Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- Contributors
- Preface and acknowledgements
- Table of cases
- List of abbreviations
- Introduction: fragmentation and coherence in international trade regulation: analysis and conceptual foundations
- PART I Constitutional issues in international trade regulation
- 1 The constitutionalisation of international trade law
- 2 Reflections on modes of decision-making in the World Trade Organization
- 3 Regionalism: moving from fragmentation towards coherence
- PART II Reforming specific areas of trade regulation
- PART III ‘Trade and…’ linkages
- Index
- References
3 - Regionalism: moving from fragmentation towards coherence
from PART I - Constitutional issues in international trade regulation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 April 2011
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- Contributors
- Preface and acknowledgements
- Table of cases
- List of abbreviations
- Introduction: fragmentation and coherence in international trade regulation: analysis and conceptual foundations
- PART I Constitutional issues in international trade regulation
- 1 The constitutionalisation of international trade law
- 2 Reflections on modes of decision-making in the World Trade Organization
- 3 Regionalism: moving from fragmentation towards coherence
- PART II Reforming specific areas of trade regulation
- PART III ‘Trade and…’ linkages
- Index
- References
Summary
KEY MESSAGES: THREE FACTS AND AN IMPLICATION
∙ Fact 1: The world trade system is marked by a motley assortment of discriminatory trade agreements known as the ‘Spaghetti Bowl’.
∙ Fact 2: Regionalism is here to stay. Trade agreements will continue to proliferate even after the current trade round meanders to a conclusion.
∙ Fact 3: This tangle of trade deals is a sub-optimal way to organise world trade. The discrimination inherent in regionalism is economically inefficient and the costs rise as manufacturing becomes ever more internationalised and supply chains grow across national borders.
Regionalism is also unfair. While the spaghetti bowl is a problem for firms in big nations, it is much more of a problem for firms in poor nations. Rich nations have the resources and negotiating leverage to navigate the tangle's worst effects. The governments of small and poor nations do not. The spaghetti bowl falls much harder on the heads of the world's small and poor nations.
Implication: As the spaghetti bowl's inefficiencies are increasingly magnified, the world must find a solution. Since regionalism is here to stay, the solution must work with existing regional arrangements, not against it. The solution must be to multilateralise regionalism.
Introduction
The World Trade Organization (WTO)-centric world trade system is principled and rules-based, yet flexible enough to embrace the vast range of realities facing nations across the planet. The key principle – Article I of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) – is non-discrimination.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Prospects of International Trade RegulationFrom Fragmentation to Coherence, pp. 136 - 166Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2011
References
., and (2005). ‘The Impact of Rules of Origin on Trade Flows’, Economic Policy, 20(43): 567–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. (1992). ‘The Economic Logic of EFTA Membership in the EEA and the EC’, EFTA Occasional Paper 41.
(1993). ‘A Domino Theory of Regionalism’, CEPR Discussion Paper 857; NBER Working Paper, 4465. Published in Baldwin, Haaparanta and Kiander (eds.), Expanding Membership in the European Union, Cambridge University Press. Republished as Chapter 23 (pp. 479–502) in J. Bhagwati, P. Krishna and A. Panagariya (1999), Trading Blocs: Alternative Approaches to Analyzing Preferential Trade Agreements. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2000). ‘Regulatory Protectionism, Developing Nations, and a Two-Tier World Trade System’, Brookings Trade Forum 2000, 237–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006a). ‘Managing the Noodle Bowl: The Fragility of East Asian Regionalism’, CEPR DP 5561, Singapore Economic Review, 53(03): 449–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006b). ‘Globalisation: The Great Unbundling(s)’, Globalisation Challenges for Europe. Helsinki: Secretariat of the Economic Council, Finnish Prime Minister's Office, Chapter 1, pp. 5–57.Google Scholar
(2006c). ‘Multilateralising Regionalism: Spaghetti Bowls as Building Blocs on the Path to Global Free Trade’, The World Economy, 29(11): 1451–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2008). ‘Sequencing and Depth of Regional Economic Integration: Lessons for the Americas from Europe’, The World Economy, 31(1): 5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2007). ‘Are Trade Blocs Building or Stumbling Blocks? New Evidence’, CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP6599.
and (2007). ‘A Test of Endogenous Trade Bloc Formation Theory on EU Data’, Journal of International Economic Studies, 11(2)(December): 77–111.Google Scholar
and (2009). ‘Are Free Trade Agreements Contagious’, NCCR Trade Regulation Working Paper 2009/31.
and (2009). ‘A 3 Bloc Dance: East Asian Regionalism and the North Atlantic Trade Giants’, NCCR Trade Regulation Working Paper 2009/29.
, and (2009). ‘Beyond Tariffs: Multilateralizing Non-tariff RTA Commitments’, in and (eds.), Multilateralizing Regionalism: Challenges for the Global Trading System. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (eds.) (2007). Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO Legal System. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
and (2008). ‘Firm Heterogeneity, Rules of Origin and Rules of Cumulation’, HEI Working Papers 09–2008, Economics Section, The Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies.
(2009). ‘A Historical Perspective on Regionalism’, in and (eds.), Multilateralizing Regionalism: Challenges for the Global Trading System. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
and (2006). ‘Constitutional Functions of the WTO and Regional Trade Agreements’, in and (eds.), Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO Legal System. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
and (2000). ‘Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO’, CREDIT Research Paper, No. 00/3, University of Nottingham.
(2009). ‘How Preferential are Preferential Trade Agreements? An analysis of Product Exclusions in PTAs’, NCCR Trade Regulation Working Paper 2009/30.
(2007). International Trade in Services and Domestic Regulations: Necessity, Transparency, and Regulatory Diversity, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2009). ‘Multilateralizing Regionalism: Case Study of African Regionalism’, in and (eds.), Multilateralizing Regionalism: Challenges for the Global Trading System. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
and (2008). ‘Interdependent Preferential Trade Agreement Memberships: An Empirical Analysis’, Journal of International Economics, 76(2): 384–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2008). ‘Does Regionalism Affect Trade Liberalization toward Nonmembers?’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, 123(4): 1531–75.Google Scholar
, and (2009). ‘Harmonizing Preferential Rules of Origin Regimes around the World’, in and (eds.), Multilateralizing Regionalism: Challenges for the Global Trading System. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2009). ‘Multilateralizing RTAs in the Americas: State of Play and Ways Forward’, in and (eds.), Multilateralizing Regionalism: Challenges for the Global Trading System. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2009). ‘Services Provisions in Regional Trade Agreements: Stumbling Blocks or Building Blocks for Multilateral Liberalization?’ in and (eds.), Multilateralizing Regionalism: Challenges for the Global Trading System. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
and (2008). ‘East Asian Free Trade Agreements in Services: Key Architectural Elements’, Journal of International Economic Law, 11(2): 263–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2007). ‘The Changing Landscape of Regional Trade Agreements: 2006 Update’ WTO Discussion Paper No. 12.
(1998). ‘Does Membership in a Regional Preferential Trade Agreement Make a Country More or Less Protectionist?’ The World Economy, 21(3): 305–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2008). ‘Do Unilateral Trade Preferences Help Export Diversification? An Investigation of the Impact of European Unilateral Trade Preferences on the Extensive and Intensive Margin of Trade’, HEI Working Papers 17–2007, Graduate Institute of International Studies and Development.
(2009). ‘Market Access, Imported Inputs and Export Growth: An Analysis of Mauritius Exporting Firms’, PhD thesis, Geneva, Graduate Institute, Chapter 3.
and (2009). ‘Multilateralizing Preferential Trade Agreements: A Developing Country Perspective’, in and (eds.), Multilateralizing Regionalism: Challenges for the Global Trading System. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2005). ‘What Drives Regional Trade Agreements that Work?’, HEI Working Papers 07–2005, Economics Section, The Graduate Institute of International Studies.
, and (2009). ‘Beyond The WTO? An Anatomy of EU and US Preferential Trade Agreements’, Centre for Economic Policy Research Discussion Paper No. 7317, available at www.iadb.org/intal/intalcdi/PE/2009/03795.pdf.
and (2009). ‘Fitting Asia-Pacific Agreements into the WTO System’, in and (eds.), Multilateralizing Regionalism: Challenges for the Global Trading System. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2009). ‘Preferential Tariff Formation: The Case of the European Union’, CTEI Working Paper 111.
and (2009). ‘Multilateralizing Regional Trade Arrangements in Asia.’ in and (eds.), Multilateralizing Regionalism: Challenges for the Global Trading System. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1996). Regionalism, Multinationalism, and Deeper Integration. Washington, DC, Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
(2007). ‘The ASEAN Free Trade Agreement: Building Block or Stumbling Block?’, NCCR Trade Regulation Working Paper 2007/33.
and (eds.) (2009). Opening Markets for Trade in Services: Countries and Sectors in Bilateral and WTO Negotiations. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2009). ‘Legal Avenues to “Multilateralising Regionalism”: Beyond Article XXIV’, in and (eds.), Multilateralizing Regionalism: Challenges for the Global Trading System. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2009). ‘The Challenge of Negotiating RTAs for Developing Countries. What Could the WTO Do to Help?’ in and (eds.), Multilateralizing Regionalism: Challenges for the Global Trading System. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
, and (2006). ‘Services Liberalization in the New Generation of Preferential Trade Agreements (PTAs): How Much Further than the GATS?’, WTO Staff Working Paper ERSD-2006–07.
(2001). ‘Domino Effects in Western European Regional Trade, 1960–1992’, European Journal of Political Economy, 17(2): 377–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998). ‘Does Mercosur's Trade Performance Raise Concerns about the Effects of Regional Trade Arrangements?’, World Bank Economic Review, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 1
- Cited by