Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T05:29:24.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Responsibility for Innocence Lost

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Peter A. French
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Get access

Summary

In “The Loss of Innocence and the Things that Remain,” Michael McKenna takes up what he calls my “controversial thesis that we morally competent adults have an obligation to usher innocents from their moral condition, and this involves opening children up to the possibility of evil.” McKenna addresses questions I originally neglected in a chapter of my Responsibility Matters on “losing innocence for the sake of responsibility.” These questions are crucial to a serious consideration of the crux of my thesis that adults have a moral responsibility to facilitate the loss of innocence in children. I used that chapter in developing the first draft of the second year's PDTCs session on moral conflict issues. The topic, it turned out, troubled a number of the chaplains who had observed firsthand how innocence lost is all too often replaced with anger and brutality rather than any hoped-for moral wisdom. Some chaplains spoke with me about their worry that confronting one's loss of innocence was most likely to be postponed by Marines with whom they were deployed in favor of losing some other part of themselves in a bottle or by taking out the rage their experiences in Iraq had aggravated when they returned to CONUS and confronted their own children and spouses.

In order to avoid confusion, the type of innocence McKenna and I are talking about is a moral status, not a particular state with respect to an untoward event. The innocent, in the sense in which McKenna and I are interested, might be described as in a state, vis-à-vis the ascription of justifiable moral responsibility, comparable to that of Adam and Eve before the Fall. Innocence, in this sense, is the purity of moral virginity. It is not the purity of always acting as morality prescribes.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×