Abramowitz, Alan, Alexander, Brad, and Gunning, Matthew. 2006. “Incumbency, Redistricting, and the Decline of Competition in U.S. House Elections.” Journal of Politics 68 (Feb.): 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abramowitz, Alan, and Saunders, Kyle L.. 1998. “Ideological Realignment in the U.S. Electorate.” Journal of Politics 60 (Aug.): 634–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aldrich, John H. 1995. Why Parties? The Origins and Transformation of Political Parties in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aldrich, John H., and Rohde, David W.. 2001. “The Logic of Conditional Party Government: Revisiting the Electoral Connection,” in Congress Reconsidered, 7th Edition, Dodd, Lawrence C. and Oppenheimer, Bruce I., eds. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar

,American Political Science Association. 1950. “The Need for Greater Party Responsibility,” American Political Science Review 44:15–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ansolabehere, Stephen, Snyder, James M., and Stewart, Charles, III. 2001. “Candidate Positioning in US House Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (Jan.): 136–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnold, R. Douglas. 1990. The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Asher, Herbert B. 1973. “The Learning of Legislative Norms.” American Political Science Review 67 (Jun.): 499–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Asher, Herbert, B., and Weisberg, Herbert F.. 1978. “Voting Change in Congress: Some Dynamic Perspectives on an Evolutionary Process.” American Journal of Political Science 22 (May): 391–425.Google Scholar

Bailey, Stephen K. 1959. The Condition of Our National Political Parties. New York: Fund for the Republic.Google Scholar

Barone, Michael, with Cohen, Richard E.. 2005. The Almanac of American Politics. The National Journal, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

Barone, Michael, Ujifusa, Grant, and Matthews, Douglas. 1972. The Almanac of American Politics. Boston: Gambit.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartels, Larry M. 1991. “Constituency Opinion and Congressional Policy Making: The Reagan Defense Build Up.” American Political Science Review 85 (Jun.): 457–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Binder, Sarah. 1997. Minority Rights, Majority Rule: Partisanship and the Development of Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Binder, Sarah. 2004. “The Limits of Senatorial Courtesy.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29 (Feb.): 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Binder, Sarah, and Smith, Steven S.. 1997. Politics or Principle? Filibustering in the United States Senate. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar

Bishop, Bill. 2004. “A Steady Slide Toward a More Partisan Union.” Austin American-Statesman, May 30, A1 and A8.Google Scholar

Bond, Jon R., Kristin, Campbell, and Cottrill, James B.. 2001. “The Puzzle of Constituency Diversity Revisited: Conditional Effects of District Diversity on Competition in Congressional Elections.” Paper read at Annual Meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Atlanta.

Brady, David. 1978. “Critical Elections, Congressional Parties and Clusters of Policy Change.” British Journal of Political Science 8: 79–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brady, David W. 1991. Critical Elections and Congressional Policy Making. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Brady, David, and Lynn, Naomi. 1973. “Switched-Seat Congressional Districts: Their Effect on Party Voting and Public Policy.” American Journal of Political Science 17 (Aug.): 528–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brady, David, and Sinclair, Barbara. 1984. “Building Majorities for Policy Changes in the House of Representatives.” Journal of Politics 46 (Nov.): 1033–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brady, David W., and Volden, Craig. 1998. Revolving Gridlock: Politics and Policy from Carter to Clinton. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Brady, David W., Cogan, John F., Gaines, Brian, and Rivers, R. Douglas. 1996. “The Perils of Presidential Support: How the Republicans Captured the House.” Political Behavior 18 (Dec.): 345–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brewer, Mark D., Mariani, Mack D., and Stonecash, Jeffrey M.. 2002. “Northern Democrats and Party Polarization in the U.S. House.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 27 (Aug.): 423–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Broder, David. 1972. The Party's Over: The Failure of Politics in America. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Broder, David. 2001. “Unnoticed Redistricting to Change Politics for Decade.” The Bay City Times, October 21, p. 9A.Google Scholar

Burnham, Walter. 1970. Critical Elections and the Mainspring of American Politics. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar

Burns, James MacGregor. 1963. The Deadlock of Democracy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Burstein, Paul. 1978. “A New Method for Measuring Legislative Content and Change.” Sociological Methods and Research 6:337–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burstein, Paul. 1980. “Attitudinal Demographic and Electoral Components of Legislative Change: Senate Voting on Civil Rights.” Sociology and Social Research 64:221–35.Google Scholar

Cain, Bruce, Ferejohn, John, and Fiorina, Morris. 1987. The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carson, Jamie, Crespin, Michael H., Finocchiaro, Charles J., and Rohde, David W.. 2007. “Redistricting and Party Polarization in the U.S. House of Representatives.” American Politics Research 35 (Nov.): 878–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clapp, Charles. 1963. The Congressman: His Work As He Sees It. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar

Clausen, Aage R. 1973. How Congressmen Decide: A Policy Focus. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar

Coleman, John J. 1997. “The Decline and Resurgence of Congressional Party Conflict.” Journal of Politics 59 (Feb.): 165–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collie, Melissa P., and Mason, John Lyman. 2000. “The Electoral Connection Between Party and Constituency Reconsidered: Evidence from the U.S. House of Representatives, 1972–1994,” in Brady, David W., Cogan, John F., and Fiorina, Morris P., eds. Continuity and Change in House Elections. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Combs, Jerald A. 1970. The Jay Treaty: Political Battleground of the Founding Fathers. Berkeley: The University of California Press.Google Scholar

Congressional Districts in the 1990s: A Portrait of America. 1993. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.

Converse, Philip. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics,” in Ideology and Discontent, Apter, David, ed. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Cook, Charlie. May 3, 2003. “The Senate and House are a Study in Contrasts,” National Journal 35 (18): 1406.Google Scholar

Cooper, Joseph, and Brady, David W.. 1981. “Institutional Context and Leadership Style: The House from Cannon to Rayburn.” American Political Science Review 75 (June): 411–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, Gary W., and Katz, Jonathan N.. 2002. Elbridge Gerry's Salamander: The Electoral Consequences of the Reapportionment Revolution. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley: The University of California Press.Google Scholar

Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, Gary W., and Poole, Keith T.. 2002. “On Measuring Partisanship in Roll-Call Voting: The U.S. House of Representatives, 1877–1999.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (July): 477–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davidson, Roger H., Oleszek, Walter J., and Lee, Frances E.. 2008. Congress and Its Members, 11th ed. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar

Hartog, Chris, and Monroe, Nathan W.. 2008. “Agenda Influence and Tabling Motions in the U.S. Senate” in Roberts, Jason R. and Rohde, David W., eds., Why Not Parties? Party Effects in the U.S. Senate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Denzau, Arthur, Riker, William, and Shepsle, Kenneth. 1985. “Farquharson and Fenno: Sophisticated Voting and Home Style.” American Political Science Review 79 (Dec.): 1117–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DiMaggio, Paul, Evans, John, and Bryson, Bethany. 1996. “Have Americans' Social Attitudes Become More Polarized?” American Journal of Sociology 102 (Nov.): 690–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dion, Douglas. 1997. Turning the Legislative Thumbscrews: Minority Rights and Procedural Change in Legislative Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar

Duncan, Philip D., Lawrence, Christine C.. 1997. Politics in America 1998: The 105th Congress. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar

Edwards, George C. III, and Barrett, Andrew. 2000. “Presidential Agenda Setting in Congress,” in Polarized Politics: Congress and the President in a Partisan Era, Bond, Jon R. and Fleisher, Richard, eds. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar

Edwards III, George C., Barrett, Andrew, and Peake, Jeffrey. 1997. “The Legislative Impact of Divided Government.” American Journal of Political Science 41:545–63.Google Scholar

Edwards, Mickey. 2003. “The American Congress.” Unpublished manuscript.

Erikson, Robert S., MacKuen, Michael B., and Stimson, James A.. 2002. The Macro Polity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Evans, C. Lawrence, and Oleszek, Walter J.. 1997. Congress Under Fire: Reform Politics and the Republican Majority. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar

Evans, C. Lawrence, and Oleszek, Walter J.. 2001. “Message Politics and Senate Procedure,” in Campbell, Colton C. and Rae, Nicol C., eds., The Contentious Senate: Partisanship, Ideology, and the Myth of Cool Judgment. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Farquharson, Robin. 1969. Theory of Voting. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Fenno, Richard F. 1966. The Power of the Purse: Appropriations Politics in Congress. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar

Ferejohn, John. 1977. “On the Decline of Competition in Congressional Elections.” American Political Science Review 71 (Mar.): 166–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fiorina, Morris P. 2006. Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America. 2nd ed. New York: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar

Fiorina, Morris P. 1977. “The Case of the Vanishing Marginals: The Bureaucracy Did It.” American Political Science Review 71 (Mar.): 177–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fleisher, Richard, and Bond, Jon R.. 2000. “Partisanship and the President's Quest for Votes on the Floor of Congress,” in Bond, Jon R. and Fleisher, Richard, eds. Polarized Politics: Congress and the President in a Partisan Era. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar

Fleisher, Richard, Bond, R.. 2004. “The Shrinking Middle in Congress,” British Journal of Politics 34: 429–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frank, Thomas. 2004. What's the Matter with Kansas? How Conservatives Won the Heart of America. New York: A Metropolitan/Owl Book.Google Scholar

Froman, Lewis A., and Ripley, Randall B.. 1965. “Conditions for Party Leadership: The Case of the House Democrats.” American Political Science Review 59 (Mar.): 52–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galston, William A., and Kamarck, Elaine C.. October 2005. “The Politics of Polarization.” The Third Way Middle Class Project.

Gilmour, John B. 1995. Strategic Disagreement: Stalemate in American Politics. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilmour, John B., and Rothstein, Paul. 1994. “Term Limitation in a Dynamic Model of Partisan Balance.” American Journal of Political Science 38:770–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gimpel, James, A., and Schuknecht, Jason E.. 2003. Patchwork Nation: Sectionalism and Political Change in American Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Ginsberg, Benjamin. 1973. “Critical Elections and the Substance of Party Conflict: 1844–1968.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 16:603–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ginsberg, Benjamin. 1976. “Elections and Public Policy.” American Political Science Review 70 (Mar.): 41–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giroux, Gregory L. 2001. “Remaps' Clear Trend: Incumbent Protection.” CQ Weekly, November 3, pp. 2627–32.Google Scholar

Giroux, Gregory L. 2005. “A Line in the Suburban Sand.” CQ Weekly, June 27, p. 1714.Google Scholar

Green, John C., and Herrnson, Paul S.. 2002. “Party Development in the Twentieth Century: Laying the Foundation for Responsible Party Government,” in Green, John C. and Herrnson, Paul S., eds., Responsible Partisanship? The Evolution of American Political Parties Since 1950. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar

Groseclose, Timothy, and McCarty, Nolan. 2001. “The Politics of Blame: Bargaining Before an Audience.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (Mar.): 100–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hacker, Jacob S., and Pierson, Paul. 2005. Off Center: The Republican Revolution and the Erosion of American Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Herrera, Richard. 1992. “The Understanding of Ideological Labels by Political Elites: A Research Note.” Western Political Quarterly 45 (December): 1021–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herrera, Richard, and Shafer, Karen. 2003. “The Influence of Party on the Legislative Process: Constituents are Key.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.

Hetherington, Marc J. 2001. “Resurgent Mass Partisanship: The Role of Elite Polarization.” American Political Science Review 95 (Sept.): 619–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hetherington, Marc J. 2005. Why Trust Matters: Declining Political Trust and the Demise of American Liberalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Hibbing, John R., and Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth. 1995. Congress as Public Enemy: Public Attitudes Toward American Political Institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hibbing, John R., and Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth. 2002. Stealth Democracy: Americans' Beliefs about How Government Should Work. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Highton, Benjamin, and Michael, S. Rocca 2005. “Beyond the Roll-Call Arena: The Determinants of Position Taking in Congress.” Political Research Quarterly 58 (June): 303–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirsch, Sam. 2003. “The United States of Unrepresentatives: What Went Wrong in the Latest Round of Congressional Redistricting.” Election Law Journal 2 (Nov.): 179–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackley, John. 1992. Hill Rats: Blowing the Lid Off Congress. Washington, D.C.: Regnery Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C. 1987. “Running Scared: Elections and Congressional Politics in the 1980s,” in McCubbins, Mathew D. and Sullivan, Terry, eds. Congress: Structure and Policy, pp. xx. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C. 2000. “Party Polarization in National Politics: The Electoral Connection,” in Bond, Jon R. and Fleisher, Richard, eds. Polarized Politics: Congress and the President in a Partisan Era. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C. 2004. The Politics of Congressional Elections. 6th ed. New York: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar

Jenkins, Jeffery A., Crespin, Michael H., and Carson, Jamie L.. 2005. “Parties as Procedural Coalitions in Congress: An Examination of Differing Career Tracks.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 30 (Aug.): 365–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, Charles. 1974. “Speculative Augmentation in Federal Air Pollution Policy-Making.” Journal of Politics 36 (May): 438–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, Charles O. 1968. “Joseph G. Cannon and Howard W. Smith: An Essay on the Limits of Leadership in the House of Representatives.” Journal of Politics 39 (Aug.): 617–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kessler, Daniel, and Krehbiel, Keith. 1996. “Dynamics of Cosponsorship.” American Political Science Review 90 (Sept.): 555–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Key, V.O. 1961. Public Opinion and American Democracy. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar

Anthony, King. 1997. Running Scared: Why America's Politicians Campaign Too Much and Govern Too Little. Glencoe, IL: Free Press Publishers.Google Scholar

Kingdon, John W. 1989. Congressmen's Voting Decisions. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koger, Gregory. 2003. “Position Taking and Cosponsorship in the U.S. House.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 28 (May): 225–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith. 1995. “Cosponsors and Wafflers from A to Z.” American Journal of Political Science 39 (Nov.): 906–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith. 1998. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith, and Meirowitz, Adam. 2002. “Minority Rights and Majority Power: Theoretical Consequences of the Motion to Recommit.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 37 (May): 191–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith, and Woon, Jonathan. 2005. “Selection Criteria for Roll Call Votes.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.

Krehbiel, Keith, Meirowitz, Adam, and Woon, Jonathan. 2005. “Testing of Theories of Lawmaking,” in Austen-Smith, David and Duggan, John, eds., Essays in Honor of Jeffrey S. Banks, pp. 249–68. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Krutz, Glen S. 2005. “Issues and Institutions: ‘Winnowing’ in the U.S. Congress.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (April): 313–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Layman, Geoffrey C., and Carsey, Thomas M.. 2002. “Party Polarization and ‘Conflict Extension’ in the American Electorate.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (October): 786–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Layman, Geoffrey C., Carsey, Thomas M., and Horowitz, Juliana Menasce. 2006. “Party Polarization in American Politics: Characteristics, Causes, and Consequences.” Annual Review of Political Science 9 (June): 83–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, Frances. 2008. “Agreeing to Disagree: Agenda Content and Senate Partisanship, 1981–2004.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 32 (May): 199-222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mann, Thomas E., and Ornstein, Norman J.. 2006. The Broken Branch: How Congress Is Failing America and How to Get It Back on Track. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Matthews, Donald. 1960. U.S. Senators and Their World. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Mayhew, David R. 1991. Divided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking, and Investigations, 1946–1990. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Mayhew, David R. 2005. Divided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking, and Investigations, 1946–2002, 2nd ed. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith, and Rosenthal, Howard. 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar

McClosky, Herbert, Hoffman, Paul J., and O'Hara, Rosemary. 1960. “Issue Conflict and Consensus Among Party Leaders and Followers.” American Political Science Review 54: 406–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1963. “Constituency Influence in Congress.” American Political Science Review 57: 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, Warren E., and Jennings, M. Kent. 1986. Parties in Transition: A Longitudinal Study of Party Elites and Party Supporters. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Ornstein, Norman J. 2002. “Why Close Races Ruin Politics.” New York Times, November 4, p. 23.Google Scholar

Oppenheimer, Bruce I. 2005. “Deep Red and Blue Congressional Districts” in Dodd, Lawrence C. and Oppenheimer, Bruce I., eds., Congress Reconsidered, 8th ed. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar

Pearson, Kathryn. 2005. “Party Discipline in the Contemporary Congress: Rewarding Loyalty in Theory and in Practice.” Ph.D. diss. University of California at Berkeley.

Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1984. “The Polarization of American Politics.” Journal of Politics 46 (Nov.): 1061–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Rae, Nicol C., and Campbell, Colton C.. 2001. “Party Politics and Ideology in the Contemporary Senate” in Campbell, Colton C. and Rae, Nicol C., eds., The Contentious Senate: Partisanship, Ideology, and the Myth of Cool Judgment. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar

Ranney, Austin. 1951. “Toward a More Responsible Two-Party System: A Commentary.” American Political Science Review 44 (June): 488–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ranney, Austin, and Kendall, Willmoore. 1956. Democracy and the American Party System. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar

Riker, William H. 1986. The Art of Political Manipulation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Roberts, Jason M., and Smith, Steven S.. 2003. “Procedural Contexts, Party Strategy, and Conditional Party Voting in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1971–2000.” American Journal of Political Science 47 (Apr.): 305–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rohde, David W. 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rohde, David W., and Aldrich, John H.. 2001. “The Logic of Conditional Party Government: Revisiting the Electoral Connection,” in Dodd, Lawrence C. and Oppenheimer, Bruce I., eds., Congress Reconsidered, 7th ed. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar

Rothenberg, Stuart. 2002. “Redistricting Shortfall May Not Cost GOP House Majority.” Roll Call, October 21, p. A-6.Google Scholar

Rothenberg, Stuart. 2001. “Sparing Incumbents Won't Improve Tone on Capitol Hill.” Roll Call, November 29, p. 6.Google Scholar

Schickler, Eric. 2001. Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and the Development of the U.S. Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Schickler, Eric, McGhee, Eric, and Sides, John. 2003. “Remaking the House and Senate: Personal Power, Ideology, and the 1970s Reforms.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 28 (Aug.): 297–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1989. “The Changing Textbook Congress,” in Can the Government Govern?Chubb, John E. and Peterson, Paul E., eds. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Weingast, Barry R.. 1987. “The Institutional Foundations of Committee Power.” American Political Science Review 81 (Mar.): 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shipan, Charles R., and Lowry, William R.. 2001. “Environmental Policy and Party Divergence in Congress.” Political Research Quarterly 54 (Jun.): 245–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sinclair, Barbara. 1977. “Party Realignment and the Transformation of the Political Agenda: The House of Representatives, 1925–1938.” American Political Science Review 71 (Sept.): 940–53.Google Scholar

Sinclair, Barbara. 1982. Congressional Realignment1925–1978. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Sinclair, Barbara. 2000. Unorthodox Lawmaking: New Legislative Processes in the U.S. Congress, 2nd ed. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar

Sinclair, Barbara. 2006. Party Wars: Polarization and the Politics of National Policy Making. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar

Smith, Steven S. 1989. Call to Order: Floor Politics in the House and Senate. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar

Snyder, James M. 1992. “Artificial Extremism in Interest Group Ratings.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 17 (Aug.): 319–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stonecash, Jeffrey M., Brewer, Mark D., and Mariani, Mark D.. 2003. Diverging Parties: Social Change, Realignment, and Party Polarization. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Sundquist, James. 1988. “Needed: A Political Theory for the New Era of Coalition Government in the United States.” Political Science Quarterly 103: 613–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Talbert, Jeffery C., and Potoski, Matthew. 2002. “Setting the Legislative Agenda: The Dimensional Structure of Bill Cosponsoring and Floor Voting.” Journal of Politics 64 (Aug.): 864–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Theriault, Sean M. 2004. “Public Pressure and Punishment in the Politics of Congressional Pay Raises.” American Politics Research 32 (Jul.): 444–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Theriault, Sean M. 2005. The Power of the People: Congressional Competition, Public Attention, and Voter Retribution. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar

Theriault, Sean M. 2006. “Party Polarization in the U.S. Congress: Member Replacement and Member Adaptation.” Party Politics 12 (4): 483–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thorson, Gregory R. 1998. “Divided Government and the Passage of Partisan Legislation, 1947–1990.” Political Research Quarterly 51 (Sept.): 751–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tufte, Edward R. 1973. “The Relationship Between Seats and Votes in Two-Party Systems.” American Political Science Review 67 (Jun.): 540–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turner, Julius. 1951. “Responsible Parties: A Dissent from the Floor.” American Political Science Revew 45:143–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turner, Julius, and Edward, Schneier 1970. Party and Constituency: Pressures on Congress. Rev. ed. Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar

Houweling, Paul P. 2003. “Legislators' Personal Policy Preferences and Partisan Legislative Organization.” Ph.D. diss., Harvard University.

Weingast, Barry R. 1992. “Fighting Fire with Fire,” in The Post-Reform Congress, Davidson, Roger H., ed. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar

Wildavsky, Aaron. 1965. “The Goldwater Phenomenon: Jurists, Politicians, and the Future of the Two-Party System.” Review of Politics 27 (July):386–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilson, James Q. 1962. The Amateur Democrat. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Wilson, Rick K., and Young, Cheryl D.. 1997. “Cosponsorship in the U.S. Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 22:25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilson, Woodrow. 1956 (originally published in 1885). Congressional Government: A Study in American Politics. New York: Meridian Books.Google Scholar

Wilkerson, John. 1991. The Evolution of Strategy: A Case Study of Congressional Pay Raises. Ph.D. diss., University of Rochester.

Wlezien, Christopher. 1995. “The Public as Thermostat: Dynamics of Preferences for Spending.” American Journal of Political Science 39 (Nov.): 981–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zone, Rob. 2002. “Why So Many Races Lack One Thing: Competition.” The Seattle Times, October 13, p. A1.Google Scholar