Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wbk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-14T19:43:51.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Moulding and Manipulating the News

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Sharon Beder
Affiliation:
University of Wollongong
Robert White
Affiliation:
University of Tasmania
Get access

Summary

The media are accused of bias by people from both ends of the political spectrum, but journalists, editors and owners maintain that they provide an objective source of news. This chapter will consider the ways in which the news is shaped and how this in turn influences the way environmental issues are reported and constructed in the mass media.

In the United States, where the debate over media objectivity is most heated, conservatives criticise the media for having a ‘liberal’ bias and these critics focus on the personal views of journalists, editors and media owners who, they argue, tend to be elitist, left-leaning and politically correct. A number of books have been published recently highlighting this supposed liberal bias including Press Bias and Politics: How the media frame controversial issues (Kuypers 2002), Bias: A CBS Insider Exposes How the Media Distort the News (Goldberg 2003b) and Arrogance: Rescuing America from the media elite (Goldberg 2003a). Goldberg argues that ‘the majority of journalists in big newsrooms slant leftward in their personal politics, especially on issues like abortion, affirmative action, gay rights, and gun control; and so in their professional role they tend to assume those positions are reasonable and morally correct. Bias in the news stems from that …’ (Goldberg 2003a: 4).

Accusations of liberal bias, however, are not new. Richard Nixon and his vice-president Spiro Agnew repeatedly referred to the bias of the media, particularly with regard to the Nixon administration, and Agnew called journalists ‘pointy-headed intellectuals’ (West 2001: 65).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramsky, S. 1995, ‘Citizen Murdoch: the shape of things to come?Extra! Nov.–Dec.: 16–17Google Scholar
Alterman, E. 2003, What Liberal Media? The truth about bias and the news, New York: Basic Books
Bagdikian, B. H. 1983, The Media Monopoly, Boston MA: Beacon Press
Beder, S. 2002a, ‘Bp: Beyond Petroleum?’ In Eveline Lubbers (ed.) Battling Big Business: Countering greenwash, infiltration and other forms of corporate bullying, Devon, UK: Green Books, pp. 26–32
Beder, S. 2002b, Global Spin: The Corporate assault on environmentalism, rev. edn, Totnes, Devon, UK: Green Books
Bleifuss, J. 1995, ‘Covering the earth with “Green PR”’, PR Watch 2(1): 1–7Google Scholar
Blyskal, J., and M. Blyskal 1985, PR: How the public relations industry writes the news, New York: William Morrow & Co.
Burton, B. 1994, ‘Nice names – pity about the policies – industry front groups’, Chain Reaction (70): 16–19Google Scholar
Carlisle, J. 1993, ‘Public Relationships: Hill and Knowlton, Robert Gray, and the CIA’, Covert Action (44): 19–25Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1989, Necessary Illusions: Thought control in democratic societies, London: Pluto Press
Dolny, M. 2000, ‘Think tanks: the rich get richer’, Extra! May–June
Entman, R. M. 1989, Democracy without Citizens: Media and the decay of American politics, New York: Oxford University Press
Franklin, B. 1994, Packaging Politics: Political communications in Britain's media democracy, London: Edward Arnold
Gamson, W. A., Croteau, D., Hoynes, W. and Sasson, T. 1992, ‘Media Images and the social construction of reality’, Annual Review of Sociology 18: 373–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gersh, D. 1992, ‘Covering solid waste issues’, Editor & Publisher 125 (29 August): 15–16Google Scholar
Gitlin, T. 1980, The Whole World Is Watching: Mass media in the making and unmaking of the New Left, Berkeley CA: University of California Press
Gold, P. 1994, ‘Just Say no to infotainment’, Insight on the News 10(28): 37–8Google Scholar
Goldberg, B. 2003a, Arrogance: Rescuing America from the media elite, New York: Warner Books
Goldberg, B. 2003b, Bias: A CBS Insider exposes how the media distort the news, New York: Perennial
Grossman, K. 1992, ‘Survey Says: Newspapers Boost Nukes’, Extra! March: 14
Herman, E. S., and N. Chomsky 2002, Manufacturing Consent: The political economy of the mass media, New York: Pantheon Books
Holmes Report 2001, Council of PR Firms Rankings. http://www.holmesreport.com/agencies/rankings.cfm (accessed 10 March 2004)
‘Issue Guides: Media Concentration’ 2003, Mediachannel.org. http://www.mediachannel.org/ownership/front.shtml (accessed 1 December)
Jackson, J., P. Hart and R. Coen 2003, ‘Fear and favor 2002 – the third annual report’, Extra! March–April. http://www.fair.org/extra/0303/fear-favor-2003.html
Kellner, D. 1990, Television and the Crisis of Democracy, Boulder CO: Westview
Kilbourne, J. 2000, Can't Buy My Love: How advertising changes the way we think and feel, New York: Touchstone
Kuypers, J. A. 2002, Press Bias and Politics: How the media frame controversial issues, Westport CT: Praeger Publishers
Lawson, A. 2003, ‘Murdoch faces Australian setback’, Guardian 25 June
Lee, M. A., and N. Solomon 1990, Unreliable Sources: A guide to detecting bias in news media, New York: Carol Publishing Group
Letto, J. 1995, ‘TV lets corporations pull green wool over viewers’ eyes', Extra! July–August: 21–4
Levy, M. R. 1992, ‘Learning from television news’. In P. S. Cook, D. Gomery and L. W. Lichty (eds) The Future of News: Television-newspapers-wire services-newsmagazines, Washington DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press, pp. 69–71
Makower, J. 1996, ‘Just the Facts’, E: the Environmental Magazine 7(2): 48, 50Google Scholar
McNair, B. 1994, News and Journalism in the UK, London/New York: Routledge
Nelkin, D. 1987, Selling Science: How the press covers science and technology, New York: W. H. Freeman & Co
Parenti, M. 1986, Inventing Reality: The politics of the mass media, New York: St Martin's Press
Parry, R. 1995, ‘The Rise of the Right-Wing Media Machine’, Extra! March/April: 6–10Google Scholar
Phillips, P., N. Chomsky and T. Tomorrow 2001, Censored 2001: 25 years of censored news and the top censored stories of the year, New York: Seven Stories Press
Rauber, P. 1996, ‘The Uncertainty Principle’, Sierra 81 (Sept.–Oct.): 20–2Google Scholar
Ricci, D. 1993, The Transformation of American Politics: The new Washington and the rise of think tanks, New Haven CT: Yale University Press
Roschwalb, S. A. 1994, ‘The Hill & Knowlton cases: a brief on the controversy’, Public Relations Review 20(3): 267–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, M. 1991, ‘Activism in the 90s: changing roles for public relations’, Public Relations Quarterly 36(3): 28–32Google Scholar
Rowell, A. 1996, Green Backlash: Global subversion of the environment movement, London/New York: Routledge
Ruben, B. 1994, ‘Back Talk’, Environmental Action Magazine 25(4): 11–16Google Scholar
Ryan, C. 1991, Prime Time Activism: Media strategies for grassroots organizing, Boston MA: South End Press
Saloma, J. S. 1984, Ominous Politics: The new conservative labyrinth, New York: Hill & Wang
Shabecoff, P. 1994, ‘Mudslinging on the earth-beat’, Amicus Journal 15(4): 42–3Google Scholar
Solomon, N. 1996, ‘The media's favorite think tank’, Extra! July/August: 9–12Google Scholar
Spencer, M. 1991, ‘Cold war environmentalism: reporting on Eastern European pollution’, Extra! January/February: 6–7Google Scholar
Spencer, M. 1992, ‘U.S. environmental reporting: the big fizzle’, Extra! April–May: 12–22Google Scholar
Stauber, J. C., and Rampton, S. 1995, ‘“Democracy” for hire: public relations and environmental movements’, Ecologist 25(5): 173–80Google Scholar
Walters, L. M., and Walters, T. N. 1992, ‘Environment of confidence: daily newspaper use of press releases’, Public Relations Review 18(1): 31–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, D. M. 2001, The Rise and Fall of the Media Establishment, Boston MA: Bedford/St Martin's Press
Windschuttle, K. 1988, The Media: A New Analysis of the Press, Television, Radio and Advertising in Australia, 2nd edn, Melbourne: Penguin

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×