Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T11:09:59.802Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Speciation and patterns of biodiversity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Roger K. Butlin
Affiliation:
Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield
Jon R. Bridle
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol
Dolph Schluter
Affiliation:
Zoology Department and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia
Roger Butlin
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield
Jon Bridle
Affiliation:
University of Bristol
Dolph Schluter
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Vancouver
Get access

Summary

There are many more species of insects (>850,000) than of their putative sister taxon (Entognatha, 7500 species) (Mayhew 2002). More than 1600 species of birds have been recorded near the Equator in the New World compared with 300–400 species at latitudes around 40° North or South (Gaston & Blackburn 2000). Mammalian families with average body sizes around 10 g have nearly 10 times as many species as those with average body sizes around 3 kg (Purvis et al. 2003). In a catch of 15,609 moths of 240 species over 4 years of light trapping at Rothamsted, England, the majority of species (180) were represented by 50 individuals or less (Fisher et al. 1943). These observations illustrate the highly uneven distribution of the world's biological diversity. They are examples of four well-known patterns: species richness varies among clades; it varies spatially, with the latitudinal gradient being a classic example; it is higher in small animals than large ones; and rare species are more numerous than common ones. Documenting and explaining such patterns is a major enterprise of ecology (Gaston & Blackburn 2000).

In their introduction to a previous British Ecological Society (BES) Symposium Volume, Blackburn and Gaston (2003) identified three evolutionary processes that underlie large-scale patterns of biodiversity: speciation, extinction and range changes. Anagenetic change might also contribute to some patterns, for example if there is a general tendency for size increase among mammalian lineages (Alroy 1998).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albert, A. Y. K. and Schluter, D. (2004) Reproductive character displacement of male stickleback mate preference: reinforcement or direct selection?Evolution 58, 1099–1107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alroy, J. (1998) Cope's rule and the dynamics of body mass evolution in North American fossil mammals. Science 280, 731–734.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arnqvist, G., Edvardsson, M., Friberg, U. and Nilsson, T. (2000) Sexual conflict promotes speciation in insects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97, 10460–10464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barluenga, M., Stolting, K. N., Salzburger, W., Muschick, M. and Meyer, A. (2006) Sympatric speciation in Nicaraguan crater lake cichlid fish. Nature 439, 719–723.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barraclough, T. G., Harvey, P. H. and Nee, S. (1995) Sexual selection and taxonomic diversity in passerine birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 259, 211–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barraclough, T. G. and Vogler, A. P. (2000) Detecting the geographical pattern of speciation from species-level phylogenies. American Naturalist 155, 419–434.Google ScholarPubMed
Barton, N. H. and Charlesworth, B. (1984) Genetic revolutions, founder effects, and speciation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 15, 133–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, N. H. and Hewitt, G. M. (1985) Analysis of hybrid zones. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 16, 113–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, T. M. and Gaston, K. J. (2003) Macroecology: Concepts and Consequences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Boughman, J. W. (2002) How sensory drive can promote speciation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17, 571–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butlin, R. (1998) What do hybrid zones in general, and the Chorthippus parallelus zone in particular, tell us about speciation? In: Endless Forms: Species and Speciation (ed. Howard, D. J. and Berlocher, C. H.), pp. 367–378. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Butlin, R. K. (2005) Recombination and speciation. Molecular Ecology 14, 2621–2635.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cadena, C. D., Ricklefs, R. E., Jimenez, I. and Bermingham, E. (2005) Ecology – is speciation driven by species diversity?Nature 438, E1–E2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cardillo, M. (1999) Latitude and rates of diversification in birds and butterflies. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 266, 1221–1225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chave, J. (2004) Neutral theory and community ecology. Ecology Letters 7, 241–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coyne, J. A. and Orr, H. A. (2004) Speciation. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
Emerson, B. C. and Kolm, N. (2005) Species diversity can drive speciation. Nature 434, 1015–1017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Endler, J. A. (1992) Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. American Naturalist 139, S125–S153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R. A., Corbet, A. S. and Williams, C. B. (1943) The relation between the number of species and the number of individuals in a random sample of an animal population. Journal of Animal Ecology 12, 42–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaston, K. J. and Blackburn, T. M. (2000) Pattern and Process in Macroecology. Blackwell Science, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavrilets, S. (2004) Fitness Landscapes and the Origin of Species. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Goldberg, E. E. and Lande, R. (2006) Ecological and reproductive character displacement on an environmental gradient. Evolution 60, 1344–1357.Google ScholarPubMed
Hubbell, S. P. (2001) The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Hubbell, S. P. and Lake, J. (2003) The neutral theory of biogeography and biodiversity: and beyond. In: Macroecology: Concepts and Consequences (ed. Blackburn, T. M. and Gaston, K. J.), pp. 45–63. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hunt, J. A., Houtchens, K. A., Brezinsky, L., Shadravan, F. and Bishop, J. G. (1989) Genomic DNA variation within and between closely related species of Hawaiian Drosophila. In: Genetics, Speciation and the Founder Prinicple (ed. Giddings, L. V., Kaneshiro, K. Y. and Anderson, W. W.), pp. 167–180. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Irwin, D. E., Thimgan, M. P. and Irwin, J. H. (2008) Call divergence is correlated with geographic and genetic distance in greenish warblers (Phylloscopus trochiloides): a strong role for stochasticity in signal evolution? Journal of Evolutionary Biology 21, 435–448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lande, R. (1981) Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America-Biological Sciences 78, 3721–3725.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levin, D. A. (2002) The Role of Chromosomal Change in Plant Evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Mace, G. M., Gittleman, J. L. and Purvis, A. (2003) Preserving the tree of life. Science 300, 1707–1709.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, O. Y. and Hosken, D. J. (2003) The evolution of reproductive isolation through sexual conflict. Nature 423, 979–982.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mavarez, J., Salazar, C. A., Bermingham, E., et al. (2006) Speciation by hybridization in Heliconius butterflies. Nature 441, 868–871.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayhew, P. J. (2002) Shifts in hexapod diversification and what Haldane could have said. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 269, 969–974.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayr, E. (1942) Systematics and the Origin of Species from the Viewpoint of a Zoologist. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
McKinnon, J. S., Mori, S., Blackman, B. K., et al. (2004) Evidence for ecology's role in speciation. Nature 429, 294–298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noor, M. A. F. (2003) Evolutionary biology – genes to make new species. Nature 423, 699–700.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Otto, S. P. and Whitton, J. (2000) Polyploid incidence and evolution. Annual Review of Genetics 34, 401–437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Panhuis, T. M., Butlin, R., Zuk, M. and Tregenza, T. (2001) Sexual selection and speciation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16, 364–371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillimore, A. B., Freckleton, R. P., Orme, C. D. L. and Owens, I. P. F. (2006) Ecology predicts large-scale patterns of phylogenetic diversification in birds. American Naturalist 168, 220–229.Google ScholarPubMed
Presgraves, D. C. and Stephan, W. (2007) Pervasive adaptive evolution among interactors of the Drosophila hybrid inviability gene, Nup96. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24, 306–314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Price, T. (1998) Sexual selection and natural selection in bird speciation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 353, 251–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purvis, A., Orme, C. D. L. and Dolphin, K. (2003) Why are most species small-bodied? A phylogenetic view. In: Macroecology: Concepts and Consequences (ed. Blackburn, T. M. and Gaston, K. J.), pp. 155–173. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ricklefs, R. E. (2003) Genetics, evolution, and ecological communities. Ecology 84, 588–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricklefs, R. E. (2006) Global variation in the diversification rate of passerine birds. Ecology 87, 2468–2478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rieseberg, L. H., Kim, S. C., Randell, R. A., et al. (2007) Hybridization and the colonization of novel habitats by annual sunflowers. Genetica 129, 149–165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ritchie, M. G. (2007) Sexual selection and speciation. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 38, 79–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rundle, H. D., Nagel, L., Boughman, J. W. and Schluter, D. (2000) Natural selection and parallel speciation in sympatric sticklebacks. Science 287, 306–308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rundle, H. D. and Schluter, D. (1998) Reinforcement of stickleback mate preferences: sympatry breeds contempt. Evolution 52, 200–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savolainen, V., Anstett, M. C., Lexer, C., et al. (2006) Sympatric speciation in palms on an oceanic island. Nature 441, 210–213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schluter, D. (2001) Ecology and the origin of species. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16, 372–380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tregenza, T. and Butlin, R. K. (1999) Genetic diversity: do marker genes tell us the whole story?. In: Evolution of Biological Diversity (ed. Magurran, A. E. and May, R. M.), pp. 37–55. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Tregenza, T., Pritchard, V. L. and Butlin, R. K. (2000) The origins of premating reproductive isolation: testing hypotheses in the grasshopper Chorthippus parallelus. Evolution 54, 1687–1698.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tregenza, T., Pritchard, V. L. and Butlin, R. K. (2002) The origins of postmating reproductive isolation: testing hypotheses in the grasshopper Chorthippus parallelus. Population Ecology 44, 137–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, G. F. and Burrows, M. T. (1995) A model of sympatric speciation by sexual selection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 260, 287–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Via, S. (2001) Sympatric speciation in animals: the ugly duckling grows up. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16, 381–390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vines, T. H., Kohler, S. C., Thiel, A., et al. (2003) The maintenance of reproductive isolation in a mosaic hybrid zone between the fire-bellied toads Bombina bombina and B. variegata. Evolution 57, 1876–1888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vines, T. H. and Schluter, D. (2006) Strong assortative mating between allopatric sticklebacks as a by-product of adaptation to different environments. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 273, 911–916.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weir, J. T. and Schluter, D. (2007) The latitudinal gradient in recent speciation and extinction rates of birds and mammals. Science 315, 1574–1576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×