Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-11T11:25:52.590Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - The International Criminal Court

Nuremberg and Tokyo

from PART C - INTERNATIONAL PROSECUTIONS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Robert Cryer
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
Hakan Friman
Affiliation:
University College London
Darryl Robinson
Affiliation:
Queen's University, Ontario
Elizabeth Wilmshurst
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The creation of a permanent international criminal court with potentially worldwide jurisdiction is one of the most important developments in international criminal law. The Statute of the International Criminal Court has not only established a new judicial institution to investigate and try international offences, but has also set out a new code of international criminal law. This chapter describes the steps leading to the establishment of the ICC, its principal features, early developments and some of the legal and political responses to the Court; it also attempts a brief assessment of the Court's first years, while recognizing that its practice is still at a very early stage.

The creation of the ICC

In spite of the so-called Nuremberg Promise that the trials after the Second World War would set a precedent for others, there was no early successor to the Nuremberg and Tokyo Tribunals to prosecute international crimes at the international level. There had been earlier proposals for a permanent international criminal court and a proposal was discussed during the negotiations on the 1948 Genocide Convention, but the Convention as agreed looks only to the possibility of such a court in the future. Article VI provides that persons charged with genocide are to be tried by a court in the territory where the act was committed or ‘by such international penal tribunal as may have jurisdiction with respect to those Contracting Parties which shall have accepted its jurisdiction’.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benzing, Markus, ‘The Complementarity Regime of the International Criminal Court: International Criminal Justice between State Sovereignty and the Fight against Impunity’ (2003) 7 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broomhall, Bruce, International Justice and the International Criminal Court: Between Sovereignty and the Rule of Law (Oxford, 2003).Google Scholar
Cassese, Antonio, Gaeta, Paola and Jones, John R. W. D. (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary (Oxford, 2002).CrossRef
Doria, José, Bassiouni, M. Cherif and Gasser, Hans-Peter (eds.), The Legal Regime of the International Criminal Court (Leiden, 2009).
Kirsch, Philippe and Holmes, John, ‘The Rome Conference of an International Criminal Court: The Negotiating Process’ (1999) 93 American Journal of International Law2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleffner, Jann, Complementarity in the Rome Statute and National Criminal Jurisdictions (Oxford, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lattimer, Mark and Sands, Philippe (eds.), Justice for Crimes against Humanity (Oxford, 2003).
Lee, Roy (ed.), The International Criminal Court: the Making of the Rome Statute (The Hague, 1999).
McGoldrick, Dominic, Rowe, Peter, Donnelly, Eric (eds.), The Permanent International Criminal Court: Legal and Policy Issues (Oxford, 2004).
Sadat, Leila, The International Criminal Court and the Transformation of International Law (New York, 2002).Google Scholar
Sands, Philippe (ed.), From Nuremberg to the Hague: The Future of International Criminal Justice (Cambridge, 2003) chs. 2 and 4.CrossRef
Schiff, Benjamin, Building the International Criminal Court (Cambridge, 2008).CrossRef
Stahn, Carsten and Sluiter, Göran (eds.), The Emerging Practice of the International Criminal Court (Leiden, 2009).
Triffterer, Otto (ed.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers' Notes, Article by Article, 2nd edn (Baden-Baden, 2008).
Christopher, Keith Hall, ‘The First Proposal for a Permanent International Criminal Court’ (1998) 322 International Review of the Red Cross57.Google Scholar
Bassiouni, M. Cherif, The Statute of the International Criminal Court: A documentary history (New York, 1998) 657Google Scholar
Shabtai, Rosenne, ‘Poor drafting and imperfect organisation: flaws to overcome in the Rome Statute’ (2000) 41 Virginia Journal of International Law164Google Scholar
Darryl, Robinson, ‘Crimes against Humanity: Reflections on State Sovereignty, Legal Precision and the Dictates of the Public Conscience’ in Flavia, Lattanzi and William, Schabas (eds.), Essays on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (Il Sirente, 1999), vol. I, 139 at 140–4.Google Scholar
Robert, Cryer, ‘The Definitions of International Crimes in the Al Bashir Arrest Warrant Decision’ (2009) 7 Journal of International Criminal Justice283Google Scholar
Claus, Kreß, ‘The Crime of Genocide and Contextual Elements’ (2009) 7 Journal of International Criminal Justice297Google Scholar
Darryl, Robinson, ‘Serving the Interests of Justice: Amnesties, Truth Commissions and the International Criminal Court’ (2003) 14 European Journal of International Law481 at 500.Google Scholar
Federica, Gioia, ‘State Sovereignty, Jurisdiction and “Modern” International Law: The Principle of Complementarity in the International Criminal Court” (2006) 19 Leiden Journal of International Law1095 at 1110–13.Google Scholar
Enrique, Rojo, ‘The Role of Fair Trial Considerations in the Complementarity Regime of the International Criminal Court: From “No Peace without Justice” to “No Peace with Victor's Justice”?’ (2005) 18 Leiden Journal of International Law829Google Scholar
Mahnoush, Arsanjani and Michael, Reisman, ‘The Law-in-action of the International Criminal Court’ (2005) 99 American Journal of International Law385 at 395–7Google Scholar
William, Schabas, ‘First Prosecutions at the International Criminal Court’ (2006) 27 Human Rights Law Journal25 at 32.Google Scholar
Payam, Akhavan, ‘The Lord's Resistance Army Case: Uganda's Submission of the First State Referral to the International Criminal Court’ (2005) 99 American Journal of International Law403Google Scholar
William, Burke-White, ‘Complementarity in Practice: the International Criminal Court as part of a system of Multi-level Global Governance in the Democratic Republic of Congo’ (2005) 18 Leiden Journal of International Law557 at 567–8Google Scholar
Darryl, Robinson, ‘Serving the Interests of Justice: Amnesties, Truth Commissions and the International Criminal Court’ (2003) 14 European Journal of International Law481Google Scholar
Michael, Scharf, ‘The Amnesty Exception to the Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court’ (1999) 32 Cornell International Law Journal507Google Scholar
Jessica, Gavron, ‘Amnesties in the Light of Developments in International Law and the Establishment of the International Criminal Court’ (2002) 51 International and Comparative Law Quarterly91Google Scholar
Anja, Seibert-Fohr, ‘The Relevance of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court for Amnesties and Truth Commissions’ (2003) 7 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law553.Google Scholar
John, Bolton, ‘The Risks and Weaknesses of the International Criminal Court from America's Perspective’ (2000–2001) 41 Virginia Journal of International Law199–200.Google Scholar
Carsten, Stahn, ‘Complementarity, Amnesties and Alternative Forms of Justice: some Interpretative Guidelines for the International Criminal Court’ (2005) 3 Journal of International Criminal Justice695 at 716.Google Scholar
William, Schabas, ‘Prosecutorial Discretion v. Judicial Activism at the International Criminal Court’ (2008) 6 Journal of International Criminal Justice731.Google Scholar
Ignaz, Stegmiller, ‘The Gravity Threshold under the ICC Statute: Gravity Back and Forth in Lubanga and Ntaganda’ (2009) 9 International Criminal Law Review547Google Scholar
Hector, Olasolo, The Triggering Procedure of the International Criminal Court (Leiden, 2005) 72–5.Google Scholar
Dapo, Akande, ‘The Legal Nature of Security Council Referrals to the ICC and its Impact on Al Bashir's Immunities’ (2009) 7 Journal of International Criminal Justice333Google Scholar
Paola, Gaeta, ‘Does President Al Bashir Enjoy Immunity from Arrest?’ (2009) 7 Journal of International Criminal Justice315.Google Scholar
Allison, Marston Banner, ‘Enhancing the Legitimacy and Accountability of Prosecutorial Discretion at the International Criminal Court’ (2003) 97 American Journal of International Law510.Google Scholar
William, Schabas, ‘First Prosecutions at the International Criminal Court’ (2006) 27 Human Rights Law Journal25 at 32.Google Scholar
Claus, Kreß, ‘Self-Referrals and Waivers of Complementarity: Some Considerations in Law and Policy’ (2004) 2 Journal of International Criminal Justice944Google Scholar
Mahnoush, Arsanjani and Michael, Reisman, ‘The Law-in-action of the International Criminal Court’ (2005) 99 American Journal of International Law385 at 392.Google Scholar
William, Burke-White, ‘Complementarity in Practice: the International Criminal Court as part of a system of Multi-level Global Governance in the Democratic Republic of Congo’ (2005) 18 Leiden Journal of International Law557 at 567–8.Google Scholar
Carsten, Stahn, Mohamed, El Zeidy and Héctor, Olásolo, ‘The International Criminal Court's Ad Hoc Jurisdiction Revisited’ (2005) 99 American Journal of International Law421.Google Scholar
Franklin, Berman, ‘The Relationship between the International Criminal Court and the Security Council’ in Hebel, H., Lammers, J. and Schukking, J. (eds.), Reflections on the International Criminal Court (The Hague, 1999).Google Scholar
Leila, Sadat and Richard, Garden, ‘The New International Criminal Court: an Uneasy Revolution’ (2000) 88 Georgetown Law Journal381 at 389.Google Scholar
Lu, Jianping and Wang, Zhixiang, ‘China's Attitude towards the ICC’ (2005) 3 Journal of International Criminal Justice608Google Scholar
Eve, Haye, ‘The Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court’ (1999) XLVI Netherlands International Law Review1Google Scholar
Scharf, M., ‘The ICC's Jurisdiction Over the Nationals of Non-Party States: A Critique of the US Position’ (2001) 64 Law and Contemporary Problems98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madeline, Morris, ‘High Crimes and Misconceptions: The ICC and Non Party States’ (2000) 64 Law and Contemporary Problems131Google Scholar
Frederic, Megret, ‘Epilogue To An Endless Debate: The International Criminal Court's Third Party Jurisdiction And The Looming Revolution Of International Law’ (2001) 12 European Journal of International Law241Google Scholar
Dapo, Akande, ‘The Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court over Nationals of Non-Parties: Legal Basis and Limits’ (2003) 1 Journal of International Criminal Justice618.Google Scholar
Michael, Lohr and William, Lietzau, ‘One Road Away From Rome: Concerns Regarding the International Criminal Court’ (1999) 9 US Air Force Journal of Legal Studies33.Google Scholar
John, Bolton, ‘The Risks and Weaknesses of the International Criminal Court From an American Perspective’ (2000–2001) 41 Virginia Journal of International Law186Google Scholar
David, Forsythe, ‘The United States and International Criminal Justice’ (2002) 24 Human Rights Quarterly974.Google Scholar
Thomas, Pittman and Matthew, Heaphy, ‘Does the United States Really Prosecute its Service Members for War Crimes? Implications for Complementarity before the International Criminal Court’ (2008) 21 Leiden Journal of International Law165.Google Scholar
Sean, Murphy, ‘Contemporary Practice of the United States’ (2002) 96 American Journal of International Law975.Google Scholar
Aly, Mokhtar, ‘The fine art of arm-twisting: The US, Resolution 1422 and Security Council deferral power under the Rome Statute’ (2002) 3 International Criminal Law Review295Google Scholar
Neha, Jain, ‘A Separate Law for Peacekeepers; the Clash between the Security Council and the International Criminal Court’ (2005) 16 European Journal of International Law239Google Scholar
Carsten, Stahn, ‘The Ambiguities of Security Council Resolution 1422 (2002)’ (2003) 14 European Journal of International Law85Google Scholar
Karl, Doehring, ‘Unlawful Resolutions of the Security Council and their Legal Consequences’ (1997) 1 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law91.Google Scholar
David, Scheffer, ‘Staying the Course With the International Criminal Court’ (2001–2) 35 Cornell International Law Journal47 at 90.Google Scholar
Markus, Benzing, ‘U.S. Bilateral Non-Surrender Agreements and Article 98 of the Statute of the International Criminal Court: An Exercise in the Law of Treaties’ (2004) 8 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law182 at 219Google Scholar
Hans-Peter, Kaul and Claus, Kreß, ‘Jurisdiction and Cooperation in the Statute of the International Criminal Court: Principles and Compromises’ (1999) 2 Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law143 at 165.Google Scholar
David, Scheffer, ‘Article 98(2) of the Rome Statute: America's Original Intent’ (2005) 3 Journal of International Criminal Justice333 at 347–50.Google Scholar
Herman, Wilt, ‘Bilateral Agreements between the US and States Parties to the Rome Statute’ (2005) 18 Leiden Journal of International Law93.Google Scholar
Judge, Iain Bonomy, ‘The Reality of Conducting a War Crimes Trial’ (2007) 5 Journal of International Criminal Justice348Google Scholar
Payam, Akhavan, ‘The Lord's Resistance Army Case: Uganda's Submission of the First State Referral to the International Criminal Court’ (2005) 99 American Journal of International Law403, 416–21Google Scholar
Manisuli, Ssenyonjo, ‘Accountability of non-State actors in Uganda for war crimes and human rights violations: between amnesty and the ICC’ (2005) 10 Journal of Conflict and Security Law405.Google Scholar
Christopher, Gosnell, ‘The Request for an Arrest Warrant in Al Bashir: Idealistic Posturing or Calculated Plan?’ (2008) 6 Journal of International Criminal Justice841.Google Scholar
Kenneth, Rodman, ‘Is Peace in the Interests of Justice? The Case for Broad Prosecutorial Discretion at the International Criminal Court’ (2009) 22 Leiden Journal of International Law99.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×