Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T06:41:55.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

18 - Depoliticizing compliance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2012

Jutta Brunnée
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Meinhard Doelle
Affiliation:
Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia
Lavanya Rajamani
Affiliation:
Centre for Policy Research, New Delhi
Get access

Summary

Introduction

International climate cooperation is first and foremost of a political character. It is essential that political leaders commit to reductions in greenhouse emissions, adaptation measures, protection of forests, and transfer of financial resources and capacity building. At the same time, the need for independent organs and experts is also acknowledged. The scientific authority of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is based on its independence and expertise and the secretariat of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (FCCC), while accountable to the Conference of the Parties/Conference of the Parties Serving as the meeting of the parties to the Kyoto Protocol (COP/CMP), is independent from individual state parties, and is expected to respect professional standards. This independence from political interference is seen as a guarantee of a reliable execution of the task at hand.

Likewise, both effectiveness and legitimacy may be served by establishing independent organs with power to control national implementation of international climate change obligations. First, depoliticization may be achieved through establishment of independent organs (‘institutional independence’). Second, depoliticization may take the form of legalization, i.e. through establishing commitments and procedures in binding legal instruments (‘formal independence’). Depoliticization, while important, must be controlled. Due process guarantees (‘procedural safeguards’) are a quid pro quo in the sense that empowered independent organs should be subject to procedural control. Moreover, independent organs should be politically accountable. In this way the circle is completed: independent organs are established by political organs and are accountable to such organs.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×