Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T19:27:32.196Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Collecting ethnographic and sociolinguistic data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Daniel Schreier
Affiliation:
English Department, University of Zurich, Switzerland
Manfred Krug
Affiliation:
Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg, Germany
Julia Schlüter
Affiliation:
Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg, Germany
Get access

Summary

‘Who would want to pore over ancient manuscripts in a library when they could sit under a tree with Emmanuel Rowe and a bottle of rum?’

Robert B. Le Page (1920–2006) in his memoirs (Le Page 1998: 58)

Introduction

Doing successful fieldwork is perhaps the most underestimated academic skill of all. For some reason or other, being out in the field to collect data is often regarded as some time off from ‘serious research’ in the lab or office, as a part of research that is certainly important yet not really central. When one enquires why recording conversations with people for a sociolinguistic project should be an easy task, the response one usually hears is that, after all, fieldwork ‘only’ involves having ‘a chat’ with somebody, which most of us do in our daily routines anyway (so what’s special about it?). Some have gone as far as to claim that fieldwork is not really work at all. Labov (1997) famously recalls that ‘I remember one time a fourteen-year-old in Albuquerque said to me, “Let me get this straight. Your job is going anywhere in the world, talking to anybody about anything you want?” I said, “Yeah.” He said, “I want that job!”’.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bowern, Claire 2008. Linguistic fieldwork: a practical guide. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope 2000. Linguistic variation as social practice: the linguistic construction of social identity in Belten High. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Feagin, Crawford 1979. Variation and change in Alabama English: a sociolinguistic study of the white community. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Feagin, Crawford 2002. ‘Entering the community: fieldwork’, in Chambers, J.K., Trudgill, Peter and Schilling-Estes, Natalie (eds.), The handbook of language variation and change. Malden, MA: Blackwell. 20–39.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew and Milroy, Leslie 2003. Sociolinguistics: method and interpretation. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William 1984a. ‘Field methods of the project on linguistic change and variation’, in Baugh, John and Sherzer, Joel (eds.), Language in use. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall. 28–53.Google Scholar
Milroy, Lesley 1987b. Observing and analysing natural language: a critical account of sociolinguistic method. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schilling-Estes, Natalie 2007. ‘Sociolinguistic fieldwork’, in Bayley, Robert and Lucas, Ceil (eds.), Sociolinguistic variation: theories, methods and applications. Cambridge University Press. 165–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schilling, Natalie 2013. Sociolinguistic fieldwork. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreier, Daniel 2003. Isolation and language change: contemporary and sociohistorical evidence from Tristan da Cunha English. Houndmills, Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreier, Daniel 2006. ‘The backyard as a dialect boundary? Individuation, linguistic heterogeneity and sociolinguistic eccentricity in a small speech community’, Journal of English Linguistics 34: 26–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreier, Daniel in press. Investigating variation and change in English: an introduction. (Grundlagen der Anglistik und Amerikanistik.)Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. 2006. Analysing sociolinguistic variation. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfram, Walt and Fasold, Ralph W. 1974. The study of social dialects in American English. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×