Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Chapter 1 Introduction
- Chapter 2 Context and aims
- Chapter 3 The Introduction to the Principles
- Chapter 4 The argument for immaterialism
- Chapter 5 Against the philosophers: the refutation of materialism
- Chapter 6 Reality and God
- Chapter 7 Science and mathematics
- Chapter 8 Spirits
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2014
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Chapter 1 Introduction
- Chapter 2 Context and aims
- Chapter 3 The Introduction to the Principles
- Chapter 4 The argument for immaterialism
- Chapter 5 Against the philosophers: the refutation of materialism
- Chapter 6 Reality and God
- Chapter 7 Science and mathematics
- Chapter 8 Spirits
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Berkeley's A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human KnowledgeAn Introduction, pp. 152 - 156Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2014
References
‘The Objects of Immediate Perception’, in (ed.), New Interpretations of Berkeley’s Thought, Amherst, NY: Humanity Books, 2008, pp. 107–19.Google Scholar
How to Do Things with Words,2nd edn, ed. and . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Was Berkeley an Empiricist or a Rationalist?’, in (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley. Cambridge University Press, 2005, pp. 34–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(ed.). George Berkeley: Philosophical Works. Dent: London, 1975.
Historical and Critical Dictionary, Selections, trans. . Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1991.Google Scholar
‘Berkeley’s Four Concepts of the Soul (1707–1709)’, in (ed.), Reexamining Berkeley’s Philosophy. University of Toronto Press, 2007, pp. 172–87.Google Scholar
Learning from Six Philosophers: Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz, Locke, Berkeley, Hume, 2 vols., Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
‘Editors Introduction’, A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge, ed. , Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Berkeley’s Philosophy of Spirit: Consciousness, Ontology, and the Elusive Subject. London: Continuum, 2007.Google Scholar
‘British Sceptical Realism: A Fresh Look at the British Tradition’, European Journal of Philosophy 7 (1999), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Berkeley’s Puzzle’, in and (eds.), Conceivability and Possibility. Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 127–43.Google Scholar
, and The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, 2 vols., Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
‘Perceiving and Berkeley’s Theory of Substance’, in (ed.), Reexamining Berkeley’s Philosophy. University of Toronto Press, 2007, pp. 121–52.Google Scholar
‘How Berkeley’s Works are Interpreted’, in (ed.), George Berkeley: Religion and Science in the Age of Enlightenment. Dordrecht: Springer, 2010, pp. 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(ed.). ‘Berkeley’s Stoic Notion of Spiritual Substance’, in New Interpretations of Berkeley’s Thought. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books, 2008, pp. 203–30.
‘Berkeley’s Christian Neoplatonism, Archetypes, and Divine Ideas’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 39 (2001), 239–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Berkeley’s Natural Philosophy and Philosophy of Science’, in (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley. Cambridge University Press, 2005, pp. 230–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Berkeley’s Argument for Other Minds’, History of Philosophy Quarterly 7 (1990), 431–40.Google Scholar
‘Something-We-Know-Not-What, Something-We-Know-Not-Why: Berkeley, Meanings and Minds, Philosophia 37 (2009), 381–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Berkeley on the Numerical Identity of what Several Immediately Perceive (Three Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous iii 247–8), Philosophy Compass 7/8 (2012), 517–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘The Problem of the Unity of a Physical Object in Berkeley’, in (ed.), Reexamining Berkeley’s Philosophy. University of Toronto Press, 2007, pp. 50–81.Google Scholar
Ideas and Ontology: An Essay in Early Modern Metaphysics of Ideas. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
‘Berkeley’s Philosophy of Mathematics’, in (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley. Cambridge University Press, 2005, pp. 266–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Causation, Fictionalism and Non-Cognitivism’, in (ed.), George Berkeley: Religion and Science in the Age of Enlightenment. Dordrecht: Springer, 2010, pp. 31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(ed.). Fictionalism in Metaphysics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2005.
From Descartes to Hume: Continental Metaphysics and the Development of Modern Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
‘Experience and its Objects’, in (ed.), The Contents of Experience: Essays on Perception. Cambridge University Press, 1992, pp. 79–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (eds.), The Works of George Berkeley, Bishop of Cloyne, 9 vols., London: Thomas Nelson, 1949.
‘Berkeley’s Notion of Spirit’, in (ed.), The Empiricists: Critical Essays on Locke, Berkeley and Hume. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1999, pp. 145–52.Google Scholar
and (eds.), Berkeley’s Principles and Dialogues: Background Source Materials. Cambridge University Press, 2000.
‘Berkeley’s Notebooks’, in (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley. Cambridge University Press, 2005, pp. 63–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Berkeley, Human Agency and Divine Concurrence’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (2008), 567–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dialogues Concerning Metaphysics and Religion, trans. and . Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
‘Berkeley’s Actively Passive Mind’, in (ed.), Reexamining Berkeley’s Philosophy. University of Toronto Press, 2007, pp. 153–71.Google Scholar
(ed.). ‘The Substance of Berkeley’s Philosophy’, in Berkeley’s Metaphysics: Structural, Interpretative and Critical Essays. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1995, pp. 89–105.
‘Berkeley’s Philosophy of Science’, in and (eds.), Essays on Berkeley: A Tercentennial Celebration. Oxford:Clarendon Press, 1985, pp. 149–61.Google Scholar
A Metaphysics for the Mob: The Philosophy of George Berkeley. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Malebranche’s Cartesianism and Lockean Colours’, History of Philosophy Quarterly 12 (1995), 387–403.Google Scholar
‘Berkeley and his Contemporaries: The Question of Mathematical Formalism’, in (ed.), George Berkeley: Religion and Science in the Age of Enlightenment. Dordrecht: Springer, 2010, pp. 43–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Philosophy and the Scientific Image of Man’, in (ed.), Science, Perception and Reality. Ridgeview: Humanities Press, 1963.Google Scholar
‘Hermeneutic Fictionalism’, in and (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy xxv: Figurative Language. Oxford: Blackwell, 2001, pp. 36–71.Google Scholar
Berkeley’s World: An Examination of the Three Dialogues. Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
‘Action and Inaction in Berkeley’, in and (eds.), Essays on Berkeley: A Tercentennial Celebration. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985, pp. 211–25.Google Scholar
(ed.). ‘Lending a Hand to Philonous: The Berkeley, Plato, Aristotle Connection’, in Berkeley: Critical and Interpretative Essays. Manchester University Press, 1982, pp. 295–310.
The Construction of Modern Science: Mechanisms and Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Unnatural Doubts: Epistemological Realism and the Basis of Scepticism. Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
‘Did Berkeley Completely Misunderstand the Basis of the Primary–Secondary Quality Distinction in Locke?’, in Ideas and Mechanism: Essays on Early Modern Philosophy. Princeton University Press, 1999, pp. 215–28.Google Scholar
Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz: The Concept of Substance in Seventeenth-Century Metaphysics. London: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar