Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T14:37:55.747Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - RMNO and quality control of scientific advice to policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2011

Bert de Wit
Affiliation:
Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
Justus Lentsch
Affiliation:
Heinrich Böll Foundation
Peter Weingart
Affiliation:
Universität Bielefeld, Germany
Get access

Summary

RMNO, the Advisory Council for Research on Spatial Planning, Nature and the Environment in the Netherlands

RMNO, the Advisory Council for Research on Spatial Planning, Nature and the Environment, is a knowledge broker, focusing on the knowledge for the mid- to long-term that is needed in order to solve or mitigate societal problems. This knowledge is thought to be relevant for societal groups, policymakers and politicians. Policymakers can use this knowledge to underpin their strategic policies.

RMNO's main clients are five ministries, but RMNO nowadays also works for provinces and other decentralised authorities.

RMNO deals with the articulation of strategic knowledge needs, the assessment of available knowledge, the formulation of research questions, the evaluation of research programmes and the utilisation of knowledge in policymaking. Advice about knowledge infrastructure and networks is also one of the products of RMNO.

RMNO is an independent advisory council, financed by the five ministries mentioned above. The leading ministry is the Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment which also appoints RMNO's members. They fall into three categories: policymakers (directors of departments, research coordinators), scientists who are interested in societal problems and people from business and societal groups.

Advice and studies provided by the Council have either been requested by one or more ministries or have been produced on the Council's own initiative. RMNO does not allocate research money or research grants. That is the task of universities and the NWO, the Dutch Foundation for Scientific Research.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Politics of Scientific Advice
Institutional Design for Quality Assurance
, pp. 139 - 156
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abma, T. 2001. ‘Variatie in beleidsevaluaties/Variations in policy evaluation’, in Abma, T. and Veld, R. In't (eds.), Handboek beleidswetenschap (Handbook of Policy Sciences), Meppel: Uitgeverij Boom.Google Scholar
Bergmann, Matthias, Brohmann, Bettina, Hofmann, Esther, Loibl, M. Céline, Rehaag, Regine, Schramm, Engelbert and Voß, Jan-Peter 2005. Qualitätskriterien transdisziplinärer Forschung. Ein Leitfaden für die formative Evaluation von Forschungsprojekten. – Quality Criteria for Transdisciplinary Research. A Guide for the Formative Evaluation of Research Project, ISOE-Studientexte Nr. 13, Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Hajer, M.A. and Wagenaar, H. (eds.) 2003. Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society, Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Halffman, W. and Hoppe, R. 2005. ‘Science policy boundaries: A changing division of labour in Dutch expert policy advice’, in Sabine, Maasen and Peter, Weingart (eds.), Democratization of Expertise? Exploring Novel Forms of Scientific Advice in Political Decision-Making, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 135–52.Google Scholar
Halffman, W. 2008. States of Nature: Nature and fish stock reports for policy, Report for the Netherlands Consultative Committee of Sector Councils for research and development, RMNO preliminary study V.13, The Hague.Google Scholar
Hisschemöller, M. 1998. Kennisbenutting en politieke keuze: Een dilemma voor het milieubeleid? (Knowledge Utilisation and Political Choice: A Dilemma for Environmental Policy?), Werkdocument no. 65, Den Haag, Rathenau-Instituut.Google Scholar
Hoppe, R. and Huijs, S. 2003. Werk op de grenzen van wetenschap en beleid. Paradoxen en dilemma's (Work on the Boundaries of Science and Policy), Paradoxes and Dilemmas. RMNO nr. 157, Den Haag.Google Scholar
In't, R.J. 2000. Willingly and Knowingly. The Role of Knowledge About Nature and The Environment in Policy Processes RMNO, Utrecht, The Netherlands: Lemma.Google Scholar
Veld, R.J. In't 2001. Eerherstel voor Cassandra/Rehabilitation for Cassandra (available in English) WRR, RMNO, Den Haag.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S. 2004. ‘The idiom of co-production’, in Sheila, Jasanoff (ed.), States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order, London: Routledge, pp. 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeuw, F. 2001. ‘Evaluatieonderzoek, auditing en controle in Nederland anno 2000/Evaluation Research, auditing and control in the Netherlands in 2000’, in Abma, T. and Veld, R. In't (eds.), Handboek beleidswetenschap, Meppel: Uitgeverij Boom.Google Scholar
,KNAW 2005. Verklaring van Wetenschappelijke Onafhankelijkheid/Declaration of Scientific Independence, Amsterdam: KNAW.Google Scholar
,RMNO 2001. Disaster, Failure Or Success? Towards a Better Interaction Between Scientists, Policymakers and Societal Groups, RMNO nr. 152, Den Haag.Google Scholar
Spaapen, J., Dijstelbloem, H. and Wamelink, F. 2004. A Model for the Evaluation of Research in the Context of Application. Self-Evaluation of Two Pharmaceutical Faculties in a New National System of Evaluation, Den Haag: COS.Google Scholar
Tweede, Kamer (Dutch Parliament) 2004/2005. Grote Projecten uitvergroot. Een infrastructuur voor besluitvorming/Mega Projects Magnified. An Infrastructure for Decision-Making, TK vergaderjaar 2004/2005, nr. 29283, nr 6.
Weingart, , , Peter and Lentsch, , , Justus 2006. Standards and Best Practices of Scientific Policy Advice. Round Table Discussion with Sir David King, Chief Scientific Adviser to the British Government, Berlin: Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×