Abe, Isamu. 1962. Call contours. ICPhS 7 (Helsinki): 519–23.Google Scholar

Abercrombie, David. 1991. Fifty years in phonetics. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Abramson, Arthur. 1962. The vowels and tones of Standard Thai: acoustical measurements and experiments. IJAL 28, no. 2, part 3.Google Scholar

Adriaens, L.M.H. 1991. Ein Modell deutscher Intonation: eine experimentell-phonetische Untersuchung nach den perzeptiv relevanten Grundfrequenzänderungen in vorgelesenem Text. PhD thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology.Google Scholar

Allerton, David and Alan, Cruttenden. 1979. Three reasons for accenting a definite subject. JL 15: 49–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Altmann, Hans (ed.). 1988. Intonationsforschungen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRef

Anderson, Anne H., Miles, Bader, Ellen, Gurman Bard, Elizabeth, Boyle, Gwyneth, Doherty, Simon, Garrod, Stephen, Isard, Jacqueline, Kowtko, Jan, McAllister, Jim, Miller, Catherine, Sotillo, Henry, S. Thompson, and Regina, Weinert. 1991. The HCRC map task corpus. LgSp 34: 351–66.Google Scholar

Anderson, Mark, Janet, Pierrehumbert, and Mark, Liberman. 1984. Synthesis by rule of English intonation patterns. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2.8.2–2.8.4.Google Scholar

Anderson, Stephen R. 1978. Tone features. In Fromkin 1978: pp. 133–75.

Anderson, Steven W. and William, E. Cooper. 1986. Fundamental frequency patterns during spontaneous picture description. JASA 79: 1172–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Apple, W. and Hecht, K.. 1982. Speaking emotionally: the relation between verbal and vocal communication of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42: 864–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Árnason, Kristján. 2005. Hljóð. Handbók um hljóðfræði og hljóðkerfisfræði. Reykjavik: Almenna bókafélagið.Google Scholar

Arndt, W. 1960. ‘Modal particles’ in Russian and German. Word 16: 323–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arvaniti, Amalia and Mary, Baltazani. 2005. Intonational analysis and prosodic annotation of Greek spoken corpora. In Jun 2005: pp. 84–117.

Arvaniti, Amalia and Gina, Garding. 2007. Dialectal variation in the rising accents of American English. In Hualde, J. and Cole, J. (eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology IX. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 547–76.Google Scholar

Arvaniti, Amalia and Svetlana, Godjevac. 2003. The origins and scope of final lowering in English and Greek. ICPhS 15 (Barcelona): 1077–80.Google Scholar

Arvaniti, Amalia and Ladd, D. Robert. 1995. Tonal alignment and the representation of accentual targets. ICPhS 13 (Stockholm), vol. 4: 220–3.Google Scholar

Arvaniti, Amalia, Ladd, D. Robert, and Ineke, Mennen. 1998. Stability of tonal alignment: the case of Greek prenuclear accents. JPhon 26: 3–25.Google Scholar

Arvaniti, Amalia, Ladd, D. Robert, and Ineke, Mennen 2000. What is a starred tone? Evidence from Greek. In Broe and Pierrehumbert 2000: pp. 119–31.

Arvaniti, Amalia, Ladd, D. Robert, and Ineke, Mennen 2006. Phonetic effects of focus and ‘tonal crowding’ in intonation: evidence from Greek polar questions. SpComm 48: 667–96.Google Scholar

Ashby, Michael. 1978. A study of two English nuclear tones. LgSp 21: 326–36.Google ScholarPubMed

Atterer, Michaela and Ladd, D. Robert. 2004. On the phonetics and phonology of ‘segmental anchoring’ of F0: evidence from German. JPhon 32: 177–97.Google Scholar

Bard, Ellen Gurman, Anderson, Anne H., Catherine, Sotillo, Matthew, Aylett, Gwyneth, Doherty-Sneddon, and Arlene, Newlands. 2000. Controlling the intelligibility of referring expressions in dialogue. JML 42: 1–22.Google Scholar

Bard, Ellen Gurman and Matthew, Aylett. 1999. The dissociation of deaccenting, givenness, and syntactic role in spontaneous speech. ICPhS 14 (San Francisco): 1753–6.Google Scholar

Bard, Ellen Gurman, Daniel, Robertson, and Antonella, Sorace. 1996. Magnitude estimation of linguistic acceptability. Lg 72: 32–68.Google Scholar

Baumann, Stefan. 2006. The intonation of givenness: evidence from German. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beaugendre, Frédéric. 1994. Une étude perceptive de l'intonation du français. PhD thesis, Université de Paris XI.Google Scholar

Beaver, David, Brady, Zack Clark, Edward, Flemming, Jaeger, T. Florian, and Maria, Wolters. 2007. When semantics meets phonetics: acoustical studies of second-occurrence focus. Lg 83: 245–76.Google Scholar

Beckman, Mary E. 1986. Stress and non-stress accent. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beckman, Mary E. 1995. Local shapes and global trends. ICPhS 13 (Stockholm), vol. 2: 100–7.Google Scholar

Beckman, Mary E. 2007. ToBI home page. Online at www.ling.ohio-state.edu/∼tobi (last accessed 22 March 2008). Linked to new English ToBI home page at www.tobihome.org (last accessed 22 March 2008).

Beckman, Mary E. and Gayle, Ayers Elam. 1993 Guidelines for ToBI labelling. Linked to main ToBI website, online at www.tobihome.org (last accessed 29 October 2007).

Beckman, Mary E., Julia, Hirschberg, and Stefanie, Shattuck-Hufnagel. 2005. The original ToBI system and the evolution of the ToBI framework. In Jun 2005: pp. 9–54.

Beckman, Mary E. and John, Kingston. 1990. Introduction. In Kingston and Beckman 1990: pp. 1–16.

Beckman, Mary E. and Pierrehumbert, Janet B.. 1986. Intonational structure in English and Japanese. Phonology Yearbook 3: 255–310.Google Scholar

Beckman, Mary E. and Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 1992. Comments on chapters 14 and 15. In Docherty and Ladd 1992: pp. 387–97.

Bing, Janet Mueller. 1979. Aspects of English prosody. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts. Published 1985 by Garland Press, New York.Google Scholar

Bing, Janet Mueller 1980. The given/new distinction and the unmarked stress pattern. NELS XI (Ottawa): 13–21.Google Scholar

Birch, Stacy and Charles, Clifton Jr. 1995. Focus, accent, and argument structure: Effects on language comprehension. LgSp 38: 365–91.Google ScholarPubMed

Bishop, Judith and Janet, Fletcher. 2005. Intonation in six dialects of Bininj Gun-Wok. In Jun 2005: pp. 331–61.

Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight. 1951. Intonation: levels versus configurations. Word 7: 199–210. Reprinted in Bolinger 1965: pp. 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight 1954. English prosodic stress and Spanish sentence order. Hispania 37: pp. 152–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight 1958. A theory of pitch accent in English. Word 14: 109–49. Reprinted in Bolinger 1965: pp. 17–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight 1961a. Generality, gradience, and the all-or-none. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight 1961b. Contrastive accent and contrastive stress. Lg 37: 83–96. Reprinted in Bolinger 1965: pp. 101–17.Google Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight 1964. Intonation: around the edge of language. Harvard Educational Review 34: 282–96. Reprinted (slightly abridged) in Bolinger 1972a: 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight 1965. Forms of English: accent, morpheme, order. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight (ed.). 1972a. Intonation. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight 1972b. Accent is predictable (if you're a mind-reader). Lg 48: 633–44.Google Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight 1978. Intonation across languages. In Greenberg, J. (ed.), Universals of human language, vol. II: Phonology. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 471–524.Google Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight 1982. Intonation and its parts. Lg 58: 505–33.Google Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight 1986. Intonation and its parts. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight 1989. Intonation and its uses. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Bosch, Peter and Rob, Sandt (eds.), 1999. Focus: linguistic, cognitive, and computational perspectives. Cambridge University Press.

Botinis, Antonis, Georgios, Kouroupetroglou, and George, Carayiannis (eds.), 1997. Intonation: theory, models and applications (Proceedings of an ESCA Workshop, Athens).

Braun, Bettina. 2006. Phonetics and phonology of thematic contrast in German. LgSp 49: 451–93.Google ScholarPubMed

Brazil, David, Malcolm, Coulthard, and Catherine, Johns. 1980. Discourse intonation and language teaching. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Bresnan, Joan. 1971. Sentence stress and syntactic transformations. Lg 47: 257–80.Google Scholar

Britain, David. 1992. Linguistic change in intonation: the use of high rising terminals in New Zealand English. LVC 4: 77–104.Google Scholar

Broe, Michael and Pierrehumbert, Janet B. (eds.). 2000. Papers in laboratory phonology V. Cambridge University Press.

Brown, Gillian, Karen, Currie, and Joanne, Kenworthy. 1980. Questions of intonation. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar

Browne, E.W. and McCawley, James D.. 1965. Serbo-Croatian accent. In Fudge, Erik C. (ed.), Phonology. Harmondsworth: Penguin, pp. 330–5.Google Scholar

Bruce, Gösta. 1977. Swedish word accents in sentence perspective. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar

Bruce, Gösta. 1982. Developing the Swedish intonation model. Working Papers 22 (Department of Linguistics and Phonetics, University of Lund) 51–116.Google Scholar

Bruce, Gösta. 1987. How floating is focal accent? In Gregerson, K. and Basbøll, H. (eds.), Nordic Prosody IV. Odense University Press, pp. 41–9.Google Scholar

Bruce, Gösta and Eva, Gårding. 1978. A prosodic typology for Swedish dialects. In Gårding, E., Bruce, G., and Bannert, R. (eds.), Nordic prosody. Lund: Gleerup, pp. 219–28.Google Scholar

Brugos, Alejna, Stefanie, Shattuck-Hufnagel, and Nanette, Veilleux. 2006. Transcribing Prosodic Structure of Spoken Utterances with ToBI (MIT Open Courseware). Linked to main ToBI website, online at www.tobihome.org (last accessed 22 March 2008).

Büring, Daniel. 1997. The meaning of topic and focus: the 59th Street Bridge accent. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Büring, Daniel. 1999. Topic. In Bosch and van der Sandt 1999: pp. 142–65.

Calhoun, Sasha. 2006. Information structure and the prosodic structure of English: a probabilistic relationship. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Campbell, W.N. 1993. Automatic detection of prosodic boundaries in speech. SpComm 13: 343–54.Google Scholar

Campbell, W.N. and Beckman, Mary E.. 1997. Stress, prominence and spectral tilt. In Botinis, Kouroupetroglou, and Carayiannis 1997: pp. 67–70.

Caspers, Johanneke and Vincent, Heuven. 1993. Effects of time pressure on the phonetic realization of the Dutch accent-lending pitch rise and fall. Phonetica 50: 161–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chafe, Wallace. 1974. Language and consciousness. Lg 50: 111–33.Google Scholar

Chafe, Wallace. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and points of view. In Li, C. (ed.), Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press, pp. 25–56.Google Scholar

Chang, Nien-Chuang. 1958. Tones and intonation in the Chengtu dialect (Szechuan, China). Phonetica 2: 59–84. Reprinted in Bolinger 1972a: 391–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chao, Y.R. 1932. A preliminary study of English intonation (with American variants) and its Chinese equivalents. T'sai Yuan Pei Anniversary Volume, supplementary vol. 1 of Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology of the Academica Sinica, Peiping.

Chen, Aoju, Carlos, Gussenhoven, and Toni, Rietveld. 2004. Language-specificity in the perception of paralinguistic intonational meaning. LgSp 47: 311–49.Google ScholarPubMed

Chen, Matthew. 1987. The syntax of Xiamen tone sandhi. Phonology Yearbook 4: 109–49.Google Scholar

Chen, Yiya and Yi, Xu. 2006. Production of weak elements in speech – evidence from F0 patterns of neutral tone in Standard Chinese. Phonetica 63: 47–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ching, Marvin K.L. 1982. The question intonation in assertions. American Speech 57: 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cho, Taehong and Peter, Ladefoged. 1999. Variation and universals in VOT: evidence from 18 languages. JPhon 27: 207–29.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1972. Deep structure, surface structure and semantic interpretation. In Chomsky, Noam, Studies on semantics in generative grammar. The Hague: Mouton, pp. 62–119.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam and Morris, Halle. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo. 1993. A null theory of phrase and compound stress. LI 24: 239–97.Google Scholar

Clements, G.N. 1979. The description of terraced-level tone languages. Lg 55: 536–58.Google Scholar

Clements, G.N. 1983. The hierarchical representation of tone features. In Dihoff, I. (ed.), Current approaches to African linguistics, vol. I. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Clements, G.N. 1990. The status of register in intonation theory. In Kingston and Beckman 1990: pp. 58–71.

Clifton, Charles Jr and Lyn, Frazier. 2004. Should given information come before new? Yes and no. Memory and Cognition 32: 886–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cohen, Antonie, René, Collier, and Johan 't, Hart. 1982. Declination: construct or intrinsic feature of speech pitch?Phonetica 39: 254–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cohen, Antonie and 't Hart, Johan. 1967. On the anatomy of intonation. Lingua 19: 177–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collier, René and Hart, Johan 't. 1981. Cursus Nederlandse Intonatie. Louvain: Acco/De Horstink.Google Scholar

Connell, Bruce. 2000. The perception of lexical tone in Mambila. LgSp 43: 163–82.Google ScholarPubMed

Connell, Bruce and Amalia, Arvaniti (eds.). 1995. Papers in laboratory phonology IV. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Connell, Bruce and Ladd, D. Robert. 1990. Aspects of pitch realisation in Yoruba. Phonology 7: 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooper, William, Eady, Stephen J., and Mueller, Pamela R.. 1985. Acoustical aspects of contrastive stress in question-answer contexts. JASA 77: 2142–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cooper, William and Jeanne, Paccia-Cooper. 1980. Syntax and speech. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooper, William and Sorensen, John. 1981. Fundamental frequency in sentence production. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Margret, Selting. 1996. Prosody in conversation. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Croft, William. 1995. Intonation units and grammatical structure. Linguistics 33: 839–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cruttenden, Alan. 1986. Intonation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cruttenden, Alan. 1992a. Review of 't Hart, Collier, and Cohen 1990. JL 28: 522–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cruttenden, Alan. 1992b. The origins of nucleus. JIPA 20: 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cruttenden, Alan. 1993. The de-accenting and re-accenting of repeated lexical items. Working Papers 41 (Department of Linguistics and Phonetics, University of Lund): Proceedings of the ESCA Workshop on Prosody, Lund, 27–29 September 1993, 16–19.Google Scholar

Cruttenden, Alan. 1994a. Rises in English. In Lewis, J. Windsor (ed.), Studies in general and English phonetics: Essays in honour of Professor J.D. O'Connor. London: Routledge, pp. 155–73.Google Scholar

Cruttenden, Alan. 1994b. Gimson's Pronunciation of English, fifth edition. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Crystal, David. 1969. Prosodic systems and intonation in English. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Culicover, Peter and Rochemont, Michael. 1983. Stress and focus in English. Lg 59: 123–65.Google Scholar

Cutler, Anne, Delphine, Dahan, and Donselaar, Wilma. 1997. Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: a literature review. LgSp 40: 141–201.PubMed

Cutler, Anne and Ladd, D. Robert (eds.). 1983. Prosody: models and measurements. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRef

Dainora, Audra. 2001. An empirically based probabilistic model of intonation in American English. PhD thesis, University of Chicago.Google Scholar

Dainora, Audra. 2006. Modeling intonation in English: A probabilistic approach to phonological competence. In Goldstein, L., Whalen, D.H., and Best, C. (eds.), Laboratory phonology VIII. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 107–32.Google Scholar

D'Alessandro, Christophe and Mertens, Piet. 1995. Automatic pitch contour stylization using a model of tonal perception. Computer Speech and Language 9: 257–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dalton, Martha and Chasaide, Ailbhe Ní. 2005. Tonal alignment in Irish dialects. LgSp 48: 441–64.Google ScholarPubMed

Daneš, Frantisek. 1967. Order of elements and sentence intonation. In To honour Roman Jakobson: essays on the occasion of his seventieth birthday. The Hague: Mouton, pp. 499–512. Reprinted in Bolinger 1972a: pp. 216–32.Google Scholar

Dawe, L.A., Platt, J.R., and Racine, R.J.. 1993. Harmonic accents in inference of metrical structure and perception of rhythm patterns. Perception & Psychophysics 54: 794–807.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Delattre, Pierre. 1963. Comparing the phonetic features of English, German, Spanish and French. International Review of Applied Linguistics 1: 193–210. Reprinted (slightly revised) 1965, as chapter 2 of Comparing the phonetic features of English, German, Spanish and French. Heidelberg: Julius Groos, pp. 23–43.Google Scholar

Delattre, Pierre. 1966. Les dix intonations de base du français. French Review 40: 1–14.Google Scholar

Dell, François. 1984. L'accentuation dans les phrases en français. In Dell, F., Vergnaud, J.-R., and Hirst, D. (eds.), Les représentations en phonologie. Paris: Hermann, pp. 65–112.Google Scholar

Pijper, Jan Roelof. 1983. Modelling British English intonation. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Pijper, Jan Roelof and Sanderman, Angelien. 1995. On the perceptual strength of prosodic boundaries and its relation to suprasegmental cues. JASA 96: 2037–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sivers, Fanny. 1965. L'unité intonationelle d'interrogation en hongrois. La Linguistique 1: 75–112.Google Scholar

Dilley, Laura. 2005. The phonetics and phonology of tonal systems. PhD thesis, MIT.Google Scholar

Dilley, Laura and Brown, Meredith. 2007. Effects of pitch range variation on F0 extrema in an imitation task. JPhon 35: 523–51.Google Scholar

Dilley, Laura,Ladd, D. Robert, and Schepman, Astrid. 2005. Alignment of L and H in bitonal pitch accents: testing two hypotheses. JPhon 33: 115–19.Google Scholar

D'Imperio, Mariapaola. 2002. Italian intonation: An overview and some questions. Probus 14: 37–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

D'Imperio, Mariapaola and House, David. 1997. Perception of questions and statements in Neapolitan Italian. Proceedings of Eurospeech (Rhodes), pp. 251–4.Google Scholar

Docherty, Gerard and Ladd, D. Robert (eds.). 1992. Papers in laboratory phonology II. Cambridge University Press.

Mark, Donohue. 1997. Tone systems in New Guinea. Linguistic Typology 1: 347–86.Google Scholar

Downing, Laura J. 2008. Focus and prominence in Chichewa, Chitumbuka, and Durban Zulu. ZAS Papers in Linguistics (ZASPiL) 49: 47–65.Google Scholar

Dresher, B. Elan. 1994. The prosodic basis of the Tiberian Hebrew system of accents. Lg 70: 1–52.Google Scholar

Duanmu, San. 1994. Against contour tone units. LI 25: 555–608.Google Scholar

Dupoux, Emmanuel, Pallier, Christophe, Sebastián, Nuria, and Mehler, Jacques. 1997. A destressing ‘deafness’ in French?JML 36: 406–21.Google Scholar

Dupoux, Emmanuel, Peperkamp, Sharon, and Sebastián-Gallés, Nuria. 2001. A robust method to study stress ‘deafness’. JASA 110: 1606–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eady, S.J. and Cooper, W.E.. 1986. Speech intonation and focus location in matched statements and questions. JASA 80: 402–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Eady, S.J., Cooper, W.E., Klouda, G.V., Mueller, P.R., and Lotts, D.W.. 1986. Acoustical characteristics of sentential focus: narrow vs. broad and single vs. dual focus environments. LgSp 29: 233–51.Google ScholarPubMed

Earle, M.A. 1975. An acoustic phonetic study of Northern Vietnamese tones. Santa Barbara: Speech Communications Research Laboratory.Google Scholar

Ebing, E.F. 1994. Towards an inventory of perceptually relevant pitch movements for Indonesian. In Odé and van Heuven 1994: pp. 181–210.

Elordieta, Gorka and Calleja, Nagore. 2005. Microvariation in accentual alignment in Basque Spanish. LgSp 48: 397–439.Google ScholarPubMed

Elordieta, Gorka, Frota, Sónia, Prieto, Pilar, and Vigário, Marina. 2003. Effects of constituent length and syntactic branching on intonational phrasing in Ibero-Romance. ICPhS 15 (Barcelona): 487–90.Google Scholar

Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 2007. Information structure: the syntax-discourse interface. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Faber, David. 1987. The accentuation of intransitive sentences in English. JL 23: 341–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Face, Timothy L. 2002. Intonational marking of contrastive focus in Castilian Spanish. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar

Fant, Gunnar and Kruckenberg, Anita. 1994. Notes on stress and word accent in Swedish. Speech Transmission Laboratory Quarterly Status Report, 15 October 1994. Department of Speech Communication and Music Acoustics, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.Google Scholar

Féry, Caroline. 1993. German intonational patterns. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Féry, Caroline and Samek-Lodovici, Vieri. 2006. Focus projection and prosodic prominence in nested foci. Lg 82: 131–50.Google Scholar

Caroline, Féry and Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 2005. Sisterhood and tonal scaling. Studia Linguistica 59: 223–43.Google Scholar

Fletcher, Janet and Harrington, Jonathan. 2001. High-Rising Terminals and Fall-Rise Tunes in Australian English. Phonetica 58: 215–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fónagy, I., Fónagy, J., and Sap, J.. 1979. A la recherche de traits pertinents prosodiques du français parisien. Phonetica 36: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fowler, Carol A. and Housum, J.. 1987. Talkers' signaling of ‘new’ and ‘old’ words in speech and listeners' perception and use of the distinction. JML 26: 489–504.Google Scholar

Fromkin, Victoria (ed.). 1978. Tone. New York: Academic Press.

Frota, Sónia. 1998. Prosody and focus in European Portuguese. PhD thesis, University of Lisbon.Google Scholar

Frota, Sónia. 2002. Nuclear falls and rises in European Portuguese: A phonological analysis of declarative and question intonation. Probus 14: 113–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fry, D.B. 1955. Duration and intensity as physical correlates of linguistic stress. JASA 27: 765–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fry, D.B. 1958. Experiments in the perception of stress. LgSp 1: 126–52.Google Scholar

Fujisaki, Hiroya. 1983. Dynamic characteristics of voice fundamental frequency in speech and singing. In MacNeilage, Peter F. (ed.), The production of speech. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, pp. 39–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fujisaki, Hiroya and Keikichi, Hirose. 1982. Modelling the dynamic characteristics of voice fundamental frequency with applications to analysis and synthesis of intonation. In Preprints of Papers, Working Group on Intonation, Thirteenth International Congress of Linguists, Tokyo, pp. 57–70.Google Scholar

Gandour, Jackson T. 1978. The perception of tone. In Fromkin 1978: pp. 41–76.

Gårding, Eva. 1983. A generative model of intonation. In Cutler and Ladd 1983: pp. 11–25.

Gårding, Eva. 1987. Speech act and tonal pattern in standard Chinese – constancy and variation. Phonetica 44: 13–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gay, Thomas. 1978. Physiological and acoustic correlates of perceived stress. LgSp 21: 347–53.Google ScholarPubMed

Gee, J.P. and Grosjean, François. 1983. Performance structures: a psycholinguistic and linguistic appraisal. Cognitive Psychology 15: 411–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

German, James, Janet, Pierrehumbert, and Stefan, Kaufmann. 2006. Evidence for phonological constraints on nuclear accent placement. Lg 82: 151–68.Google Scholar

Gibbon, Dafydd. 1976. Perspectives of intonation analysis. Bern: Lang.Google Scholar

Gibbon, Dafydd. 1998. Intonation in German. In Hirst and di Cristo 1998: pp. 78–95.

Giegerich, Heinz. 1985. Metrical phonology and phonological structure: German and English. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Giegerich, Heinz. 1992. English phonology: an introduction. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glasberg, B.R. and Moore, Brian. 1990. Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data. Hearing Research 47: 103–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Goldsmith, John. 1976. Autosegmental phonology. PhD thesis, MIT. Distributed by IULC and published 1979 by Garland Press, New York.Google Scholar

Gordon, Matthew K. 2005. Intonational phonology of Chickasaw. In Jun 2005: pp. 301–30.

Gorman, James. 1993. On language. New York Times Magazine, 20 August.Google Scholar

Gósy, Mária and Terken, Jacques. 1994. Question marking in Hungarian: timing and height of pitch peaks. JPhon 22: 269–81.Google Scholar

Grabe, Esther. 1998. Comparative intonational phonology: English and German. PhD thesis, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen.Google Scholar

Grabe, Esther. 2003. English Intonation in the British Isles: The IViE corpus. Online at www.phon.ox.ac.uk/old_IViE (last accessed 22 March 2008).

Grabe, Esther, Post, Brechtje, Nolan, Francis, and Farrar, Kimberley. 2000. Pitch accent realization in four varieties of British English. JPhon 28: 161–85.Google Scholar

Grice, Martine. 1995a. The intonation of interrogation in Palermo Italian: implications for intonation theory. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grice, Martine. 1995b. Leading tones and downstep in English. Phonology 12: 183–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grice, Martine, Baumann, Stefan, and Benzmüller, Ralf. 2005. German intonation in autosegmental-metrical phonology. In Jun 2005: pp. 55–83.

Grice, Martine, Baumann, Stefan, and Benzmüller, Ralf. 2007. GToBI. Online at www.uni-koeln.de/phil-fak/phonetik/gtobi/index. html (last accessed 22 March 2008).

Grice, Martine, D'Imperio, Mariapaola, Savino, Michelina, and Avesani, Cinzia. 2005. Strategies for intonation labelling across varieties of Italian. In Jun 2005: pp. 362–89.

Grice, Martine, D.Ladd, Robert, and Arvaniti, Amalia (eds.). 2000. On the place of phrase accents in intonational phonology. Phonology 17: 143–85.CrossRef

Grice, Martine, Reyelt, Matthias, Benzmüller, Ralf, Mayer, J., and Batliner, Anton. 1996. Consistency in transcription and labelling of German intonation with GToBI. ICSLP 4 (Philadelphia): 1716–19.Google Scholar

Grønnum, Nina. See also Thorsen.

Grønnum, Nina. 1991. Prosodic parameters in a variety of regional Danish standard languages, with a view towards Swedish and German. Phonetica 47: 188–214.Google Scholar

Grosz, Barbara and Sidner, Candy. 1986. Attention, intention, and the structure of discourse. Journal of Computational Linguistics 12: 175–204.Google Scholar

Grundstrom, Allan W. 1973. L'intonation des questions en français standard. In Grundstrom, A. and Léon, P. (eds.), Interrogation et intonation en français standard et français canadien. Montreal: Didier, pp. 19–51.Google Scholar

Gumperz, John. 1982. Discourse strategies. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gundel, Jeanette, Hedberg, Nancy, and Zacharski, Ron. 1993. Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Lg 69: 274–307.Google Scholar

Gussenhoven, Carlos. 1983a. Focus, mode, and the nucleus. JL 19: 377–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gussenhoven, Carlos. 1983b. Testing the reality of focus domains. LgSp 26: 61–80.Google Scholar

Gussenhoven, Carlos. 1984. On the grammar and semantics of sentence accents. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gussenhoven, Carlos. 1993. The Dutch foot and the chanted call. JL 29: 37–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gussenhoven, Carlos. 2000. The boundary tones are coming: On the nonperipheral realisation of boundary tones. In Broe and Pierrehumbert 2000: pp. 132–51.

Gussenhoven, Carlos. 2004. The phonology of tone and intonation. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gussenhoven, Carlos. 2005. Transcription of Dutch intonation. In Jun 2005: pp. 118–45.

Gussenhoven, Carlos, Repp, Bruno H., Rietveld, A.C.M., Rump, H.H., and Terken, Jacques. 1997. The perceptual prominence of fundamental frequency peaks. JASA 102: 3009–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gussenhoven, Carlos and Rietveld, Toni. 1988. Fundamental frequency declination in Dutch: testing three hypotheses. JPhon 16: 355–69.Google Scholar

Gussenhoven, Carlos and Rietveld, Toni. 1991. An experimental evaluation of two nuclear-tone taxonomies. Linguistics 29: 423–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gussenhoven, Carlos, Rietveld, Toni, Kerkhoff, Joop, and Terken, Jacques. 2003. Transcription of Dutch Intonation (ToDI), second edition. Online at http://todi.let.kun.nl/ToDI/home.htm (last accessed 22 March 2008).

Gussenhoven, Carlos and Vliet, Peter. 1999. The phonology of tone and intonation in the Dutch dialect of Venlo. JL 35: 99–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haan, Judith. 2001. Speaking of questions: an exploration of Dutch question intonation. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar

Hadding-Koch, Kerstin. 1961. Acoustico-phonetic studies in the intonation of southern Swedish. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar

Hadding-Koch, Kerstin and Studdert-Kennedy, Michael. 1964. An experimental study of some intonation contours. Phonetica 11: 175–85. Reprinted in Bolinger 1972a: pp. 348–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haggo, Douglas C. 1987. The structure of English tonal morphemes. PhD thesis, University of Canterbury (NZ).Google Scholar

Halle, Morris and Vergnaud, Jean-Roger. 1987. An essay on stress. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Halliday, M.A.K. 1960. Categories of the theory of grammar. Word 17: 241–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halliday, M.A.K. 1966. The concept of rank: a reply. JL 2: 110–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halliday, M.A.K. 1967a. Intonation and grammar in British English. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halliday, M.A.K. 1967b. Notes on transitivity and theme in English (part II). JL 3: 199–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halliday, M.A.K. 1970. A course in spoken English: intonation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Halliday, M.A.K. and Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Hannon, E.E., Snyder, J.S., Eerola, T., and Krumhansl, C.L.. 2004. The role of melodic and temporal cues in perceiving musical meter. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 30: 956 –74.Google ScholarPubMed

Haspelmath, Martin. 1997. Indefinite pronouns. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2007. Pre-established categories don't exist: Consequences for language description and typology. Linguistic Typology 11: 119–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hatcher, Anna G. 1956. Theme and underlying question: two studies in Spanish word order. Word 12 (Monograph no. 3).Google Scholar

Haugen, Einar and Joos, Martin. 1952. Tone and intonation in East Norwegian. Acta Philologica Scandinavica 22: 41–64. Reprinted in Bolinger 1972a: pp. 414–36.Google Scholar

Hawkins, Sarah and Warren, Paul. 1991. Factors affecting the given-new distinction in speech. ICPhS 12 (Aix-en-Provence), vol. 4: 66–9.Google Scholar

Hayes, Bruce. 1981. A metrical theory of stress rules. PhD thesis, MIT. Distributed by IULC.Google Scholar

Hayes, Bruce. 1995. Metrical stress theory: principles and case studies. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hayes, Bruce and Lahiri, Aditi. 1991. Bengali intonational phonology. NLLT 9: 47–96.Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd and Nurse, Derek (eds.). 2000. African languages: an introduction. Cambridge University Press.

Hellmuth, Samantha. 2007. The relationship between prosodic structure and pitch accent distribution: Evidence from Egyptian Arabic. The Linguistic Review 24: 291–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henderson, Eugénie. 1952. The main features of Cambodian pronunciation. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 14: 149–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herman, Rebecca. 1996. Final lowering in Kipare. Phonology 13: 171–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hermes, Dik. 2006. Stylization of pitch contours. In Sudhoff, S.et al. (eds.), Methods in empirical prosody research. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 29–61.Google Scholar

Hermes, Dik and Rump, H.H.. 1994. Perception of prominence in speech intonation induced by rising and falling pitch movements. JASA 96: 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hermes, Dik and Gestel, Joost. 1991. The frequency scale of speech intonation. JASA 90: 97–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Himmelmann, Nikolaus. Unpublished ms. Notes on Waima'a intonation.

Hirschberg, Julia and Pierrehumbert, Janet. 1986. Intonational structuring of discourse. Proceedings of the 24th Association for Computational Linguistics, New York, pp. 136–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirschberg, Julia and Ward, Gregory. 1992. The influence of pitch range, duration, amplitude and spectral features on the interpretation of the rise-fall-rise intonation contour in English. JPhon 20: 241–51.Google Scholar

Hirschberg, Julia and Ward, Gregory. 1995. The interpretation of the high-rise question contour in English. Journal of Pragmatics 24: 407–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirst, Daniel. 1983. Structures and categories in prosodic representations. In Cutler and Ladd 1983: pp. 93–109.

Hirst, Daniel and Cristo, Albert Di (eds.). 1998. Intonation systems: A survey of twenty languages. Cambridge University Press.

Hirst, Daniel, Cristo, Albert Di, and Espesser, Robert. 2000. Levels of representation and levels of analysis for the description of intonation systems. In Horne 2000: pp. 51–88.

Hobbs, Jerry. 1990. The Pierrehumbert–Hirschberg theory of intonational meaning made simple: comments on Pierrehumbert and Hirschberg. In Cohen, P.R., Morgan, J., and Pollack, M.E. (eds.), Intentions in communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 313–23.Google Scholar

Hockett, Charles F. 1955. A manual of phonology. Baltimore: Waverley Press.Google Scholar

Hockett, Charles F. 1958. A course in modern linguistics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Horne, Merle (ed.). 2000. Prosody: theory and experiment (Studies presented to Gösta Bruce). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Horvath, Julia. 1986. Focus in the theory of grammar and the syntax of Hungarian. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Hualde, José Ignacio. 2002. Intonation in Spanish and other Ibero-Romance languages: overview and status quaestionis. In Wiltshire, C. and Camps, J. (eds.), Romance phonology and variation. Selected papers from the 30th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, Gainesville, Florida, February 2000. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 101–15.

Huang, C.-T. James. 1980. The metrical structure of terraced-level tones. NELS 11 (Ottawa): 257–70.Google Scholar

Huddleston, Rodney. 1965. Rank and depth. Lg 41: 574–86. Reprinted in Halliday, M.A.K. and Martin, J.R. (eds.), Readings in systemic linguistics. London: Batsford.Google Scholar

Huss, Volker. 1978. English word stress in the postnuclear position. Phonetica 35: 86–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hyman, Larry. 2006. Word-prosodic typology. Phonology 23: 225–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hyman, Larry, Katamba, Francis, and Walusimbi, Livingstone. 1987. Luganda and the strict layer hypothesis. Phonology Yearbook 4: 87–108.Google Scholar

Inkelas, Sharon and Leben, William. 1990. Where phonology and phonetics intersect: the case of Hausa intonation. In Kingston and Beckman 1990: pp. 17–34.

Inkelas, Sharon and Zec, Draga. 1988. Serbo-Croatian pitch accent. Lg 64: 227–48.Google Scholar

Isačenko, A. and Schädlich, H.-J.. 1970. A model of Standard German intonation. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ishihara, Takeshi. 2003. A phonological effect on tonal alignment in Tokyo Japanese. ICPhS 15 (Barcelona): 615–19.Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Jacobs, Joachim. 1982. Neutraler und nicht-neutraler Satzakzent im Deutschen. In Vennemann, Th. (ed.), Silben, Segmente, Akzente. Tübingen: Niemeyer, pp. 141–69.Google Scholar

Jacobs, Joachim. 1997. I-Topikalisierung. Linguistische Berichte 168: 91–133.Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman, Fant, Gunnar, and Halle, Morris. 1952. Preliminaries to speech analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman and Halle, Morris. 1971. Fundamentals of language, second edition. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Joos, Martin (ed.). 1957. Readings in linguistics, vol. I. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Jun, Sun-Ah. 1993. The phonetics and phonology of Korean prosody. PhD thesis, Ohio State University. Published 1996 by Garland Press, New York.Google Scholar

Jun, Sun-Ah. (ed.). 2005. Prosodic typology: the phonology of intonation and phrasing. Oxford University Press.CrossRef

Kager, René. 1999. Optimality theory. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kanerva, Jonni. 1990. Focusing on phonological phrases in Chicheŵa. In Inkelas, S. and Zec, D. (eds.), The phonology-syntax connection. University of Chicago Press, pp. 145–61.Google Scholar

Keating, Patricia (ed.). 1993. Papers in laboratory phonology III. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kefer, Michel. 1986. Some sentence accent universals referring to noun phrases. Unpublished paper, University of Liège.Google Scholar

Kendon, Adam. 2004. Gesture: visible action as utterance. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kiefer, Ferenc. 1967. On emphasis and word order in Hungarian. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Kim, A.H. 1988. Preverbal focusing and type XXIII languages. In Hammond, M., Moravcsik, E. and Wirth, J.R. (eds.), Studies in syntactic typology. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 147–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, Heather B. 1998. The declarative intonation of Dyirbal: an acoustic analysis. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar

Kingdon, Roger. 1958. The groundwork of English intonation. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Kingston, John and Beckman, Mary E. (eds.). 1990. Papers in laboratory phonology I. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Kiparsky, Paul. 1966. Über den deutschen Akzent. Studia Grammatica 7: 69–98.Google Scholar

Kiss, Katalin É. 1998. Identificational focus versus information focus. Lg 74: 245–73.Google Scholar

Knight, Rachael-Anne and Nolan, Francis. 2006. The effect of pitch span on intonational plateaux. JIPA 36: 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knowles, G.O. 1973. Scouse: the urban dialect of Liverpool. PhD thesis, University of Leeds.Google Scholar

Kochanski, Greg and Shih, Chilin. 2003. Prosody modeling with soft templates. SpComm 39: 311–52.Google Scholar

Kochanski, Greg, Shih, Chilin and Jing, Hongyan. 2003. Hierarchical structure and word strength prediction of Mandarin prosody. International Journal of Speech Technology 6: 33–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kohler, Klaus J. 1987. Categorical pitch perception. ICPhS 11 (Tallinn), vol. 5: 331–3.Google Scholar

Kohler, Klaus J. 1990. Macro and micro F0 in the synthesis of intonation. In Kingston and Beckman 1990: pp. 115–38.

Kohler, Klaus J. 2005. Timing and communicative functions of pitch contours. Phonetica 62: 88–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

König, Ekkehard. 1991. The meaning of focus particles: a comparative perspective. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koopmans-van Beinum, F.J. and Bergem, D.R., 1989. The role of ‘given’ and ‘new’ in the production and perception of vowel contrasts in read text and in spontaneous speech. Proceedings of Eurospeech(Paris), pp. 113–16.Google Scholar

Kori, S. 1987. The tonal behavior of Osaka Japanese: an interim report. Working Papers in Linguistics 36 (Ohio State University): 31–61.Google Scholar

Kornai, András and Pullum, Geoffrey K.. 1990. The X-bar theory of phrase structure. Lg 66: 24–50.Google Scholar

Kramer, E. 1964. Elimination of verbal cues in judgments of emotion from voice. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 68: 390–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Krifka, Manfred. 1991. A compositional semantics for multiple focus constructions. In Moore, S. and Wyner, A. (eds.), Proceedings of SALT I, Cornell, pp. 127–58.Google Scholar

Krifka, Manfred 2006. Association with focus phrases. In Molnár, V. and Winkler, S. (eds.), The architecture of focus. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 105–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kruijff-Korbayová, Ivana and Steedman, Mark. 2003. Discourse and information structure. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 12: 249–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kruyt, J.G. 1985. Accents from speakers to listeners. An experimental study of the production and perception of accent patterns in Dutch. PhD thesis, University of Leiden.Google Scholar

Kubozono, Haruo. 1987. The organization of Japanese prosody. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh. Published 1993 by Kurishio Publishers, Tokyo.Google Scholar

Kubozono, Haruo. 1989. Syntactic and rhythmic effects on downstep in Japanese. Phonology 6: 39–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ladd, D. Robert. 1978. Stylized intonation. Lg 54: 517–39.Google Scholar

Ladd, D. Robert. 1980a. The structure of intonational meaning: evidence from English. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Ladd, D. Robert. 1980b. English compound stress. NELS 10. Reprinted 1984 in Gibbon, D. and Richter, H. (eds.), Intonation, accent and rhythm. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 253–66.Google Scholar

Ladd, D. Robert. 1983a. Phonological features of intonational peaks. Lg 59: 721–59.Google Scholar

Ladd, D. Robert. 1983b. Levels versus configurations, revisited. In Agard, F.B., Kelley, G.B., Makkai, A., and Makkai, V.B. (eds.), Essays in honor of Charles F. Hockett. Leiden: E. J. Brill, pp. 93–131.Google Scholar

Ladd, D. Robert. 1984. Declination: a review and some hypotheses. Phonology Yearbook 1: 53–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ladd, D. Robert. 1986. Intonational phrasing: the case for recursive prosodic structure. Phonology Yearbook 3: 311–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ladd, D. Robert. 1987a. Review of Bolinger 1986. Lg 63: 637–43.Google Scholar

Ladd, D. Robert. 1987b. A phonological model of intonation for use in speech synthesis by rule. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Speech Technology, Edinburgh, pp. 21–4.Google Scholar

Ladd, D. Robert. 1988. Declination ‘reset’ and the hierarchical organization of utterances. JASA 84: 530–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ladd, D. Robert. 1989. Review of Pierrehumbert and Beckman 1988. JL 25: 519–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ladd, D. Robert. 1990a. Intonation: emotion vs. grammar. (Review of Bolinger 1989.)Lg 66: 806–16.Google Scholar

Ladd, D. Robert. 1990b. Metrical representation of pitch register. In Kingston and Beckman 1990: pp. 35–57.

Ladd, D. Robert. 1992. An introduction to intonational phonology. In Docherty and Ladd 1992: pp. 321–34.

Ladd, D. Robert. 1993a. In defense of a metrical theory of intonational downstep. In Hulst, H. v. d. and Snider, K. (eds.), The representation of tonal register. Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 109–32.Google Scholar

Ladd, D. Robert. 1993b. Constraints on the gradient variability of pitch range (or) Pitch Level 4 lives! In Keating 1993: pp. 43–63.

Ladd, D. Robert. 1993c. On the theoretical status of ‘the baseline’ in modelling intonation. LgSp 36: 435–51.Google Scholar

Ladd, D. Robert. 1996. Intonational phonology, first edition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ladd, D. Robert. 2001. Intonation. In Haspelmath, M., König, E., Oesterreicher, W., Raible, W. (eds.), Language typology and language universals: an international handbook, vol. 2. Berlin: Walterde Gruyter, pp. 1380–90.Google Scholar

Ladd, D. Robert. 2006. Segmental anchoring of pitch movements: autosegmental association or gestural coordination?Rivista di linguistica [Italian Journal of Linguistics] 18: 19–38.Google Scholar

Ladd, D. Robert, Faulkner, Dan, Faulkner, Hanneke, and Schepman, Astrid. 1999. Constant ‘segmental anchoring’ of F0 movements under changes in speech rate. JASA 106: 1543–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ladd, D. Robert, Mennen, Ineke, and Schepman, Astrid. 2000. Phonological conditioning of peak alignment in rising pitch accents in Dutch. JASA 107: 2685–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ladd, D. Robert and Morton, Rachel. 1997. The perception of intonational emphasis: continuous or categorical?JPhon 25: 313–42.Google Scholar

Ladd, D. Robert and Schepman, Astrid. 2003. ‘Sagging transitions’ between high pitch accents in English: experimental evidence. JPhon 31: 81–112.Google Scholar

Ladd, D. Robert, Schepman, Astrid, White, Laurence, Quarmby, Louise May, and Stackhouse, Rebekah. Forthcoming. Phonological factors in F0 alignment: evidence from Scottish Standard English. Submitted to JPhon.

Ladd, D. Robert, Scherer, Klaus R., and Silverman, Kim. 1986. An integrated approach to studying intonation and attitude. In Johns-Lewis, C. (ed.), Intonation in discourse. London: Croom Helm, pp. 125–38.Google Scholar

Ladd, D. Robert, Silverman, Kim, Tolkmitt, Frank, Bergmann, Günther, and Scherer, Klaus R.. 1985. Evidence for the independent function of intonation contour type, voice quality and F0 range in signalling speaker affect. JASA 78: 435–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ladd, D. Robert and Terken, Jacques. 1995. Modelling intra- and inter-speaker pitch range variation. ICPhS 13 (Stockholm), vol. 2: 386–9.Google Scholar

Ladefoged, Peter. 1967. Linguistic phonetics. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 6.Google Scholar

Ladefoged, Peter. 1982. A course in phonetics, second edition. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar

Ladefoged, Peter. 1983. The linguistic use of different phonation types. In Bless, D. and Abbs, J. (eds.), Vocal fold physiology: contemporary research and clinical issues. San Diego: College Hill Press, pp. 351–60.Google Scholar

Ladefoged, Peter and Broadbent, D.E.. 1957. Information conveyed by vowels. JASA 29: 98–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laksman, Myrna. 1994. Location of stress in Indonesian words and sentences. In Odé and van Heuven 1994: pp. 108–39.

Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information structure and sentence form: topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langendoen, D. Terence. 1975. Finite-state parsing of phrase structure languages and the status of readjustment rules in the grammar. LI 6: 533–54.Google Scholar

Laniran, Yetunde O. 1992. Intonation in tone languages: the phonetic implementation of tones in Yoruba. PhD thesis, Cornell University.Google Scholar

Laniran, Yetunde O. and Clements, G.N.. 2003. Downstep and high raising: interacting factors in Yoruba tone production. JPhon 31: 203–50.Google Scholar

Lass, Roger. 1984. Vowel system universals and typology: prologue to theory. Phonology Yearbook 1: 75–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

LaVelle, C.R. 1974. An experimental study of Yoruba tone. Studies in African Linguistics, supplement 5: 185–94.Google Scholar

Laver, John. 1980. The phonetic description of voice quality. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Laver, John. 1994. Principles of phonetics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leben, William. 1973. Suprasegmental phonology. PhD thesis, MIT. Published 1980 by Garland Press, New York.Google Scholar

Leben, William. 1976. The tones in English intonation. Linguistic Analysis 2: 69–107.Google Scholar

Lee, W.R. 1956. Fall–rise intonations in English. English Studies 37: 62–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lehiste, Ilse. 1970. Suprasegmentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Lehiste, Ilse. 1975. The phonetic structure of paragraphs. In Cohen, Antonie and Nooteboom, S.G. (eds.), Structure and process in speech perception. Cambridge, MA: Springer, pp. 195–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lehiste, Ilse and Ivić, Pavle. 1980. The intonation of yes-and-no questions: a new Balkanism?Balkanistica 6: 45–53.Google Scholar

Lehiste, Ilse and Ivić, Pavle. 1986. Word and sentence prosody in Serbo-Croatian. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Levi, Susannah. 2005. Acoustic correlates of lexical accent in Turkish. JIPA 35: 73–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levin, Beth and Rappaport-Hovav, M.. 1995. Unaccusativity: at the syntax–lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Levy, Elena T. and McNeill, David. 1992. Speech, gesture, and discourse. Discourse Processes 15: 277–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liberman, Mark. 1975. The intonational system of English. PhD thesis, MIT. Distributed 1978 by IULC.Google Scholar

Liberman, Mark. 2007. How about the Germans? Posting to Language Log, 14 November 2007. Online at http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/005113.html (last accessed 22 March 2008).

Liberman, Mark and Pierrehumbert, Janet. 1984. Intonational invariance under changes in pitch range and length. In Aronoff, M. and Oerhle, R. (eds.), Language sound structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 157–233.Google Scholar

Liberman, Mark and Prince, Alan. 1977. On stress and linguistic rhythm. LI 8: 249–336.Google Scholar

Liberman, Mark and Sag, Ivan. 1974. Prosodic form and discourse function. CLS 10: 416–27.Google Scholar

Liberman, Mark, Schultz, J. Michael, Hong, Soonhyun, and Okeke, Vincent. 1993. The phonetic interpretation of tone in Igbo. Phonetica 50: 147–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lickley, Robin, Schepman, Astrid, and Ladd, D. Robert. 2005. Alignment of ‘phrase accent’ low in Dutch falling rising questions: theoretical and methodological implications. LgSp 48: 157–83.Google Scholar

Liddell, Scott. 1977. An investigation into the syntactic structure of American Sign Language. PhD thesis, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar

Lieberman, Philip. 1960. Some acoustic correlates of word stress in American English. JASA 32: 451–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lieberman, Philip. 1965. On the acoustic basis of the perception of intonation by linguists. Word 21: 40–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lieberman, Philip. 1967. Intonation, perception, and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Lieberman, Philip and Michaels, Sheldon B.. 1962. Some aspects of fundamental frequency and envelope amplitude as related to the emotional content of speech. JASA 34: 922–7. Reprinted in Bolinger 1972a: pp. 235–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lindau, Mona. 1986. Testing a model of intonation in a tone language. JASA 80: 757–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lindsey, Geoffrey. 1985. Intonation and interrogation: tonal structure and the expression of a pragmatic function in English and other languages. PhD thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Lindström, Eva and Remijsen, Bert. 2005. Aspects of the prosody of Kuot, a language where intonation ignores stress. Linguistics 43: 839–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCawley, James D. 1978. What is a tone language? In Fromkin 1978: pp. 113–32.

McClure, J. Derrick. 1980. Western Scottish intonation: a preliminary study. In Waugh, L. and Schooneveld, C. (eds.), The melody of language. Baltimore: University Park Press, pp. 201–17.Google Scholar

McGregor, Jeannette. 2005. High rising tunes in Australian English. PhD thesis, Macquarie University.Google Scholar

McNeill, David. 1992. Hand and mind. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Maeda, Shinji. 1976. A characterization of American English intonation. PhD thesis, MIT.Google Scholar

Makarova, Veronika. 2007. The effect of pitch peak alignment on sentence type identification in Russian. LgSp 50: 385–422.Google ScholarPubMed

Matthews, Peter H. 1966. The concept of rank in Neo-Firthian linguistics. JL 2: 101–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayo, Catherine, Aylett, Matthew, and Ladd, D. Robert. 1997. Prosodic transcription of Glasgow English: an evaluation study of GlaToBI. In Botinis et al. 1997: pp. 231–4.

Mencken, H.L. 1948. American street names. American Speech 23: 81–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Menn, Lise and Boyce, Suzanne. 1982. Fundamental frequency and discourse structure. LgSp 25: 341–83.Google Scholar

Mertens, Piet. 2002. The prosogram: transcription of prosody using pitch contour stylization based on a tonal perception model and automatic segmentation. Online at http://bach.arts.kuleuven.be/pmertens/prosogram (last accessed 22 March 2008).

Möbius, Bernd 1993. Perceptual evaluation of rule-generated intonation contours for German interrogatives. Working Papers 41 (Department of Linguistics and Phonetics, University of Lund): Proceedings of the ESCA Workshop on Prosody, Lund, 27–29 September 1993, 216–19.Google Scholar

Möbius, B., Pätzold, M., and Hess, W.. 1993. Analysis and synthesis of German F0 contours by means of Fujisaki's model. SpComm 13: 53–61.Google Scholar

Monaghan, A. I. C. 1991. Intonation in a text to speech conversion system. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Monaghan, A. I. C. 1992. Heuristic strategies for the higher-level analysis of unrestricted text. In Bailly, G., Benoit, G., and Sawallis, T.R. (eds.), Talking machines: theories, models, and designs. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 143–61.Google Scholar

Mücke, Doris, Grice, Martine, Becker, Johannes, and Hermes, Anne. Forthcoming. Sources of variation in tonal alignment: evidence from acoustic and kinematic data. Submitted to JPhon.

Nespor, Marina and Vogel, Irene. 1982. Prosodic domains of external sandhi rules. In Hulst, Harry and Smith, Norval (eds.), The structure of phonological representations, vol. I. Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 225–55.Google Scholar

Nespor, Marina and Vogel, Irene. 1983. Prosodic structure above the word. In Cutler and Ladd 1983: pp. 123–40.

Nespor, Marina and Vogel, Irene. 1986. Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris. Republished 2007 by Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.Google Scholar

Newman, Stanley. 1946. On the stress system of English. Word 2: 171–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Newmeyer, Frederick J. 2007. Linguistic typology requires crosslinguistic formal categories. Linguistic Typology 11: 133–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nibert, Holly. 2000. Phonetic and phonological evidence for intermediate phrasing in Spanish. PhD thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar

Niebuhr, Oliver. 2007. The signalling of German rising-falling intonation categories – the interplay of synchronization, shape, and height. Phonetica 64: 174–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nolan, Francis and Grabe, Esther. 1997. Can ToBI transcribe intonational variation in English? In Botinis et al. 1997: pp. 259–62.

Nooteboom, S.G. and Kruyt, J.G.. 1987. Accents, focus distribution and the perceived distribution of given and new information: an experiment. JASA 82: 1512–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nooteboom, S.G. and Terken, J. M. B.. 1982. What makes speakers omit pitch accents? An experiment. Phonetica 39: 317–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

O'Connor, J.D. and Arnold, G.F.. 1973. Intonation of colloquial English, second edition. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Odden, David. 1995. Tone: African languages. In Goldsmith, J. (ed.), The handbook of phonological theory. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 444–75.Google Scholar

Odé, Cecilia. 1989. Russian intonation: a perceptual description. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar

Odé, Cecilia. 1994. On the perception of prominence in Indonesian. In Odé and van Heuven 1994: pp. 27–107.

Odé, Cecilia and Heuven, Vincent J. (eds.), 1994. Experimental studies of Indonesian prosody. Department of Languages and Cultures of Southeast Asia and Oceania, University of Leiden.Google Scholar

Ofuka, Etsuko, McKeown, J. Denis, Waterman, Mitch, and Roach, Peter. 2000. Prosodic cues for rated politeness in Japanese speech. SpComm 32: 199–217.Google Scholar

Ohala, John J. 1975. Review of Lehiste 1970. Lg 51: 736–40.Google Scholar

Ohala, John J. 1984. An ethological perspective on common cross-language utilization of F0 in voice. Phonetica 41: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ohala, John J. 1994. The frequency code underlies the sound symbolic use of voice pitch. In Hinton, L., Nichols, J., and Ohala, J. J. (eds.), Sound symbolism. Cambridge University Press, pp. 325–47.Google Scholar

Öhman, Sven. 1967. Word and sentence intonation: a quantitative model. Speech Transmission Laboratory (Stockholm) Quarterly Progress and Status Report 2: 20–54.Google Scholar

Ortiz-Lira, Hector. 1994. A contrastive analysis of English and Spanish sentence accentuation. PhD thesis, University of Manchester.Google Scholar

O'Shaughnessy, Douglas and Allen, Jonathan. 1983. Linguistic modality effects on fundamental frequency in speech. JASA 74: 1155–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Palmer, Harold. 1922. English intonation, with systematic exercises. Cambridge: Heffer.Google Scholar

Partee, Barbara H. 1999. Focus, quantification, and semantics-pragmatics issues. In Bosch and van der Sandt 1999: pp. 213–31.

Patel, Aniruddh. 2007. Music, language and the brain. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Patterson, David. 2000. A linguistic approach to pitch range modelling. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Patterson, David and Ladd, D. Robert. 1999. Pitch range modelling: Linguistic dimensions of variation. ICPhS 14 (San Francisco): 1169–73.Google Scholar

Perlmutter, David. 1978. Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis. BLS 4: 157–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pierrehumbert, Janet. 1980. The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. PhD thesis, MIT. Published 1988 by IULC, Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar

Pierrehumbert, Janet. 1981. Synthesizing intonation. JASA 70: 985–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pierrehumbert, Janet. 1990. Phonological and phonetic representation. JPhon 18: 375–94.Google Scholar

Pierrehumbert, Janet. 2000. Tonal elements and their alignment. In Horne 2000: pp. 11–36.

Pierrehumbert, Janet and Beckman, Mary E.. 1988. Japanese tone structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Pierrehumbert, Janet, Beckman, Mary E., and Ladd, D. Robert. 2000. Conceptual foundations of phonology as a laboratory science. In Burton-Roberts, N., Carr, P., and Docherty, G.J. (eds.), Conceptual and empirical foundations of phonology. Oxford University Press, pp. 273–303.Google Scholar

Pierrehumbert, Janet and Hirschberg, Julia. 1990. The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In Cohen, P.R., Morgan, J., and Pollack, M.E. (eds.), Intentions in communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 271–311.Google Scholar

Pierrehumbert, Janet and Liberman, Mark. 1982. Modelling the fundamental frequency of the voice. (Review of Cooper and Sorensen 1981.)Contemporary Psychology 27: 690–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pierrehumbert, Janet and Steele, Shirley. 1989. Categories of tonal alignment in English. Phonetica 46: 181–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pike, Kenneth L. 1945. The intonation of American English. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Pike, Kenneth L. 1948. Tone languages: a technique for determining the number and type of pitch contrasts in a language, with studies in tonemic substitution and fusion. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Pitrelli, John F.Beckman, Mary E., and Hirschberg, Julia. 1994. Evaluation of prosodic transcription labeling reliability in the ToBI framework. ICSLP 1 (Yokohama): 123–6.Google Scholar

Poser, William J. 1984. The phonetics and phonology of tone and intonation in Japanese. PhD thesis, MIT.Google Scholar

Post, Brechtje. 2000. Tonal and phrasal structures in French intonation. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar

Prevost, Scott and Steedman, Mark. 1994. Specifying intonation from context for speech synthesis. SpComm 15: 139–53.Google Scholar

Price, PattiOstendorf, J., M., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., and Fong, C.. 1991. The use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation. JASA 90: 2956–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Prieto, Pilar. 1998. The scaling of the L values in Spanish downstepping contours. JPhon 26: 261–82.Google Scholar

Prieto, Pilar. 2005. Stability effects in tonal clash contexts in Catalan. JPhon 33: 215–42.Google Scholar

Prieto, Pilar, D'Imperio, Mariapaola, and Fivela, Barbara Gili. 2005. Pitch accent alignment in Romance: primary and secondary associations with metrical structure. LgSp 48: 359–96.Google ScholarPubMed

Prieto, Pilar and Torreira, Francisco. 2007. The segmental anchoring hypothesis revisited. Syllable structure and speech rate effects on peak timing in Spanish. JPhon 35: 473–500.Google Scholar

Prieto, Pilar, Santen, Jan, and Hirschberg, Julia. 1995. Tonal alignment patterns in Spanish. JPhon. 23: 429–51.Google Scholar

Prince, Alan. 1983. Relating to the grid. LI 14: 19–100.Google Scholar

Prince, Alan and Smolensky, Paul. 2004. Optimality theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prince, Ellen. 1981. Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In Cole, Peter (ed.), Radical pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, pp. 223–56.Google Scholar

Niels, Reinholt Petersen. 1986. Perceptual compensation for segmentally conditioned fundamental frequency perturbation. Phonetica 43: 21–42.Google Scholar

Remijsen, Bert. 2002. Lexically contrastive stress accent and lexical tone in Ma‘ya. In Gussenhoven, C. and Warner, N. (eds.), Laboratory phonology VII. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 585–614.Google Scholar

Remijsen, Bert and Heuven, Vincent. 2005. Stress, tone, and discourse prominence in the Curaçao dialect of Papiamentu. Phonology 22: 205–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Repp, Bruno H. 1984. Categorical perception: issues, methods, findings. In Lass, N. (ed.), Speech and language, vol. 10: Advances in basic research and practice. Orlando: Academic Press, pp. 244–335.Google Scholar

Rialland, Annie. 2007. Question prosody: an African perspective. In Gussenhoven, C. and Riad, T. (eds.), Tones and tunes, vol. I: Typological studies in word and sentence prosody. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 35–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rialland, Annie and Robert, Stéphane. 2001. The intonational system of Wolof. Linguistics 39: 893–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rietveld, A.C.M. and Gussenhoven, Carlos. 1985. On the relation between pitch excursion size and prominence. JPhon 13: 299–308.Google Scholar

Rietveld, A.C.M. and Gussenhoven, Carlos. 1995. Aligning pitch targets in speech synthesis: effects of syllable structure. JPhon 23: 375–85.Google Scholar

Roach, Peter. 1994. Conversion between prosodic transcription systems: Standard British and ToBI. SpComm 15: 91–9.Google Scholar

Rooth, Mats. 1985. Association with focus. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar

Rooth, Mats. 1992. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1: 75–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rose, Phil. 1987. Considerations in the normalisation of the fundamental frequency of linguistic tone. SpComm 6: 343–51.Google Scholar

Rose, Phil. 1989. Phonetics and phonology of Yang tone phonation types in Zhenhai. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale 18: 229–45.Google Scholar

Rose, Phil. 1990. Acoustics and phonology of complex tone sandhi. Phonetica 47: 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rowlands, E.C. 1969. Teach yourself Yoruba. Sevenoaks, Kent: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar

Rump, H.H. and Collier, René. 1996. Focus conditions and the prominence of pitch-accented syllables. LgSp 39: 1–15.Google Scholar

Sag, Ivan and Liberman, Mark. 1975. The intonational disambiguation of indirect speech acts. CLS 11: 487–97.Google Scholar

Schepman, Astrid, Lickley, Robin, and Ladd, D. Robert. 2006. Effects of vowel length and ‘right context’ on the alignment of Dutch nuclear accents. JPhon 34: 1–28.Google Scholar

Scherer, KlausLadd, R., D. Robert, and Silverman, K.. 1984. Vocal cues to speaker affect: testing two models. JASA 76: 1346–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schiller, Niels F., Meyer, Antje, and Levelt, Willem. 1997. The syllabic structure of spoken words: evidence from the syllabification of intervocalic consonants. LgSp 40: 103–40.Google ScholarPubMed

Schmerling, Susan F. 1976. Aspects of English sentence stress. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Schubiger, Maria. 1958. English intonation: its form and function. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar

Schubiger, Maria. 1965. English intonation and German modal particles: a comparative study. Phonetica 12: 65–84. Reprinted in Bolinger 1972a: pp. 175–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schubiger, Maria. 1980. English intonation and German modal particles, II: a comparative study. In Waugh, L.R. and Schooneveld, C.H. (eds.), The melody of language. Baltimore: University Park Press, pp. 279–98.Google Scholar

Scott, Donia R. 1982. Duration as a cue to the perception of phrase boundary. JASA 71: 996–1007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Selkirk, Elisabeth O. 1980. The role of prosodic categories in English word stress. LI 11: 563–605.Google Scholar

Selkirk, Elisabeth O. 1984. Phonology and syntax: the relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Selkirk, Elisabeth O. 1986. On derived domains in sentence phonology. Phonology Yearbook 3: 371–405.Google Scholar

Selkirk, Elisabeth O. 1995. Sentence prosody: intonation, stress, and phrasing. In Goldsmith, J. (ed.), The handbook of phonological theory. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 550–69.Google Scholar

Sharp, Alan E. 1958. Falling–rising intonation patterns in English. Phonetica 2: 127–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie. 1995. The importance of phonological transcription in empirical approaches to ‘stress shift’ vs. ‘early accent’: comments on Grabe and Warren, and Vogel, Bunnell and Hoskins. In Connell and Arvaniti 1995: pp. 128–40.

Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie, Ostendorf, Mari, and Ross, K.. 1994. Stress shift and early pitch accent placement in lexical items in American English. JPhon 22: 357–88.Google Scholar

Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie and Turk, Alice E.. 1996. A prosody tutorial for investigators of auditory sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 25: 193–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shen, Xiao-nan Susan. 1990. The prosody of Mandarin Chinese. University of California Publications in Linguistics 118. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Shields, L.W. and Balota, D.A.. 1991. Repetition and associative context effects in speech production. LgSp 34: 47–55.Google ScholarPubMed

Shriberg, Elizabeth, Ladd, D. Robert, Terken, Jacques, and Stolcke, Andreas. 1996. Modeling pitch range variation within and across speakers: predicting F0 targets when ‘speaking up’. ICSLP 4 (Philadelphia): 650–3. Online version at www-speech.sri.com/cgi-bin/run-distill?papers/icslp96-scaling.ps.gz (last accessed 22 March 2008) replaces version printed in proceedings.Google Scholar

Silverman, Kim. 1986. F0 segmental cues depend on intonation: the case of the rise after voiced stops. Phonetica 43: 76–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silverman, Kim. 1987. The structure and processing of fundamental frequency contours. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar

Silverman, Kim. 1990: The separation of prosodies: comments on Kohler's paper. In Kingston and Beckman 1990: pp. 139–51.

Silverman, Kim, Beckman, Mary E., Pitrelli, John, Ostendorf, Mari, Wightman, Colin, Price, Patti, Pierrehumbert, Janet, and Hirschberg, Julia. 1992. ToBI: a standard for labeling English prosody. ICSLP 2 (Banff): 867–70.Google Scholar

Silverman, Kim and Pierrehumbert, Janet. 1990. The timing of prenuclear high accents in English. In Kingston and Beckman 1990: pp. 71–106.

Slater, Andrew. 2007. The IViE corpus: English Intonation in the British Isles. Online at www.phon.ox.ac.uk/IViE/index.php (last accessed 22 March 2008).

Sledd, James. 1955. Review of Trager and Smith 1951. Lg 31: 312–35.Google Scholar

Sluijter, Agaath and Heuven, Vincent. 1996. Spectral balance as an acoustic correlate of linguistic stress. JASA 100: 2471–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Smith, Henry Lee Jr. 1955. Review of W. Jassem, Intonation of conversational English. Lg 31: 189–93.Google Scholar

Sorace, Antonella. Forthcoming. Gradience in split intransitivity. Oxford University Press.

Sosa, Juan Manuel. 1999. La entonación del español: su estructura fónica, variabilidad y dialectología. Madrid: Ediciones Cátedra.Google Scholar

Steedman, Mark. 1991. Structure and intonation. Lg 67: 260–96.Google Scholar

Steedman, Mark. 2000. Information structure and the syntax-phonology interface. LI 31: 649–89.Google Scholar

Steele, Shirley. 1986. Nuclear accent F0 peak location: effects of rate, vowel, and number of following syllables. JASA 80: S51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sugito, Miyoko and Hirose, Hajime. 1988. Production and perception of accented devoiced vowels in Japanese. Annual Bulletin of the Research Institute of Logopedics and Phoniatrics 22: 21–39.Google Scholar

Swerts, Marc, Krahmer, Emiel, and Avesani, Cinzia. 2002. Prosodic marking of information status in Dutch and Italian: a comparative analysis. JPhon 30: 629–54.Google Scholar