Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T23:40:24.893Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Carbon Emissions from Land-Use Change: Model Estimates Using Three Different Data Sets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2013

Daniel G. Brown
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Derek T. Robinson
Affiliation:
University of Waterloo, Ontario
Nancy H. F. French
Affiliation:
Michigan Technological University
Bradley C. Reed
Affiliation:
United States Geological Survey, California
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Land-use and land-cover change (LUCC) are an important contributor to emissions of direct (e.g., carbon dioxide [CO2], methane [CH4], and nitrous oxide[N2O]) and indirect (e.g., carbon monoxide [CO], nitrogen oxide [NOx], and nonmethane hydrocarbons) greenhouse gases to the atmosphere. The future projections for atmospheric composition and climate, as well as the associated potential for mitigating emissions and climate change, critically depend on these gases. LUCC has the potential to alter regional and global climate through changes in the biophysical characteristics of the Earth's surface (e.g., albedo and surface roughness) and changes in the biogeochemical cycles of the terrestrial ecosystems (e.g., global carbon [C] and nitrogen [N] cycles). Because of these strong links between LUCC and climate change, historical reconstruction and future projections of LUCC are necessary to better understand climate change.

Estimating the impact of historical LUCC activities on C storage from regional to global scales critically depends on understanding the disturbance history of land. This consists of knowing the current land-cover type, the process used in changing the land to its current land-cover type, and its preconversion land-cover type. Additionally, information about the age of forests, which indicates the maturity, and successional stage of the land are required. Furthermore, the biogeochemical processes and feedbacks adopted to estimate emissions are critically important. For example, it is essential for terrestrial C cycle models to consider the interactions between the terrestrial C and N cycle processes, which are altered not only by changes in LUCC activities but also climate, N inputs, and atmospheric CO2 concentrations (Jain et al. 2009). The uncertainties arising because of these factors hinder our ability to make accurate predictions of changes in the global C cycle and regional and global climate change. This is reflected by the fact that even estimates of the amount of CO2 released to the atmosphere or absorbed by the terrestrial ecosystems for years immediately following LUCC activities have been published with relatively large differences in results (Hurtt et al. 2006; Jain and Yang 2005; Yang, Richardson, and Jain 2010). For example, according to the latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) AR4, CO2 emissions due to LUCC for the 1990s could vary between 0.5 and 2.7 Pg C·yr−1 (median value of 1.6 Pg C·yr−1) (Denman et al. 2007).

Type
Chapter
Information
Land Use and the Carbon Cycle
Advances in Integrated Science, Management, and Policy
, pp. 241 - 258
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, S., and Lugo, A.E. 1990. Tropical secondary forests. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 6:1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canadell, J.G., Le Quéré, C., Raupach, M.R., Field, C.B., Buitenhuis, E.T., Ciais, P.,…Marland, G. 2007. Contributions to accelerating atmospheric CO2 growth from economic activity, carbon intensity, and efficiency of natural sinks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(47):18866.CrossRef
Davidson, E.A., Reis de Carvalho, C.J., Vieira, I.C.G., Figueiredo, R.O., Moutinho, P., Yoko Ishida, F.,…Tuma Sabá, R. 2004. Nitrogen and phosphorus limitation of biomass growth in a tropical secondary forest. Ecological Applications, 14(4):150–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denman, K.L., Brasseur, G., Chidthaisong, A., Ciais, P., Cox, P.M., Dickinson, R.E.,…Zhang, X. 2007. Couplings between changes in the climate system and biogeochemistry. In Climate change 2007: The physical science basis, ed. Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K.B., and Miller, H.L.. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Galloway, J., Dentener, F., Capone, D., Boyer, E., Howarth, R., Seitzinger, S.,…Holland, E. 2004. Nitrogen cycles: Past, present, and future. Biogeochemistry, 70(2):153–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guariguata, M.R., and Ostertag, R. 2001. Neotropical secondary forest succession: Changes in structural and functional characteristics. Forest Ecology and Management, 148(1–3):185–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houghton, R., Lefkowitz, D., and Skole, D. 1991. Changes in the landscape of Latin America between 1850 and 1985. I. Progressive loss of forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 38(3):143–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houghton, R.A. 2003. Revised estimates of the annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land use and land management 1850–2000. Tellus B, 55:378–390.Google Scholar
Houghton, R.A. 2008. Carbon flux to the atmosphere from land-use changes: 1850–2005. CarbonDioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.Google Scholar
Houghton, R.A., and Hackler, J.L. 2000. Changes in terrestrial carbon storage in the United States. 1. The roles of agriculture and forestry. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 9:125–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houghton, R.A., and Hackler, J.L. 2003. Sources and sinks of carbon from land-use change in China. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 17(2):1034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurtt, G., Frolking, S., Fearon, M., Moore, B., Shevliakova, E., Malyshev, S.,…Houghton, R. 2006. The underpinnings of land-use history: Three centuries of global gridded land-use transitions, wood-harvest activity, and resulting secondary lands. Global Change Biology, 12(7):1208–1229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jain, A.K., and Yang, X. 2005. Modeling the effects of two different land cover change data sets on the carbon stocks of plants and soils in concert with CO2 and climate change. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 19(2):1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jain, A.K., Yang, X., Kheshgi, H., McGuire, A.D., Post, W., and Kicklighter, , , D., 2009. Nitrogen attenuation of terrestrial carbon cycle response to global environmental factors. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 23:GB4028, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeling, C., Bacastow, R., and Whorf, T. 1982. Measurements of the concentration of carbon dioxide at Mauna Loa Observatory, Hawaii. Carbon Dioxide Review, 982:377–385.Google Scholar
Keeling, C., and Whorf, T. 2007. Atmospheric CO2 concentrations (ppmv) at Mauna Loa. Carbon Dioxide Research Group, Scripps Institute of Oceanography (SIO), from .
Kenji, K. 2000. Recycling of forests: Overseas forest plantation projects of Oji Paper Co., Ltd. Japan TAPPI Journal, 54(1):45–48.Google Scholar
Klein Goldewijk, K. 2001. Estimating global land use change over the past 300 years: The HYDE database. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 15(2):417–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein Goldewijk, K., and Ramankutty, N. 2004. Land cover change over the last three centuries due to human activities: The availability of new global data sets. GeoJournal, 61(4):335–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leite, C.C., Costa, M.H., de Lima, C.A., Ribeiro, A.S., and Sediyama, G.C. 2011. Historical reconstruction of land use in the Brazilian Amazon (1940–1995). Journal of Land Use Science, 6:33–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, B.B., Fang, X.Q., Ye, Y., and Zhang, X. 2010. Accuracy assessment of global historical cropland datasets based on regional reconstructed historical data – a case study in Northeast China. Science China Earth Sciences, 53(11):1689–1699, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, A.D., Sitch, S., Clein, J.S., Dargaville, R., Esser, G., Foley, J.,…Wittenberg, U. 2001. Carbon balance of the terrestrial biosphere in the twentieth century: Analyses of CO2, climate and land-use effects with four process-based ecosystem models. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 15(1):183–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merker, S., Yustian, I., and Muhlenberg, M. 2004. Losing ground but still doing well – Tarsius dianae in human-altered rainforests of central Sulawesi, Indonesia. In Land use, nature conservation and the stability of rainforest margins in Southeast Asia, ed. Gerold, G., Fremercy, M., and Guhardja, E.. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 299–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, T.D., and Jones, P.D. 2005. An improved method of constructing a database of monthly climate observations and associated high-resolution grids. International Journal of Climatology, 25(6):693–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pacala, S.W., Hurtt, G.C., Moorcroft, P.R., and Caspersen, J.P. 2001. Carbon storage in the US caused by land use change. In The present and future of modeling global environmental change. Tokyo: Terra Scientific Publishing, pp. 145–172.Google Scholar
Ramankutty, N., and Foley, J.A. 1998. Characterizing patterns of global land use: An analysis of global croplands data. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 12(4):667–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramankutty, N., and Foley, J.A. 1999. Estimating historical changes in global land cover: Croplands from 1700 to 1992. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 13(4):997–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramankutty, N., Gibbs, H.K., Achard, F., DeFries, R., Foley, J.A., and Houghton, R.A. 2007. Challenges to estimating carbon emissions from tropical deforestation. GlobalChange Biology, 13:51–66, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reay, D.S., Dentener, F., Smith, P., Grace, J., and Feely, R.A. 2008. Global nitrogen deposition and carbon sinks. Nature Geoscience, 1:430–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shevliakova, E., Pacala, S.W., Malyshev, S., Hurtt, G.C., Milly, P.C.D., Caspersen, J.P.Crevoisier, C. 2009. Carbon cycling under 300 years of land use change: Importance of the secondary vegetation sink. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 23:GB2022, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Minnen, J.G., Klein Goldewijk, K., Stehfest, E., Eickhout, B., van Drecht, G., and Leemans, R. 2009. The importance of three centuries of land-use change for the global and regional terrestrial carbon cycle. Climatic Change, 97:123–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, X., Richardson, T.K., and Jain, A.K. 2010. Contributions of secondary forest and nitrogen dynamics to terrestrial carbon uptake. Biogeosciences, 7:3041–3050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, X., Wittig, V., Jain, A., and Post, W. 2009. Integration of nitrogen dynamics into a global terrestrial ecosystem model. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 23:GB4028, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ye, Y., and Fang, X.Q. 2011. Spatial pattern of land cover changes across Northeast China over the past 300 years. Journal of Historical Geography, 37:408–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×