Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T14:14:38.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2012

Frank R. Baumgartner
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
Suzanna L. De Boef
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
Amber E. Boydstun
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Althaus, Scott L., Edy, Jill A., and Phalen, Patricia F.. 2001. Using Substitutes for Full-Text News Stories in Content Analysis: Which Text Is Best? American Journal of Political Science 45 (3): 707–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, R. Michael, and Brehm, John. 1995. American Ambivalence Towards Abortion Policy: Development of a Heteroskedastic Probit Model of Competing Values. American Journal of Political Science 39 (4): 1055–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, R. Michael, and Brehm, John. 1997. Are Americans Ambivalent Towards Racial Policies? American Journal of Political Science 41 (2): 345–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, R. Michael, and Brehm, John. 1998. Speaking in Two Voices: American Equivocation about the Internal Revenue Service. American Journal of Political Science 42 (2): 418–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, R. Michael, and Brehm, John. 2002. Hard Choices, Easy Answers: Values, Information, and American Public Opinion. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Amnesty International. 2006. Abolitionist and Retentionist Countries. Retrieved March 13, 2007, from http://web.amnesty.org/pages/deathpenalty-abolitionist1-eng.
Arrow, Kenneth. 1970. Social Choice and Individual Values. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Associated Press. 2004. Justice Dept. Reports a 30-Year Low in Death Sentences and Fewer Inmates on Death Row. New York Times 15 November.
Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002).
Ball, Philip. 2004. Critical Mass: How One Thing Leads to Another. New York, N.Y.: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar
Banner, Stuart. 2002. The Death Penalty: An American History. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Barabasi, Albert-Laszlo. 2003. Linked: How Everything Is Connected to Everything Else and What It Means. New York, N.Y.: Plume.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R. 1989. Conflict and Rhetoric in French Policymaking.Pittsburgh, Pa.: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Jones, Bryan D.. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago, Ill.: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bedau, Hugo Adam, ed. 1997. The Death Penalty in America: Current Controversies. New York, N.Y.: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bedau, Hugo Adam, and Radelet, Michael L.. 1987. Miscarriages of Justice in Potentially Capital Cases. Stanford Law Review 40 (1): 21–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berinski, Adam J., and Kinder, Donald R.. 2006. Making Sense of Issues through Media Frames: Understanding the Kosovo Crisis. Journal of Politics 68 (3): 640–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohm, Robert M. 1987. American Death Penalty Attitudes. Criminal Justice and Behavior 14 (3): 380–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohm, Robert M., Clark, Louise J., and Aveni, Adrian F.. 1991. Knowledge and Death Penalty Opinion: A Test of the Marshall Hypothesis. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 28 (3): 360–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borchard, Edwin M. 1932. Convicting the Innocent. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bowers, William. 1993. Research Note: Capital Punishment and Contemporary Values: People's Misgivings and the Court's Misperceptions. Law & Society Review 27 (1): 157–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branch v. Texas, 408 U.S. 238 (1972).
Carroll, William K., and Ratner, R. S.. 1999. Media Strategies and Political Projects: A Comparative Study of Social Movements. Canadian Journal of Sociology 24 (1): 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Center on Wrongful Convictions. Last modified March 11, 2005. The Maryland Exonerated: Kirk Bloodsworth. Retrieved November 24, 2006, from http://www.law.northwestern.edu/depts/clinic/wrongful/exonerations/.
The Center on Wrongful Convictions. 2007. A Constituency for the Innocent. Retrieved August 3, 2007, from http://www.law.northwestern.edu/wrongfulconvictions/History.htm.
Chebium, Raju. June 20, 2000. Kirk Bloodsworth, Twice Convicted of Rape and Murder, Exonerated by DNA Evidence. CNN.com. Retrieved November 24, 2006, from http://archives.cnn.com.
Chong, Dennis, and Druckman, James N.. 2007. Framing Theory. Annual Review of Political Science 10: 103–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CNN. November 8, 2002. Sniper Suspects Sent to Virginia for Trial. Retrieved December 16, 2006, from http://archives.cnn.com/2002/US/11/07/sniper.case/index.html.
Connors, Edward, Thomas Lundregan, Neal Miller, and Tom McEwen. June 1996. Convicted by Juries, Exonerated by Science: Case Studies in the Use of DNA Evidence to Establish Innocence after Trial. National Institute of Justice (U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs). Retrieved December 15, 2006, from http://www.ncjrs.gov/txtfiles/dnaevid.txt.
Crampton v. Ohio, 402 U.S. 183 (1971).
Cullen, Francis T., Bonnie S. Fisher, and Brandon K. Applegate. 2000. Public Opinion about Punishment and Corrections. In Tonry, Michael, ed., Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, Volume 27. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1–79.Google Scholar
Dardis, Frank, Baumgartner, Frank R., Boydstun, Amber E., Boef, Suzanna, and Shen, Fuyuan. 2007. Mass Communication and Society 10 (4). Forthcoming.
Dieter, Richard C. 2000. The Death Penalty in 2000: Year End Report. Washington, D.C., Death Penalty Information Center. Retrieved March 19, 2007, from http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/article.php?scid=45&did=488.
DPIC (Death Penalty Information Center). 2006a. Clemency. Retrieved March 13, 2007, from http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/article.php?did=126&scid=13.
DPIC. 2006b. Death Row Inmates by State. Retrieved March 13, 2007, from http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/article.php?scid=9&did=188#state.
DPIC. 2006c. Searchable Database of Executions [Database]. Retrieved March 13, 2007, from http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/executions.php.
DPIC. 2006d. Death Sentences in the United States from 1977 to 2005. Retrieved March 13, 2007, from http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/article.php?scid=9&did=847.
DPIC. 2006e. Innocence: List of Those Freed from Death Row. Retrieved March 13, 2007, from http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/article.php?scid=6&did=110.
DPIC. 2006f. The Death Penalty in 2006: Year End Report. Retrieved December 17, 2006, from http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/2006YearEnd.pdf.
Druckman, James N. 2001a. On the Limits of Framing Effects: Who Can Frame? Journal of Politics 63 (4): 1041–1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, James N. 2001b. The Implication of Framing Effects for Citizen Competence. Political Behavior 23 (3): 225–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, James N. 2004. Political Preference Formation: Competition, Deliberation, and the (Ir)relevance of Framing Effects. American Political Science Review 98 (4): 761–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, James N., and Nelson, Kjersten R.. 2003. Framing and Deliberation: How Citizens' Conversations Limit Elite Influence. American Journal of Political Science 47 (4): 729–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durham, Alexis M., Elrod, H. Preston, and Kinkade, Patrick T.. 1996. Public Support for the Death Penalty: Beyond Gallup. Justice Quarterly 13 (4): 705–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elder, Charles D., and Cobb, Roger W.. 1983. The Political Use of Symbols. New York, N.Y.: Longman.Google Scholar
Ellsworth, Phoebe, and Gross, Samuel R.. 1994. Hardening of the Attitudes: Americans' Views on the Death Penalty. Journal of Social Issues 50 (2): 19–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellsworth, Phoebe, and Ross, Lee. 1983. Public Opinion and Capital Punishment: A Close Examination of the Views of Abolitionists and Retentionists. Crime and Delinquency 29 (1): 116–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, Robert S., Stimson, James A., and MacKuen, Michael. 2002. The Macro Polity. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Espy, M. Watt, and John Ortiz Smykla. 2005. Executions in the United States, 1608–2002: The Espy File [Computer File]. 4th ICPSR ed. Compiled by M. Watt Espy and John Ortiz Smykla, University of Alabama. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [producer and distributor], updated 11/04/05.
Fan, David P., Keltner, Kathy A., and Wyatt, Robert O.. 2002. A Matter of Guilt or Innocence: How News Reports Affect Support for the Death Penalty in the United States. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 14 (4): 439–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Festinger, Leon. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Evanston, Ill.: Row, Peterson, and Co.Google Scholar
Fins, Deborah. 2006. Death Row U.S.A.: Fall 2006. Washington, D.C.: NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc. Retrieved March 13, 2007, from http://www.naacpldf.org/content/pdf/pubs/drusa/DRUSA_Fall_2006.pdf.
Fox, James Alan. 2005. Uniform Crime Reports (United States): Supplementary Homicide Reports, 1976–2003 [Computer File]. Compiled by Northeastern University, College of Criminal Justice. ICPSR04351-v1. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [producer and distributor], 2005–11-22.
Fox, James A., Radelet, Michael L., and Bonsteel, Julie L.. 1991. Death Penalty Opinion in the Post-Furman Years. New York University Review of Law and Social Change 28: 499–528.Google Scholar
Fox, James Alan, and Marianne W. Zawitz. 2006. Homicide Trends in the United States. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved March 16, 2007, from http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/homicide/tables/totalstab.htm.
Frisbie, Thomas, and Garrett, Randy. 1998. Victims of Justice.New York, N.Y.: Avon Books.Google Scholar
Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972).
Gallup Organization. Public opinion surveys conducted November 11, 1953 to May 5, 2006. Retrieved March 18, 2007, from the iPOLL Databank, The Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut, http://www.ropercenter.uconn.edu/ipoll.html.
Gilliam, Franklin D., Jr., and Iyengar, Shanto. 2000. Prime Suspects: The Influence of Local Television News on the Viewing Public. American Journal of Political Science 44 (3): 560–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gladwell, Malcolm. 2002. The Tipping Point. New York, N.Y.: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark S. 1978. Threshold Models of Collective Behavior. American Journal of Sociology 83 (6): 1420–1443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grasmick, Harold G., Davenport, Elizabeth, Chamlin, Mitchell B., and Bursik, Robert J. Jr. 1992. Protestant Fundamentalism and the Retributivist Doctrine of Punishment. Criminology 30 (1): 21–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grasmick, Harold G., and McGill, Ann. 1994. Religion, Attribution Style, and Punitiveness toward Juvenile Offenders. Criminology 32 (1): 23–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153 (1976).
Grisham, John. 2006. The Innocent Man. New York, N.Y.: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Gross, Samuel R. 1998. Update: American Public Opinion on the Death Penalty – It's Getting Personal. Cornell Law Review 83 (6): 1448–1475.Google Scholar
Gross, Samuel R., and Phoebe C. Ellsworth. 2003. Second Thoughts: Americans' Views on the Death Penalty at the Turn of the Century. In Garvey, Stephen P., ed., Beyond Repair? America's Death Penalty. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Gross, Samuel R., Jacoby, Kristen, Matheson, Daniel J., Montgomery, Nicholas, and Patil, Sujata. 2005. Exonerations in the United States 1989 through 2003. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 95 (2): 523–560.Google Scholar
Haddock, Geoffrey, and Zanna, Mark P.. 1998. Assessing the Impact of Affective and Cognitive Information in Predicting Attitudes toward Capital Punishment. Law and Human Behavior 22 (3): 325–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halim, Shaheen, and Stiles, Beverly L.. 2001. Differential Support for Police Use of Force, the Death Penalty, and Perceived Harshness of the Courts. Criminal Justice and Behavior 28 (1): 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, Ange-Marie. 2004. The Politics of Disgust: The Public Identity of the Welfare Queen. New York, N. Y.: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Herrera v. Collins, 506 U.S. 390 (1993).
Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 (2006).
House v. Bell, 126 S.Ct. 2064 (2006).
The Innocence Project. (n.d.) Kirk Bloodsworth Case Profile. Retrieved November 24, 2006, from http://www.innocenceproject.org/.
Jackson v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972).
Jacobs, David, and Carmichael, Jason T.. 2002. The Political Sociology of the Death Penalty: A Pooled Time-Series Analysis. American Sociological Review 67 (1): 109–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janson, Philip, and Ryder, Louise K.. 1983. Crime and the Elderly: The Relationship between Risk and Fear. Gerontologist 23 (2): 207–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, Bryan D., and Baumgartner, Frank R.. 2005. The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Junkin, Tim. 2004. Bloodsworth: The True Story of the First Death Row Inmate Exonerated by DNA. Chapel Hill, N.C.: Algonquin Books.Google Scholar
Jurek v. Texas, 428 U.S. 153 (1976).
The Justice Project. (n.d.) The Problem: A Broken System, Kirk Bloodsworth. Retrieved November 24, 2006, from http://www.thejusticeproject.org/press/bloodsworth/.
Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos. 1985. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision-Making under Risk. Econometrica 47 (2): 263–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kansas v. Marsh, 547 U.S. 1037 (2006).
Kellstedt, Paul M. 2000. Media Framing and the Dynamics of Racial Policy Preferences. American Journal of Political Science 44 (2): 245–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Jae-on, and Mueller, Charles W.. 1978a. Introduction to Factor Analysis: What It Is and How to Do It. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Jae-on, and Mueller, Charles W.. 1978b. Factor Analysis: Statistical Methods and Practical Issues. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingdon, John W. 1984. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar
Kleinman, Paula H., and David, Deborah S.. 1973. Victimization and Perception of Crime in a Ghetto Community. Criminology 11 (3): 307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, Regina. 2000. The Politics of Force: Media and the Construction of Police Brutality. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, Dan A., and Salem, Greta. 1986. Fear of Crime: Incivility and the Production of a Social Problem. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
Liebman, James S., Fagan, Jeffrey, Gelman, Andrew, West, Valerie, Davies, Garth, and Kiss, Alexander. 2002. A Broken System, Part II: Why There Is So Much Error in Capital Cases, and What Can Be Done about It. Columbia University Law School. Retrieved March 18, 2007, from http://www2.law.columbia.edu/brokensystem2/index2.html.Google Scholar
Lockhart v. McCree, 476 U.S. 162 (1986).
Lord, Charles G., Ross, Lee, and Lepper, Mark R.. 1979. Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37 (11): 2098–2109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGautha v. California, 402 U.S. 183 (1971).
McPherson, Marlys. 1978. Realities and Perceptions of Crime at the Neighborhood Level. Victimology 3 (3–4): 319–328.Google Scholar
Mueller, Robert S., III. 2006. Preliminary Semiannual Uniform Crime Report 2006. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation.
National Prisoner Statistics. 1974. Capital Punishment, 1971–1972 (SD-NPS-CP-1). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration.
Nelson, Thomas E., Clawson, Rosalee A., and Oxley, Zoe M.. 1997. Media Framing of a Civil Liberties Conflict and Its Effect on Tolerance. American Political Science Review 91 (3): 567–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nice, David C. 1992. The States and the Death Penalty. The Western Political Quarterly 45 (4): 1037–1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oregon v. Guzek, 546 U.S. 517 (2006).
Page, Benjamin I., and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 1983. Effects of Public Opinion on Public Policy. The American Political Science Review 77 (1): 175–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Benjamin I., and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans' Policy Preferences. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penry v. Lynaugh, 492 U.S. 302 (1989).
Pierce, Glenn L., and Radelet, Michael L.. 2005. The Impact of Legally Inappropriate Factors on Death Sentencing for California Homicides, 1990–1999. Santa Clara Law Review 46: 1–47.Google Scholar
Pollock, Philip H. III. 1994. Issues, Values, and Critical Moments: Did “Magic” Johnson Transform Public Opinion on AIDS? American Journal of Political Science 38 (2): 426–446.Google Scholar
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1984. The Polarization of American Politics. The Journal of Politics 46 (4): 1061–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proffitt v. Florida, 428 U.S. 153 (1976).
Quattrone, George A., and Tversky, Amos. 1988. Contrasting Rational and Psychological Analyses of Political Choice. American Political Science Review 82 (3): 719–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radelet, Michael L., Bedau, Hugo Adam, and Putnam, Constance E.. 1992. In Spite of Innocence. Boston, Mass.: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Radelet, Michael L., and Borg, Marian J.. 2000. The Changing Nature of the Death Penalty Debates. Annual Review of Sociology 26: 43–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rankin, Joseph H. 1979. Changing Attitudes toward Capital Punishment. Social Forces 58 (1): 194–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William H. 1980. Implications from the Disequilibrium of Majority Rule for the Study of Institutions. American Political Science Review 74 (2): 432–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William H. 1982. Liberalism against Populism: A Confrontation between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice. Prospect Heights, Ill.: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
Riker, William H. 1983. Political Theory and the Art of Heresthetics. In Finifter, Ada, ed., Political Science: The State of the Discipline. Washington, D.C.: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Riker, William H. 1984. The Heresthetics of Constitution-Making: The Presidency in 1787, with Comments on Determinism and Rational Choice. American Political Science Review 78 (1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William H. 1986. The Art of Political Manipulation. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Riker, William H. 1988. Liberalism against Populism. Prospect Heights, Ill.: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
Riker, William H. 1990. Heresthetic and Rhetoric in the Spatial Model. In Enelow, James M. and Hinich, Melvin J., eds., Advances in the Spatial Theory of Voting. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William H. 1996. The Strategy of Rhetoric. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts v. Louisiana, 428 U.S. 153 (1976).
Roper v. Simmons, 534 U.S. 551 (2005).
Sarat, Austin, and Vidmar, Neil. 1976. Public Opinion, the Death Penalty, and the Eighth Amendment: Testing the Marshall Hypothesis. Wisconsin Law Review 1: 171.Google Scholar
Scheck, Barry, Neufeld, Peter, and Dwyer, Jim. 2000. Actual Innocence: Five Days to Execution, and Other Dispatches from the Wrongly Convicted. New York, N.Y.: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas C. 1971. Dynamic Models of Segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 1 (2): 143–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schelling, Thomas C. 1978. Micromotives and Macrobehavior. New York, N.Y.: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Schlup v. Delo, 513 U.S. 298 (1995).
Schneider, Anne, and Ingram, Helen. 1993. Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Politics and Policy. The American Political Science Review 87 (2): 334–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1979. Institutional Arrangements and Equilibrium in Multidimensional Voting. American Journal of Political Science 23 (1): 27–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Weingast, Barry R.. 1981. Structure-Induced Equilibrium and Legislative Choice. Public Choice 37 (3): 503–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Weingast, Barry R.. 1987. The Institutional Foundations of Committee Power. American Political Science Review 81 (1): 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snell, Tracy L. 2005. Capital Punishment, 2005 (NCJ-215083). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved March 13, 2007, from http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/cp05.pdf.
Soroka, Stuart Neil. 2002. Agenda-Setting Dynamics in Canada. Vancouver, B.C.: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Soss, Joe, Langbein, Laura, and Metelko, Alan R.. 2003. Why Do White Americans Support the Death Penalty? The Journal of Politics 65 (2): 397–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sparks, Holloway. 2003. Queens, Teens, and Model Mothers: Race, Gender, and the Discourse of Welfare Reform. In Schram, Sanford, Soss, Joe, and , Richard C. Fording, eds., Race and the Politics of Welfare Reform. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stack, Steven. 2000. Support for the Death Penalty: A Gender-Specific Model. Sex Roles 43 (3–4): 163–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stafford, Mark C., and Galle, Omer R.. 1984. Victimization Rates, Exposure to Risk, and Fear of Crime. Criminology 22 (2): 173–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stimson, James A. 1991. Public Opinion in America: Moods, Cycles, and Swings. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, D. Garth, Scheppele, Kim Lane, and Stinchcombe, Arthur L.. 1979. Salience of Crime and Support for Harsher Criminal Sanctions. Social Problems 26 (4): 413–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terkildsen, Nayda, and Damore, David F.. 1999. The Dynamics of Racialized Media Coverage in Congressional Elections. The Journal of Politics 61 (3): 680–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terkildsen, Nayda, and Schnell, Frauke. 1997. How Media Frames Move Public Opinion: An Analysis of the Women's Movement. Political Research Quarterly 50 (4): 879–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R., and Weber, Renee. 1982. Support for the Death Penalty; Instrumental Response to Crime, or Symbolic Attitude? Law & Society Review 17 (1): 21–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uniform Crime Reporting Program. 2006. Crime in the United States 2005. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation. Retrieved March 16, 2007, from http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/05cius/data/table_01.html.
United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570 (1968).
Vidmar, Neil, and Ellsworth, Phoebe. 1974. Public Opinion and the Death Penalty. Stanford Law Review 26 (6): 1245–1270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warden, Rob, and Radelet, Michael L.. 2008. Encyclopedia of Wrongful Convictions. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Warr, Mark. 1980. The Accuracy of Public Beliefs about Crime. Social Forces 59 (2): 456–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warr, Mark. 1982. The Accuracy of Public Beliefs about Crime: Further Evidence. Criminology 20 (2): 185–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warr, Mark. 1995. Poll Trends: Public Opinion on Crime and Punishment. The Public Opinion Quarterly 59 (2): 296–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, Duncan J. 1999. Networks, Dynamics, and the Small-World Phenomenon. American Journal of Sociology 105 (2): 493–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, Duncan J. 2003. Six Degrees: The Science of a Connected Age. New York, N.Y.: Norton.Google Scholar
Weems v. United States, 217 U.S. 349 (1910).
Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510 (1968).
Wood, B. Dan, and Doan, Alesha. 2003. The Politics of Problem Definition: Applying and Testing Threshold Models. American Journal of Political Science 47 (4): 640–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodson v. North Carolina, 428 U.S. 153 (1976).
Woolley, John T. 2000. Using Media-Based Data in Studies of Politics. American Journal of Political Science 44 (1): 156–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Robert L. 1991. Race, Conceptions of Crime and Justice, and Support for the Death Penalty. Social Psychology Quarterly 54 (1): 67–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Robert L. 1992. Religious Orientation, Race and Support for the Death Penalty. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 31 (1): 76–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Frank R. Baumgartner, Pennsylvania State University, Suzanna L. De Boef, Pennsylvania State University, Amber E. Boydstun, Pennsylvania State University
  • Book: The Decline of the Death Penalty and the Discovery of Innocence
  • Online publication: 05 September 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790638.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Frank R. Baumgartner, Pennsylvania State University, Suzanna L. De Boef, Pennsylvania State University, Amber E. Boydstun, Pennsylvania State University
  • Book: The Decline of the Death Penalty and the Discovery of Innocence
  • Online publication: 05 September 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790638.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Frank R. Baumgartner, Pennsylvania State University, Suzanna L. De Boef, Pennsylvania State University, Amber E. Boydstun, Pennsylvania State University
  • Book: The Decline of the Death Penalty and the Discovery of Innocence
  • Online publication: 05 September 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790638.013
Available formats
×