use of Style Shift in the Speech of African American Adolescents. American Speech 84(4): 367–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickford, John R. 1986. The Need for New Approaches to Social Class Analysis in Sociolinguistics. Language and Communication 6: 215–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickford, John R. 1997a. Suite for Ebony and Phonics. Discover. New York: Kalmbach.Google Scholar
Rickford, John R. 1997b. Unequal Partnership: Sociolinguistics and the African American Speech Community. Language in Society 26(2): 161–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickford, John R. and McNair-Knox, Faye 1994. Addressee- and Topic-Influenced Style Shift: A Quantitative Sociolinguistic Study. In Biber, Douglas and Finegan, Edward (eds.), Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register. New York: Oxford University Press, 235–276.Google Scholar
Rickford, John R. and Rickford, Angela E. 1995. Dialect Readers Revisited. Linguistics and Education 7(2): 107–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne 1978. Post-Vocalic /r/ in Scottish English: Sound Change in Progress. In Trudgill, Peter (ed.), Sociolinguistic Patterns in British English. London: Edward Arnold, 144–157.Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne 1980. A Critical Overview of the Methodology of Urban British Sociolinguistics. English World-Wide 1(163–198).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, David and Laberge, Suzanne 1978. The Linguistic Market and the Statistical Explanation of Variability. In Sankoff, David (ed.), Linguistic Variation: Models and Methods. New York: Academic Press, 239–250.Google Scholar
Sankoff, David, Sankoff, Gillian, Laberge, Suzanne, and Topham, Marjorie 1976. Méthodes D’échantillonnage Et Utilisation De L’ordinateur Dan L’étude De La Variation Grammaticale. Cahiers de linguistique de l’Université du Québec 6: 85–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian 1980. The Social Life of Language. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian 2006. Apparent Time and Real Time. Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Brown, Keith. Oxford: Elsevier. 1: 110–116.Google Scholar
Ana, Santa, Otto 2002. Brown Tide Rising. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Ana, Santa, 2009. “Did You Call in Mexican?” The Racial Politics of Jay Leno Immigrant Jokes. Language in Society 38(1): 23–45.Google Scholar
Ana, Santa, forthcoming, 2013. Juan in a Hundred: The Representation of Latinos on Network News. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Saville-Troike, Muriel 2003. The Ethnography of Communication. 3rd edn. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1997. “Narrative Analysis” Thirty Years Later. Journal of Narrative and Life History 7(1–4): 97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah 2006. In Other Words: Variation in Reference and Narrative. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah 2009. Crossing Boundaries: The Nexus of Time, Space, Person, and Place in Narrative. Language in Society 38: 421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schilling, Natalie 2011. Language, Gender, and Sexuality. In Mesthrie, Raj (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Cambridge University Press, 218–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schilling, Natalie 2013. Investigating Stylistic Variation. In Chambers, J. K. and Schilling, Natalie (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. 2nd edn. Malden/Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schilling, Natalie and Jamsu, Jermay 2010. Real-Time Data and Communal Change in Washington, DC, African American Vernacular English. New Ways of Analyzing Variation (NWAV) 39. San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
Schilling-Estes, Natalie 1998. Investigating “Self-Conscious” Speech: The Performance Register in Ocracoke English. Language in Society 27: 53–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schilling-Estes, Natalie 2004. Constructing Ethnicity in Interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics 8: 163–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schilling-Estes, Natalie 2007. Sociolinguistic Fieldwork. In Bayley, Robert and Lucas, Ceil (eds.), Sociolinguistic Variation: Theory, Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, 165–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schilling-Estes, Natalie 2008. Stylistic Variation and the Sociolinguistic Interview: A Reconsideration. In Monroy, Rafael and Sánchez, Aquilino (eds.), 25 Años De Linguística Aplicada En España: Hitos Y Retos (Proceedings of AESLA 25). Murcia, Spain: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia, 971–986.Google Scholar
Schilling-Estes, Natalie and Wolfram, Walt 1994. Convergent Explanation and Alternative Regularization Patterns: Were/Weren’t Leveling in a Vernacular English Variety. Language Variation and Change 6(3): 273–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2013. Investigating Variation and Change in Written Documents: New Perspectives. In Chambers, J. K. and Schilling, Natalie (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. 2nd edn. Malden/Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sclafani, Jennifer 2009. Martha Stewart Behaving Badly: Parody and the Symbolic Meaning of Style. Journal of Sociolinguistics 13(5): 613–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seals, Corinne under review. Phonological Cues for Identity Expression: Examining the Linguistic Meaning of Palatalization Amongst Multilingual Ukrainian Youth.
Shuy, Roger W. 1996. Language Crimes: The Use and Abuse of Language Evidence in the Courtroom. Malden/Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Shuy, Roger W. 1998. The Language of Confession, Interrogation and Deception. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Shuy, Roger W. 2005. Creating Language Crimes: How Law Enforcement Uses (and Misuses) Language. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shuy, Roger W., Wolfram, Walt, and Riley, William K. 1968. Field Techniques in an Urban Language Study. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Smitherman, Geneva 1981. “What Go Round Come Round”: King in Perspective. Harvard Educational Review 51(1): 40–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soukup, Barbara 2011. Austrian Listeners’ Perceptions of Standard-Dialect Style-Shifting: An Empirical Approach. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15(3): 347–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soukup, Barbara 2012. Current Issues in the Social Psychological Study of “Language Attitudes”: Constructionism, Context, and the Attitude–Behavior Link. Language and Linguistics Compass 6(4): 212–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenström, Anna-Brita, Andersen, Gisle, and Kristine Hasund, Ingrid 2002. Trends in Teenage Talk: Corpus Compilation, Analysis and Findings. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strand, Elizabeth 1999. Uncovering the Role of Gender Stereotypes in Speech Perception. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18(1): 86–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuart-Smith, Jane 1999. Glasgow: Accent and Voice Quality. In Foulkes, P. and Docherty, G. J. (eds.), Urban Voices: Accent Studies in the British Isles. Leeds: Arnold, 203–222.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. 1998. Was/Were Variation across the Generations: View from the City of York. Language Variation and Change 10(2): 153–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. 2006a. Analysing Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. 2006b. “So Cool, Right?”: Canadian English Entering the 21st Century.Canadian Journal of Linguistics 51(2/3): 309–331.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah 1989. Constructing Dialog in Conversation: Towards a Poetics of Talk. Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue and Imagery in Conversational Discourse, 98–133.Google Scholar
Thelander, Mats 1982. A Qualitative Approach to the Quantitative Data of Speech Variation. In Romaine, Suzanne (ed.), Sociolinguistic Variation in Speech Communities. London: Edward Arnold, 65–83.Google Scholar
Thibault, Pierrette and Vincent, Diane 1990. Un Corpus De Français Parlé. Montréal: Recherches Sociolinguistiques.Google Scholar
Thomas, Erik R. 2002. Sociophonetic Applications of Speech Perception Experiments. American Speech 77(2): 115–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Erik R. 2011. Sociophonetics: An Introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Erik R. 2013. Sociophonetics. In Chambers, J. K. and Schilling, Natalie (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. 2nd edn. Malden/Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Thomas, Erik R. and Reaser, Jeffrey 2004. Delimiting Perceptual Cues Used for the Ethnic Labeling of African American and European American Voices. Journal of Sociolinguistics 8(1): 54–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter 1972. Sex, Covert Prestige and Linguistic Change in the Urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society 1(2): 179–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter 1974. The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter 1981. Linguistic Accommodation: Sociolinguistic Observations on a Sociopsychological Theory. In Masek, Carrie S., Hendrick, Roberta A., and Miller, Mary Frances (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Language and Behavior. Chicago Linguistic Society, 218–237.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter 1983. Acts of Conflicting Identity: The Sociolinguistics of British Pop-Song Pronunciation. In Trudgill, Peter, On Dialect: Social and Geographical Perspectives. Oxford: Blackwell, 141–160.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter 1988. Norwich Revisited: Recent Linguistic Changes in an English Urban Dialect. English World-Wide 9(3): 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter 1989. Contact and Isolation in Linguistic Change. In Breivik, Leiv Egil and Håkon Jahr, Ernst (eds.), Language Change: Contributions to the Study of Its Causes. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 227–237.Google Scholar
Tseng, Amelia 2011. “I Can Tell She’s Gonna Be Bilingual, and Pretty Good at It Too”: /ae/ Realization, Situated Identity Construction, and Latino Immigration in Washington, DC. New Ways of Analyzing Variation (NWAV) 40. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Van Hofwegen, Janneke 2012. The Development of African American English through Childhood and Adolescence. In Lanehart, Sonja, Green, Lisa and Bloomquist, Jennifer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook on African American Language. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vincent, Diane, Laforest, Marty, and Martel, Guylaine 1995. Le Corpus De Montréal 1995: Adaptation De La Méthode D’enquête Sociolinguistique Pour L’analyse Conversationnelle. Dialangue 6: 29–46.Google Scholar
Watson, Mark 2006. Post-Revolutionary Cuban Spanish: Changes in the Lexicon and Language Attitudes Motivated by Socio-political Reforms. PhD, Georgetown University.
Weinreich, Uriel, Labov, William, and Herzog, Marvin I. 1968. Empirical Foundations for a Theory of Language and Change. In Lehmann, Winfred P. and Malkiel, Yakov (eds.), Directions for Historical Linguistics: A Symposium. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 95–188.Google Scholar
Wells, John Christopher 1982. Accents of English. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willemyns, Michael, Gallois, Cynthia, Callan, Victor J., and Pittam, Jeffrey 1997. Accent Accommodation in the Job Interview: Impact of Interviewer Accent and Gender. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 16(1): 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson-Ige, Dorothy K. 1984. Approaches to Black Language Studies: A Cultural Critique. Journal of Black Studies 15(1): 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfram, Walt 1969. A Sociolinguistic Description of Detroit Negro Speech. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt 1971. Sociolinguistic Aspects of Assimilation: Puerto Rican English in East Harlem. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt 1993. Ethical Considerations in Language Awareness Programs. American Association of Applied Linguistics Ethics Symposium. Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt 1995. Delineation and Description in Dialectology: The Case of Perfective I’m in Lumbee English. American Speech 71: 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfram, Walt 2013. Community Commitment and Responsibility. The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. 2nd edn. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt and Fasold, Ralph 1974. The Study of Social Dialects in American English. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt and Dannenberg, Clare J. 1999. Dialect Identity in a Tri-Ethnic Context: The Case of Lumbee American Indian English. English World-Wide 20: 179–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfram, Walt and Reaser, Jeffrey forthcoming. Tar Heel Talk: Voices of North Carolina. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
Wolfram, Walt, Adger, Carolyn Temple, and Christian, Donna 1999. Dialects in Schools and Communities. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt, Hazen, Kirk, and Schilling-Estes, Natalie 1999. Dialect Change and Maintenance in Outer Banks English. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt, Reaser, Jeffrey, and Vaughn, Charlotte 2008. Operationalizing Linguistic Gratuity: From Principle to Practice. Language and Linguistics Compass 2(6): 1109–1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfram, Walt, Hofwegen, Janneke Van, Renn, Jennifer, and Kohn, Mary E. 2011. The Progression of African American English in Childhood and Adolescence : A Longitudinal Study, ms.
Wolfson, Nessa 1976. Speech Events and Natural Speech: Some Implications for Sociolinguistic Methodology. Language in Society 5: 189–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zentella, Ana Celia 1997. Growing up Bilingual: Puerto Rican Children in New York. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Zubair, Cala 2008. Discourses of History in a Gentrifying Neighborhood of Washington, DC. Annual meeting of the American Anthropological Association. San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
Zubair, Cala 2012. Register Formation among Sri Lankan University Youth. PhD, Georgetown University.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Natalie Schilling, Georgetown University, Washington DC
  • Book: Sociolinguistic Fieldwork
  • Online publication: 05 April 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511980541.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Natalie Schilling, Georgetown University, Washington DC
  • Book: Sociolinguistic Fieldwork
  • Online publication: 05 April 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511980541.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Natalie Schilling, Georgetown University, Washington DC
  • Book: Sociolinguistic Fieldwork
  • Online publication: 05 April 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511980541.008
Available formats
×