Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T04:53:12.967Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 3 - Preoperative testing

from Section 1 - General

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2013

By
Eva Rimler  and
Danielle Jones
Edited by
Michael F. Lubin ,
Thomas F. Dodson  and
Neil H. Winawer
Michael F. Lubin
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
Thomas F. Dodson
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
Neil H. Winawer
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
Get access

Summary

Overview and historical perspective

Preoperative evaluation of patients is a unique opportunity to assess patients who may not have previously been in contact with primary care with the principal goal of intraoperative and postoperative risk reduction. New diagnoses may be identified, or perhaps more frequently, chronic conditions medically optimized in preparation for surgery. In all cases, a meticulous preoperative history and physical exam will be performed. The data gleaned from the history and physical exam, combined with information about the planned procedure, form the basis for selection of medically indicated preoperative tests.

Preoperative evaluation and testing theory has evolved greatly over the last 50 years. Routine preoperative testing for all patients, rather than indicated testing for selected patients, came into vogue with the advent of multiphasic screening in the 1960s. The alluring notion that routine testing would lead to the discovery and treatment of unsuspected abnormalities, thereby decreasing perioperative complications, has not been realized. In a landmark 1985 study, Kaplan et al. assessed the value of routine laboratory screening of preoperative patients. In a random sample of 2,000 patients who underwent tests before elective surgery in an academic medical center, Kaplan's group found there was no indication for 60% of the preoperative tests that were performed. Only 3.4% of these tests were abnormal and very few of these tests (0.14%) were potentially significant [1]. Moreover, even though none of these potentially significant results was acted on and no changes in patient care resulted, Kaplan showed that no complications resulted.

Type
Chapter
Information
Medical Management of the Surgical Patient
A Textbook of Perioperative Medicine
 , pp. 26 - 31
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kaplan, EB, Sheiner, LB, Boeckmann, AJ et al. The usefulness of preoperative laboratory screening. J Am Med Assoc 1985; 253: 3576–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schein, OD, Katz, J, Bass, EB et al. The value of routine preoperative medical testing before cataract surgery. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 168–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Narr, BJ, Warner, ME, Scroeder, DR et al. Outcomes of patients with no laboratory assessment before anesthesia and a surgical procedure. Mayo Clinic Proc 1997; 72: 505–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hlatky, MA, Boineau, RE, Higginbotham, MB et al. A brief self-administered questionnaire to determine functional capacity (The Duke Activity Status Index). Am J Cardiol 1989; 64: 651–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, CL, Herndon, JE, Mark, DB et al. Relation of clinical and angiographic factors to functional capacity as measured by the Duke Activity Status Index. Am J Cardiol 1991; 68: 973–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fleisher, LA, Beckman, JA, Brown, KA et al. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines on preoperative cardiovascular evaluation and care for noncardiac surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (writing committee to revise the 2002 guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation for noncardiac surgery). Circulation 2007; 116: e418–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcello, PW, Roberts, PL.“Routine” preoperative studies. Which studies in which patients?Surg Clin North Am 1996; 76: 11–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Munro, J, Booth, A, Nicholl, J.Routine preoperative testing: a systematic review of the evidence. Health Techno Assessm 1997; 1(12): 1–62.Google Scholar
Macpherson, DS, Snow, R, Lofgren, RP.Preoperative screening: value of previous tests. Ann Intern Med 1990; 113: 969–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eckman, MH, Erban, JK, Singh, SK, Kao, GS.Screening for the risk for bleeding or thrombosis. Ann Intern Med 2003; 138: W15–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gold, BS, Young, ML, Kinman, JL et al. The utility of preoperative electrocardiograms in the ambulatory surgical patient. Arch Intern Med 1992; 152: 301–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashton, CM, Tjomas, J, Wray, NP et al. The frequency and significance of ECG changes after transurethral prostate resection. J Am Geriat Soc 1991; 39: 575–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tait, AR, Parr, HG, Tremper, KK.Evaluation of the efficacy of routine preoperative electrocardiograms. J Cardioth Vasc Anesth 1997; 11: 752–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberger, AL, O'Konski, M.Utility of the routine electrocardiogram before surgery and on general hospital admission. Ann Intern Med 1986; 105: 552–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wijeysundera, DM, Beattie, WS, Karkouti, et al. Association of echocardiography before major elective non cardiac surgery with postoperative survival and length of hospital stay: population based cohort study. Br Med J 2011; 342: d3695..CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, TH, Marcantonio, ER, Mangione, CM.Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery. Circulation 1999; 100: 1043–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wijeysundera, DM, Beattie, WS, Austin, PC et al. Non-invasive cardiac stress testing before elective non-cardiac surgery: population based cohort study. Br Med J 2010; 340: b5526. .CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dimich, JB, Chen, SL, Taheri, PA et al. Hospital costs associated with surgical complications: a report from the private-sector National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 2004; 199: 531–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, DB.Postoperative recovery of pulmonary function. Anesth Analg 1981; 60: 46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American College of Physicians. Position paper: preoperative pulmonary function testing. Ann Intern Med 1990; 112: 793–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, C, Levy, AR, McGregor, M.Value of routine pre-operative chest X-rays: a meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth 1993; 40: 1022–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joo, HS, Wong, J, Naik, VN et al. The value of screening preoperative chest x-rays: a systematic review. Can J Anaesth 2005; 52: 568–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacMahon, H, Khan, AR, Mohammed, T-L et al. Appropriateness criteria: routine admission and preoperative chest radiography. American College of Radiology 2000 (Reviewed 2008).
Gass, GD, Olsen, GN.Preoperative pulmonary function testing to predict postoperative morbidity and mortality. Chest 1986; 89: 127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kroenke, K, Lawrence, VA, Theroux, JF et al. Postoperative complications after thoracic and major abdominal surgery in patients with and without obstructive disease. Chest 1993; 104: 1445–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, DO, Warner, MA, Offord, KP et al. Airway obstruction and perioperative complications in smokers undergoing abdominal surgery. Anesthesiology 1999; 90: 372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brooks-Brunn, JA.Predictors of postoperative pulmonary complications following abdominal surgery. Chest 1997; 111: 564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Qaseem, A, Snow, V, Fitterman, N et al. Risk assessment for strategies to reduce perioperative pulmonary complications for patients undergoing noncardiothoracic surgery: a guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2006; 144: 575–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chung, F, Yuan, H, Yin, L et al. Eliminating preoperative testing in ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg 2009; 108: 467–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×