Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T11:44:48.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comment

Reductionism in the Human Sciences:A Philosopher's Game

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Robert G. Shulman
Affiliation:
Yale University Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry
Ian Shapiro
Affiliation:
Yale University Department of Political Science
C. Mantzavinos
Affiliation:
Witten/Herdecke University
Get access

Summary

David Papineau contends that the possibility of science depends on there being uniformly realized phenomena that are reducible to physical laws, not merely the variably realized selection mechanisms that are characteristic of much social science. Some who share Papineau's view regard it as fatal to the possibility of social science on the grounds that their subject matter lacks the uniformly realized phenomena that he regards as necessary for science.

Papineau disagrees with this pessimism, asserting that, like “pain mechanisms,” many cognitive abilities are uniformly realized across humans. As a result, there can be a “rich nexus of laws” about them – though he says nothing about what these laws might be. Not everything social scientists study exhibits what Papineau regards as the necessary reductive feature, but although he sidesteps any attempt to demarcate what he takes to be the scientific zone of the social sciences, he is confident that enough falls within its ambit to make the game worth the candle.

To the extent that human categories are uniformly physically realized, they will function as scientific kinds in a full sense. There will be a wide range of projectible general truths about various facets of human pain, human vision, and human learning. Moreover, to the extent that subjects such as economics and sociology formulate generalizations that depend only on the basic structure of human reasoning, rather than on variably realized learned states, we can expect them to deal with complexes of interrelated generalizations too. It is plausible that many of the principles of economics, political science, and social choice theory will fit this bill.

Papineau, this book, p. 120
Type
Chapter
Information
Philosophy of the Social Sciences
Philosophical Theory and Scientific Practice
, pp. 124 - 129
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fodor, J. 2001. The Mind Doesn't Work That Way: The Scope and Limits of Computational Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gibbs, J. W. 1876. “Equilibrium of heterogeneous substances,” Trans. Connecticut Academy Sci. 3.Google Scholar
Green, D. and Shapiro, I. 1994. Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science. London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kaplan, J. T., Freedman, J., and Iacoboni, M. 2007. “Us versus them: Political attitudes and party affiliation influence neural response to faces of presidential candidates,” Neuropsychologia 45: 55–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petersen, A. 1963. “The Philosophy of Niels Bohr,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, pp. 8–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, I. 2002. “Problems, methods, and theories in the study of politics, or: What's wrong with political science and what to do about it,” Political Theory 30(4): 588–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shulman, R. G. 1996. Interview in Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 8: 474–480.
Shulman, R. G. 2001. “Functional imaging studies: Linking mind and basic neuroscience,” American Journal of Psychiatry 158: 11–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eijsden, P., Hyder, F., Rothman, D. L., and Shulman, R. G. 2009. “Neurophysiology of functional imaging,” Neuroimage 4: 1047–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Comment
    • By Robert G. Shulman, Yale University Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Ian Shapiro, Yale University Department of Political Science
  • Edited by C. Mantzavinos, Witten/Herdecke University
  • Book: Philosophy of the Social Sciences
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812880.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Comment
    • By Robert G. Shulman, Yale University Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Ian Shapiro, Yale University Department of Political Science
  • Edited by C. Mantzavinos, Witten/Herdecke University
  • Book: Philosophy of the Social Sciences
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812880.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Comment
    • By Robert G. Shulman, Yale University Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Ian Shapiro, Yale University Department of Political Science
  • Edited by C. Mantzavinos, Witten/Herdecke University
  • Book: Philosophy of the Social Sciences
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812880.011
Available formats
×