Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-03T19:25:13.739Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

4 - Microscopy

Keith Wilson
Affiliation:
University of Hertfordshire
John Walker
Affiliation:
University of Hertfordshire
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Biochemical analysis is frequently accompanied by microscopic examination of tissue, cell or organelle preparations. Such examinations are used in many different applications, for example: to evaluate the integrity of samples during an experiment; to map the fine details of the spatial distribution of macromolecules within cells; to directly measure biochemical events within living tissues.

There are two fundamentally different types of microscope: the light microscope and the electron microscope (Fig. 4.1). Light microscopes use a series of glass lenses to focus light in order to form an image whereas electron microscopes use electromagnetic lenses to focus a beam of electrons. Light microscopes are able to magnify to a maximum of approximately 1500 times whereas electron microscopes are capable of magnifying to a maximum of approximately 200 000 times.

Magnification is not the best measure of a microscope, however. Rather, resolution, the ability to distinguish between two closely spaced points in a specimen, is a much more reliable estimate of a microscope's utility. Standard light microscopes have a lateral resolution limit of about 0.5 micrometers (μm) for routine analysis. In contrast, electron microscopes have a lateral resolution of up to 1 nanometer (nm). Both living and dead specimens are viewed with a light microscope, and often in real colour, whereas only dead ones are viewed with an electron microscope, and never in real colour.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, M. (2003). Microscope Basics and Beyond. Melville, NY: Olympus of America. (Good well-illustrated primer on all aspects of basic light microscopy, also available online as a pdf. file.)Google Scholar
Afzelius, B. A. and Maunsbach, A. B. (2004). Biological ultrastructure research: the first 50 years. Tissue Cell, 36, 83–94. (Ageless review of the early history of electron microscopy.)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alberts, B., Johnson, A., Lewis, J., Raff, M., Roberts, K. and Walter, P. (2007). Molecular Biology of the Cell, 5th edn. New York: Garland Science. (Basic introduction to all forms of microscopy and live cell imaging for the cell biologist.)Google Scholar
Andrews, P. D., Harper, I. S. and Swedlow, J. R. (2002). To 5D and beyond: quantitative fluorescence microscopy in the postgenomic era. Traffic, 3, 29–36. (Review of multidimensional imaging, methods of coping with large data sets and international image databases.)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumeister, W. (2004). Mapping molecular landscapes inside cells. Biological Chemistry, 385, 865–872. (Review of electron tomography.)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cox, G. C. (2006). Optical Imaging Techniques in Cell Biology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. (Overview of the entire field of light microscopy.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damle, S., Hanser, B., Davidson, E. H. and Fraser, S. E. (2006). Confocal quantification of cis-regulatory reporter gene expression in living sea urchins. Developmental Biology, 299, 543–550. (Practical example of quantitative measurements in living cells.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darzacq, X.et al. (2009). Imaging transcription in living cells. Annual Review of Biophysics, 38, 173–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunn, G. A. and Jones, G. E. (2004). Cell motility under the microscope: Vorsprung durch Technik. Nature Reviews Molecular and Cell Biology, 5, 667–672. (Review of techniques used to study cell motility.)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evanko, D., Heinrichs, A. and Karlsson-Rosenthal, C. (eds.) (2009). Light Microscopy. Nature Milestones. www.nature.com/milestones/light-microscopy (Well-produced and complete review of all aspects of contemporary light microscopy.)
Frankel, F. (2002). Envisioning Science: The Design and Craft of the Science Image. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Popular work on imaging with some great tips and tricks for the stereomicroscope.)Google Scholar
Giepmans, B. N. G., Adams, S. R., Ellisman, M. H. and Tsien, R. Y. (2006). The fluorescent toolbox for assessing protein location and function. Science, 312, 217–224. (A review of the characteristics and benefits of using fluorescent probes to study proteins.)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hadjantonakis, A. K., Dickinson, M. E., Fraser, S. E. and Papaioannou, V. E. (2003). Technicolor transgenics: imaging tools for functional genomics in the mouse. Nature Review Genetics, 4, 613–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, J. P. (2005). Dictionary of Microscopy. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Hoenger, A. and McIntosh, J. R. (2009). Probing the macromolecular organisation of cells by electron tomography. Current Opinion in Cell Biology, 21, 89–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inoue, S. and Spring, K. (1997). Video Microscopy: The Fundamentals, 2nd edn. New York: Plenum Press. (The classic text on live cell imaging, video microscopy and general microscopy.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaiswal, J. K. and Simon, S. M. (2007). Imaging single events at the cell membrane. Nature Chemical Biology, 3, 92–98. (Overview of high resolution methods of light microscopy including TIRF.)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keller, P. J., Schimdt, A. D., Wittbrodt, J. and Stelzer, E. H. K. (2008). Reconstruction of zebrafish early embryonic development by scanned light sheet microscopy. Sciencexpress, www.sciencexpress.org, 9 October 2008. (Application of scanning light microscopy to image living zebrafish embryos – stunning movies of zebrafish embryogenesis available online.)CrossRef
Knoops, K., Kikkert, M., Worm, S. H. E., Zevenhoven-dobbe, J. C., Meer, Y., Koster, A. J., Mommaas, A. M. and Snijder, E. J. (2008). SARS–Coronavirus replication is supported by a reticulovesicular network of modified endoplasmic reticulum. PLoS Biology, 6, 1957–1974. (Cryo-electron tomography in action.)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lichtman, J. W. and Fraser, S. E. (2001). The neuronal naturalist: watching neurons in their native habitat. Nature Neuroscience (Suppl.), 4, 1215–1220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Livet, J., Weissman, T. A., Kang, H., Draft, R. W., Lu, J., Bennis, R. A., Sanes, J. R. and Lichtman, J. W. (2007). Transgenic strategies for combinatorial expression of fluorescent proteins in the nervous system. Nature, 450, 56–62. (Imaginative use of reporter gene technology to label multiple neurons in living brains.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGurk, L., Morrison, H., Keegan, L. P., Sharpe, J. and O'Connell, M. A. (2007). Three-dimensional imaging of Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS ONE, 2, E834. (Methods of three-dimensional imaging including confocal and optical projection tomography.)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sedgewick, J. (2008). Scientific Imaging with PhotoShop: Methods, Measurement, and Output. Berkeley, CA: Pearson Education, Peachpit Press. (Practical manual on the use of PhotoShop for measuring and preparing images for publication.)Google Scholar
Shapiro, H. M. (2003). Practical Flow Cytometry, 4th edn. New York: John Wiley. (Wonderfully written book on basic fluorescence and flow cytometry.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spector, D. L. and Goldman, R. D. (2006). Basic Methods in Microscopy. Plainview, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. (A good introduction to contemporary methods of imaging both fixed and living cells at both the light and electron microscope level.)Google Scholar
Swedlow, J. R., Lewis, S. E. and Goldberg, I. G. (2006). Modeling data across labs, genomes, space and time. Nature Cell Biology, 8, 1190–1194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swedlow, J. R., Goldberg, I. G., Eliceiri, K. W. and the OME Consortium (2009). Bioimage informatics for experimental biology. Annual Review of Biophysics, 38, 327–346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomancak, P., Berman, B. P., Beaton, A., Weiszmann, R., Kwan, E., Hartenstein, V., Celniker, S. E. and Rubin, G. M. (2007). Global analysis of gene expression during Drosophila embryogenesis. Genome Biology, 8, R145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roessel, P. and Brand, A. H. (2002). Imaging into the future: visualizing gene expression and protein interaction with fluorescent proteins. Nature Cell Biology, 4, E15–E20. (Good primer on GFP and FRET.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volpi, E. V. and Bridger, J. M. (2008). FISH glossary: an overview of the fluorescence in situ hybridization technique. BioTechniques, 45, 385–409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallace, W., Schaefer, L. H. and Swedlow, J. R. (2001). Workingperson's guide to deconvolution in light microscopy. BioTechniques, 31, 1076–1097. (Comprehensive review of the deconvolution technique.)Google ScholarPubMed
Wilt, B. A., Burns, L. D., Tatt Wei Ho, E., Ghosh, K. K., Mukamel, E. A. and Schnitzer, M. J. (2009). Advances in light microscopy for neuroscience. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 32, 435–506. (Complete coverage of all modern methods of imaging including super-resolution methods.)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, J., Campbell, R. E., Ting, A. Y. and Tsien, R. Y. (2002). Creating new fluorescent probes for cell biology. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 3, 906–918. (Review of the development of fluorescent probes of biological activity especially reporter molecules.)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Microscopy
  • Edited by Keith Wilson, University of Hertfordshire, John Walker, University of Hertfordshire
  • Book: Principles and Techniques of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
  • Online publication: 05 July 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511841477.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Microscopy
  • Edited by Keith Wilson, University of Hertfordshire, John Walker, University of Hertfordshire
  • Book: Principles and Techniques of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
  • Online publication: 05 July 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511841477.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Microscopy
  • Edited by Keith Wilson, University of Hertfordshire, John Walker, University of Hertfordshire
  • Book: Principles and Techniques of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
  • Online publication: 05 July 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511841477.005
Available formats
×