Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-14T04:10:47.253Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

20 - Suspension of concessions and retaliation under the Agreement on Safeguards: the recent US – Steel Safeguards case

from PART III - The WTO Dispute Settlement System: Systemic and Other Issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Raimund Raith
Affiliation:
Minister-Counsellor/Legal Adviser, Permanent Delegation of the European Commission, Geneva
Rufus Yerxa
Affiliation:
World Trade Organization, Geneva
Bruce Wilson
Affiliation:
World Trade Organization, Geneva
Get access

Summary

Procedural background of the US – Steel Safeguards case

The United States, by Presidential Proclamation of 5 March 2002, adopted far-reaching safeguard measures on ten steel product groupings in the form of additional tariffs of up to 30 per cent for a duration of three years, becoming effective 20 March 2002.

From the outset a great number of WTO Members voiced their concerns on the compatibility of these measures with US obligations under the WTO agreements and in particular the Agreement on Safeguards and GATT 1994.

The European Communities requested formal consultations with the United States under Article 4.1 of the DSU shortly after the issuance of the proclamation. A significant number of other WTO Members (Norway, Switzerland, China, Korea, Brazil, Japan and New Zealand) did likewise.

Joint consultations were held in mid-April 2002, but did not yield any solution of the dispute.

The eight Members referred to above subsequently sought the establishment of a panel under Article 6 of the DSU. The panels were eventually established and composed and the panel issued its reports in July 2003.

The panel reports found largely in favour of the complainants. This result, which was appealed by the United States, was essentially confirmed by the Appellate Body in its report of 10 November 2003.

Type
Chapter
Information
Key Issues in WTO Dispute Settlement
The First Ten Years
, pp. 232 - 241
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×