Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T11:59:09.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

CHAPTER 6 - Δ3 CONSTRUCTIONS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Manuel Lerman
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
Get access

Summary

Δ3 constructions are similar to Δ2 constructions, raised by a level. They take place on four trees, T0, T1, T2 and T3, and are characterized by the following property: If η3ν3T3, ν3 corresponds to a terminal node of the basic module associated with η3, lev(η3) = 3, and η3 has Π outcome along ν3, then no requirement is assigned to ν3 or any of its successors. In this case, the falsity of the directing sentence assigned to η3 together with activated action for this node suffices to prove the theorem.

We prove one theorem falling under this classification, the Sacks Density Theorem, in Section 6.2. We discuss certain types of requirements encountered in Δ3 constructions and state lemmas delineating properties of these requirements in Section 6.1.

Δ3 Constructions

When functional axioms need to be declared and Player I controls the enumeration of one of the oracle sets, the construction becomes more complex. This is the case when we are trying to construct a degree within a given interval. The simplest such case dealing with an arbitrary interval whose endpoints are computably enumerable degrees is the density theorem, proved in the next section; this theorem asserts that there is a computably enumerable set whose degree lies strictly between the endpoints of the interval. Thus we will be given computably enumerable sets U <TV controlled by Player I, and Player II will be assigned the responsibility to construct a computably enumerable set A such that U <TA <TV. Player II can replace A by UA, and will use backtracking combined with permitting to show that ATV.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Δ3 CONSTRUCTIONS
  • Manuel Lerman, University of Connecticut
  • Book: A Framework for Priority Arguments
  • Online publication: 04 August 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750779.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Δ3 CONSTRUCTIONS
  • Manuel Lerman, University of Connecticut
  • Book: A Framework for Priority Arguments
  • Online publication: 04 August 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750779.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Δ3 CONSTRUCTIONS
  • Manuel Lerman, University of Connecticut
  • Book: A Framework for Priority Arguments
  • Online publication: 04 August 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750779.007
Available formats
×