Abrahamsen, Yngve, Hartwig, Jochen and Schips, Bernd (2003). Volkswirtschaftliche Auswirkungen verschiedener Demographieszenarien und Varianten zur langfristigen Finanzierung der Alterssicherung in der Schweiz. Forschungsbericht Nr. 12/03. Bundesamt für Sozialversicherungen. Bern: Beiträge zur Sozialen, Sicherheit.Google Scholar

Abramovici, Gérard (2002). “Der Sozialschutz: Rentenausgaben”, Statistik kurz gefasst. Thema 3–6/2002. Luxembourg: Eurostat: 1–8.Google Scholar

Alber, Jens (1987). Der Sozialstaat in der Bundesrepublik 1950–1983. Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar

Alber, Jens (2001). “Recent Developments of the German Welfare State: Basic Continuity or Paradigm Shift,” ZeS Working Paper 6/2001. Bremen: Centre for Social Policy Research, University of Bremen.Google Scholar

Allmendinger, Jutta (2000). “Wandel von Erwerbs – und Lebensverläufen und die Ungleichheit zwischen den Geschlechtern im Alterseinkommen,” in Schmähl, Winfried und Michaelis, Klaus (eds.), Alterssicherung von Frauen. Leitbilder, gesellschaftlicher Wandel und Reformen. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher, Verlag, 61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amenta, Edwin (2003). “What We Know about the Development of Social Policy: Comparative and Historical Research in Comparative and Historical Perspective,” in Mahoney, James and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich (eds.), Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 91–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karen, Anderson (2007). “The Netherlands: Political competition in a proportional system,” in Immergut, Ellen M., Anderson, Karen M., and Schulze, Isabelle (eds.), The Handbook of West European Pension Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 713–57.Google Scholar

Karen, Anderson and Immergut, Ellen M. (2007). “Sweden: After Social Democratic Hegemony,” in Immergut, Ellen M., Anderson, Karen M. and Schulze, Isabelle (eds.), The Handbook of West European Pension Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 349–95.Google Scholar

Anderson, Karen and Lynch, Julia (2007). “Reconsidering Seniority Bias: Ageing, Internal Institutions, and Union Support for Pension Reform,” Comparative Politics 39(2): 189–208.Google Scholar

Anderson, Karen M. and Meyer, Traute (2003). “Social Democracy, Unions and Pension Politics in Germany and Sweden,” Journal of Public Policy 23(1): 23–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, Karen and Meyer, Traute (2004). “The Third Way in Welfare State Reform? Social Democratic Pension Politics in Germany and Sweden,” in Bonoli, Giuliano and Powell, Martin (eds.), Social Democratic Party Policies in Contemporary Europe. London: Routledge, 141–60.Google Scholar

Anderson, Karen M. and Meyer, Traute (2006). “New Social Risks and Pension Reform in Germany and Sweden: The Politics of Pension Rights for Childcare,” in Armingeon, Klaus and Bonoli, Giuliano (eds.), The Politics of Post-Industrial Welfare States. London: Routledge, 171–91.Google Scholar

Anderson, Robert and Evans, Jocelyn A. J. (2003). “Values, Cleavages and Party Choice in France 1988–1995,” French Politics 1: 83–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Armingeon, Klaus (1988). Die Entwicklung der westdeutschen Gewerkschaften 1950–1985. Frankfurt: Campus, Verlag.Google Scholar

Armingeon, Klaus (2001). “Institutionalising the Swiss Welfare State,” West European Politics 24(2), 145–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Armingeon, Klaus (2004). “Institutional Change in OECD Democracies, 1970–2000,” Comparative European Politics 2(2): 212–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Armingeon, Klaus (2006). “Reconciling Competing Claims of the Welfare State Clientele,” in Armingeon, Klaus and Bonoli, Giuliano (eds.), The Politics of Post-Industrial Welfare States. London: Routledge, 100–122.Google Scholar

Armingeon, Klaus, Bertozzi, Fabio, and Bonoli, Giuliano (2004). “Swiss Worlds of Welfare,” West European Politics 27(1): 20–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Armingeon, Klaus and Beyeler, Michelle (2000). “Gewerkschaftsmitgliedschaft: Beitrittsmotive und Fragmentierungen,” in Armingeon, Klaus and Geissbühler, Simon (eds.), Gewerkschaften in der Schweiz. Herausforderungen und Optionen. Zurich: Seismo, 39–69.Google Scholar

Armingeon, Klaus and Bonoli, Giuliano (2006). The Politics of Post-Industrial Welfare States. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Baccaro, Lucio (2002). “Negotiating the Italian Pension Reform with the Unions: Lessons for Corporatist Theory,” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 55(3): 413–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baldwin, Peter (1990). The Politics of Social Solidarity: Class Bases of the European Welfare States 1875–1975. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ballestri, Yuri and Bonoli, Giuliano (2003). “L'état social suisse face aux nouveaux risques sociaux : Genèse et déterminants de l'adoption du programme de subventions pour les crèches,” Swiss Political Science Review 9(3): 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Balthasar, Andreas, Bieri, Oliver, Grau, Peter, Küenzi, Kilian, and Guggisberg, Jürg (2003). Der Übergang in den Ruhestand – Wege, Einflussfaktoren und Konsequenzen. Bericht im Rahmen des Forschungsprogrammes zur längerfristigen Zukunft der Alterssicherung. Forschungsbericht, Nr. 2/03. Bundesamt für Sozialversicherungen. Bern: Beiträge zur Sozialen, Sicherheit.Google Scholar

Bartolini, Stefano (2000). The Political Mobilization of the European Left, 1860-1980: The Class Cleavage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baumgartner, Frank and Jones, Bryan D. (1993). Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Baumgartner, Frank and Jones, Bryan D. (2002). Policy Dynamics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Bertozzi, Fabio, Bonoli, Giuliano, and Gay-des-Combes, Benoît (2005). La réforme de l'état social en Suisse. Vieillissement, Employ, Conflict Travail-Famille. Lausanne: Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires, Romandes.Google Scholar

Binswanger, Peter (1987). Histoire de l'AVS. Bern: Pro, Senectute.Google Scholar

Birchfield, Vicki and Crepaz, Markus M. L. (1998). “The Impact of Constitutional Structures and Collective and Competitive Veto Points on Income Inequality in Industrialized Democracies,” European Journal of Political Research 34: 175–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bleses, Peter and Seeleib-Kaiser, Martin (2004). The Dual Transformation of the German Welfare State. Basingstoke, U.K.: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonoli, Giuliano (1997). “Pension Politics in France: Patterns of Co-operation and Conflict in Two Recent Reforms,” West European Politics 20(4): 160–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonoli, Giuliano (1999). “La 10e révision de l'AVS : une politique consensuelle de retranchement?” in Mach, André (ed.), Globalisation, néo-libéralisme et politiques publiques dans la Suisse des années 1990. Zurich, Seismo, 191–216.Google Scholar

Bonoli, Giuliano (2000). The Politics of Pension Reform: Institutions and Policy Change in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonoli, Giuliano (2001a). “The Institutionalization of the Swiss Multipillar System,” paper presented at the conference Political Economy of Pension Reform, Institute for Advanced Studies, Delmenhorst (Germany), May 3–5.

Bonoli, Giuliano (2001b). “Political Institutions, Veto Points, and the Process of Welfare State Adaptation,” in Pierson, Paul (ed.), The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 238–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonoli, Giuliano (2004). “The Institutionalisation of the Swiss Multipillar Pension System,” in Rein, Martin and Schmähl, Winfried (eds.), The Political Economy of Pension Reform. London: Edward Elgar- 102–22.Google Scholar

Bonoli, Giuliano (2005a). “The Politics of the New Social Policies: Providing Coverage against New Social Risks in Mature Welfare States,” Policy and Politics 33(3): 431–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonoli, Giuliano (2005b). “Switzerland: Negotiating a New Welfare State in a Fragmented Political System,” in Taylor-Gooby, Peter (ed.), New Risks, New Welfare: The Transformation of the European Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 157–180.Google Scholar

Bonoli, Giuliano (2006a) “Les politiques sociales,” in Klöti, Ulrich, Knoepfel, Peter, Kriesi, Hanspeter, Linder, Wolf, Papadopoulos, Yannis, and Sciarini, Pascal (eds.), Handbuch der Schweizer Politik, 4th ed. Zurich: NZZ, Verlag.Google Scholar

Bonoli, Giuliano (2006b). “New Social Risks and the Politics of Post-Industrial Social Policies,” in Armingeon, Klaus and Bonoli, Giuliano (eds.), The Politics of Post-Industrial Welfare States: Adapting Post-War Social Policies to New Social Risks. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bonoli, Giuliano (2007). “Time Matters: Postindustrialization, New Social Risks and Welfare State Adaptation in Advanced Industrial Democracies,” Comparative Political Studies 40(5): 495–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonoli, Giuliano, George, Vic, and Taylor-Gooby, Peter (2000). European Welfare Futures: Towards a Theory of Retrenchment. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Bonoli, Giuliano and Gay-des-Combes, Benoît (2003). “Prospektive Simulation der Altersvorsorge vor dem Zeithorizont 2040,” Soziale Sicherheit CHSS 3: 125–7.Google Scholar

Bonoli, Giuliano and Mach, André (2000). “Switzerland: Adjustment Politics within Institutional Constraints,” in Scharpf, Fritz W. and Schmidt, Vivien A. (eds.), Welfare and Work in the Open Economy, vol. 2, Diverse Responses to Common Challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 131–174.Google Scholar

Bonoli, Giuliano and Palier, Bruno (1998). “Changing the Politics of Social Programmes: Innovative Change in British and French Welfare Reforms,” Journal of European Social Policy 8(4): 317–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonoli, Giuliano and Palier, Bruno (2000). “How Do Welfare States Change? Institutions and Their Impact on the Politics of Welfare State Reform,” European Review 8(2): 333–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonoli, Giuliano and Palier, Bruno (2007). “When Past Reforms Open New Opportunities: Comparing Old Age Insurance Reforms in Bismarckian Welfare Systems,” Social Policy and Administration 41(6): 555–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bornschier, Simon (2005). “Unis dans l'opposition à la mondialisation? Une analyse de la convergence programmatique des partis populistes de droite en Europe,” Revue Internationale de Politique Comparée 12(4): 415–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bornschier, Simon (2010). Cleavage Politics and the Populist Right: The New Cultural Conflict in Western Europe. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Boyer, Robert (1990). The Regulation School: A Critical Introduction. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Branger, Katja (2000). Lebensbedingungen älterer Menschen in der Schweiz unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Dimension Geschlecht. Discussion Document for the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) Working Session on Gender Statistics, Orvieto, Italy, October 11–13.Google Scholar

Bridgen, Paul and Meyer, Traute (2008). “Politically Dominant but Socially Flawed: Projected Pension Levels for Citizens at Risk in Six European Multi-Pillar Pension Systems,” in Seeleib-Kaiser, Martin (ed.), Welfare State Transformations: Comparative Perspectives. Basingstoke, U.K.: Palgrave Macmillan, 111–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bruhnes, Bernard (1992). Rapport sur les retraites. Paris: La Documentation française.Google Scholar

Budge, Ian, Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, Volkens, Andrea, Bara, Judith, Tanenbaum, Eric, Fording, Richard C., Hearl, Derek J., Kim, Hee Min, McDonals, Michael, and Mendez, Silvia (2001). Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors and Governments 1945–1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sozialversicherungen, Bundesamt für (1995). Bericht des eidgenössischen Departementes des Innern zur heutigen Ausgestaltung und Weiterentwicklung der schweizerischen 3-Säulen-Konzeption der Alters-, Hinterlassenen – und Invalidenvorsorge. Bern: Beiträge zur Sozialen, Sicherheit.Google Scholar

Sozialversicherungen, Bundesamt für (2003). Statistik der Ergänzungsleistungen zur AHV und IV 2002. Bern: Beiträge zur Sozialen, Sicherheit.Google Scholar

Statistik, Bundesamt für (2001). Szenarien zur Bevölkerungsentwicklung der Schweiz 2000–2060. Neuchâtel: Bundesamt für Statistik.Google Scholar

Statistik, Bundesamt für (2003). Die schweizerische Altersvorsorge im Spiegel der Einkommens – und Verbrauchserhebung 1998. Neuchâtel: Bundesamt für Statistik.Google Scholar

Statistik, Bundesamt für (2004). Die berufliche Vorsorge in der Schweiz. Pensionskassenstatistik 2002. Neuchâtel: Bundesamt für Statistik.Google Scholar

Bunel, Jean (1995) La transformation de la representation patronale en France, CNPF et CGPME. Paris: Commissariat General du Plan.Google Scholar

Busemeyer, Marius R. (2005). “Pension Reform in Germany and Austria: System Change vs. Quantitative Retrenchment,” West European Politics 28(3): 569–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, Andrea L. and Lynch, Julia (2000). “Whose ‘Gray Power’? Elderly Voters, Elderly Lobbies, and Welfare Reform in Italy and the United States,” Italian Politics and Society 53: 11–39.Google Scholar

Castles, Francis G. (2004). The Future of the Welfare State: Crisis Myths and Crisis Realities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cattacin, Sandro, Gianni, Matteo, Mänz, Marcus, and Tattini, Véronique (2002). Retour au Travail! Le Workfare comme Instrument de Réforme. Fribourg: Presses Universitaires de Fribourg.Google Scholar

Cattell, Raymond B. (1978). The Scientific Use of Factor Analysis in Behavioral Sciences. NewYork: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charpin, Jean-Michel, Zaidman, Catherine and Aubert, Jean-Marc (1999). L'avenir de nos retraites. Rapport au Premier ministre. Paris: La Documentation française.Google Scholar

Chulià, Elisa (2007). “Spain: Between Majority Rule and Incrementalism,” in Immergut, Ellen M., Anderson, Karen M., and Schulze, Isabelle (eds.), The Handbook of West European Pension Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 499–554.Google Scholar

Clasen, Jochen and Clegg, Daniel (2006). “Beyond Activation: Reforming European Unemployment Protection Systems in Post-Industrial Labour Markets,” European Societies 8 (4): 527–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clayton, Richard and Pontusson, Jonas (1998). “Welfare-State Retrenchment Revisited: Entitlement Cuts, Public Sector Restructuring and Inegalitarian Trends in Advanced Capitalist Societies,” World Politics 51 (October): 67–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clegg, Daniel (2007). “Continental Drift: On Unemployment Policy Change in Bismarckian Welfare States,” Social Policy and Administration 41(6): 597–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Commaille, Jacques, Strobel, Pierre, and Villac, Michel (2002). La politique de la famille. Paris: Editions la Découverte.Google Scholar

,Commissariat général du Plan (1991). Rapport de la mission Retraites, Mission Cottave. Paris: La Documentation française.Google Scholar

,CONSOC Recherche (2003). Situation économique des rentiers. Analyse introductive et générale dans la perspective d'une 13ème rente AVS. Report by Valérie Legrand-Germanier and Stéphane Rossini for the Swiss Union of Trade Unions. Bern: CONSOC Recherche.Google Scholar

Cooke, Lynn Prince (2001). “Impact of Dual Careers on Average Family Size: Comparison of 11 Countries,” Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper No. 267. Luxembourg: Luxembourg Income Study.

Da Conceiçao-Heldt, Eugénia (2006). “France: The Importance of the Electoral Cycle,” in Immergut, Ellen M., Anderson, Karen M., and Schulze, Isabelle (eds.), The Handbook of West European Pension Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 150–201.Google Scholar

Dafflon, Bernard (2003). La politique familiale en Suisse: enjeux et défis. Lausanne: Réalités Sociales.Google Scholar

Deitch, C. (2004). “Gender and Popular Support for the Welfare State: Cross-National Trends in a Period of Restructuring,” paper prepared at the International Sociological Association Research Committee 19 conference Welfare State Restructuring: Processes and Social Outcomes, Paris, September 2–4.

Dienel, Christiane (2002). Familienpolitik. Eine praxisorientierte Gesamtdarstellung der Handlungsfelder und Probleme. Weinheim: Juventa.Google Scholar

Ebbinghaus, Bernhard and Visser, Jelle (2000). The Societies of Europe: Trade Unions in Western Europe since 1945. New York: Palgrave, Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ebbinghaus, Bernhard (2001). “When Labour and Capital Collude: The Political Economy of Early Retirement in Europe, Japan and the USA,” in Ebbinghaus, Bernhard and Manow, Philip (eds.), Comparing Welfare Capitalism. Social Policy and Political Economy in Europe, Japan and the USA. London: Routledge, 76–101.Google Scholar

Ebbinghaus, Bernhard (2006a). “From Path Dependence to Path Departure in Welfare Reform Analysis,” European Politics and Society Newsletter 5(2): 1–4.Google Scholar

Ebbinghaus, Bernhard (2006b). “Trade Union Movements in Post-Industrial Welfare States: Opening Up to New Social Interests?” in Armingeon, Klaus and Bonoli, Giuliano (eds.), The Politics of Post-Industrial Welfare States: Adapting Post-War Policies To New Social Risks. London: Routledge, 123–142.Google Scholar

Ebbinghaus, Bernhard and Manow, Philip (2001). Comparing Welfare Capitalism. Social Policy and Political Economy in Europe, Japan and the USA. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Eidgenössische, Finanzkontrolle (2004). Berufliche Vorsorge. Evaluation der Besteuerung und Vorsorgewirkung von Kapitalzahlungen aus den Säulen 2 und 3a. Bern: Eidgenössische Finanzkontrolle.Google Scholar

Engeli, Isabelle and Häusermann, Silja (2009). “Government Strategies for Successful Reforms in Controversial Policy Fields,” EUI Working Paper SPS No. 2009/1. European University Institute, Florence.

Erikson, R. and Goldthorpe, J. H. (1993). The Constant Flux. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Esping-Andersen, Gösta (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Esping-Andersen, Gösta (1996a). “After the Golden Age? Welfare State Dilemmas in a Global Economy,” in Esping-Andersen, Gösta (ed.), Welfare States in Transition: National Adaptations in Global Economies. London: Sage, 1–32.Google Scholar

Esping-Andersen, Gösta (1996b). “Welfare States without Work: The Impasse of Labour Shedding and Familialism in Continental European Social Policy,” in Esping-Andersen, Gösta (ed.), Welfare States in Transition: National Adaptations in Global Economies. London: Sage: 66–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Esping-Andersen, Gösta (1999a). “Politics without Class? Post-Industrial Cleavages in Europe and America,” in Kitschelt, Herbert, Lange, Peter, Marks, Gary, and Stephens, John D. (eds.), Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 293–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Esping-Andersen, Gösta (1999b). Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Esping-Andersen, Gösta and Regini, Marino (2000). Why Deregulate Labor Markets?Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Estevez-Abe, Margarita (2006). “Gendering the Varieties of Capitalism: A Study of Occupational Segregation by Sex in Advanced Industrial Societies,” World Politics 59 (1): 142–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Estevez-Abe, Margarita, Iversen, Torben, and Soskice, David (2001). “Social Protection and the Formation of Skills: A Reinterpretation of the Welfare State,” in Hall, Peter A. and Soskice, David (eds.), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. New York: Oxford University Press, 145–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fagnani, Jeanne and Letablier, Marie-Thérèse (2005). “La politique familiale française,” in Maruani, M. (ed.), Femmes, genre et société, 167–75, Collection l'État des Savoirs. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

Ferrera, Maurizio (1996). “The Southern Model of Welfare in Social Europe,” Journal of European Social Policy 6(1): 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferrera, Maurizio and Gualmini, Elisabetta (2000). “Italy. Rescue from Without?” in Scharpf, Fritz W. and Schmidt, Vivien A. (eds.), Welfare and Work in the Open Economy, vol. 2, Diverse Responses to Common Challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 351–398.Google Scholar

Ferrera, Maurizio and Gualmini, Elisabetta (2004). Rescued by Europe? Social and Labour Market Reforms in Italy from Maastricht to Berlusconi. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferrera, Maurizio, Hemerijck, Anton, and Rhodes, Martin (2004). The Future of European Welfare States: Recasting Welfare for a New Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ferrera, Maurizio and Jessoula, Matteo (2007). “Italy: A Narrow Gate for Path-Shift,” in Immergut, Ellen M., Anderson, Karen M., and Schulze, Isabelle (eds.), The Handbook of West European Pension Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 396–453.Google Scholar

Finlayson, Ann (1988). Whose Money Is It Anyway? The Showdown on Pensions. Markham: Penguin.Google Scholar

Flora, Peter and Alber, Jens (1981). “Modernization, Democratization and the Development of Welfare States in Western Europe,” in Flora, Peter and Heidenheimer, Arnold (eds.), The Development of Welfare States in Europe and America. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar

Fluder, Robert (1996). Interessenorganisationen und kollektive Arbeitsbeziehungen im öffentlichen Dienst der Schweiz: Entstehung, Mitgliedschaft, Organisation und Politik seit 1940. Zurich, Seismo.Google Scholar

Fluder, Robert, Ruf, H., Schöni, W., and Wicki, M. (1991). Gewerkschaften und Angestelltenverbände in der schweizerischen Privatwirtschaft: Entstehung, Mitgliedschaft, Organisation und Politik seit 1940. Zurich: Seismo.Google Scholar

Frey, Tim (2009). Die Christdemokratie in Westeuropa – Der schmale Grat zum Erfolg. Baden-Baden: Nomos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fuchs, Johann (2003). “Fachkräftemangel und demographischer Wandel. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Aktivierung heimischer Personalreserven,” in Seminar für Handwerkswesen an der Universität Göttingen (ed.), Fachkräftesicherung im Handwerk vor dem Hintergrund struktureller Wandlungen der Arbeitsmärkte. Dauderstadt: Mecke, 83–117.Google Scholar

Gees, Thomas (2004). “Successful as a ‘Go-between’: The Conservative People's Party in Switzerland,” in Gehler, Michael and Kaiser, Wolfram (eds.), Christian Democracy in Europe since 1945. London: Routledge, 38–53.Google Scholar

Gerlach, Irene (2005). Familienpolitik. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar

Gilliand, Pierre (1993). “Politique sociale,” in Schmidt, G. (ed.), Handbuch Politisches System der Schweiz. Band 4. Politikbereiche. Bern: Haupt.Google Scholar

Gorsuch, Richard L. (1983). Factor Analysis, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Gourevitch, Peter (1986). Politics in Hard Times: Comparative Responses to International Economic Crises. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Grunberg, Gérard (2006). “The French Party System and the Crisis of Representation,” in Culpepper, Pepper D., Hall, Peter A., and Palier, Bruno (eds.), Changing France: The Politics That Markets Make. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 223–43.Google Scholar

Guillén, Ana (2010). “Defrosting the Spanish Welfare State: The Weight of Conservative and Corporatist Traditions,” in Palier, Bruno (ed.), A Long Goodbye to Bismarck? The Politics of Welfare Reforms in Continental European Welfare States. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar

Hacker, Jacob S. (1998). “The Historical Logic of National Health Insurance: Structure and Sequence in the Development of British, Canadian and U.S. Medical Policy,” Studies in American Political Development 12(1): 57–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hacker, Jacob S. (2002). The Divided Welfare State: The Battle over Public and Private Social Benefits in the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hacker, Jacob S. (2004). “Privatizing Risk without Privatizing the Welfare State: The Hidden Politics of Social Policy Retrenchment in the United States,” American Political Science Review 98(2): 243–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hacker, Jacob S. (2005). “Policy Drift: The Hidden Politics of US Welfare State Retrenchment,” in Streeck, Wolfgang and Thelen, Kathleen (eds.), Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 40–82.Google Scholar

Hall, Peter A. (1986). Governing the Economy: The Politics of State Intervention in Britain and France. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Hall, Peter A. (1993). “Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain,” Comparative Politics 25(3): 275–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall, Peter A. (2006). “Introduction: The Politics of Social Change in France,” in Culpepper, Pepper D., Hall, Peter A., and Palier, Bruno (eds.), Changing France: The Politics That Markets Make. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1–28.Google Scholar

Hall, Peter A. and Soskice, David (2001). Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hassenteufel, Patrick and Palier, Bruno (2007). “Towards Neo-Bismarckian Health Care States? Comparing Health Insurance Reforms in Bismarckian Welfare Systems,” Social Policy and Administration 41(6): 574–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Häusermann, Silja (2002). Flexibilisation des relations d'emploi et sécurité sociale. La réforme de la loi suisse sur la prévoyance professionnelle. Unpublished manuscript. Lausanne: Idheap.Google Scholar

Häusermann, Silja (2006). “Changing Coalitions in Social Policy Reforms: The Politics of New Social Needs and Demands,” Journal of European Social Policy 16(1): 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Häusermann, Silja (2006b). “Different Paths of Family Policy Modernization in Continental Welfare States: Changing Dynamics of Reform in German and Swiss family policies since the mid-70s,” paper presented at the annual conference of the Swiss Political Science Association, Balsthal, November 2–3.

Häusermann, Silja (2008). “What Explains the “Unfreezing” of Continental European Welfare States?” paper presented at the annual conference of the American Political Science Association, Boston, August 28–31.

Häusermann, Silja (2009). “Policy Flexibility vs. Policy Inertia: Coalitional Dynamics in German Pension Reform,” in Capano, Giliberto and Howlett, Michael (eds.), European and American Experiences in Policy Change: Policy Drivers and Policy Dynamics. London: Routledge, 43–67.Google Scholar

Häusermann, Silja (2010a). “Reform Opportunities in a Bismarckian Latecomer: Restructuring the Swiss Welfare State,” in Palier, Bruno (ed.), A Long Goodbye to Bismarck? The Politics of Welfare Reforms in Continental European Welfare States. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Häusermann, Silja (2010b). “Solidarity with Whom? Why Organized Labor Is Losing Ground in Continental Pension Politics,” European Journal of Political Research.

Häusermann, Silja, Mach, André, and Papadopoulos, Yannis (2004). “From Corporatism to Partisan Politics: Social Policy Making under Strain in Switzerland,” Swiss Political Science Review 10(2): 33–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Häusermann, Silja and Schwander, Hanna (2009). “Identifying Outsiders across Countries: Similarities and Differences in Patterns of Dualisation,” Recwowe Working Paper No. 09/09.

Heclo, Hugh (1974). Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden: From Relief to Income Maintenance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Hemerijck, Anton and Marx, Ive (2010). “Redirecting Continental Welfare in Belgium and the Netherlands,” in Palier, Bruno (ed.), A Long Goodbye to Bismarck? The Politics of Welfare Reforms in Continental Europe. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar

Hemerijck, Anton, Unger, Brigitte, and Visser, Jelle (2000). “How Small Countries Negotiate Change: Twenty-Five Years of Policy Adjustment in Austria, the Netherlands and Belgium,” in Scharpf, Fritz W. and Schmidt, Vivien A. (eds.), Welfare and Work in the Open Economy, vol. 2, Diverse Responses to Common Challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 175–263.Google Scholar

Hering, Martin (2004a). Rough Transition: Institutional Change in Germany's “Frozen” Welfare State. Ph.D. dissertation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.Google Scholar

Hering, Martin (2004b). “Turning Ideas into Policies: Implementing Modern Social Democratic Thinking in Germany's Pension Policy,” in Bonoli, Giuliano and Powell, Martin (eds.), Social Democratic Party Policies in Contemporary Europe. London: Routledge, 102–22.Google Scholar

Hinrichs, Karl (2000). “Auf dem Weg zur Alterssicherungspolitik – Reformperspektiven in der gesetzlichen Rentenversicherung,” in Leibfried, Stephan and Wagschal, Uwe (eds.), Der deutsche Sozialstaat. Bilanzen – Reformen – Perspektiven. Schriften des Zentrums für Sozialpolitik, Bd. 10, Bremen, 276–305.Google Scholar

Hinrichs, Karl (2005). “New Century – New Paradigm: Pension Reforms in Germany,” in Shinkawa, Toshimitsu and Bonoli, Giuliano (eds.), Ageing and Pension Reform around the World: Evidence from Eleven Countries. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 47–73.Google Scholar

Hiscox, Michael J. (2001). “Class versus Industry Cleavages: Inter-Industry Factor Mobility and the Politics of Trade,” International Organization 55(1): 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huber, Evelyne, Ragin, Charles, and Stephens, John D. (1993). “Social Democracy, Christian Democracy, Constitutional Structure, and the Welfare State,” American Journal of Sociology 99(3): 711–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huber, Evelyne and Stephens, John D. (1998). “Internationalization and the Social Democratic Model: Crisis and Future Prospects,” Comparative Political Studies 31(3): 353–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huber, Evelyne and Stephens, John D. (2001). Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huber, Evelyne and Stephens, John D. (2006). “Combating Old and New Social Risks,” in Armingeon, Klaus and Bonoli, Giuliano (eds.), The Politics of Post-Industrial Welfare States. London: Routledge, 143–67.Google Scholar

,IDA FiSo 1 (1996). Interdepartementale Arbeitsgruppe “Finanzierungsperspektiven der Sozialversicherungen”: Bericht über die Finanzierungsperspektiven der Sozialversicherungen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der demographischen Entwicklung. Bern: Bundesamt für Sozialversicherungen.Google Scholar

,IDA FiSo 2 (1997). Interdepartementale Arbeitsgruppe “Finanzierungsperspektiven der Sozialversicherungen”: Analyse der Leistungen der Sozialversicherungen; Konkretisierung möglicher Veränderungen für drei Finanzierungsperspektiven. Bern: Bundesamt für Sozialversicherungen.Google Scholar

Immergut, Ellen M. (1992). Health Politics: Interests and Institutions in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Immergut, Ellen M. and Anderson, Karen M. (2006). “Editor's Introduction: The Dynamics of Pension Politics,” in Immergut, Ellen M., Anderson, Karen M., and Schulze, Isabelle (eds.), The Handbook of West European Pension Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–47.Google Scholar

Inglehart, Ronald (1977). The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Inglehart, Ronald and Norris, Pippa (2000). “The Developmental Theory of the Gender Gap: Women's and Men's Voting Behavior in Global Perspective,” International Political Science Review, 21(4): 441–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,Institut für Politikwissenschaft der Universität Bern (1970-2003). Année politique suisse. Bern: Universität Bern.Google Scholar

,International Social Survey Program (1996). ISSP: Role of Government III, 1996 (ZACAT computer file). Cologne, Germany: Zentralarchiv für Empirische Sozialforschung (producer) and Mannheim, Germany: GESIS Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences.Google Scholar

Iversen, Torben, Cusack, Thomas, and Rehm, Philipp (2006). “Risks at Work: The Demand and Supply Sides of Government Redistribution,” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 22(3): 365–89.Google Scholar

Iversen, Torben and Rosenbluth, Frances (2006). “The Political Economy of Gender: Explaining Cross-National Variation in the Gender Division of Labor and the Gender Voting Gap,” American Journal of Political Science 50: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Iversen, Torben and Soskice, David (2001). “An Asset Theory of Social Policy Preferences,” American Political Science Review 95(4): 875–93.Google Scholar

Iversen, Torben and Soskice, David (2006). “Electoral Institutions and the Politics of Coalitions: Why Some Democracies Redistribute More Than Others,” American Political Science Review, 100(2): 165–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Iversen, Torben and Wren, Anne (1998). “Equality, Employment and Budgetary Restraint: The Trilemma of the Service Economy,” World Politics 50(July): 507–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacobs, Alan M. (2004). Governing for the Long Term: Democratic Politics and Policy Investment. Cambridge, MA: Department of Government, Harvard University.Google Scholar

Jaumotte, Florence (2003). “Female Labour Force Participation: Past Trends and Main Determinants in OECD Countries,” OECD Economics Department Working Papers ECO/WKP(2003)30, No. 376.CrossRef

Jegher, Annina (1999). Bundesversammlung und Gesetzgebung. Bern: Haupt.Google Scholar

Jenson, Jane and Sineau, Mariette (1994). “François Mitterrand and French Women: Un rendez-vous manqué,” French Politics and Society 12(4): 35–52.Google Scholar

Jenson, Jane and Sineau, Mariette (2001). Who Cares? Women's Work, Childcare, and Welfare State Redesign. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Katzenstein, Peter J. (1987). Policy and Politics in West Germany: The Growth of a Semi-sovereign State. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Katzenstein, Peter J. (1985). Small States in World Markets. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Kirchheimer, Otto (1966). “The Transformation of theWestern European Party Systems,” in LaPalombara, Joseph and Weiner, Myron (eds.), Political Parties and Political Development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 177–200.Google Scholar

Kitschelt, Herbert (1994). The Transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kitschelt, Herbert (1997). The Radical Right in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Kitschelt, Herbert (2001). “Partisan Competition and Welfare State Retrenchment: When Do Politicians Choose Unpopular Policies?,” in Pierson, Paul (ed.), The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 265–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kitschelt, Herbert (2003). “Political-Economic Context and Partisan Strategies in the German Federal Elections 1990–2002,” West European Politics 26(4): 125–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kitschelt, Herbert and Rehm, Philip (2005). “Work, Family and Politics: Foundations of Electoral Partisan Alignments in Postindustrial Democracies,” paper prepared for delivery at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C., September 1–4.

Kitschelt, Herbert and Rehm, Philip (2006). “New Social Risk and Political Preferences,” in Armingeon, Klaus and Bonoli, Giuliano (eds.), The Politics of Post-Industrial Welfare States: Adapting Post-War Policies to New Social Risks. London: Routledge, 52–82.Google Scholar

Kitschelt, Herbert and Streeck, Wolfgang (2003). “From Stability to Stagnation: Germany at the Beginning of the Twenty-First Century,” West European Politics 26(4): 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knight, Jack (1999). Explaining the Rise of Neo-Liberalism: The Mechanisms of Institutional Change. Unpublished manuscript, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.Google Scholar

Kolinsky, Eva (1993). “Party Change and Women's Representation in Unified Germany,” in Lovendusky, Joni and Norris, Pippa (eds.), Gender and Party Politics. London: Sage, 113–46.Google Scholar

Korpi, Walter (1983). The Democratic Class Struggle. London: Routeledge and Kegan.Google Scholar

Korpi, Walter and Palme, Joakim (2003). “New Politics and Class Politics in the Context of Austerity and Globalization: Welfare State Regress in 18 Countries. 1975–95,” American Political Science Review 97(3): 425–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kriesi, Hanspeter (1980). Entscheidungsstrukturen und Entscheidungsprozesse in der Schweizer Politik. Frankfurt: Campus, Verlag.Google Scholar

Kriesi, Hanspeter (1986). “Einleitung,” in Farago, Peter and Kriesi, Hanspeter (eds.), Wirtschaftsverbände in der Schweiz. Organisation und Aktivitäten von Wirtschaftsverbänden in vier Sektoren der Industrie. Grüsch: Rüegger, 1–18.Google Scholar

Kriesi, Hanspeter (1998a). Le système politique suisse. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar

Kriesi, Hanspeter (1998b). “The Transformation of Cleavage Politics: The 1997 Stein Rokkan Lecture,” European Journal of Political Research 33(2): 165–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kriesi, Hanspeter (1999). “Movements of the Left, Movements of the Right: Putting the Mobilization of Two New Types of Social Movements into Political Context,” in Kitschelt, Herbert, Lange, Peter, Marks, Gary, and Stephens, John D. (eds.), Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 398–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kriesi, Hanspeter, Grande, Edgar, Lachat, Romain, Dolezal, Martin, Bornschier, Simon, and Frey, Timotheos (2006). “Globalization and the Transformation of the National Political Space: Six European Countries Compared,” European Journal of Political Research 45(6): 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kriesi, Hanspeter, Grande, Edgar, Lachat, Romain, Dolezal, Martin, Bornschier, Simon, and Frey, Timotheus (2008). West European Politics in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuhnle, Stein (2000). Survival of the European Welfare State. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Künzi, Kilian and Schärrer, Markus (2004). Wer zahlt für die Soziale Sicherheit und wer profitiert davon? Eine Analyse der Sozialtransfers in der Schweiz. Zurich: Rüegger.Google Scholar

Laver, Michael and Hunt, W. Ben (1992). Policy and Party Competition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Laver, Michael and Schofield, Norman (1990). Multiparty Government: The Politics of Coalition in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lehmbruch, Gerhard (2000). Parteienwettbewerb im Bundesstaat. Regelsysteme und Spannungslagen im politischen System der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher, Verlag.Google Scholar

Leibfried, Stephan and Obinger, Herbert (2003). “The State of the Welfare State: German Social Policy between Macroeconomic Retrenchment and Microeconomic Recalibration”, West European Politics 26(4): 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leimgruber, Matthieu (2008). Solidarity without the State? Business and the Shaping of the Swiss Welfare State, 1890–2000. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leitner, Sigrid and Obinger, Herbert (1996). “Feminisierung der Armut im Wohlfahrtsstaat. Eine strukturelle Analyse weiblicher Armut am Beispiel der Alterssicherung in Österreich und in der Schweiz,” Swiss Political Science Review 2(4): 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leitner, Sigrid, Ostner, Ilona, and Schratzenstaller, Margrit (2004). Wohlfahrtsstaat und Geschlechterverhältnis im Umbruch. Was kommt nach dem Ernährermodell?Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lepperhoff, Julia, Meyer, Traute, and Riedmüller, Barbara (2001). “Zur Alterssicherung der Frau in Deutschland und in der Schweiz,” Leviathan 29(2): 199–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leu, Robert E., Burri, Stefan, and Priester, Tom (1997). Lebensqualität und Armut in der Schweiz. Bern: Haupt.Google Scholar

Leuzinger-Naef, Susanne (1998). “Flexibilisierte Arbeitsverhältnisse im Sozialversicherungsrecht,” Soziale Sicherheit 3: 125–43.Google Scholar

Levy, Jonah (1999). “Vice into Virtue? Progressive Politics and Welfare Reform in Continental Europe,” Politics and Society 27(2): 239–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Levy, Jonah (2000). “France: Directing Adjustment?” in Scharpf, Fritz W. and Schmidt, Vivien (eds.), Welfare and Work in the Open Economy, vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 308–50.Google Scholar

Lewis, Jane (1992). “Gender and the Development of Welfare Regimes,” Journal of European Social Policy 2(3): 159–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, Jane (1993). Women and Social Policies in Europe: Work, Family and the State. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Lijphart, Arend (1999). Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Lipset, Seymour M. and Rokkan, Stein (1985). “Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments,” in Lipset, Seymour M. (ed.), Consensus and Conflict. Essays in Political Sociology, 113–85. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar

Lister, Ruth (2004). “The Third Way's Social Investment State,” in Lewis, Jane and Surender, Rebecca (eds.), Welfare State Change: Towards a Third Way? Oxford: Oxford University Press, 157–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luchsinger, Christine (1995). Solidarität, Selbständigkeit, Bedürftigkeit. Der schwierige Weg zu einer Gleichberechtigung der Geschlechter in der AHV 1939–1980. Zurich: Chronos.Google Scholar

Mach, André (2006). La Suisse entre internationalisation et changements politiques internes. La législation sur les cartels et les relations industrielles dans les années 1990. Zurich: Rüegger.Google Scholar

Mach, André and Oesch, Daniel (2003). “Collective Bargaining between Decentralization and Stability: A Sectoral Model Explaining the Swiss Experience during the 1990s,” Industrielle Beziehungen 10(4): 160–82.Google Scholar

Mahoney, James and Thelen, Kathleen (2010). “A Theory of Gradual Instituitional Change,” in Mahoney, James and Thelen, Kathleen (eds.), Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1–37.Google Scholar

Manow, Philip (2001). “Comparative Institutional Advantages of Welfare State Regimes and New Coalitions in Welfare State Reforms,” in Pierson, Paul (ed.), The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 146–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manow, Philip (2002). “The Good, the Bad and the Ugly: Esping-Andersens Sozialstaats-Typologie und die konfessionellen Wurzeln des westlichen Wohlfahrtsstaates,” Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 54(2): 203–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manow, Philip (2002). Social Protection, Capitalist Production. The Bismarckian Welfare State and the German Political Economy from the 1880s to the 1990s. Habilitationsschrift, Universität Konstanz.Google Scholar

Manow, Philip and Burkhart, Simone (2004). “Legislative Autolimitation under Divided Government – Evidence from the German Case 1976–2002,” Max Planck Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung (MPIfG) Discussion Paper 04/11. Cologne: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.

Manow, Philip and Seils, Eric (2000). “Adjusting Badly: The German Welfare State, Structural Change, and the Open Economy,” in Scharpf, Fritz W. and Schmidt, Vivien A. (eds.), Welfare and Work in the Open Economy, vol. 2, Diverse Responses to Common Challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 264–307.Google Scholar

Mares, Isabela (2000). “Strategic Alliances and Social Policy Reform: Unemployment Insurance in Comparative Perspective,” Politics and Society 28(2): 223–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mares, Isabela (2001a). “Enterprise Reorganisation and Social Insurance Reform: The Development of Early Retirement in France and Germany,” Governance 14(3): 295–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mares, Isabela (2001b). “Firms and the Welfare State: When, Why and How Does Social Policy Matter to Employers?” in Hall, Peter A. and Soskice, David (eds.), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. NewYork: Oxford University Press, 184–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mares, Isabela (2003a). The Politics of Social Risk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mares, Isabela (2003b). “The Sources of Business Interests in Social Insurance: Sectoral versus National Differences,” World Politics 55(2): 229–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marques-Pereirea, Bérengère and Paye, Olivier (2001). “Belgium: The Vices and Virtues of Pragmatism,” in Jenson, Jane and Sineau, Mariette (eds.), Who Cares? Women's Work, Childcare, and Welfare State Redesign. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 56–87.Google Scholar

Martin, Cathie Jo (1995). “Nature or Nurture? Sources of Firm Preferences for National Health Reform,” American Political Science Review 89: 898–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, Cathie Jo (1997). “Mandating Social Change: the Business Struggle over National Health Reform,” Governance 10(4): 397–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meyer, Traute (1998). “Retrenchment, Reproduction, Modernization: Pension Politics and the Decline of the German Breadwinner Model,” Journal of European Social Policy 8(3): 212–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morgan, Kimberly (2006). Working Mothers and the Welfare State: Religion and the Politics of Work-Family Policies in Western Europe and the United States. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Mühlberger, Ulrike (2000). Neue Formen der Beschäftigung. Arbeitsflexibilisierung durch atypische Beschäftigung in Österreich. Vienna: Braumüller.Google Scholar

Hans-Peter, Müller and Wilke, Manfred (2003). “Gewerkschaftsfusionen: Der Weg zu modernen Multibranchengewerkschaften,” in Schroeder, Wolfgang and Wessels, Bernhard (eds.), Die Gewerkschaften in Politik und Gesellschaft der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Wiesbaden. Westdeutscher Verlag, 122–43.Google Scholar

Myles, John (1984). Old Age in the Welfare State: The Political Economy of Public Pensions. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar

Myles, John and Pierson, Paul (1997). “Friedman's Revenge: The Reform of ‘Liberal’ Welfare States in Canada and the United States,” Politics and Society 25: 443–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Myles, John and Pierson, Paul (2001). “The Comparative Political Economy of Pension Reform,” in Pierson, Paul (ed.), The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 305–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Natali, David (2003). “The Role of Trade Unions in the Pension Reforms in France and Italy in the 1990s: New Forms of Political Exchange?” European University Institute Working Paper SPS, No. 2003/3. Florence: European University Institute.

Natali, David and Rhodes, Martin (2004). “The ‘New Politics’ of the Bismarckian Welfare State: Pension Reforms in Continental Europe,” European University Institute Working Paper SPS, No. 2004/10. Florence: European University Institute.

Natali, David and Rhodes, Martin (2008). “The ‘New Politics’ of Pension Reforms in Continental Europe,” in Arza, Camila and Kohli, Martin (eds.), Pension Reform in Europe. London: Routledge, 55–75.Google Scholar

Naumann, Ingela (2005). “Child Care and Feminism in West Germany and Sweden in the 1960s and 1970s,” Journal of European Social Policy 15(1): 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neidhart, Leonhard (1970). Plebiszit und pluralitäre Demokratie. Eine Analyse der Funktionen des schweizerischen Gesetzesreferendums. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar

Neuhold, Christine (1999). “Atypische Beschäftigung in Deutschland und Frankreich,” in Talos, Emmerich (ed.), Atypische Beschäftigung. Internationale Trends und sozialstaatliche Regelungen. Vienna: Manz, 36–81.Google Scholar

Nova, Colette and Häusermann, Silja (2005). Endlich existenzsichernde Renten. Erste Säule stärken – 3000 Franken Rente für alle. Dossier 34, Bern: Schweizerischer Gewerkschaftsbund.Google Scholar

Nullmeier, Frank and Rüb, Friedbert W. (1993). Die Transformation der Sozialpolitik. Vom Sozialstaat zum Sicherungsstaat. Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar

Obinger, Herbert (1998). Politische Institutionen und Sozialpolitik in der Schweiz. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

O'Connor, Julia (1993). “Gender, Class and Citizenship in the Comparative Analysis of Welfare State Regimes: Theoretical and Methodological Issues,” British Journal of Sociology 44(3): 501–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oesch, Daniel (2005). “Remodelling Class to Make Sense of Party Support: Class Voting in Britain, Germany and Switzerland,” paper presented at the European Consortium for Political Research General Conference, September 8-10, Budapest.

Oesch, Daniel (2006). Redrawing the Class Map: Stratification and Institutions in Germany, Britain, Sweden and Switzerland. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2005). Pensions at a Glance: Public Policies across OECD Countries. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar

,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2007). Pensions at a Glance: Public Policies across OECD Countries. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar

Orloff, A. S. (2006). “From Maternalism to ‘Employment for All’: State Policies to Promote Women's Employment across the Affluent Democracies,” in Levy, Jonah (ed.), The State after Statism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 230–68.Google Scholar

Orloff, Ann Shola (1993). “Gender and the Social Rights of Citizenship: The Comparative Analysis of Gender Relations and Welfare States,” American Sociological Review 58(3): 303–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orloff, Ann Shola (1996). “Gender in the Welfare State,” Annual Review of Sociology 22: 51–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orloff, Ann Shola and Skocpol, Theda (1984). “Why Not Equal Protection? Explaining the Politics of Public Social Welfare in Britain and the United States, 1880s–1920s,” American Sociological Review 49: 726–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Palier, Bruno (2002). Gouverner la sécurité sociale. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Palier, Bruno (2003a). La réforme des retraites. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Palier, Bruno (2003b). “Facing the Pension Crisis in France,” in Whiteside, Noel and Clarke, Gordon (eds.), Pension Security in the 21st Century: Redrawing the Public-Private Divide. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 93–114.Google Scholar

Palier, Bruno (2005). “Ambiguous Agreement, Cumulative Change: French Social Policy in the 1990s,” in Streeck, Wolfgang and Thelen, Kathleen (eds.), Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 127–44.Google Scholar

Palier, Bruno (2006). “The Long Good Bye to Bismarck? Changes in the French Welfare State,” in Culpepper, Pepper D., Hall, Peter A., and Palier, Bruno (eds.), Changing France: The Politics That Markets Make. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 107–28.Google Scholar

Palier, Bruno and Mandin, Christelle (2004). “France: A New World of Welfare for New Social Risks?” in Taylor-Gooby, Peter (ed.), New Risks, New Welfare: The Transformation of the European Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 111–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Palier, Bruno and Martin, Claude (2007). “From a ‘Frozen Landscape’ to Structural Reforms: The Sequential Transformation of Bismarckian Welfare Systems,” Social Policy and Administration 41(6): 535–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Palier, Bruno (2010). A Long Goodbye to Bismarck? The Politics of Welfare Reforms in Continental Europe. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peacock, Alan R. and Wiseman, Jack (1961). The Growth of Public Expenditure in the United Kingdom. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Pfenning, Astrid and Bahle, Thomas (eds) (2000). Families and Family Policies in Europe: Comparative Perspectives. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

Pierson, Paul (1996). “The New Politics of the Welfare State,” World Politics 48(2): 143–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pierson, Paul (2000a). “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics,” American Political Science Review 94(2): 251–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pierson, Paul (2000b). “Not Just What, but When: Timing and Sequence in Political Processes,” Studies in American Political Development 14(1): 73–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pierson, Paul (2000c). “Three Worlds of Welfare State Research,” Comparative Political Studies 33 (6/7): 791–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pierson, Paul (2001). “Coping with Permanent Austerity: Welfare State Restructuring in Affluent Democracies,” in Pierson, Paul (ed.), The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 410–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pierson, Paul (2004). Politics in Time: History, Institutions and Social Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poitry, Alain-Valéry (1989). La fonction d'ordre de l'Etat. Analyse des mécanismes et des déterminants sélectifs dans le processus législatif suisse. Bern: Lang.Google Scholar

Pontusson, Jonas und Swenson, Peter (1996). “Labor Markets, Production Strategies and Wage Bargaining Institutions: The Swedish Employer Offensive in Comparative Perspective,” Comparative Political Studies 29(2): 223–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Powell, Bingham (2000). Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Queisser, Monika und Vittas, Dimitri (2000). The Swiss Multi-Pillar Pension System: Triumph of Common Sense?Development Research Group, Washington: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rabinowitz, George and Macdonald, Stuart E. (1989). “A Directional Theory of Issue Voting,” American Political Science Review 83(1): 93–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rechsteiner, Rudolf (2002). Flexibilität und soziale Sicherung in der Schweiz unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Alterssicherung. Basel: Selbstverlag.Google Scholar

Reinberg, Alexander and Hummel, Markus (2003). “Steuert Deutschland langfristig auf einen Fachkräftemangel zu?” Institut für Arbeitsmarkt – und Berufsforschung der Bundesanstalt für Arbeit, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung Kurzbericht, 9, Nürnberg, 1–8.Google Scholar

Rhodes, Martin (2001). “The Political Economy of Social Pacts: ‘Competitive Corporatism’ and European Welfare Reform,” in Pierson, Paul (ed.), The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 165–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rhodes, Martin and Natali, David (2004). “Trade-Offs and Veto Players: Reforming Pensions in France and Italy,” French Politics 2(1): 1–23.Google Scholar

Riedmüller, Barbara (2000). “Frauen – und familienpolitische Leitbilder im deutschen Alterssicherungssystem,” in Schmähl, Winfried und Michaelis, Klaus (eds.), Alterssicherung von Frauen – Leitbilder, gesellschaftlicher Wandel und Reformen. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher, Verlag, 36–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Riker, William H. (1986). The Art of Political Manipulation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Riker, William H. (1987). The Theory of Political Coalitions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Rokeach, Milton (1973). The Nature of Human Values. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Rueda, David (2005). “Insider-Outsider Politics in Industrialized Democracies: The Challenge to Social Democratic Parties,” American Political Science Review 99(1): 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rueda, David (2006). Social Democracy Inside Out. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Rusciano, Frank Louis (1992). “Rethinking the Gender Gap: The Case of West German Elections, 1949–1987,” Comparative Politics 24(3): 335–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sabatier, Paul A. and Jenkins-Smith, Hank C. (1993). Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar

Sainsbury, Diane (1994). “Women's and Men's Social Rights: Gendering Dimensions of Welfare States,” in Sainbury, D. (ed.), Gendering Welfare States. London: Sage, 150–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scharpf, Fritz W. (2000). “The Viability of Advanced Welfare States in the International Economy: Vulnerabilities and Options,” Journal of European Public Policy 7(2): 190–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scharpf, Fritz W. and Schmidt, Vivien A. (2000). Welfare and Work in the Open Economy: From Vulnerability to Competitiveness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schickler, Eric (2001). Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and the Development of the U.S. Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Schludi, Martin (2005). The Reform of Bismarckian Pension Systems: A Comparison of Pension Politics in Austria, France, Germany, Italy and Sweden. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schludi, Martin (2008). “Between Conflict and Consensus: The Reform of Bismarckian Pension Regimes,” in Arza, Camila and Kohli, Martin (eds.), Pension Reform in Europe. London: Routledge, 76–99.Google Scholar

Schluep, Kurt (2003). Finanzierungsbedarf in der AHV (inkl. EL). Forschungsbericht, Nr. 10/03. Bundesamt für Sozialversicherungen, Bern: Beiträge zur Sozialen, Sicherheit.Google Scholar

Schmähl, Winfried (1997). “The Public-Private Mix in Pension Provision in Germany,” in Rein, Martin and Wadensjö, Eskil (eds.), Enterprise and the Welfare State. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 99–148.Google Scholar

Schmähl, Winfried (2000). “Alterssicherung von Frauen im Prozess ökonomischen, gesellschaftlichen und politischen Wandels,” in Schmähl, Winfried und Michaelis, Klaus (eds.), Alterssicherung von Frauen – Leitbilder, gesellschaftlicher Wandel und Reformen. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher, Verlag, 9–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmähl, Winfried and Michaelis, Klaus (2000). Alterssicherung von Frauen – Leitbilder, gesellschaftlicher Wandel und Reformen. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher, Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmidt, Manfred (1998). Sozialpolitik in Deutschland. Historische Entwicklung und internationaler Vergleich. Opladen: Leske und Budrich.Google Scholar

Schmidt, Manfred G. (2000). “Immer noch auf dem “mittleren Weg”? Deutschlands Politische Ökonomie am Ende des 20. Jahrhunderts,” in Czada, Roland und Wollmann, Hellmut (eds.), Von der Bonner zur Berliner Republik. 10 Jahre deutsche Einheit. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher, Verlag, 491–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmidt, Vivien (1999). “The Changing Dynamics of State-Society Relations in the Fifth Republic,” West European Politics 22(4): 141–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmitter, Philippe C. (1979). “Still the Century of Corporatism?” in Schmitter, Philippe C. und Lehmbruch, Gerhard (eds.), Trends toward Corporatist Intermediation, 7–48. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Schmitter, Philippe C. and Streeck, Wolfgang (1981). “The Organization of Business Interests: A Research Design,” rev. discussion paper IIMV/LMP 81–13. Berlin, Wissenschaftszentrum.

Schroeder, Wolfgang and Silvia, Stephen J. (2003). “Gewerkschaften und Arbeitgeberverbände,” in Schroeder, Wolfgang and Wessels, Bernhard (eds.), Die Gewerkschaften in Politik und Gesellschaft der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Wiesbaden. Westdeutscher, Verlag, 246–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schroeder, Wolfgang and Wessels, Bernhard (2003). “Das deutsche Gewerkschaftsmodell im Transformationsprozess: Die neue deutsche Gewerkschaftslandschaft,” in Schroeder, Wolfgang and Wessels, Bernhard (eds.), Die Gewerkschaften in Politik und Gesellschaft der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher, Verlag, 11–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schulze, Isabelle (2007). Der Einfluss von Wahlsystemen auf Politikinhalte. Electoral Threat in der Rentenpolitik. Baden-Baden: Nomos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schulze, Isabelle and Jochem, Sven (2007). “Germany: Beyond Policy Gridlock,” in Immergut, Ellen M., Anderson, Karen M., and Schulze, Isabelle (eds.), The Handbook of West European Pension Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 660–712.Google Scholar

Schulze, Isabelle and Schludi, Martin (2007). “Austria: From Electoral Cartels to Competitive Coalition-Building,” in Immergut, Ellen M., Anderson, Karen M., and Schulze, Isabelle (eds.), The Handbook of West European Pension Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 555–604.Google Scholar

Schwartz, Herman (2001). “Round Up the Usual Suspects! Globalization, Domestic Politics, and Welfare State Change,” in Pierson, Paul (ed.), The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 17–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sciarini, Pascal (1999). “La formulation de la décision,” in Klöti, U., Knoepfel, Peter, Kriesi, Hanspeter, Linder, Wolf, and Papadopoulos, Yannis (eds.), Handbuch der Schweizer Politik. Zurich: NZZ, Verlag, 491–528.Google Scholar

Sciarini, Pascal, Nicolet, Sarah, and Fischer, Alex (2002). “L'impact de l'internationalisation sur les processus de décision en Suisse: Une analyse quantitative des actes législatifs 1995–1999,” Swiss Political Science Review 8(3/4): 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scott, J. (1992). Social Network Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Senti, Martin (1994). Geschlecht als politischer Konflikt. Erfolgsbedingungen einer gleichstellungspolitischen Interessendurchsetzung. Bern: Haupt.Google Scholar

,SGK-N (2002). Bericht der Kommission für soziale Sicherheit und Gesundheit (SGK-N) über den Vorsorgeschutz für Teilzeitbeschäftigte und Personen mit kleinen Einkommen, über die Anpassung des Umwandlungssatzes und über die paritätische Verwaltung der Vorsorgeeinrichtungen, March. Bern: Vereinigte Bundesversammlung.Google Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth A. (1979). “Institutional Arrangements and Equilibrium in Multidimensional Voting Models,” American Journal of Political Science 23(1): 27–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Siegel, Nico and Jochem, Sven (2003). Konzertierung, Verhandlungsdemokratie und Reformpolitik im Wohlfahrtsstaat. Das Modell Deutschland im Vergleich. Opladen: Leske und Budrich.Google Scholar

Skocpol, Theda (1992). Protecting Soldiers and Mothers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Stephens, John D. (1979). The Transition from Capitalism to Socialism. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stephens, John D., Huber, Evelyne and Ray, Leonard (1999). “The Welfare State in Hard Times,” in Kitschelt, Herbert, Lange, Peter, Marks, Gary, and Stephens, John D. (eds.), Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 164–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Streeck, Wolfgang (1991). “On the Institutional Conditions of Diversified Quality Production”, in Matzner, Egon and Streeck, Wolfgang (eds.), Beyond Keynesianism: The Socio-Economics of Production and Employment. London: Edward Elgar, 21–61.Google Scholar

Streeck, Wolfgang and Thelen, Kathleen (2005). Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Suter, Christian and Mathey, Marie-Claire (2000). “Wirksamkeit und Umverteilungseffekte staatlicher Sozialleistungen,” info:social 3, 1–80.Google Scholar

Swank, Duane and Martin, Cathie Jo (2001). “Employers and the Welfare State: The Political Economic Organization of Firms and Social Policy in Contemporary Capitalist Democracies,” Comparative Political Studies 34(8): 889–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Swenson, Peter A. (1991a). “Bringing Capital Back In, or Social Democracy Reconsidered: Employer Power, Cross-Class Alliances, and Centralization of Industrial Relations in Denmark and Sweden,” World Politics 43(4): 513–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Swenson, Peter A. (1991b). “Labor and the Limits of the Welfare State: The Politics of Intraclass Conflict and Cross-Class Alliances in Sweden and West Germany,” Comparative Politics 24(2): 379–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Swenson, Peter A. (2002). Capitalists against Markets: The Making of Labor Markets and Welfare States in the United States and Sweden. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tabah, Léon (1986). Vieillir solidaires. Rapport du Commissariat général du Plan. Paris: La Documentation française.Google Scholar

Taddei, Dominique, Charpin, Jean-Michel and Davanne, Olivier (1999). Retraites choisies et progressives. Paris: Conseil d'analyse économique.Google Scholar

Talos, Emmerich (ed.) (1999). Atypische Beschäftigung. Internationale Trends und sozialstaatliche Regelungen. Vienna: Manz, Verlag.

Taylor-Gooby, Peter (2005). New Risks, New Welfare: The Transformation of the European Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Teulade, René (1989). Rapport de la Commission protection sociale. Paris: La Documentation française.Google Scholar

Teulade, René (1999). L'avenir de nos systèmes de retraite. Paris: Conseil économique et social, Direction des journaux officiels.Google Scholar

Thelen, Kathleen (2001). “Varieties of Labor Politics in Developed Democracies,” in Hall, Peter A. and Soskice, David (eds.), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. NewYork: Oxford University Press, 71–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thelen, Kathleen (2004). How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Titmuss, Richard (1958). Essays on the Welfare State. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Trampusch, Christine (2004). “Von Verbänden zu Parteien. Der Elitenwechsel in der Sozialpolitik,” Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 35(4): 646–66.Google Scholar

Trampusch, Christine (2005). “Institutional Resettlement: The Case of Early Retirement in Germany,” in Streeck, Wolfgang and Thelen, Kathleen (eds.), Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. New York: Oxford University Press, 203–28.Google Scholar

Trechsel, Alexandre H. and Sciarini, Pascal (1998). “Direct Democracy in Switzerland: Do Elites Matter?” European Journal of Political Research 38(1): 99–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tsebelis, George (2002). Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vail, Mark I. (1999). “The Better Part of Valour: The Politics of French Welfare Reform,” Journal of European Social Policy 9(4): 311–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vail, Mark I. (2004). “The Myth of the Frozen Welfare State and the Dynamics of Contemporary French and German Social-Protection Reform,” French Politics 2: 151–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vallat, Jean-Philippe (2002). La politique familiale en France (1945–2001). Construction des intérêts sociaux et transformation de l'Etat-Providence. Ph.D. dissertation, Institut d'études politiques, Paris.Google Scholar

Kersbergen, Kees (1995). Social Capitalism: A Study of Christian Democracy and the Welfare State. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kersbergen, Kees and Manow, Philip (2009). Religion, Class Coalitions and Welfare States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Visser, Jelle (1987). In Search of Inclusive Unionism: A Comparative Analysis. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Visser, Jelle, Dufour, Patrick, Mouriaux, René, and Subilieu, Françoise (2000). “France,” in Ebbinghaus, Bernhard and Visser, Jelle (eds.), The Societies of Europe: Trade Unions in Western Europe since 1945. London: Macmillan, 237–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Visser, Jelle and Hemerijck, Anton (1997). A Dutch Miracle: Job Growth, Welfare Reform and Corporatism in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wanner, Philippe and Ferrari, Antonella (2001). La participation des femmes au marché du travail. Neuchâtel: Forum Suisse pour l'Étude des Migrations.Google Scholar

Wasserman, S. and Faust, K.. (1994) Social Network Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wendt, Claus and Thompson, Theresa (2004). “The Need for Social Austerity versus Structural Reform in European Health Systems: A Four-Country Comparison of Health Reforms,” International Journal of Health Services 34(3): 415–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wessels, Bernhard (2004). “The German Party System: Developments after Unification,” in Reutter, Werner (ed.), Germany on the Road to “Normalcy”: Policies and Politics of the Red-Green Federal Government (1998–2002). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Wilensky, Harold (1975). The Welfare State and Equality: Structural and Ideological Roots of Public Expenditures. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Ernst, Zehnder (1988). Die Gesetzesüberprüfung durch die schweizerische Bundesversammlung: Untersuchung der parlamentarischen Veränderung von Vorlagen des Bundesrates in der Legislaturperiode 1971–1975. Entlebuch: Huber, Druck.Google Scholar