Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T02:50:05.131Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

18 - Morphologically ‘primitive’ ants: comparative review of social characters, and the importance of queen–worker dimorphism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2010

Jae C. Choe
Affiliation:
Seoul National University
Bernard J. Crespi
Affiliation:
Simon Fraser University, British Columbia
Get access

Summary

ABSTRACT

Ants that exhibit a relatively large proportion of ancestral morphological traits are commonly believed to exhibit less social complexity. This was examined through a comparative review of Nothomyrmecia, Myrmecia, and the heterogeneous subfamily Ponerinae. A limited dimorphism between winged queens and workers is a common characteristic of morphologically ‘primitive’ ants. This has two important consequences: (1) queens are not very fecund, and this is reflected in the small size of colonies (a few dozens to several hundreds of workers); (2) solitary foundresses are unable to rear their first generation of workers without hunting outside their nests. In contrast, some of the ‘primitive’ species having permanently wingless (= ergatoid) queens exhibit considerably greater fecundity, and colonies reach a few thousands. There is also a small number of permanently queenless ponerine ants, in which one or more mated workers reproduce (several dozens to a few hundreds of workers per colony).

Ecological characteristics of ‘primitive’ ants include their predatory habits (in addition, sweet secretions are collected in various genera), various degrees of diet specialization, and a widespread lack of cooperation among foragers (although several species with ergatoid queens, and larger colonies, exhibit sophisticated recruitment and even group predation). Role specialization among sterile workers (including the influence of age) follows the typical formicid pattern; polymorphic workers occur in only one species. True trophallaxis among nestmates does not exist (two exceptions only); eggs (either reproductive or trophic) are eaten in several species.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×