Abraham, Henry J. 2008. Justices, Presidents, and Senators: A History of the U.S. Supreme Court Appointments from Washington to Bush II (5th ed.). Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Aldisert, Ruggero. 1990. “Precedent: What It Is and What It Isn't; When Do We Kiss It and When Do We Kill It?” Pepperdine Law Review 17: 605–636.Google Scholar

Aleinikoff, T. Alexander. 2002. Semblances of Sovereignty – The Constitution, the State, and American Citizenship. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Allen, Charlotte. 2005. “A Wreck of a Plan.” Washington Post, July 17, B01.

Alvarez, R. Michael, and Brehm, John. 1998. “Speaking in Two Voices: American Equivocation About the Internal Revenue Service.” American Journal of Political Science 42: 418–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anastaplo, George. 2007. Reflections on Freedom of Speech and the First Amendment. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar

Axelrod-Contrada, Joan. 2006. Internet Censorship: Reno v. ACLU. New York: Benchmark Press.Google Scholar

Bailey, Michael. 2007. “Comparable Preference Estimates Across Time and Institutions for the Court, Congress and Presidency.” American Journal of Political Science 51: 433–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bailey, Michael and Maltzman, Forrest. forthcoming. The Constrained Court: Law, Politics and the Decisions Justices Make. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Bailey, Michael, Kamoie, Brian, and Maltzman, Forrest. 2005. “Signals from the Tenth Justice: The Political Role of the Solicitor General in Supreme Court Decision Making.” American Journal of Political Science 49: 72–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bailey, Michael, and Maltzman, Forrest. 2008. “Does Legal Doctrine Matter? Unpacking Law and Policy Preferences on the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review 102: 369–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baird, Vanessa. 2007. Answering the Call of the Court: How Justices and Litigants Set the Supreme Court Agenda. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar

Baird, Vanessa. 2004. “The Effect of Politically Salient Decisions on the U.S. Supreme Court's Agenda.” Journal of Politics 66: 755–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, Leonard. 1967. Back to Back: The Duel Between FDR and the Supreme Court. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Baker, Liva. 1983. Miranda: Crime, Law, and Politics. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar

Baker, Nancy. 1992. Conflicting Loyalties: Law and Politics in the Attorney General's Office, 1789–1990. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar

Ball, Howard. 2000. The Bakke Case: Race, Education, & Affirmative Action. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar

Ball, Howard. 1988. “The United States Supreme Court's Glossing of the Federal Torts Claims Act: Statutory Construction and Veterans' Tort Actions.” Western Political Quarterly 41: 529–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ball, Howard. 1978. Judicial Craftsmanship or Fiat? Direct Overturn by the United States Supreme Court. Westport, Conn.: Praeger.Google Scholar

Ball, Howard, and Cooper, Philip. 1992. Of Power and Right: Hugo Black, William O. Douglas, and America's Constitutional Revolution. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bamberger, Michael 2000. Reckless Legislation: How Lawmakers Ignore the Constitution. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar

Barilleaux, Ryan J. 2006. “Venture Constitutionalism and the Enlargement of the Presidency.” In Kelley, Christopher S. (Ed.), Executing the Constitution: Putting the President Back into the Constitution, pp. 37–52. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Barnes, Jeb. 2004. Overruled: Legislative Overrides, Pluralism, and Contemporary Court-Congress Relations. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Bartee, Alice Fleetwood. 1984. Cases Lost, Causes Won. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar

Bartels, Brandon. 2001. “Supreme Court Outputs and the Political Environment: A Neo-Institutional Macro-Analytic Perspective.” Paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association Meetings, Chicago.Google Scholar

Baum, Lawrence. 2010. The Supreme Court (10th ed.). Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar

Baum, Lawrence. 2006. Judges and their Audiences. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Baum, Lawrence. 1997. The Puzzle of Judicial Behavior. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Baum, Lawrence. 1992. “Membership Change and Collective Voting Change in the United States Supreme Court.” Journal of Politics 54: 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baum, Lawrence. 1988. “Measuring Policy Change in the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review 82: 905–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baumgartner, Frank, and Jones, Bryan. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Beck, James. 1993. Raphael: The Stanza Della Segnatura. New York: George Braziller.Google Scholar

Beesley, Susan L., and Newman Glover, Theresa A.. 1987. “Developments Under the Freedom of Information Act: 1986.” Duke Law Journal 1987: 521–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Belknap, Michal. 2005. The Supreme Court Under Earl Warren, 1953–1969. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Bell, Derrick A., Jr. 1980. Race, Racism, and American Law (2d ed.). Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Bendor, Jonathan, and Moe, Terry. 1985. “An Adaptive Model of Bureaucratic Politics.” American Political Science Review 79: 755–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benecki, Maria H. 1988. “Developments Under the Freedom of Information Act: 1987.” Duke Law Journal 1988: 566–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benesh, Sara C., and Reddick, Malia. 2002. “Overruled: An Event History Analysis of Lower Court Reaction to Supreme Court Alteration of Precedent.” Journal of Politics 64: 534–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benesh, Sara C., and Spaeth, Harold J.. 2001. “Salient to Whom? A Potential Measure of Salience to the Justices.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar

Benson, Paul R., Jr. 1970. The Supreme Court and the Commerce Clause, 1937–1970. New York: Dunellen.Google Scholar

Berelson, Bernard, Lazarsfeld, Paul, and McPhee, William. 1954. Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Bergara, Mario, Richman, Barak, and Spiller, Pablo T.. 2003. “Modeling Supreme Court Strategic Decision Making: The Congressional Constraint.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 28: 247–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berner, Richard Olin. 1976. “The Effect of the 1976 Amendment to Exemption Three of the Freedom of Information Act.” Columbia Law Review 76: 1029–1047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bickel, Alexander M. 1962. The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar

Bland, Randall W. 1993. Private Pressure on Public Law: The Legal Career of Justice Thurgood Marshall, 1934–1991 (rev. ed.). Lanham, Md.: University Press of America.Google Scholar

Blasecki, Janet. 1990. “Justice Lewis Powell: Swing Voter or Staunch Conservative?” Journal of Politics 52: 530–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blasi, Vincent (Ed.). 1983. The Burger Court: The Counter-Revolution That Wasn't. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Blumrosen, Alfred W. 1993. Modern Law: The Law Transmission System and Equal Employment Opportunity. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

Bork, Robert H. 1996. Slouching Towards Gomorrah: Modern Liberalism and American Decline. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar

Bork, Robert H. 1971. “Neutral Principles and Some First Amendment Problems.” Indiana Law Journal 47: 1–35.Google Scholar

Boucher, Richard, Jr., and Segal, Jeffrey. 1995. “Supreme Court Justices as Strategic Decision Makers: Aggressive Grants and Defensive Denials on the Vinson Court.” Journal of Politics 57: 824–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brady, David, and Volden, Craig. 2005. Revolving Gridlock: Politics and Policy from Carter to Clinton (2d ed.). Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Branch, Taylor. 1988. Parting the Waters: America in the King Years 1954–1963. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Brehm, John, and Gates, Scott. 1997. Working, Shirking, and Sabotage: Bureaucratic Response to a Democratic Public. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brenner, Saul. 1980. “Fluidity on the United States Supreme Court: A Reexamination.” American Journal of Political Science 24: 526–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brenner, Saul, and Arrington, Theodore. 1987. “Unanimous Decision Making on the U.S. Supreme Court: Case Stimuli and Judicial Attitudes.” Political Behavior 9: 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brenner, Saul, and Spaeth, Harold. 1995. Stare Indecisis: The Alteration of Precedent on the Supreme Court, 1946–1992. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brisbin, Richard A., Jr. 1997. Justice Antonin Scalia and the Conservative Revival. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Brisbin, Richard A., Jr. 1996. “Slaying the Dragon: Segal, Spaeth and the Function of Law in Supreme Court Decision Making.” American Journal of Political Science 40: 1004–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burnham, Walter Dean. 1970. Critical Elections and the Mainsprings of American Politics. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar

Caldeira, Gregory, Wright, John, and Zorn, Christopher. 1999. “Sophisticated Voting and Gate-Keeping in the Supreme Court.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 15: 549–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip, Miller, Warren, and Stokes, Donald. 1960. The American Voter. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar

Canon, Bradley, and Johnson, Charles. 1999. Judicial Policies: Implementation and Impact. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caplan, Lincoln. 1987. The Tenth Justice: The Solicitor General and the Rule of Law. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar

Carmines, Edward, and Stimson, James. 1989. Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Carp, Robert, Ronald Stidham, and Kenneth Manning. 2004. Judicial Process in America (6th ed.). Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar

Casper, Jonathan D. 1976. “The Supreme Court and National Policy Making.” American Political Science Review 70: 50–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cater, Douglass. 1964. Power in Washington: A Critical Look at Today's Struggle to Govern the Nation's Capital. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Chen, Jim. 2003. “Filburn's Legacy.” Emory Law Journal 52: 1719–1769.Google Scholar

Cheney, Timothy 1998. Who Makes the Law: The Supreme Court, Congress, the States, and Society. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Clark, Elias. 1975. “Holding Government Accountable: The Amended Freedom of Information Act – An Article in Honor of Fred Rodell.” Yale Law Journal 84: 741–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, Hunter. 1995. Justice Brennan: The Great Conciliator. Secaucus: Carol Publishing Group.Google Scholar

Claude, Richard. 1970. The Supreme Court and the Electoral Process. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Clausen, Aage. 1973. How Congressmen Decide: A Policy Focus. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar

Clayton, Cornell. 1999. “The Supreme Court and Political Jurisprudence: New and Old Institutionalisms.” In Clayton, Cornell and Gillman, Howard (Eds.), Supreme Court Decision Making: New Institutionalist Approaches, pp. 15–41. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Clayton, Cornell. 1992. The Politics of Justice: The Attorney General and the Making of Legal Policy. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar

Clayton, Cornell, and Gillman, Howard (Eds). 1999. Supreme Court Decision Making: New Institutionalist Approaches. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Cleary, Edward. 1994. Beyond the Burning Cross: A Landmark Case of Race, Censorship, and the First Amendment. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar

Cohen, Linda, and Spitzer, Matthew. 1994. “Solving the Chevron Puzzle.” Law and Contemporary Problems 57: 65–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collins, Paul M., Jr. 2008. Friends of the Supreme Court. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cortner, Richard. 2001. Civil Rights and Public Accommodations: The Heart of Atlanta Motel and McClung Cases. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar

Cortner, Richard. 1981. The Supreme Court and the Second Bill of Rights: The Fourteenth Amendment and the Nationalization of Civil Rights. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

Cortner, Richard. 1970. The Apportionment Cases. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar

Corwin, Edward. 1984. The President: Office and Powers (5th ed.). New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar

Cottrol, Robert, Raymond Diamond, and Leland Ware. 2003. Brown v. Board of Education: Caste, Culture, and the Constitution. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar

Coyne, Thomas. 1985. “Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff: A Final Requiem for the Public Use Limitation on Eminent Domain.” Notre Dame Law Review 60: 388–404.Google Scholar

Cox, Gary, and McCubbins, Mathew. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Cross, Frank B., and Nelson, Blake J.. 2001. “Strategic Institutional Effects on Supreme Court Decisionmaking.” Northwestern University Law Review 95: 1437–1493.Google Scholar

Crowley, Donald. 1987. “Judicial Review of Administrative Agencies: Does the Type of Agency Matter?” Political Research Quarterly 40: 265–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Curry, Brett W. 2005. “The Courts, Congress, and the Politics of Federal Jurisdiction.” Ph.D. diss., The Ohio State University, Columbus.Google Scholar

Curry, Brett W., Pacelle, Richard L., and Marshall, Bryan W.. 2008. “An ‘Informal and Limited Alliance’: The President and the Supreme Court.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 38: 223–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cushman, Barry. 1998. Rethinking the New Deal Court: The Structure of a Constitutional Revolution. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert. 1957. “Decision Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker.” Journal of Public Law 6: 279–295.Google Scholar

Danelski, David. 1978. “The Influence of the Chief Justice in the Decisional Process of the Supreme Court.” In Goldman, Sheldon and Sarat, Austin (Eds.), American Court Systems, pp. 506–518. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar

Davis, Dena. 2000. “Religious Clubs in the Public Schools: What Happened After Mergens?” Albany Law Review 64: 225–239.Google Scholar

Davis, Michael, and Clark, Hunter. 1992. Thurgood Marshall: Warrior at the Bar, Rebel on the Bench. New York: Birch Lane Press.Google Scholar

Days, Drew. 1994–1995. “In Search of the Solicitor General's Client: A Drama with Many Characters.” Kentucky Law Review 83: 485–503.Google Scholar

Deering, Christopher J., and Maltzman, Forrest 1999. “The Politics of Executive Orders: Legislative Constraints on Presidential Power.” Political Research Quarterly 52: 767–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dempsey, Paul Stephen. 1984. “The Interstate Commerce Commission – Disintegration of an American Legal Institution.” American University Law Review 34: 1–51.Google Scholar

Sario, Jack P., and William D. Mason. 2003. Dr. Sam Sheppard on Trial: The Prosecutors and the Marilyn Sheppard Murder. Kent: KentState University Press.Google Scholar

Dierenfield, Bruce J. 2007. The Battle Over School Prayer: How Engel v. Vitale Changed America. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar

Dodd, Lawrence. 1986. “A Theory of Congressional Cycles: Solving the Puzzle of Change.” In Dodd, Lawrence, Wright, Gerald, and Rieselbach, Leroy (Eds.), Congress and Policy Change, pp. 3–44. New York: Agathon Press.Google Scholar

Downs, Anthony. 1967. Inside Bureaucracy. Boston: Little, Brown.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dripps, Donald. 2001. “Constitutional Theory for Criminal Procedure: Dickerson, Miranda, and the Continuing Quest for Broad-but-Shallow.” William and Mary Law Review 43: 1–77.Google Scholar

Dubroff, Harold. 1979. The United States Tax Court: An Historical Analysis. Chicago: Commerce Clearing House.Google Scholar

Ducat, Craig, and Dudley, Robert. 1987. “Dimensions Underlying Economic Policymaking in the Early and Later Burger Court.” Journal of Politics 49: 521–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dudley, Robert, and Ducat, Craig. 1986. “The Burger Court and Economic Liberalism.” Political Research Quarterly 39: 236–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunne, Gerald. 1977. Hugo Black and the Judicial Revolution. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Eisler, Kim Isaac. 1993. A Justice For All: William J. Brennan, Jr. and the Decisions That Transformed America. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Eisner, Marc Allen, Worsham, Jeff, and Ringquist, Evan. 2006. Contemporary Regulatory Policy (2d ed.). Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar

Ely, James W. 1992. “Property Rights and Judicial Activism.” Georgetown Journal of Law and Public Policy. Inaugural Issue: 125–127.Google Scholar

Epp, Charles. 1998. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Epstein, Lee. 1985. Conservatives in Court. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar

Epstein, Lee, Hoekstra, Valerie, Segal, Jeffrey, and Spaeth, Harold. 1998. “Do Political Preferences Change? A Longitudinal Study of U.S. Supreme Court Justices.” Journal of Politics 60: 801–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Epstein, Lee, and Knight, Jack. 1999. “Mapping Out the Strategic Terrain: The Informational Role of Amici Curiae.” In Clayton, Cornell and Gillman, Howard (Eds.), Institutional Approaches to Supreme Court Decision Making, pp. 215–236. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Epstein, Lee, and Knight, Jack. 1998. The Choices Justices Make. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar

Epstein, Lee, and Knight, Jack. 1997. “The New Institutionalism, Part II.” Law and Courts 7: 4–9.Google Scholar

Epstein, Lee, Knight, Jack, and Martin, Andrew D.. 2001. “The Supreme Court as a Strategic National Policymaker.” Emory Law Journal 50: 583–611.Google Scholar

Epstein, Lee, and Kobylka, Joseph. 1992. The Supreme Court and Legal Change: Abortion and the Death Penalty. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Epstein, Lee, Martin, Andrew, Segal, Jeffrey, and Westerland, Chad. 2007. “The Judicial Common Space.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 23: 303–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Epstein, Lee, and Mershon, Carol. 1996. “Measuring Political Preferences.” American Journal of Political Science 40: 261–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Epstein, Lee, and Segal, Jeffrey. 2005. Advice and Consent: The Politics of Judicial Appointments. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Epstein, Lee, and Segal, Jeffrey. 2000. “Measuring Issue Salience.” American Journal of Political Science 44: 66–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Epstein, Lee, Segal, Jeffrey, Spaeth, Harold, and Walker, Thomas G.. 2007. The Supreme Court Compendium: Data, Decisions, and Developments (4th ed.). Washington D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar

Epstein, Lee, Segal, Jeffrey, Spaeth, Harold, and Walker, Thomas G.. 2003. The Supreme Court Compendium: Data, Decisions, and Developments (3rd ed.). Washington D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar

Epstein, Lee, Staudt, Nancy, and Wiedenbeck, Peter. 2003. “Judging Statutes: Thoughts on Statutory Interpretation and Notes for a Project on the Internal Revenue Code.” Washington University Journal of Law & Policy 13: 305–333.Google Scholar

Epstein, Lee, and Walker, Thomas G.. 2007a. Constitutional Law for a Changing America: Institutional Powers and Constraints (6th ed.). Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar

Epstein, Lee, and Walker, Thomas G.. 2007b. Constitutional Law for a Changing America: Rights, Liberties, and Justice (6th ed.). Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar

Epstein, Lee, and Walker, Thomas G.. 1998a. Constitutional Law for a Changing America: Institutional Powers and Constraints (3rd ed.). Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar

Epstein, Lee, and Walker, Thomas G.. 1998b. Constitutional Law for a Changing America: Rights, Liberties, and Justice (3rd ed.). Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar

Epstein, Lee, and Walker, Thomas G.. 1995. “The Role of the Supreme Court in American Society: Playing the Reconstruction Game.” In Epstein, Lee (Ed.), Contemplating Courts, pp. 315–346. Washington D.C.: CQ Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Epstein, Richard. 2008. “How to Complicate Habeas Corpus.” New York Times, June 21, B21.

Epstein, Richard. 1993. “Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council: A Tangled Web of Expectations.” Stanford Law Review 45: 1369–1392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Epstein, Richard. 1985. Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Erikson, Robert, MacKuen, Michael, and Stimson, James. 2002. The Macro Polity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Eskridge, William N., Jr. 1994. Dynamic Statutory Interpretation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Eskridge, William N., Jr. 1991a. “Overriding Supreme Court Statutory Interpretation Decisions.” Yale Law Journal 101: 331–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eskridge, William N., Jr. 1991b. “Reneging on History? Playing the Court/Congress/President Civil Rights Game.” California Law Review 79: 613–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eskridge, William N., Jr. 1990. “The Case of the Amorous Defendant: Criticizing Absolute Stare Decisis for Statutory Cases – April 2001.” Michigan Law Review 88: 2450–2466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eskridge, William N., Jr., and Baer, Lauren E.. 2008. “The Continuum of Deference: Supreme Court Treatment of Agency Statutory Interpretation from Chevron to Hamdan.” Georgetown Law Review 96: 1083–1226.Google Scholar

Eskridge, William N., Jr., and Frickey, Philip P.. 1994. “The Making of the Legal Process.” Harvard Law Review 107: 2031–2055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Estreicher, Samuel, and Sexton, John. 1986. Redefining the Supreme Court's Role: A Theory of Managing the Federal Judicial Process. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Fallon, Richard H., Jr., Meltzer, Daniel J., and Shapiro, David L.. 1996. Hart and Wechsler's The Federal Courts and the Federal System. Westbury: Foundation Press.Google Scholar

Farber, Daniel A., and Frickey, Philip P.. 1991. “In the Shadow of the Legislature: The Common Law In the Age of the New Public Law.” Michigan Law Review 89: 875–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fenno, Richard F., Jr. 1973. Congressmen in Committees. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar

Ferejohn, John, and Shipan, Charles. 1990. “Congressional Influence on Bureaucracy.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 6: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fiorina, Morris P. 1996. Divided Government (2d ed.). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Fiorina, Morris P., and Shepsle, Kenneth A.. 1989. “Formal Theories of Leadership: Agents, Agenda Setting, and Entrepreneurs.” In Jones, Bryan D. (Ed.), Leadership and Politics: New Perspectives in Political Science, pp. 17–40. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar

Fischel, William A. 1995. Regulatory Takings: Law, Economics, and Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Fisher, Louis. 2000. Congressional Abdication on War and Spending. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar

Fisher, Louis 1998. The Politics of Shared Power. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar

Fisher, Louis, and Devins, Neal. 1992. Political Dynamics of Constitutional Law. St. Paul: West.Google Scholar

Foerstel, Herbert N. 1999. Freedom of Information and the Right to Know: The Origins and Applications of the Freedom of Information Act. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar

Force, Robert. 1999. “An Essay on Federal Common Law and Admiralty.” Saint Louis Law Journal 43: 1367–1387.Google Scholar

Fox, Arthur. 1987. “Showing Workers Who's Boss.” In Schwartz, Herman (Ed.), The Burger Court: Rights and Wrongs in the Supreme Court 1969–1986, pp. 228–239. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Fox, Eleanor. 2002. “Antitrust and Business Power.” In Schwartz, Herman (Ed.), The Rehnquist Court: Judicial Activism on the Right, pp. 213–225. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar

Franklin, Charles, and Kosaki, Liane. 1989. “Republican Schoolmaster: The U.S. Supreme Court, Public Opinion, and Abortion.” American Political Science Review 83: 751–771.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Freeman, J. Leiper. 1965. The Political Process: Executive Bureau-Legislative Committee Relations. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Friedman, Barry, and Harvey, Anna. 2003. “Electing the Supreme Court.” Indiana Law Journal 78: 123–152.Google Scholar

Galanter, Marc. 1974. “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change.” Law & Society Review 9: 95–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gates, John. 1992. The Supreme Court and Partisan Realignment: A Macro- and Microlevel Perspective. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Gely, Rafael, and Spiller, Pablo. 1990. “A Rational Choice Theory of Supreme Court Statutory Decisions with Applications to the State Farm and Grove City Cases.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 6: 263–300.Google Scholar

George, Tracey, and Epstein, Lee. 1992. “On the Nature of Supreme Court Decision Making.” American Political Science Review 86: 323–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerhardt, Michael. 2008. The Power of Precedent. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibson, James L. 1991. “Decision Making in Appellate Courts.” In Gates, John and Johnson, Charles (Eds.), The American Courts: A Critical Assessment, pp. 255–278. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar

Gibson, James L. 1983. “From Simplicity to Complexity: The Development of Theory in the Study of Judicial Behavior.” Political Behavior 5: 7–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gifford, Daniel J. 1995. “The Jurisprudence of Antitrust.” Southern Methodist University Law Review 48: 1677–1712.Google Scholar

Gillman, Howard. 1993. The Constitution Besieged: The Rise and Demise of Lochner Era Police Powers Jurisprudence. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Gillman, Howard, and Clayton, Cornell. 1999. The Supreme Court in American Politics: New Institutional Interpretations. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar

Goldman, Robert. 2008. One Man Out: Curt Flood Versus Baseball. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar

Goldman, Sheldon, and Jahnige, Thomas. 1985. The Federal Courts as a Political System (3rd ed.). New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Goldman, Sheldon, and Sarat, Austin. 1989. American Court Systems (2d ed.). New York: Longman.Google Scholar

Goldstein, Leslie. 1995. “By Consent of the Governed: Directions in Constitutional Theory.” In Epstein, Lee (Ed.), Contemplating Courts, pp. 275–295. Washington D.C.: CQ Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldstein, Robert Justin. 2000. Flag Burning and Free Speech: The Case of Texas v. Johnson. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar

Goplen, Susan K. 1993. “Judicial Deference to Administrative Agencies' Legal Interpretations After Lechmere, Inc. v. NLRB.” Washington Law Review 68: 207–226.Google Scholar

Gormley, William. 1989. Taming the Bureaucracy: Muscles, Prayer, and Other Strategies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gould, William B.. 2000. “American Regulatory Policy: Have We Found the “Third Way? Labor Policy Beyond the New Deal.” Kansas Law Review 48: 751–764.Google Scholar

Graber, Mark. 1991. Transforming Free Speech: The Ambiguous Legacy of Civil Libertarianism. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Graham, Fred. 1970. The Due Process Revolution: The Warren Court's Impact on Criminal Law. New York: Hayden.Google Scholar

Graham, Hugh Davis. 1990. The Civil Rights Era: Origins and Development of National Policy, 1960–1972. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Greenberg, Jack. 1994. Crusaders in the Courts: How a Dedicated Band of Lawyers Fought for the Civil Rights Revolution. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Greenhouse, Linda. 2005. Becoming Justice Blackmun. New York: Times Books.Google Scholar

Grey, Thomas. 1975. “Do We Have an Unwritten Constitution?” Stanford Law Review 27: 703–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grossman, Joel B. 1963. “Role-Playing and the Analysis of Judicial Behavior: The Case of Justice Frankfurter.” Journal of Public Law 11: 285–309.Google Scholar

Hagle, Timothy, and Spaeth, Harold. 1993. “Ideological Patterns in the Justices' Voting in the Burger Court's Business Cases.” Journal of Politics 55: 492–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hagle, Timothy, and Spaeth, Harold. 1992. “The Emergence of a New Ideology: The Business Decisions of the Burger Court.” Journal of Politics 54: 120–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haiman, Franklyn. 1981. Speech and Law in a Free Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hamilton, Alexander. 1982. “Federalist 79.” In Wills, Garry (Ed.), The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar

Hammond, Thomas. 1986. “Agenda Control, Organizational Structure, and Bureaucratic Politics.” American Journal of Political Science 30: 379–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hammond, Thomas, Chris Bonneau, and Reginald Sheehan. 2005. Strategic Behavior on the U.S. Supreme Court. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Hansford, Thomas G., and Damore, David F.. 2000. “Congressional Preferences, Perceptions of Threat, and Supreme Court Decision Making.” American Politics Quarterly 28: 512–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansford, Thomas G., and Spriggs, James F. II. 2007. “Supreme Court Responses to Congressional Overrides.” Paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association Meetings, Chicago.Google Scholar

Hansford, Thomas G., and Spriggs, James F. II. 2006. The Politics of Precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Harriger, Katy. 1997. “The Federalism Debate in the Transformation of Federal Habeas Corpus Law.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 27: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harvey, Anna, and Friedman, Barry. 2006. “Pulling Punches: Congressional Constraints on the Supreme Court's Constitutional Rulings, 1987–2000.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 31: 533–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hausegger, Lori, and Lawrence, Baum. 1999. “Inviting Congressional Action: A Study of Supreme Court Motivations in Statutory Interpretation.” American Journal of Political Science 43: 162–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haynie, Stacia. 2004. “The Court's Protection Against Self-Incrimination: Miranda v. Arizona (1966).” In Ivers, Gregg and McGuire, Kevin (Eds.), Creating Constitutional Change, pp. 265–280. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar

Heclo, Hugh. 1978. “Issue Networks and the Executive Establishment.” In King, Anthony (Ed.), The New American Political System, pp. 87–124. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar

Hensley, Thomas, Hale, Kathleen, and Snook, Carl. 2006. The Rehnquist Court: Justices, Rulings, and Legacy. Denver: ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar

Hettinger, Virginia, Stefanie Lindquist, and Wendy Martinek. 2006. Judging on a Collegial Court: Influences on Federal Appellate Decision-Making. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar

Hickman, Kristin, and Krueger, Matthew. 2007. “In Search of the ‘Modern’ Skidmore Standard.” Columbia Law Review 108: 1235–1320.Google Scholar

Hill, Alfred. 1995. “The Judicial Function in Choice of Law.” Columbia Law Review 85: 1585–1647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoekstra, Valerie. 2003. Public Reaction to Supreme Court Decisions. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoff, Joan. 1991. Law, Gender, and Injustice: A Legal History of U.S. Women. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Horowitz, Donald. 1977. The Courts and Social Policy. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar

Howard, J. Woodford. 1968. “On the Fluidity of Judicial Choice.” American Political Science Review 62: 43–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howell, William G. 2003. Power Without Persuasion: A Theory of Direct Presidential Action. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howell, William G., and Pevehouse, Jon C.. 2007. While Dangers Gather: Congressional Checks on Presidential War Powers. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hutchinson, Dennis. 1998. The Man Who Once Was Whizzer White: A Portrait of Justice Byron R. White. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Ignagni, Joseph. 1994. “Explaining and Predicting Supreme Court Decision Making: The Burger Court's Establishment Clause Decisions.” Journal of Church and State 36: 301–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ignagni, Joseph. 1993. “U.S. Supreme Court Decision Making and the Free Exercise Clause.” Review of Politics 55: 511–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Irons, Peter H. 2006. A People's History of the Supreme Court: The Men and Women Whose Cases and Decisions Shaped Our Constitution (rev. ed.). New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Irons, Peter H. 1994. Brennan vs. Rehnquist: The Battle for the Constitution. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar

Irons, Peter H. 1993. Justice At War: The Story of the Japanese American Internment Cases. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Johnson, John W. 1997. Struggle for Student Rights: Tinker v. Des Moines and the 1960s. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar

Johnson, Timothy R. 2004. Oral Arguments and Decision Making on the United States Supreme Court. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar

Kahn, Jacob L. 2008. “From Borden to Billing: Identifying a Uniform Approach to Implied Antitrust Immunity from the Supreme Court's Precedents.” Chicago-Kent Law Review 83: 1439–1496.Google Scholar

Kahn, Ronald. 1994. The Supreme Court and Constitutional Theory: 1953–1993. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar

Karst, Kenneth L. 1989. Belonging to America: Equal Citizenship and the Constitution. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Katzmann, Robert A. 1997. Courts and Congress. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar

Keck, Thomas M. 2004. The Most Activist Supreme Court in History: The Road to Modern Judicial Conservatism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennedy, Randall. 1997. Race, Crime and the Law. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar

Kennedy, Randall. 1988. “McCleskey v. Kemp: Race, Capital Punishment and the Supreme Court.” Harvard Law Review 101: 1388–1443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kernell, Samuel. 2006. Going Public: New Strategies of Presidential Leadership. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar

Kerr, Orin S. 1998. “Shedding Light on Chevron: An Empirical Study of the Chevron Doctrine in the U.S. Courts of Appeals.” Yale Journal of Regulation 15: 1–60.Google Scholar

Keynes, Edward, with Miller, Randall K.. 1989. The Court Versus Congress: Prayer, Busing, and Abortion. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

King, Chad. 2007. “Strategic Selection of Legal Instruments on the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Politics Research 35: 621–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kingdon, John. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies (2d ed.). New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar

Kingdon, John. 1989. Congressmen's Voting Decisions. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kmiec, Douglas. 2007. “Up In Smoke: The Supreme Court Loses Its Unanimity.” Slate, 27 February.

Knight, Jack, and Epstein, Lee. 1996. “The Norm of Stare Decisis.” American Journal of Political Science 40: 1018–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kobylka, Joseph. 1989. “Leadership on the Supreme Court: Chief Justice Burger and Establishment Clause Litigation.” Western Political Quarterly 42: 545–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kobylka, Joseph. 1987. “A Court-Related Context for Group Litigation: Libertarian Groups and Obscenity.” Journal of Politics 49: 1061–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Konvitz, Milton. 1966. Expanding Liberties: Freedom's Gains in Postwar America. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar

Kort, Fred. 1963. “Simultaneous Equations and Boolean Algebra in the Analysis of Judicial Decisions.” Law and Contemporary Problems 28: 143–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kort, Fred. 1957. “Predicting Supreme Court Decisions Mathematically: A Quantitative Analysis of Right to Counsel Cases.” American Political Science Review 51: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith. 2007. “Supreme Court Appointments as a Move-the-Median Game.” American Journal of Political Science 51: 231–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith. 1998. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith. 1993. “Where's the Party?” British Journal of Political Science 23: 235–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith, 1991. Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kritzer, Herbert M., and Richards, Mark J. 2005. “The Influence of Law in the Supreme Court's Search-and-Seizure Jurisprudence.” American Politics Research 33: 33–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kritzer, Herbert M., and Richards, Mark J.. 2003. “Jurisprudential Regimes and Supreme Court Decision Making: The Lemon Regime and Establishment Clause Cases.” Law & Society Review 37: 827–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krol, John, and Brenner, Saul. 1990. “Strategies in Certiorari Voting on the United States Supreme Court: A Reevaluation.” Western Political Quarterly 43: 335–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krutz, Glen S., and Peake, Jeffrey S.. 2010. Treaty Politics and the Rise of Executive Agreements. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Landes, William, and Posner, Richard. 1976. “Legal Precedent: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Law and Economics 19: 249–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lasser, William. 1985. “The Supreme Court in Periods of Critical Realignment.” Journal of Politics 47: 1174–1187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Latzer, Barry. 1998. Death Penalty Cases: Leading U.S. Supreme Court Cases on Capital Punishment. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar

Law, Anna. 2003. “Cracks in the National Consensus – Institutional Norms, the American Judiciary, and Immigration, 1883–1893 and 1990–2000.” Ph.D. diss., University of Texas at Austin.

Legomsky, Stephen. 1995. “Ten More Years of Plenary Power: Immigration, Congress, and the Courts.” Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly 22: 925–993.Google Scholar

Legomsky, Stephen. 1985. “Immigration Law and the Principle of Plenary Congressional Power.” The Supreme Court Review 6: 225–307.Google Scholar

Leuchtenburg, William. 1995. The Supreme Court Reborn: The Constitutional Revolution in the Age of Roosevelt. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Leuchtenburg, William. 1963. Franklin D. Roosevelt and the New Deal, 1932–1940. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Levinson, Sanford V. 1982. “Law as Literature.” Texas Law Review 60: 373–403.Google Scholar

Lewis, Anthony. 1991. Make No Law: The Sullivan Case and the First Amendment. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar

Lewis, Anthony. 1964. Gideon's Trumpet. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar

Lewis, David. 2005. “Staffing Alone: Unilateral Action and the Politicization of the Executive Office of the President, 1988–2004.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 35: 496–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Light, Paul. 1982. The President's Agenda: Domestic Policy Choice from Kennedy to Carter. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Long, Carolyn. 2006. Mapp v. Ohio: Guarding Against Unreasonable Searches and Seizures. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar

Long, Carolyn. 2000. Religious Freedom and Indian Rights: The Case of Oregon v. Smith. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar

Long, J. Scott. 1997. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Loue, Sana. 1985. “Alien Rights and Government Authority: An Examination of the Conflicting Views of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and the United States Supreme Court.” San Diego Law Review 22: 1021–1073.Google Scholar

Lovell, George. 2003. Legislative Deferrals: Statutory Ambiguity, Judicial Power, and American Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lowe, Michael. 1994. “The Freedom of Information Act in 1993–1994.” Duke Law Journal 43: 1282–1316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lowi, Theodore J. 1969. The End of Liberalism: Ideology, Policy, and the Crisis of Public Authority. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar

Malkovitz, R. S. 1983. “The Burger Court, Antitrust, and Economic Analysis.” In Blasi, Vincent (Ed.), The Burger Court: The Counter-Revolution That Wasn't, pp. 180–197. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Maltz, Earl M. 2000. The Chief Justiceship of Warren Burger, 1969–1986. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Maltzman, Forrest. 1997. Competing Principals: Committees, Parties, and the Organization of Congress. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maltzman, Forrest, and Shipan, Charles R.. 2008. “Continuity, Change and the Evolution of the Law.” American Journal of Political Science 52: 252–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maltzman, Forrest, Spriggs, James F., and Wahlbeck, Paul J.. 2000. Crafting Law on the Supreme Court: The Collegial Game. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mann, Thomas E., and Ornstein, Norman J.. 2006. The Broken Branch: How Congress is Failing America and How to Get it Back on Track. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

March, James, and Olsen, Johan. 1984. “The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life.” American Political Science Review 78: 734–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marion, David E. 1997. The Jurisprudence of Justice William J. Brennan, Jr. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Marshall, Bryan W., and Haney, Patrick J.. 2010. “Aiding and Abetting: Congressional Complicity in the Rise of the Unitary Executive.” In Barilleaux, Ryan J. and Kelley, Christopher S. (Eds.), The Unitary Executive and the Modern Presidency, pp. 188–216. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar

Marshall, Bryan W., and Pacelle, Jr. Richard L. 2005. “Revisiting the Two Presidencies: The Strategic Use of Executive Orders.” American Politics Research 33: 81–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, Andrew D. 2006. “Statutory Battles and Constitutional Wars: Congress and the Supreme Court.” In Rogers, James, Flemming, Roy, and Bond, Jon (Eds.), Institutional Games and the U.S. Supreme Court, pp. 3–23. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar

Martin, Andrew D., and Quinn, Kevin M.. 2002. “Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999.” Political Analysis 10: 134–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mason, Alpheus T. 1956. Harlan Fiske Stone: Pillar of the Law. New York: Viking.Google Scholar

Matthews, Donald R., and Prothro, James W.. 1966. Negroes and the New Southern Politics. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar

Mauro, Tony. 2008. “Supreme Court Reduces Damages Awarded in Exxon Case.” Legal Times, 26 June.

Maveety, Nancy. 1996. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor: Strategist on the Supreme Court. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Mayer, Kenneth. 2001. With the Stroke of a Pen: Executive Orders and Presidential Power. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Mayhew, David R. 2005. Divided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking and Investigations, 1946–2002. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Mayhew, David R. 2002. Electoral Realignments: A Critique of an American Genre. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

McCann, Michael. 1999. “How the Supreme Court Matters for American Politics.” In Gillman, Howard and Clayton, Cornell (Eds.), The Supreme Court in American Politics: New Institutionalist Approaches, pp. 63–97. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar

McCloskey, Robert. 1960. The American Supreme Court. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

McConnell, Grant. 1966. Private Power and American Democracy. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar

McCubbins, Mathew, and Schwartz, Thomas. 1984. “Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms.” American Journal of Political Science 28: 165–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McFarland, Andrew. 1987. “Interest Groups and Theories of Power in America.” British Journal of Political Science 17: 129–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGuire, Kevin. 1998. “Explaining Executive Success in the U.S. Supreme Court.” Political Research Quarterly 51: 505–526.Google Scholar

McGuire, Kevin. 1995. “Repeat Players in the Supreme Court: The Role of Experienced Lawyers in Litigation Success.” Journal of Politics 57: 187–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGuire, Kevin, and Palmer, Barbara. 1995. “Issue Fluidity on the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review 89: 691–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKeever, Robert. 1993. Raw Judicial Power? The Supreme Court and American Society. New York: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

McKenna, Marian C. 2002. Franklin Roosevelt and the Great Constitutional War: The Court-Packing Crisis of 1937. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar

McWhirter, Darien. 1994. Freedom of Speech, Press, and Assembly. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar

Meernik, James, and Ignagni, Joseph. 1997. “Judicial Review and Coordinate Construction of the Constitution.” American Journal of Political Science 41: 447–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mendelson, Wallace. 1961. “Mr. Justice Frankfurter Law and Choice.” Vanderbilt Law Review 2: 333–350.Google Scholar

Mendelson, Wallace. 1958. “Mr. Justice Frankfurter on the Distribution of Judicial Power in the United States.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 2: 40–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mendelson, Wallace. 1957. “Mr. Justice Frankfurter on Administrative Law.” Journal of Politics 19: 441–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, Arthur. 1968. The Supreme Court and American Capitalism. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Miller, Banks and Brett Curry, 2009. “Expertise, Experience, and Ideology on Specialized Courts: The Case of the Courts if Appeals for the Federal Circuit.” Law & Society Review 43: 839–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mitchell, Lawrence E. 2002. “No Business Like No Business.” In Schwartz, Herman (Ed.), The Rehnquist Court: Judicial Activism on the Right, pp. 227–243. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar

Moe, Terry, and Howell, William. 1999. “Unilateral Action and Presidential Power: A Theory.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 29: 850–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morrison, Steven, and Winston, Clifford. 1986. The Economic Effects of Airline Deregulation. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar

Motomura, Hiroshi. 1992. “The Curious Evolution of Immigration Law: Procedural Surrogates for Substantive Constitutional Rights.” Columbia Law Review 92: 1625–1704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Motomura, Hiroshi. 1990. “Immigration Law After a Century of Plenary Power: Phantom Constitutional Norms and Statutory Interpretation.” Yale Law Journal 100: 545–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murphy, Paul. 1972. The Constitution in Crisis Times, 1918–1969. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Murphy, Walter F. 1964. Elements of Judicial Strategy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Murphy, Walter F. 1962. Congress and the Court. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Murphy, Walter F., and Tanenhaus, Joseph. 1972. The Study of Public Law. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Nathan, Richard. 1975. The Plot That Failed: Nixon and the Administrative Presidency. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Nelson, Michael 1982. “A Short, Ironic History of American National Bureaucracy.” Journal of Politics 44: 747–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nelson, William E. 1994. “Justice Byron R. White: A Modern Federalist and a New Deal Liberal.” Brigham Young University Law Review 1994: 313–348.

Neuman, Gerald. 2002. “Jurisdiction and the Rule of Law After the 1996 Immigration Act.” Harvard Law Review 113: 1963–1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neuman, Gerald. 1998. “Habeas Corpus, Executive Detention, and Removal of Aliens.” Columbia Law Review 98: 961–1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neuman, Gerald. 1996. Strangers to the Constitution – Immigrants, Borders, and Fundamental Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Newmyer, R. Kent. 2001. John Marshall and the Heroic Age of the Supreme Court. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar

Newton, Jim. 2006. Justice for All: Earl Warren and the Nation He Made. New York: Riverhead Books.Google Scholar

Nichols, David. 2007. A Matter of Justice: Eisenhower and the Beginning of the Civil Rights Revolution. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

,Note. 1976. “National Security and the Amended Freedom of Information Act.” Yale Law Journal 85: 401–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,Note. 1958. “Congressional Reversals of Supreme Court Decisions: 1945–1957.” Harvard Law Review 71: 1324–1337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O'Brien, David. 2008a. Constitutional Law and Politics: Struggles for Power and Governmental Accountability (7th ed.). New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar

O'Brien, David. 2008b. Constitutional Law and Politics: Civil Rights and Civil Liberties (7th ed.). New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar

O'Brien, David. 2005. Storm Center: The Supreme Court in American Politics (7th ed.). New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar

O'Connor, Karen. 1996. No Neutral Ground? Abortion Politics in an Age of Absolutes. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar

O'Connor, Karen. 1980. Women's Organizations' Use of the Courts. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

O'Connor, Sandra Day. 2005. “Justice O'Connor Speaks on the Judiciary.” The Third Branch: Newsletter of the Federal Courts 37: 8.Google Scholar

Olivetti, Alfred M., Jr., and Worsham, Jeff. 2003. This Land is Your Land, This Land Is My Land: The Property Rights Movement and Regulatory Takings. New York: LFB Scholarly.Google Scholar

Pacelle, Richard L. Forthcoming. “Rebuilding Institutions and Redefining Issues: The Reagan Justice Department and the Reconstruction of Civil Rights.” In Osgood, Kenneth and White, Derrick (Eds.), Civil Rights, the Conservative Movement, and the Presidency. Gainesville: University of Florida Press.

Pacelle, Richard L., Jr. 2009. “The Emergence and Evolution of Supreme Court Policy.” In Miller, Mark (Ed.), Rethinking U.S. Judicial Politics, pp. 174–191. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pacelle, Richard L., Jr. 2006. “Amicus Curiae or Amicus Praesidentis? Reexamining the Role of the Office of the Solicitor General in Filing Amici.” Judicature 89: 317–325.Google Scholar

Pacelle, Richard L., Jr. 2004. “A Mapp to Legal Change and Policy Retreat: United States v. Leon.” In Ivers, Gregg and McGuire, Kevin T. (Eds.), Creating Constitutional Change, pp. 249–263. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar

Pacelle, Richard L., Jr. 2003. Between Law and Politics: The Solicitor General and the Structuring of Race, Gender, and Reproductive Rights Litigation. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar

Pacelle, Richard L., Jr. 2002. The Role of the Supreme Court in American Politics: The Least Dangerous Branch?Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Pacelle, Richard L., Jr. 1995. “The Dynamics and Determinants of Agenda Change in the Rehnquist Court.” In Epstein, Lee (Ed.), Contemplating Courts, pp. 251–274. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pacelle, Richard L., Jr. 1991. The Transformation of the Supreme Court's Agenda: From the New Deal to the Reagan Administration. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Pacelle, Richard L., Jr., Marshall, Bryan W., and Curry, Brett W.. 2007. “Keepers of the Covenant or Platonic Guardians? Decision Making on the United States Supreme Court.” American Politics Research 35: 694–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pacelle, Richard L., Jr., and Pauly, Patricia. 1996. “The Freshman Effect Revisited: An Individual Based Analysis.” Review of Politics 17: 1–22.Google Scholar

Pack, Bradley. 2004. “FOIA Frustration: Access to Government Records Under the Bush Administration.” Arizona Law Review 46: 815–842.Google Scholar

Parmet, Herbert S. 1997. George Bush: The Life of a Lone Star Yankee. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar

Patchel, Kathleen. 1991. “The New Habeas.” Hastings Law Journal 42: 941–1066.Google Scholar

Patterson, James. 2001. Brown v. Board of Education: A Civil Rights Milestone and Its Troubled Legacy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pauley, Garth. 2001. The Modern Presidency & Civil Rights: Rhetoric on Race from Roosevelt to Nixon. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar

Peacock, James R. III. 1981. “Developments Under the Freedom of Information Act: 1980.” Duke Law Journal 1981: 338–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perry, Barbara. 2007. The Michigan Affirmative Action Cases. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar

Perry, H. W., Jr. 1991. Deciding to Decide: Agenda Setting in the U.S. Supreme Court. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Peters, Shawn Francis. 2000. Judging Jehovah's Witnesses: Religious Persecution and the Dawn of the Rights Revolution. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar

Peterson, Andrea. 1989. “The Takings Clause: In Search of Underlying Principles: Part I. A Critique of Current Takings Clause Doctrine.” California Law Review 77: 1299–1363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peterson, Mark. 1990. Legislating Together: The White House and Capitol Hill from Eisenhower to Reagan. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Phelps, Glenn, and Gates, John. 1991. “The Myth of Jurisprudence: Interpretive Theory in the Constitutional Opinions of Justices Rehnquist and Brennan.” Santa Clara Law Review 31: 567–596.Google Scholar

Pickerill, J. Mitchell. 2004. Constitutional Deliberation in Congress: The Impact of Judicial Review in a Separated System. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pietruszkiewicz, Christopher. 2006. “Discarded Deference: Judicial Independence in Informal Agency Guidance.” Tennessee Law Review 74: 1–45.Google Scholar

Poole, Keith, and Rosenthal, Howard. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Posner, Eric. 1997. “The Political Economy of the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978.” Michigan Law Review 96: 47–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Powe, Lucas A., Jr. 2009. The Supreme Court and the American Elite, 1789–2008. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Powe, Lucas A., Jr. 2000. The Warren Court and American Politics. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press.Google Scholar

Pritchett, C. Herman. 1984. Constitutional Law of the Federal System. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Pritchett, C. Herman. 1969. “The Development of Judicial Research.” In Grossman, Joel and Tanenhaus, Joseph (Eds.), Frontiers of Judicial Research. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Pritchett, C. Herman. 1948. “The Roosevelt Court: Votes and Values.” American Political Science Review 42: 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pye, A. Kenneth. 1968. “The Warren Court and Criminal Procedure.” Michigan Law Review 67: 249–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quirk, Paul. 1989. “The Cooperative Resolution of Policy Conflict.” American Political Science Review 83: 905–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quirk, Paul. 1981. Industry Influence in Federal Regulatory Agencies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raskin, Jamin, and LeBlanc, Clark. 2002. “Disfavored Speech About Favored Rights: Hill v. Colorado, The Vanishing Public Forum and the Need for an Objective Speech Discrimination Test.” American University Law Review 51: 179–228.Google Scholar

Rehnquist, William. 2002. The Supreme Court (rev. and updated ed.). New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar

Rehnquist, William. 1998. All the Laws But One: Civil Liberties In Wartime. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Reichley, A. James. 1981. Conservatives in an Era of Change. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar

Richards, Mark J., and Kritzer, Herbert M.. 2002. “Jurisprudential Regimes in Supreme Court Decision Making.” American Political Science Review 96: 305–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Riker, William. 1986. The Art of Political Manipulation. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Ripley, Randall. 1967. Party Leaders in the House of Representatives. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar

Ripley, Randall, and Grace Franklin. 1990. Congress, the Bureaucracy, and Public Policy (5th ed.). Homewood: Dorsey Press.Google Scholar

Ripley, Randall, and Franklin, Grace. 1982. Bureaucracy and Policy Implementation. Homewood: Dorsey Press.Google Scholar

Robertson, David Brian. 2005. The Constitution and America's Destiny. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robyn, Dorothy L. 1987. Braking the Special Interests: Trucking Deregulation and the Politics of Policy Reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Roche, John. 1964. “The Expatriation Decisions: A Study in Constitutional Improvisation and the Uses of History.” American Political Science Review 58: 72–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rogers, James. 2001. “Information and Judicial Review: A Signaling Game of Legislative-Judicial Interaction.” American Journal of Political Science 45: 84–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rohde, David. 1972. “Policy Goals, Strategic Choice and Majority Opinion Assignments in the U.S. Supreme Court.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 16: 652–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rohde, David, and Spaeth, Harold. 1976. Supreme Court Decision Making. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar

Rosenberg, Gerald 2008. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? (2d ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenberg, Gerald. 1994. “Review Symposium of 1993 Edition of Segal and Spaeth's The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model.” Law and Courts 4: 6–7.Google Scholar

Rosenbloom, David, and O'Leary, Rosemary. 1997. Public Administration and Law (2d ed.). Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar

Rudalevige, Andrew. 2005. The New Imperial Presidency: Renewing Presidential Power after Watergate. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rudalevige, Andrew. 2002. Managing the President's Program: Presidential Leadership and Legislative Policy Formation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Sager, Lawrence. 2004. Justice in Plainclothes: A Theory of American Constitutional Practice. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Sala, Brian R., and Spriggs, James F. II. 2004. “Designing Tests of the Supreme Court and the Separation of Powers.” Political Research Quarterly 57: 197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Salokar, Rebecca Mae. 1992. The Solicitor General: The Politics of Law. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Savage, David. 1992. Turning Right: The Making of the Rehnquist Supreme Court. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Sax, Joseph L. 1993. “Property Rights and the Economy of Nature: Understanding Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council.” Stanford Law Review 45: 1433–1455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scalia, Antonin. 1997. A Matter of Interpretation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Scalia, Antonin. 1982. “The Freedom of Information Act Has No Clothes.” Regulation 6: 14–19.Google Scholar

Schauer, Frederick. 1985. “Easy Cases.” Southern California Law Review 58: 399–440.Google Scholar

Schmidhauser, John R., and Berg, Larry L.. 1972. The Supreme Court and Congress: Conflict and Interaction, 1945–1968. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Scholz, John T., and Dan Wood, B.. 1998. “Controlling the IRS: Principals, Principles, and Public Administration.” American Journal of Political Science 42: 141–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schubert, Glendon. 1974. The Judicial Mind Revisited. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Schubert, Glendon. 1965. The Judicial Mind. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Schubert, Glendon. 1962. “The 1962 Term of the Supreme Court: A Psychological Analysis.” American Political Science Review 56: 90–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schuck, Peter. 1984. “The Transformation of Immigration Law.” Columbia Law Review 84: 1–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schuck, Peter. 1983. Suing Government: Citizen Remedies for Official Wrongs. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Schuck, Peter, and Hsien Wang, Theodore. 1992. “Continuity and Change: Patterns of Immigration Litigation in the Courts, 1979–1990.” Stanford Law Review 45: 115–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schultz, David Andrew. 1992. Property, Power, and American Democracy. New Brunswick: Transaction Press.Google Scholar

Schultz, David A., and Smith, Christopher E.. 1996. The Jurisprudential Vision of Justice Antonin Scalia. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Schwartz, Bernard. 1983. Super Chief: Earl Warren and His Supreme Court – A Judicial Biography. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Schwartz, Bernard (Ed.): 1998. The Burger Court: Counter-Revolution or Confirmation?New York: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarPubMed

Scigliano, Robert. 1971. The Supreme Court and the Presidency. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Scourfield McLauchlan, Judithanne. 2005. Congressional Participation as Amicus Curiae Before the U.S. Supreme Court. New York: LFB Scholarly.Google Scholar

Segal, Jeffrey. 1997. “Separation-of-Powers Games in the Positive Theory of Congress and the Courts.” American Political Science Review 91: 28–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Segal, Jeffrey. 1990. “Supreme Court Support for the Solicitor General: The Effect of Presidential Appointments.” Political Research Quarterly 43: 137–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Segal, Jeffrey. 1988. “Amicus Curiae Briefs by the Solicitor General During the Warren and Burger Courts: A Research Note.” Western Political Quarterly 41: 135–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Segal, Jeffrey. 1986. “Supreme Court Justices as Human Decision Makers: An Individual Level Analysis of Search and Seizure Cases.” Journal of Politics 48: 938–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Segal, Jeffrey. 1984. “Predicting Supreme Court Cases Probabilistically: The Search and Seizure Cases, 1962–1981.” American Political Science Review 78: 891–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Segal, Jeffrey, and Cover, Albert D.. 1989. “Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices.” American Political Science Review 83: 557–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Segal, Jeffrey, Epstein, Lee, Cameron, Charles, and Spaeth, Harold. 1995. “Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices Revisited.” Journal of Politics 57: 812–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Segal, Jeffrey, and Spaeth, Harold. 2002. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Segal, Jeffrey, and Spaeth, Harold. 1996a. “The Influence of Stare Decisis on the Votes of United States Supreme Court Justices.” American Journal of Political Science 40: 971–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Segal, Jeffrey, and Spaeth, Harold. 1996b. “Norms, Dragons, and Stare Decisis.” American Journal of Political Science 40: 1064–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Segal, Jeffrey, and Spaeth, Harold. 1993. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Segal, Jeffrey, Spaeth, Harold, and Benesh, Sara. 2005. The Supreme Court in the American Legal System. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Segal, Jeffrey, Timpone, Richard, and Howard, Robert. 2000. “Buyer Beware? Presidential Success Through Supreme Court Appointments.” Political Research Quarterly 53: 557–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Selden, Sally Coleman, Brudney, Jeffrey, and Kellough, J. Edward. 1998. “Bureaucracy as a Representative Institution: Toward a Reconciliation of Bureaucratic Government and Democratic Theory.” American Journal of Political Science 42: 717–742.Google Scholar

,Senate Judiciary Committee. 2006. Confirmation Hearing on the Nomination of Samuel Alito to be Associate Justice of the United States: Hearing Before the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, 109th Congress, 2d session.

Shanks, Cheryl. 2001. Immigration and the Politics of American Sovereignty, 1890–1990. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth. 2006. “Old Questions and New Answers About Institutions: The Riker Objection Revisited.” In Weingast, Barry and Wittman, Donald (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Political Economy, pp. 1031–1050. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth, and Weingast, Barry. 1995. Positive Theories of Congressional Institutions. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shur, Luba L. 1995. “Content-Based Distinctions in a University Funding System and the Irrelevance of the Establishment Clause: Putting Wide Awake to Rest.” Virginia Law Review 81: 1665–1720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silberman, David. 1987. “The Burger Court and Labor-Management Relations.” In Schwartz, Herman (Ed.), The Burger Court: Rights and Wrongs in the Supreme Court 1969–1986. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Silver, Edward, and McAvoy, Joan. 1987. “The National Labor Relations Act at the Crossroads.” Fordham Law Review 56: 181–208.Google Scholar

Silverstein, Gordon. 2009. Law's Allure: How Law Shapes, Constrains, Saves, and Kills Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silverstein, Gordon. 1997. Imbalance of Powers: Constitutional Interpretation and the Making of American Foreign Policy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Silverstein, Mark. 1994. Judicious Choices: The New Politics of Supreme Court Confirmations. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar

Simon, James F. 1995. The Center Holds: The Power Struggle Inside the Rehnquist Court. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Sinclair, Barbara. 2007. Unorthodox Lawmaking: New Legislative Processes in the U.S. Congress (3rd ed.). Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar

Sinclair, Barbara. 2006. Party Wars: Polarization and the Politics of National Policy Making. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar

Sinclair, Barbara. 1989. “Leadership Strategies in the Modern Congress.” In Deering, Christopher J. (Ed.), Congressional Politics, pp. 135–154. Chicago: Dorsey Press.Google Scholar

Sinclair, Michael. 2007. “Precedent, Super Precedent.” George Mason University Law Review 14: 363–411.Google Scholar

Skowronek, Stephen. 1997. The Politics Presidents Make: Leadership from John Adams to Bill Clinton. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press.Google Scholar

Skrentny, John. 1996. The Ironies of Affirmative Action: Politics, Culture and Justice in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Slotnick, Elliot E. 1979. “Who Speaks for the Court? Majority Opinion Assignment from Taft to Burger.” American Journal of Political Science 23: 60–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Christopher. 1993. Critical Judicial Nominations and Political Change: The Impact of Clarence Thomas. Westport, Conn.: Praeger.Google Scholar

Smith, Martin J. 1993. Pressure Power & Policy: State Autonomy and Policy Networks in Britain and the United States. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar

Smith, Rogers M. 1994. “Review Symposium of 1993 Edition of Segal and Spaeth's The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model.” Law and Courts 4: 8–9.Google Scholar

Smith, Rogers M. 1985. Liberalism and American Constitutional Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Smith, Steven S. 1989. Call to Order: Floor Politics in the House and Senate. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar

Smith, William French. 1991. Law & Justice in the Reagan Administration: Memoirs of an Attorney General. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press.Google Scholar

Smolla, Rodney A. 1990. Jerry Falwell v. Larry Flynt: The First Amendment on Trial. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Snyder, Eloise. 1958. “The Supreme Court as a Small Group.” Social Forces 36: 232–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Songer, Donald, and Haire, Susan. 1992. “Integrating Alternative Approaches to the Study of Judicial Voting: Obscenity Cases in the US Courts of Appeals.” American Journal of Political Science 36: 963–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Songer, Donald, and Lindquist, Stefanie. 1996. “Not the Whole Story: The Impact of Justices' Values on Supreme Court Decision Making.” American Journal of Political Science 40: 1049–1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Songer, Donald, Segal, Jeffrey, and Cameron, Charles. 1994. “The Hierarchy of Justice: Testing a Principal-Agent Model of Supreme Court-Circuit Court Interactions.” American Journal of Political Science 38: 673–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spaeth, Harold. 1995. “The Attitudinal Model.” In Epstein, Lee (Ed.), Contemplating Courts, pp. 296–314. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spaeth, Harold. 1964. “The Judicial Restraint of Mr. Justice Frankfurter – Myth or Reality.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 8: 22–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spill Solberg, Rorie L., and Heberlig, Eric S.. 2004. “Communicating to the Courts and Beyond: Why Members of Congress Participate as Amici Curiae.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29: 591–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spiller, Pablo T., and Gely, Rafael. 1992. “Congressional Control or Judicial Independence: The Determinants of U.S. Supreme Court Labor Decisions, 1949–1988.” RAND Journal of Economics 23: 463–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spiller, Pablo T., and Spitzer, Matthew L.. 1992. “Judicial Choice of Legal Doctrines.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 8: 8–46.Google Scholar

Spriggs, James F., and Hansford, Thomas G.. 2001. “Explaining the Overruling of U.S. Supreme Court Precedent.” Journal of Politics 63: 1091–1111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Staudt, Nancy, Epstein, Lee, Wiedenbeck, Peter, Lindstadt, Rene, and Vander Wielen, Ryan J.. 2005. “Theories of Statutory Interpretation: Judging Statutes: Interpretive Regimes.” Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 38: 1909–1970.Google Scholar

Strum, Philippa. 1974. The Supreme Court and Political Questions: A Study in Judicial Evasion. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar

Sundquist, James. 1983. Dynamics of the Party System: Alignment and Realignment of Political Parties in the United States (rev. ed.). Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass. 1999. One Case at a Time: Judicial Minimalism on the Supreme Court. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass. 1993. The Partial Constitution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Tate, C. Neal. 1981. “Personal Attribute Models of the Voting Behavior of U.S. Supreme Court Justices: Liberalism in Civil Liberties and Economics Decisions, 1946–1978.” American Political Science Review 745: 355–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tate, C. Neal, and Handberg, Roger. 1991. “Time Binding and Theory Building in Personal Attribute Models of Supreme Court Voting Behavior, 1916–1988.” American Journal of Political Science 35: 460–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tedford, Thomas, and Herbeck, Dale. 2009. Freedom of Speech in the United States (6th ed.). State College: Strata Publishing.Google Scholar

Teles, Steven. 2008. The Rise of the Conservative Legal Movement: The Battle for Control of the Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Thernstrom, Abigail. 1987. Whose Votes Count? Affirmative Action and Minority Rights. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Thompson, Kenneth. 1984. The Voting Rights Act and Black Electoral Participation. Washington, D.C.: Joint Center for Political Studies.Google Scholar

Tichenor, Daniel. 2002. Dividing Lines – The Politics of Immigration Control in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Toma, Eugenia. 1991. “Congressional Influence and the Supreme Court: The Budget as a Signaling Device.” Journal of Legal Studies 20: 131–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tulis, Jeffrey. 1987. The Rhetorical Presidency. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Tushnet, Mark. 2005. A Court Divided: The Rehnquist Court and the Future of Constitutional Law. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Tushnet, Mark. 2004. The NAACP's Legal Strategy Against Segregated Education, 1925–1950. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Tushnet, Mark. 2003. The New Constitutional Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Tushnet, Mark. 1997. Making Constitutional Law: Thurgood Marshall and the Supreme Court, 1961–1991. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tushnet, Mark. 1994. Making Civil Rights Law: Thurgood Marshall and the Supreme Court, 1936–1961. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ubertaccio, Peter N.. 2005. Learned in the Law and Politics: The Office of the Solicitor General. New York: LFB Scholarly.Google Scholar

Ulmer, S. Sidney. 1984. “The Supreme Court's Certiorari Decisions: Conflict as a Predictive Variable.” American Political Science Review 78: 901–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ulmer, S. Sidney. 1982. “Issue Fluidity in the United States Supreme Court.” In Halpern, Stephen and Lamb, Charles (Eds.), Supreme Court Activism and Restraint, pp. 319–359. Lexington: Heath.Google Scholar

Ulmer, S. Sidney. 1979. “Parabolic Support of Civil Liberty Claims: The Case of William O. Douglas.” Journal of Politics 41: 634–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ulmer, S. Sidney. 1973. “The Longitudinal Behavior of Hugo Lafayette Black: Parabolic Support for Civil Liberties, 1937–1971.” Florida State University Law Review 1: 131–153.Google Scholar

Ulmer, S. Sidney. 1965. “Toward a Theory of Sub-Group Formation in the United States Supreme Court: The Case of William O. Douglas.” Journal of Politics 27: 133–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Urofsky, Melvin I. 1998. Division and Discord: The Supreme Court Under Stone and Vinson, 1941–1953. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Urofsky, Melvin I. 1997. Affirmative Action on Trial: Sex Discrimination in Johnson v. Santa Clara. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar

Vanberg, Georg. 2001. “Legislative-Judicial Relations: A Game-Theoretic Approach to Constitutional Review.” American Journal of Political Science 45: 346–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hees, Martin, and Steunenberg, Bernard. 2000. “The Choices Judges Make: Court Rulings, Personal Values, and Legal Constraints.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 12: 305–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vose, Clement. 1959. Caucasians Only: The Supreme Court, the NAACP, and the Restrictive Covenant Cases. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Wahlbeck, Paul J. 1997. “The Life of the Law: Judicial Politics and Legal Change.” Journal of Politics 59: 778–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waldron, Gerard J., and Israel, Jeff A.. 1989. “Developments Under the Freedom of Information Act: 1988.” Duke Law Journal 1989: 686–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walker, Thomas G. 2008. Eligible for Execution: The Story of the Daryl Atkins Case. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar

Walker, Jack. 1977. “Setting the Agenda in the U.S. Senate: A Theory of Problem Selection.” British Journal of Political Science 7: 423–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walker, Samuel. 1994. Hate Speech: The History of an American Controversy. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar

Walker, Samuel. 1990. In Defense of American Liberties: A History of the ACLU. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Walker, Thomas G., Epstein, Lee, and Dixon, William. 1988. “On the Mysterious Demise of Consensual Norms in the United States Supreme Court.” Journal of Politics 50: 361–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walton, Hanes, Jr. 1988. When the Marching Stopped: The Politics of Civil Rights Regulatory Agencies. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Waples, Gregory L. 1974. “The Freedom of Information Act: A Seven-Year Assessment.” Columbia Law Review 74: 895–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Warshauer, Irving J., and Dittman, Stevan C.. 2005. “The Uniqueness of Maritime Personal Injury and Death Law.” Tulane Law Review 71: 1163–1225.Google Scholar

Wasby, Stephen. 1995. Race Relations Litigation in an Age of Complexity. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar

Wasby, Stephen. 1993. “A Triangle Transformed: Court, Congress, and Presidency in Civil Rights.” Policy Studies Journal 21: 565–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wasby, Stephen. 1989. The Supreme Court and the Federal Judicial System (3rd ed.). Chicago: Nelson Hall.Google Scholar

Wasby, Stephen, D'Amato, Anthony, and Metrailer, Rosemary. 1977. Desegregation from Brown to Alexander: An Exploration of Supreme Court Strategies. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

Weaver, Suzanne. 1977. Decision to Prosecute: Organization and Public Policy in the Antitrust Division. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Wechsler, Herbert. 1959. “Toward Neutral Principles of Constitutional law.” Harvard Law Review 73: 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weingast, Barry, and Moran, Mark. 1983. “Bureaucratic Discretion or Congressional Control? Regulatory Policymaking by the Federal Trade Commission.” Journal of Political Economy 91: 765–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, G. Edward. 1982. Earl Warren: A Public Life. New York: Oxford University.Google Scholar

Whittington, Keith. 2007. Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy: The Presidency, the Supreme Court, and Constitutional Leadership in U.S. History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wildavsky, Aaron B. 1975. Perspectives on the Presidency. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Wildavsky, Aaron B. 1969. The Presidency. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Wilson, James Q. 1980. “The Politics of Regulation.” In Wilson, James Q. (Ed.), The Politics of Regulation, pp. 357–394. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Wilson, Woodrow. 1885. Congressional Government. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Woessner, Matthew, and Sims, Barbara. 2003. “Technological Innovation and the Application of the Fourth Amendment: Considering the Implications of Kyllo v. United States for Law Enforcement and Counterterrorism.” Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 19: 224–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar