Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T08:07:03.482Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - How to get away with peeking at data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

George F. Estabrook
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Get access

Summary

Examples

Paulo watched two male Mus domesticus (house mouse) interacting to establish dominance. For each 3 second interval, he recorded + if a mouse did a particular behavior, such as groom himself, or – if that behavior was not performed. This sequence was recorded for one of the behaviors of the finally dominant mouse.

– – – + – – + – + – – – – + – + – – + – + + – – + – – + + – + – –

Paulo wondered if the frequency with which the mouse performed this behavior changed at some point in the interaction; perhaps at the time he began to assume dominance. So Paulo looked through the data sequence for the time when the difference between the frequency before and the frequency after is the greatest. Then he used the hypothesis that the behavior is performed independently with the same probability for each interval to test if the frequency with which the behavior is performed before this time is different from that after this time. Somehow, he was not surprised that these frequencies turned out to be significantly different. After all, he peeked at the sequence to divide it at the point of maximal difference.

Jennifer and her colleagues observed fossil Forams (little shelled animals that lived at the bottom of the sea hundreds of millions of years ago) that had changed size through evolutionary time. Looking at a plot of size vs time before present, Forams seemed to be getting bigger. In addition, the plot of points seemed to bend at a particular time in the past, suggesting that the rate of increase after that time was more rapid. Had the evolutionary rate changed at that time? So they used the computational ANCOVA technique, described in Section 9.3, to test for equality of rate before and after that time. Somehow, they were not surprised that the rates were different. After all, they had peeked at the data to find the time before and after which rate difference was greatest.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×