Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T03:23:54.055Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Managerial objectives of formal control: high motivation control mechanisms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Antoinette Weibel
Affiliation:
University of Liechtenstein
Sim B. Sitkin
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Laura B. Cardinal
Affiliation:
University of Houston
Katinka M. Bijlsma-Frankema
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Get access

Summary

Formal managerial controls, though almost vanished as a subject in contemporary management science, are still a ubiquitous feature of modern organizations. Formal managerial control can be understood as the process by which managers officially define their subordinates' performance goals and standards, measure and monitor employees' conduct and output, and tie rewards and sanctions to goal attainment. Though interest in control scholarship has waned, it remains a popular and current topic for the practice of management. A possible reason for the high practical interest in this topic is that formal managerial controls are thought to solve the cooperation problem, a problem which has been referred to as the core of the managerial task (Miller, 1992). The cooperation problem stems from the organizational members having different and often conflicting goals, and these individual goals often conflict with the goals of the organization. This problem is most pronounced in the case of the corporate commons. The problem of the commons depicts a situation where benefits are jointly gained and shared but costs are borne individually. Because no employee can be excluded from the commons, some amount of free-riding is likely to occur (Hardin, 1968). Simon (1991) argues that the quality and success of an organization depends vitally on its ability to solve the problem of the commons.

Thus it can be argued that one of the main managerial objectives is to solve the problem of cooperation. In general two solutions are discussed.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, P. S. and Borys, B. 1996. Two types of bureaucracy: enabling and coercive. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 61–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alchian, A. A. and Demsetz, H. 1972. Production, information costs and economic organization. American Economic Review, 62: 777–795.Google Scholar
Aldefer, C. P. 1969. Empirical test of a new theory of human needs. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 4 (2): 142–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, E. and Oliver, R. L. 1987. Perspectives on behavior-based versus outcome-based salesforce control systems. Journal of Marketing, 51: 76–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Argyris, C. 1957. The individual and organization – some problems of mutual adjustment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2 (1): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Argyris, C. 1959. The individual and organization – an empirical test. Administrative Science Quarterly, 4 (2): 145–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Argyris, C. 1964. Integrating the individual and the organization. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Baldauf, A., Cravens, D. W., and Piercy, N. F. 2005. Sales management control research – synthesis and an agenda for future research. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 25 (1): 7–26.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. 1977. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84 (2): 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkema, H. G. 1995. Do executives work harder when they are monitored?Kyklos, 48: 19–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, J. N. 1993. Criticism (informal negative feedback) as a source of perceived unfairness in organizations: effects, mechanisms, and countermeasures. In Cropanzano, R. (ed.), Justice in the workplace:150–170. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F. and Leary, M. R. 1995. The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117: 497–529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bies, R. J. and Moag, J. S. 1986. Interactional justice: communication criteria of fairness. In Lewicki, R. J., Sheppard, B. H., and Bazerman, B. H. (eds.), Research on negotiations in organizations, I: 43–55. Greenwich CT: JAI.Google Scholar
Bijlsma-Frankema, K. and Costa, A. C. 2005. Understanding the trust-control nexus. International Sociology, 20 (3): 259–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bijlsma-Frankema, K., Sitkin, S. B., and Weibel, A. 2008. Breaking out of inter-group distrust: judges and administrators in a court of law. Hochschule Liechtenstein, 1–54.Google Scholar
Black, A. E. and Deci, E. L. 2000. The effects of instructors' autonomy support and students' autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: a self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84 (6): 740–756.3.0.CO;2-3>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burks, S., Carpenter, J., and Goette, L. 2006. Performance pay and the erosion of worker cooperation field experimental evidence. Bonn: IZA.Google Scholar
Cardinal, L. B. 2001. Technological innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: the use of organizational control in managing research and development. Organization Science, 12 (1): 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardinal, L. B., Sitkin, S. B., Long, C. P., and Miller, C. C. 2010. The genesis of control configurations during organizational founding. Working paper.
Challagalla, G. N. and Shervani, T. A. 1997. A measurement model of the dimensions and types of output and behavior control: an empirical test in a salesforce context. Journal of Business Research, 39 (3): 159–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conger, J. A. and Kanungo, R. N. 1988. The empowerment process: integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13 (3): 471–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creed, W. E. D. and Miles, E. R. 1996. Trust in organizations. A conceptual framework linking organizational forms, managerial philosophies, and the opportunity costs of control. In Kramer, R. M. and Tyler, T. (eds.), Trust in organizations: frontiers of theory and research:16–38. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawes, R. M. 1980. Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31: 169–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charms, R. 1968. Personal causation: the internal affective determinants of behavior. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cremer, D. and Knippenberg, D. 2002. How do leaders promote cooperation? The effects of charisma and procedural fairness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87 (5): 858–866.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cremer, D. and Vugt, M. 1999. Social identification effects in social dilemmas: a transformation of motives. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29 (7): 871–893.3.0.CO;2-I>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deci, E. L. 1975. Intrinsic motivation. New York, NY: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deci, E. L. 1980. The psychology of self-determination. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Deci, E. L. 1985. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deci, E. L. and Flaste, R. 1995. Why we do what we do: understanding self-motivation. Rochester, NY: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Deci, E. L. and Ryan, R. M. 1985. The general causality orientations scale – self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19 (2): 109–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deci, E. L. and Ryan, R. M. 2000. The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11: 227–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deci, E. L. and Ryan, R. M. (eds.). 2002. Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
Deci, E. L., Koestner, R. and Ryan, R. M. 1999. A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125: 627–668.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deutsch, M. 1960. The effect of motivational orientation upon trust and suspicion. Human Relations, 13: 123–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, R. 1979. Contested terrain: the transformation of the workplace in the twentieth century. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Eisenberger, R. and Cameron, J. 1996. Detrimental effects of rewards: reality or myth?American Psychologist, 51 (11): 1,153–1,166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisenberger, R., Pierce, W. D. and Cameron, J. 1999. Effects of reward on intrinsic motivation – negative, neutral, and positive: comment on Deci, Koestner, and Ryan (1999). Psychological Bulletin, 125 (6): 677–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M. 1985. Control: organizational and economic approaches. Management Science, 31 (2): 134–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falk, A. and Kosfeld, M. 2006. The hidden costs of control. American Economic Review, 96 (5): 1,611–1,630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fayol, H. and Urwick, L. F. 1963. General and industrial management. London, UK: Pitman.Google Scholar
Fehr, E., Falk, A. and Fischbacher, U. 2003. On the nature of fair behavior. Economic Inquiry, 41: 20–26.Google Scholar
Feld, L. P. and Frey, B. S. 2007. Tax compliance as the result of a psychological tax contract: the role of incentives and responsive regulation. Law and Policy, 29 (1): 102–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, A. 1974. Beyond contract: work, power and trust relations. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Frey, B. S. 1997a. A constitution for knaves crowds out civic virtues. Economic Journal, 107 (443): 1,043–1,053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, B. S. 1997b. Not just for the money: an economic theory of personal motivation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Frey, B. S. and Jegen, R. 2001. Motivation crowding theory: a survey of empirical evidence. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15 (5): 589–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, B. S. and Osterloh, M. F. 2002. Successful management by motivation. Balancing intrinsic and extrinsic incentives. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Gagne, M. and Deci, E. L. 2005. Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26 (4): 331–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavin, J. H. and Mason, R. O. 2004. The virtuous organization: the value of happiness in the workplace. Organizational Dynamics, 33 (4): 379–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghoshal, S. and Moran, P. 1996. Bad practice: a critique of the transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review, 21: 13–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gittell, J. H. 2000a. Organizing work to support relational coordination. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 11 (3): 517–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gittell, J. H. 2000b. Paradox of coordination and control. California Management Review, 42 (3): 101–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gneezy, U. and Rustichini, A. 2000a. A fine is a price. Journal of Legal Studies, 29 (1): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gneezy, U. and Rustichini, A. 2000b. Pay enough or don't pay at all. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115 (3): 791–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouldner, A. W. 1954. Patterns of industrial bureaucracy. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Gulati, R. 1998. Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 293–317.3.0.CO;2-M>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hackman, J. R. and Lawler, E. E. 1971. Employee reactions to job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55 (3): 259–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hackman, J. R. and Oldham, G. R. 1974. The job diagnostic survey: an instrument for the diagnosis of jobs and the evaluation of job redesign projects. New Haven, CT: Yale University.Google Scholar
Hardin, G. 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162: 1,243–1,248.Google ScholarPubMed
Hattie, J. and Timperley, H. 2007. The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77 (1): 81–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, R., Hartley, P. and Skelton, A. 2002. The conscientious consumer: reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning. Studies in Higher Education, 27 (1): 53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, T. 1909. Leviathan. In Pogson, W. G. (ed.), Leviathan. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Jensen, M. C. and Meckling, W. H. 1976. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3: 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, S. C. 1973. Self- and interpersonal evaluations: esteem theories versus consistency theories. Psychological Bulletin, 79 (3): 185–199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirsch, L. J. 2004. Deploying common systems globally: the dynamics of control. Information Systems Research, 15 (4): 374–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kluger, A. N. and DeNisi, A. 1996. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119 (2): 254–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohn, A. 1993. Punished by rewards: the trouble with gold stars, incentive plans, As, praise, and other bribes. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Kollock, P. 1998. Social dilemmas: the anatomy of cooperation. Annual Review of Sociology, 22: 183–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, R. M. 1999. Trust and distrust in organizations: emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50: 569–598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kruglanski, A. W. 1970. Attributing trustworthiness in supervisor–worker relations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 6: 214–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lam, C. F. and Gurland, S. T. 2008. Self-determined work motivation predicts job outcomes, but what predicts self-determined work motivation?Journal of Research in Personality, 42 (4): 1,109–1,115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leana, C. R., Ahlbrandt, R. S. and Murrell, A. J. 1992. The effects of employee involvement programs on unionized workers' attitudes, perceptions, and preferences in decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 35: 861–873.Google Scholar
Lind, E. A. and Tyler, T. R. 1988. The social psychology of procedural justice. New York, NY: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, E. A. and Latham, G. P. 1990. A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
London, M. and Smither, J. W. 1999. Empowered self-development and continuous learning. Human Resource Management, 38 (1): 3–15.3.0.CO;2-M>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
London, M., Larsen, H. H. and Thisted, L. N. 1999. Relationships between feedback and self-development. Group and Organization Management, 24 (1): 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, R. C. and Davis, J. H. 1999. The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: a field quasi experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84 (1): 123–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, R. C. and Schoorman, F. D. 1998. Differentiating antecedents of organizational commitment: a test of March and Simon's model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19: 15–28.3.0.CO;2-C>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, D. 1960. The human side of enterprise. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Miller, G. 1992. Managerial dilemmas. The political economy of hierarchy. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niehoff, B. P. and Moorman, R. H. 1993. Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36: 527–556.Google Scholar
Oldham, G. R. and Cummings, A. 1996. Employee creativity: personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39 (3): 607–634.Google Scholar
Oliver, R. L. and Anderson, E. 1994. An empirical test of the consequences of behavior and outcome-based sales control systems. Journal of Marketing, 58: 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osterloh, M. F. and Bruno, S. 2000. Motivation, knowledge transfer and organizational form. Organization Science, 11: 538–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, C. A. L. 1991. An assessment of extrinsic feedback on participation, role perceptions, motivation, and job-satisfaction in a self-managed system for monitoring group achievement. Human Relations, 44 (5): 517–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettijohn, C., Pettijohn, L. S., Taylor, A. J. and Keillor, B. D. 2001. Are performance appraisals a bureaucratic exercise or can they be used to enhance sales-force satisfaction and commitment?Psychology and Marketing, 18 (4): 337–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeffer, J. 1994. Competitive advantage through people: unleashing the power of the work force. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. 1971. Biology and knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Piercy, N. F., Cravens, D. W., Lane, N. and Vorhies, D. W. 2006. Driving organizational citizenship behaviors and salesperson in-role behavior performance: the role of management control and perceived organizational support. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34 (2): 244–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramaswami, S. N. 1996. Marketing controls and dysfunctional employee behaviors: a test of traditional and contingency theory postulates. Journal of Marketing, 60 (2): 105–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhoades, L. and Eisenberger, R. 2002. Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87 (4): 698–714.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rhoades, L., Eisenberger, R. and Armeli, S. 2001. Affective commitment to the organization: the contribution of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 (5): 825–836.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rhodes, S. R. and Steers, R. M. 1981. Conventional vs. worker-owned organizations. Human Relations, 34 (12): 1,013–1,035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, T. L. 1995. Social loafing on cognitive tasks – an examination of the sucker effect. Journal of Business and Psychology, 9 (3): 337–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, R. M. 1995. Psychological needs and the facilitation of integrative processes. Journal of Personality, 63 (3): 397–427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan, R. M. and Deci, E. L. 2000. Self-determination theory and the facilitating of intrinsic motivation. American Psychologist, 55: 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L. and Grolnick, W. S. 1995. Autonomy, relatedness and the self: their relation to development and psychopathology. In Cicchetti, D. and Cohen, D. J. (eds.), Manual of developmental psychopathology:618–655. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Ryan, R. M., Sheldon, K. M., Kasser, T. and Deci, E. L. 1996. All goals are not created equal: an organismic perspective in the nature of goals and their regulation. In Gollwitzer, P. M. and Bargh, J. A. (eds.), The psychology of action. Linking cognition and motivation to behavior:7–26. New York, NY: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
Rynes, S. L., Gerhart, B. and Parks, L. 2005. Personnel psychology: performance evaluation and pay for performance. Annual Review of Psychology, 56: 571–600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shapiro, S. P. 1987. The social control of impersonal trust. American Journal of Sociology, 93 (3): 623–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. A. 1991. Organization and markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5 (2): 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sitkin, S. B. 1995. On the positive effect of legalization on trust. Research on Negotiation in Organizations, 5: 185–217.Google Scholar
Sitkin, S. B. and Stickel, D. 1996. The road to hell: the dynamics of distrust in an era of quality. In Kramer, R. and Tyler, T. (eds.), Trust in organizations: frontiers of theory and research:196–215. London, UK: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sitkin, S. B., Sutcliffe, K. M. and Schroeder, R. G. 1994. Distinguishing control from learning in total quality management: a contingency perspective. Academy of Management Review, 19 (3): 537–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snell, S. A. 1992. Control-theory in strategic human-resource management – the mediating effect of administrative information. Academy of Management Journal, 35 (2): 292–327.Google Scholar
Spreitzer, G. M. and Mishra, A. K. 1999. Giving up control without losing control – trust and its substitutes' effects on managers' involving employees in decision making. Group and Organization Management, 24 (2): 155–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spreitzer, G. M., Sutcliffe, K., Dutton, J., Sonenshein, S. and Grant, A. M. 2005. A socially embedded model of thriving at work. Organization Science, 16 (5): 537–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stajkovic, A. O. and Luthans, F. 1997. A meta-analysis of the effects of organizational behavior modification on task performance. Academy of Management Journal, 40: 1,122–1,149.Google Scholar
Stajkovic, A. O. and Luthans, F. 2003. Behavioral management and task performance in organizations: conceptual background, meta-analysis, and test of alternative models. Personnel Psychology, 56 (1): 155–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strickland, L. H. 1958. Surveillance and trust. Journal of Personality, 26 (2): 200–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tannenbaum, A. S. 1968. Control in organizations. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Tannenbaum, R. and Schmid, W. H. 1958. How to choose a leadership pattern. Harvard Business Review, 36 (2): 94–101.Google Scholar
Thompson, P. J. and Warhurst, C. 1998. Workplaces of the future. Basingstoke: Macmillan Business.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, T. R. and Degoey, P. 1995. Collective restraint in social dilemmas: procedural justice and social identification effects on support for authorities. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology, 69: 482–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walton, R. E. 1985. From control to commitment in the workplace. Harvard Business Review, 63 (Mar-Apr): 77–84.Google Scholar
Wells, C. V. and Kipnis, D. 2001. Trust, dependency, and control in the contemporary organization. Journal of Business and Psychology, 15 (4): 593–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westin, A. F. 1992. Two key factors that belong in a macroergonomic analysis of electronic monitoring – employee perceptions of fairness and the climate of organizational trust or distrust. Applied Ergonomics, 23 (1): 35–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, R. W. 1959. Motivation reconsidered: the concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66: 297–333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zucker, L. G. 1986. Production of trust: institutional sources of economic structure, 1840–1920. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8: 53–111.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×