Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-28T14:53:42.563Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Evaluating the Impact of Public Spending on Socioeconomic Indicators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2011

Get access

Summary

The Benefits from Higher Public Spending

Between 1913 and 2000, the share of public spending in gross domestic product for the groups of industrial countries for which data are available rose by about a factor of four. This growth was promoted by the interaction of particular events (wars, Great Depression) with changing views that assumed that government action and more public spending would promote higher social welfare and beneficial structural changes. In much of this period, the strongest pressures on governments were those pushing for higher public spending. They were promoted partly by the growing democratization of countries that had given a vote to a large share of the population.

These pressures for more public spending led to an expansion of the government role in education, with the result that, in many countries, free or at least very cheap schools, at most educational levels, became the norm, and students were required by law to spend increasing numbers of years in school; in health; in the provision of public pensions, reaching eventually a situation where many or most aged individuals (and, increasingly, some not so aged) were receiving, or expected to receive, government-provided pensions; in assistance for the care of the old and the young; in public assistance to the unemployed and the needy in general; in assistance to families with children; in assistance to families unable to find accessible housing; in assistance to loss-making enterprises; and in other less visible programs.

Type
Chapter
Information
Government versus Markets
The Changing Economic Role of the State
, pp. 229 - 250
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Afonso, Antonio, Schuknecht, Ludger, and Tanzi, Vito. 2005. “Public Sector Efficiency: An International Comparison.” Public Choice 123: 321–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Afonso, Antonio. 2010. “Public Sector Efficiency: Evidence for New EU Member States and Emerging Markets.” Applied Economics 42: 2147–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Afonso, Antonio, Schuknecht, Ludger, Tanzi, Vito, and Veldhuis, Niels. 2007. “Public Sector Efficiency: An International Comparison.” Frazer Alert (March). The Frazer Institute.Google Scholar
Angelopoulos, Konstantinos, Philippopoulos, Apostolis, and Tsionas, Efthymios. 2008. “Does Public Sector Efficiency Matter? Revisiting the Relation between Fiscal Size and Economic Growth in a World Sample.” Public Choice 137, nos. 1–2 (October): 245–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,CEPAL (ECLAC). 2006. Panorama Social de America Latina 2005 (Santiago: Cepol).Google Scholar
Davoodi, Hamid R., Tiongson, Erwin R., and Asawanuchit, Sawitree S.. 2003. “How Useful Are Benefit Incidence Analyses of Public Education and Health Spending?” IMF Working Paper, WP/03/227.Google Scholar
,IMF. 2007. Regional Economic Outlook, Western Hemisphere, November (Washington, D.C.: IMF).Google Scholar
Lora, Eduardo. 2007. “Trends and Outcomes of Tax Reform,” in The State of State Reform in Latin America (Washington, D.C.: IDB and Stanford).Google Scholar
,OECD. 2007. Latin American Economic Outlook, 2008 (Paris: OECD Development Center).Google Scholar
Székely, Miguel. 2008. “Midiendo el Nivel de Institucionalidad de la Politica Social en America Latina.” Mimeo (June).
Tanzi, Vito. 2006. “A New Role for the State: Limits of Public Social Security.” D+C, Development and Cooperation 33, no. 11 (November). 417.21.Google Scholar
Tanzi, Vito. 2008. “The Role of the State and Public Finance in the Next Generation.” OECD Journal for Budgeting 8, no. 2 (June): 2–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanzi, Vito, and Schuknecht, Ludger. 1997. “Reconsidering the Fiscal Role of Government: The International Perspective. ”American Economic Review 87 (May): 164–68.Google Scholar
Tanzi, Vito. 2000. Public Spending in the 20th Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanzi, Vito, and Zee, Howell. 1997. “Fiscal Policy and Long-Run Growth.” IMF Staff Papers 44, no. 2 (June). 179–209.Google Scholar
,United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). 2007. Human Development Report 2007/2008 (Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×