Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T03:38:53.136Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Introduction: Why Entrepreneurship Matters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Zoltan J. Acs
Affiliation:
George Mason University; Max Planck Institute of Economics; The Kauffman Foundation
David B. Audretsch
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute of Economics; Indiana University
Robert Strom
Affiliation:
Director, Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation
Zoltan J. Acs
Affiliation:
George Mason School of Public Policy, Fairfax
David B. Audretsch
Affiliation:
Indiana University, Bloomington
Robert J. Strom
Affiliation:
Kauffman Foundation, Kansas City
Get access

Summary

Introduction

When the three editors of this volume studied and prepared for their doctoral degrees in three different American Ph.D. programs during the late 1970s, not one of them heard a word about entrepreneurship and small business. All three of them had a specialization in the field of industrial organization within economics, the field most closely related to issues concerning firm size and organization. In all three Ph.D. programs, as was no doubt true across the entire landscape of American graduate schools, the focus was exclusively on large corporations and their impact on the economy. The large corporation was widely accepted as the source of jobs – good-paying ones – and security. No wonder that when the Chairman of General Motors, Charlie “Engine” Wilson, exclaimed, “What's good for General Motors is good for America,” the country believed. There certainly was no room for the study and analysis of something as peripheral and tangential as small business and entrepreneurship in the nation's top graduate programs in economics. Nor was there any room or interest within the entire economics profession. The 1990 edition of Palgrave's Encyclopedia of Economics, consisting of over a dozen volumes and spanning thousands of pages covering virtually every topic imaginable on economics, barely touched on the issues of small business and entrepreneurship, a gap unfilled until 2008 The most influential economics book in the modern history of the profession, Principles of Economics, by Paul Samuelson, barely contains reference to small business and entrepreneurship.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acs, Zoltan J., and Armington, Catherine. 2006. Entrepreneurship, Geography and American Economic Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acs, Zoltan J., and Audretsch, David B.. 1990. Innovation and Small Firms. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Acs, Zoltan J., and Audretsch, David B.. 1988. “Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis.” American Economic Review, 78(4), 678–690.Google Scholar
Acs, Zoltan J., Audretsch, David B., Braunerhjelm, Pontus, and Carlsson, Bo. 2005. “The Knowledge Spillover Theory of Entrepreneurship.” CEPR Discussion Papers, 5326.Google Scholar
Acs, Zoltan J., Audretsch, David B., Braunerhjelm, Pontus, and Carlsson, Bo. 2004. “The Missing Link: The Knowledge Filter and Entrepreneurship in Economic Growth.” CEPR Working Paper, 4783.Google Scholar
Acs, Zoltan, and Stough, Roger, eds. 2008. Public Policy in an Entrepreneurial Economy: Creating the Conditions for Business Growth, Springer.CrossRef
Anselin, Luc, Varga, Attila, and Acs, Zoltan J.. 1997. “Local Geographic Spillovers between University Research and High Technology Innovations.” Journal of Urban Economics, 42(3), 422–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Audretsch, David B. 1995. Innovation and Industry Evolution. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Audretsch, David B. 2007a. The Entrepreneurial Society. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Audretsch, David B. 2007b. “Entrepreneurship Capital and Economic Growth.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23(1), 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Audretsch, D., and Thurik, A. Roy. 2001. “What's New about the New Economy? Sources of Growth in the Managed and Entrepreneurial Economies.” Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(1), 267–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Audretsch, David B., Keilbach, Max, and Lehmann, Erik. 2006. Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barney, Jay B., and Clark, Delwyn N.. 2007. Resource-Based Theory: Creating and Sustaining Competitive Advantage. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baumol, William. 2002. Free Market Innovation Machine: Analyzing the Growth Miracle of Capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumol, William, Littan, Robert, and Schramm, Carl. 2007. Good Capitalism, Bad Capitalism, and the Economics of Growth and Prosperity. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Casson, Mark. 2003. The Entrepreneur – An Economic Theory. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Chandler, Alfred D. 1977. The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business. Cambridge: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Chandler, Alfred D. 1990. Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Wesley M., and Levinthal, Daniel A.. 1989. “Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D.” The Economic Journal, 99(397), 569–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Wesley M., and Levinthal, Daniel A.. 1990. “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John Kenneth, Galbraith. 1956. American Capitalism. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Gartner, William, and Carter, Nancy. 2003. “Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Firm Organizing Processes.” In Acs, Z. and Audretsch, D. (eds.), International Handbook of Entrepreneurship (New York: Springer).Google Scholar
Griliches, Zvi. 1979. “Issues in Assessing the Contribution of R&D to Productivity Growth.” Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 92–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, Robert E. 1988. “On the Mechanics of Economic Development.” Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, Robert E. 1993. “Making a Miracle.” Econometrica, 61, 251–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Richard. 1981. “Research on Productivity Growth and Differences: Dead Ends and New Departures.” Journal of Economic Literature, 19(3), 1029–1064.Google Scholar
Penrose, Edith. 1958. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Prodi, R. 2002. For a New European Entrepreneurship. Public Speech. Instituto de Empresa in Madrid.Google Scholar
Romer, Paul M. 1986. “Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth.” Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, Frederic M. 1970. Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Schramm, Carl. 2006. The Entrepreneurial Imperative: How America's Economic Miracle Will Reshape the World (and Change Your Life). New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1911. Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Eine Untersuchung über Unternehmergewinn, Kapital, Kredit, Zins und dem Konjunkturzyklus. Berlin: Dunker und Humblot. (English translation, 1934, The Theory of Economic Development, trans. Redvers Opie, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.)Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1952. Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Eine Untersuchung über Unternehmergewinn, Kapital, Kredit, Zins und den Konjunkturzyklus. Reprint 1997, 9th ed., Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
Shane, Scott, and Venkataraman, S.. 2000. “The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research.” Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.Google Scholar
Solow, R. 1956. “A Contribution to Theory of Economic Growth.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, 65–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×