Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T10:14:24.760Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - The evolutionary instability of isogamy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2011

Hiroyuki Matsuda
Affiliation:
Yokohama National University, Yokohama, Japan
Peter A. Abrams
Affiliation:
University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
Tatsuya Togashi
Affiliation:
Chiba University, Japan
Paul Alan Cox
Affiliation:
Institute for Ethnomedicine
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Multicellular organisms are usually anisogamous with different mean sizes of gametes of different sexes or mating types. It is generally believed that isogamy (equal gamete sizes of different mating types) is the most primitive mating system (e.g. Maynard Smith, 1978; 1982; Hoekstra, 1987; Maynard Smith and Szathmáry, 1995). Although we observe many isogamous species in algae, fungi, and protozoans (for review see Bell, 1982; Hoekstra, 1987), anisogamy has a much wider taxonomic distribution. Attempts to use evolutionary theory to understand this restricted distribution have met with limited success, as have attempts to understand the distribution of isogamy within groups that include both isogamous and anisogamous species, as observed in the freshwater green algal order Volvocales (Randerson and Hurst, 2001). However, there are numerous exceptions to fully accept the synthetic theory (Bell, 1978; Hoekstra, 1987). We use a series of mathematical models to help understand what might account for the comparative scarcity of isogamy. The models also produce some new hypotheses that may help explain some of the anomalies in the comparative data.

It is generally believed that the evolution of mating types preceded the evolution of gamete size dimorphism (Hoekstra, 1987; Maynard Smith and Szathmáry, 1995). For example, Hoekstra (1982, 1987) has proposed several possible mechanisms for the evolution of mating types in a randomly mating population. In the simplest mechanism, it is assumed that gamete adhesion was initially brought about by two complementary molecules.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Evolution of Anisogamy
A Fundamental Phenomenon Underlying Sexual Selection
, pp. 75 - 95
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, P. A., Matsuda, H., and Harada, Y. (1993). Evolutionarily unstable fitness maxima and stable minima in the evolution of continuous traits. Evolutionary Ecology, 7, 465–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, G. (1978). The evolution of anisogamy. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 73, 247–270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bell, G. (1982). The Masterpiece of Nature. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bulmer, M. (1994). Theoretical Evolutionary Ecology. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.Google Scholar
Bulmer, M. G. and Parker, G. A. (2002). The evolution of anisogamy: a game-theoretic approach. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 269, 2381–2388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charlesworth, B. (1978). The population genetics of anisogamy. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 73, 347–357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charlesworth, B. (1990). Optimization models, quantitative genetics, and mutation. Evolution, 44, 520–538.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charnov, E. L. (1982). The Theory of Sex Allocation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Christiansen, F. B. (1991). On conditions for evolutionary stability for a continuous varying character. American Naturalist, 138, 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cosmides, L. M. and Tooby, J. (1981). Cytoplasmic inheritance and intragenomic conflict. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 89, 83–129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cox, P. A. and Sethian, J. A. (1985). Gamete motion, search, and the evolution of anisogamy, oogamy, and chemotaxis. American Naturalist, 125, 74–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cressman, R., Dash, A. T., and Akin, E. A. (1986). Evolutionary games and two species population dynamics. Journal of Mathematical Biology, 23, 221–230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darwin, C. R. (1871). The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: J. Murray.Google Scholar
DeAngelis, D. L. and Gross, L. J. (editors) (1992). Individual-based Models and Approaches in Ecology. London: Chapman and Hall.CrossRef
Dusenbery, D. B. (2000). Selection for high gamete encounter rates explains the success of male and female mating types. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 202, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eshel, I. and Akin, E. A. (1983). Coevolutionary instability of mixed Nash solutions. Journal of Mathematical Biology, 18, 123–134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eshel, I. and Motro, U. (1981). Kin selection and strong evolutionary stability of mutual help. Theoretical Population Biology, 19, 420–433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, R. F. (1930). The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. New York: Dover (reprinted 1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galloway, R. E. and Goodenough, U. W. (1985). Genetic analysis of mating locus linked mutation in Chlamydomonas reinhardii. Genetics, 111, 447–461.Google ScholarPubMed
Geritz, S. A. H., Kisdi, É., Meszéna, G., and Metz, J. A. J. (1998). Evolutionarily singular strategies and the adaptive growth and branching of the evolutionary tree. Evolutionary Ecology, 12, 35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geritz, S. A. H., Metz, J. A. J., Kisdi, É., and Meszéna, G. (1997). The dynamics of adaptation and evolutionary branching. Physical Review Letters, 78, 2024–2027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hastings, A. and Hom, C. (1990). Multiple equilibria and maintenance of additive genetic variance in a model of pleiotropy. Evolution, 44, 1153–1163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, R. F. (1980). Why do organisms produce gametes of only two different sizes? Some theoretical aspects of the evolution of anisogamy. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 87, 785–793.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoekstra, R. F. (1982). On the asymmetry of sex: evolution of mating types in isogamous populations. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 98, 427–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, R. F. (1987). The evolution of sexes. In Sterns, S. C. (editor), The Evolution of Sex and its Consequences. Basel: Birkhäuser, pp. 59–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, R. F. (1990). The evolution of male–female dimorphism: older than sex? Journal of Genetics, 69, 11–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurst, L. D. (1990). Parasite diversity and the evolution of diploidy, multicellularity, and anisogamy. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 144, 429–443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hurst, L. D. and Hamilton, W. D. (1992). Cytoplasmic fusion and the nature of sexes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B – Biological Sciences, 247, 189–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iwasa, Y., Pomiankowski, A., and Nee, S. (1991). The evolution of costly mate preferences. II. The “handicap” principle. Evolution, 45, 1431–1442.Google ScholarPubMed
Kagami, Y., Mogi, Y., Arai, T., Yamamoto, M., Kuwano, K., and Kawano, S. (2008). Sexuality and uniparental inheritance of chloroplast DNA in the isogamous green alga Ulva compressa (Ulvophyceae). Journal of Phycology, 44, 691–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karr, T. L. and Pitnick, S. (1996). The ins and outs of fertilization. Nature, 379, 405–406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kawata, M. and Toquenaga, Y. (1994). From artificial individuals to global patterns. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 11, 417–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knowlton, N. (1974). A note on the evolution of gamete dimorphism. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 46, 283–285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lande, R. (1981). Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 78, 3721–3725.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lessard, S. (1990). Evolutionary stability: one concept, several meanings. Theoretical Population Biology, 37, 159–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, J. D. and Waller, D. M. (1983). A note on the evolution of gamete dimorphism in algae. American Naturalist, 121, 443–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsuda, H. and Abrams, P. A. (1999). Why are equally sized gametes so rare? The instability of isogamy and the cost of anisogamy. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 1, 769–784.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. (1978). The Evolution of Sex. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. (1982). Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. and Szathmáry, E. (1995). The Major Transitions in Evolution. San Francisco, CA: W. J. Freeman.Google Scholar
Michod, R. E. (1995). Eros and Evolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Nozaki, H., Mori, T., Misumi, O., Matsunaga, S. and Kuroiwa, T. (2006). Males evolved from the dominant isogametic mating type. Current Biology, 16, R1018–R1020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parker, G. A. (1982). Why so many tiny sperm? The maintenance of two sexes with internal fertilization. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 96, 281–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, G. A., Baker, R. R., and Smith, V. G. F. (1972). The origin and evolution of gamete dimorphism and the male–female phemomenon. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 36, 529–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitnick, S. and Markow, T. A. (1994). Male gametic strategies: sperm size, testes size, and the allocation of ejaculate among successive mates by the sperm-limited fly, Drosophila pachea and its relatives. American Naturalist, 143, 785–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitnick, S., Spicer, G. S., and Markow, T. A. (1995). How long is a giant sperm? Nature, 375, 109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randerson, J. P. and Hurst, L. D. (2001). A comparative test of a theory for the evolution of anisogamy. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 268, 879–884.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Randerson, J. P. and Hurst, L. D. (2002). Survival and anisogamy. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 17, 358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, P. D. (1989). Evolutionary stability in one-parameter models under weak selection. Theoretical Population Biology, 36, 125–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, B. (1985). On evolutionary stable sets. Journal of Mathematical Biology, 22, 105–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Togashi, T., Cox, P. A., and Bartelt, J. L. (2007). Underwater fertilization dynamics of marine green algae. Mathematical Biosciences, 209, 205–221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whatley, J. W. (1982). Ultrastructure of plastid inheritance: green algae to angiosperms. Biological Reviews, 57, 525–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×