Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T07:26:31.169Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - On the Liberty of the Moderns: Benjamin Constant and the Discovery of an Immanent Liberalism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2012

Andreas Kalyvas  and
Ira Katznelson
Andreas Kalyvas
Affiliation:
New School for Social Research, New York
Ira Katznelson
Affiliation:
Columbia University, New York
Get access

Summary

Reading Benjamin Constant provides a privileged access to the unfolding and gradual crystallization of modern continental liberal constitutionalism within and against a republican background. His experience parallels Germaine de Staël's, but because Constant was a more explicitly reflective and systematic political thinker, we can see this process develop in a more lucid manner. With Constant as our guide, we trace another political pathway for the emergence of postrevolutionary French liberalism. As we have seen, with the king deposed, monarchy's main doctrinal antagonist, republicanism, failed to fill the vacuum of authority and neutrality at the center of the state. This incapacity impelled a young generation of republicans, notably including Staël and Constant, to question their initial commitments and search for more effective political solutions. Encountering theories of rights, they produced a body of thought that gradually broke, though not completely, with its republican past, to become an independent and distinctive political doctrine.

Their liberalism faced two strong adversaries, each also competing to replace the deposed king. The political spectrum polarized between counterrevolutionaries and radical republicans. Satisfied with neither position, the generation of new liberals understood that substitution for the monarch demanded new instruments that could wear a magisterial mantle of neutrality. To this end, they designed a strategy of transcendence to supersede the radical and conservative extremes. They did so by raising the level of abstraction to constitute an impartial and objective point of view from which neutrality, detached from the person of the king, could reappear in the formal and procedural activities of the state's institutional ensemble.

Type
Chapter
Information
Liberal Beginnings
Making a Republic for the Moderns
 , pp. 146 - 175
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Mortier, Roland, “Comment terminer la Révolution et fonder la République,” Annales Benjamin Constant, 8–9 (1988), pp. 293–310.Google Scholar
Constant, Benjamin, “The Liberty of the Ancients Compared with that of the Moderns,” in Constant: Political Writings, ed. Fontana, Biancamaria, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988, p. 323.Google Scholar
Constant, Benjamin, Cours de politique constitutionnelle, Geneva-Paris: Slatkine, 1982, p. LV. This collection was first published in 1861, but the version reproduced here was published in 1872.Google Scholar
Dodge, Guy Howard, Benjamin Constant's Philosophy of Liberalism: A Study in Politics and Religion, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1980, p. 100Google Scholar
Todorov, Tzvetan, Benjamin Constant: la passion démocratique, Paris: Hachette, 1997, p. 37.Google Scholar
Constant, Benjamin, Fragments d'un ouvrage abandonné sur la possibilité d'une constitution républicaine dans un grand pays, ed. Grange, Henri, Paris: Aubier, 1991.Google Scholar
Constant, Benjamin, Principes de politique applicables à tous les governments, Geneva: Droz, 1980.Google Scholar
Goyard-Fabre, , “L'idée de souveraineté du peuple et le ‘liberalisme pur’ de Benjamin Constant,” Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale, 71:3 (1976), pp. 289–327Google Scholar
Vincent, K. Steven, “Benjamin Constant, the French Revolution, and the Origins of French Romantic Liberalism,” French Historical Studies, 23:4 (2000), pp. 608–637.Google Scholar
Holmes, Stephen, Benjamin Constant and the Making of Modern Liberalism, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Kelly, George A., “Liberalism and Aristocracy in the French Restoration,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 26:4 (1965), p. 522Google Scholar
Raynaud, Philippe, “Un romantique liberal Benjamin Constant,” Esprit, 3 (March 1983), pp. 49–66.Google Scholar
Gauchet, Marcel, “Constant: le libéralisme entre le droit et l'histoire,” in Gauchet, Marcel, La condition politique, Paris: Gallimard, 2005, pp. 277–304.Google Scholar
Fontana, Biancamaria, Benjamin Constant and the Post-Revolutionary Mind, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Raynaud, “Un romantique liberal: Benjamin Constant,” Esprit, 33 (1983), pp. 49–66.Google Scholar
Constant, Benjamin, Ecrits et discours politiques, Vol. 1, ed. Borgo, O. Pozzo diParis: Chez Jean-Jacques Pauvert, 1964, p. 82.Google Scholar
Grange, Henri, Benjamin Constant. Amoureux et Républican 1795–1799, Paris: Le Belles Letters, 2004.Google Scholar
Weber, Max, Economy and Society, ed. Roth, Guenther and Wittich, Claus, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978, pp. 215, 226–41.Google Scholar
Constant's preoccupation with governability and stability contradicts Pierre Manent's interpretation that he is an “oppositional” and “critical” thinker who proposed a “negative” liberalism unable to rule effectively. By adopting and overimposing on Constant's texts Carl Schmitt's idiosyncratic and highly controversial approach to liberalism, Manent misses an entire aspect of Constant's thought. Manent, Pierre, An Intellectual History of Liberalism, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1994, pp. 91, 93.Google Scholar
A similar, but less confident approach is expounded by Holmes. Paradoxically, although he rightly praises Constant for his institutional acuity and for a political liberalism capable of supplanting traditional monarchy as an effective instrument of governance, he scorns him for his excessive negative evaluation of power and for his obsession with the requisite limits to be placed on sovereign power and thus with the inability of his liberalism to rule and govern effectively. Holmes, Constant, pp. 128, 222, 259. Additionally, Mark Lilla reiterates the same misleading view characterizing Constant works as “mainly critical and oppositional, reacting to events of the day: the collapse of the Revolution into the Terror, the rise of Napoleanic despotism and empire.” Lilla, Mark, “The Legitimacy of the Liberal Age,” in New French Thought: Political Philosophy, ed. Lilla, Mark, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1994, p. 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauchet, Marcel, by contrast, attends to this aspect of Constant's thought and makes it a central pivot of his interpretive reading in his preface, “Benjamin Constant: l'illusion lucide du liberalisme,” in Benjamin Constant: écrits politiques, ed. Gauchet, Marcel, Paris: Le Livre de Poche, 1980, pp. 26, 38–39, 81–82.Google Scholar
Bastid, Paul, Benjamin Constant et sa doctrine, Vol. 1, Paris: Librairie Armand Colin, 1966, p. 110.Google Scholar
Asse, Eugène, “Benjamin Constant et le Directoire,” Revue de la Révolution, 15 (1889), pp. 337–356;Google Scholar
Dijn, Annelien, “Aristocratic Liberalism in Post-Revolutionary France,” Historical Journal, 48:3 (2005), p. 663;Google Scholar
Chopin, Thierry, Benjamin Constant: le libéralisme inquiet, Paris: Éditions Michalon, 2002, pp. 69–114.Google Scholar
Fink, Beatrice, “Benjamin Constant on Equality,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 33 (1972), pp. 307–314;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fink, Beatrice, “Benjamin Constant and the Enlightenment,” Studies in 18th Century Culture, 3 (1973), pp. 67–81.Google Scholar
Hohfeld, Wesley Newcomb, Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1966 [1919], pp. 73–74.Google Scholar
Rawls's, , A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1973, pp. 28–33.Google Scholar
Sainte-Beuve, Charles Augustin, “Benjamin Constant et Belle de Charrière, Lettres Inédites,” Revue des deux Mondes, 14, n.s., 6 (April 1944), pp. 193–264;Google Scholar
Droz, Jacques, Histoire des doctrines politiques en France, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1948, pp. 69–73.Google Scholar
Harpaz, Ephraim, “Benjamin Constant entre la Republique et la Monarchie,” Annales Benjamin Constant, 12 (1991), pp. 43–52.Google Scholar
Urbinati, Nadia, Individualismo Democratico. Emerson, Dewey e la cultura politica americana, Rome: Donzeli Editore, 1997, pp. 44–45.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×