Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Foreword
- Why a handbook on human dignity?
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Human dignity from a legal perspective
- 2 Human dignity: concepts, discussions, philosophical perspectives
- Part I Origins of the concept in European history
- Part II Beyond the scope of the European tradition
- Part III Systematic conceptualization
- 19 Social and cultural presuppositions for the use of the concept of human dignity
- 20 Is human dignity the ground of human rights?
- 21 Human dignity: can a historical foundation alone suffice? From Joas’ affirmative genealogy to Kierkegaard's leap of faith
- 22 Kantian perspectives on the rational basis of human dignity
- 23 Kantian dignity: a critique
- 24 Human dignity and human rights in Alan Gewirth's moral philosophy
- 25 Human dignity in the capability approach
- 26 Human dignity in Catholic thought
- 27 Jacques Maritain's personalist conception of human dignity
- 28 Scheler and human dignity
- 29 Dignity and the Other: dignity and the phenomenological tradition
- 30 Dignity, fragility, singularity in Paul Ricœur's ethics
- 31 Human dignity as universal nobility
- 32 Dignity in the ubuntu tradition
- 33 Posthuman dignity
- 34 Dignity as the right to have rights: human dignity in Hannah Arendt
- 35 Individual and collective dignity
- Part IV Legal implementation
- Part V Conflicts and violence
- Part VI Contexts of justice
- Part VII Biology and bioethics
- Appendix 1 Further reading
- Appendix 2 Universal Declaration of Human Rights
- Index
- References
33 - Posthuman dignity
from Part III - Systematic conceptualization
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 March 2015
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Foreword
- Why a handbook on human dignity?
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Human dignity from a legal perspective
- 2 Human dignity: concepts, discussions, philosophical perspectives
- Part I Origins of the concept in European history
- Part II Beyond the scope of the European tradition
- Part III Systematic conceptualization
- 19 Social and cultural presuppositions for the use of the concept of human dignity
- 20 Is human dignity the ground of human rights?
- 21 Human dignity: can a historical foundation alone suffice? From Joas’ affirmative genealogy to Kierkegaard's leap of faith
- 22 Kantian perspectives on the rational basis of human dignity
- 23 Kantian dignity: a critique
- 24 Human dignity and human rights in Alan Gewirth's moral philosophy
- 25 Human dignity in the capability approach
- 26 Human dignity in Catholic thought
- 27 Jacques Maritain's personalist conception of human dignity
- 28 Scheler and human dignity
- 29 Dignity and the Other: dignity and the phenomenological tradition
- 30 Dignity, fragility, singularity in Paul Ricœur's ethics
- 31 Human dignity as universal nobility
- 32 Dignity in the ubuntu tradition
- 33 Posthuman dignity
- 34 Dignity as the right to have rights: human dignity in Hannah Arendt
- 35 Individual and collective dignity
- Part IV Legal implementation
- Part V Conflicts and violence
- Part VI Contexts of justice
- Part VII Biology and bioethics
- Appendix 1 Further reading
- Appendix 2 Universal Declaration of Human Rights
- Index
- References
Summary
The notion of ‘posthuman dignity’ first appeared in a paper entitled ‘In Defense of Posthuman Dignity’, which Nick Bostrom published in 2005 in the Journal Bioethics. In this paper, he stresses that neither means nor ends of enhancement technologies advocated by the exponents of the transhumanist or posthumanist movement endanger human dignity or the fundamental human rights derived from it (Bostrom 2005).
As the concept of ‘human dignity’ as well as that of ‘enhancement’ are controversial and the answer to the question of whether radically enhancing human nature violates human dignity depends on the definition of these two notions, in the following I will try to clarify these key concepts in the context of the enhancement debate. Whereas the notion of enhancement is relatively well defined by its proponents, the different argumentations put forward to explain human dignity will lead us to the question of human nature and its moral status.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Human DignityInterdisciplinary Perspectives, pp. 319 - 331Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2014
References
2007. ‘Whereto Transhumanism? The Literature Reaches a Critical Mass’, Hastings Center Report 37(3): 12–17CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2000. ‘The Man on the Moon, Immortality and Other Millennial Myths: The Prospects and Perils of Human Genetic Engineering’, Emory Law Journal 49(3): 753–82Google ScholarPubMed
1994. GenEthics: Technological Intervention in Human Reproduction as a Philosophical Problem. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
2008. ‘Why I Want To Be a Posthuman When I Grow Up’, in and (eds.), Medical Enhancement and Posthumanity. New York: Springer, 107–37Google Scholar
, and 2009. ‘Human Enhancement Ethics: The State of the Debate’ in and (eds.), Human Enhancement. Oxford University Press, 1–22Google Scholar
2009. ‘Moral Status and Human Enhancement’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 37(4): 346–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2000. ‘Gene Modification Technology’, in (ed.), Engineering the Human Germline: An Exploration of the Science and Ethics of Altering the Genes We Pass to Our Children. Oxford University Press, 119–22Google Scholar
2002. Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnological Revolution. New York: Farrar, Straus & GirouxGoogle Scholar
. 1985. ‘Lasst uns einen Menschen klonieren’, in , Technik, Medizin und Ethik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 162–203Google Scholar
2009. ‘What's Taxonomy Got to Do with It? Species Integrity”, Human Rights, and Science Policy’, in and (eds.), Human Enhancement. Oxford University Press, 43–58Google Scholar
2009. ‘Toward a More Fruitful Debate About Enhancement’, in and (eds.), Human Enhancement. Oxford University Press, 181–98Google Scholar
2006. ‘Negotiating Life: The Regulation of Human Cloning and Embryonic Stem Cell Research in Israel’, Social Studies of Science 36(2): 173–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1970. ‘Zum Problem der genetischen Manipulation aus der Sicht des Theologen’, in (ed.), Menschenzüchtung: Das Problem der genetischen Manipulierung des Menschen. Munich: C. H. Beck, 135–66Google Scholar
2007. ‘Embryonic Stem Cell Patents and Human Dignity’, Health Care Analysis 15: 211–22CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2009. ‘The Case Against Perfection: What's Wrong with Designer Children, Bionic Athletes, and Genetic Engineering’, in and (eds.), Human Enhancement. Oxford University Press, 71–90Google Scholar
2009. ‘The Human Prejudice and the Moral Status of Enhanced Beings: What Do We Owe the Gods?’, in and (eds.), Human Enhancement. Oxford University Press, 211–50Google Scholar
(ed.). 2000. Engineering the Human Germline: An Exploration of the Science and Ethics of Altering the Genes We Pass to Our Children. Oxford University Press
2003. Redesigning Humans: Choosing Our Genes, Changing Our Future. New York: Mariner Books
- 3
- Cited by