Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T19:33:01.557Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

19 - Design of culturally-appropriate developmental interventions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Sevda Bekman
Affiliation:
Bogaziçi University, Istanbul
Ayhan Aksu-Koç
Affiliation:
Bogaziçi University, Istanbul
Get access

Summary

About five years ago I would not have thought that I would be worrying (let alone writing) about cultural appropriateness of interventions. After about twenty years of doing research in the US, I believed that science was science, and theory was theory no matter where one might be located. Professor Kağıtçıbaşı should have been, but was not, dismayed at my attitude. She merely suggested that there may be other points of view, and continued to collaborate with me in various research projects. I am deeply grateful for that opportunity.

Introduction

Developmental interventions often cite an effort to make an intervention “culturally appropriate” or “culturally sensitive,” and many applied developmental scientists view such appropriateness or sensitivity as a desirable property of interventions. At the same time, “cultural appropriateness” remains largely undefined, unmeasured, and consequently of untested virtue. We, the developmental scientists, often refrain from conceptually discussing or operationalizing “cultural appropriateness.” Hence, “cultural appropriateness” remains a slogan rather than a well-defined and measured property of developmental interventions.

The lack of a conceptual definition and an operationalization of cultural appropriateness of interventions are not without consequences. An effort to develop a culturally appropriate intervention without well articulated conceptual guidance may lead to well-meaning but perhaps unnecessary or even undesirable modifications of an intervention, without the possibility of evaluating whether those modifications were cost-effective or whether they contribute to the effectiveness of the intervention. Furthermore, cultural appropriateness may be a quantitative, rather than a qualitative, property.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amorim, K. S. and Rossetti-Ferreira, M. C., “Ethnotheories and childrearing practices: Some constraints on their investigation,” Culture & Psychology, 10 (2004), 337–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arbiter, E., Sato-Tanaka, R., Kolvin, I., and Leitch, I., “Differences in behaviour and temperament between Japanese and British toddlers living in London: A pilot study,” Child Psychology and Psychiatry Review, 4 (1999), 117–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aukrust, V. G., Edwards, C. P., Kumru, A., Knoche, L., and Kim, M., “Young children's close relationships outside the family: Parental ethnotheories in four communities in Norway, the United States, Turkey, and Korea,” International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27 (2003), 481–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, J. and Grimley, L. K., “Parenting in the global community: A cross-cultural/international perspective,” in Fine, M. J. and Lee, S. W. (eds.), Handbook of Diversity in Parent Education: The Changing Faces of Parenting and Parent Education (San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2001), pp. 97–132.Google Scholar
Bornstein, M. H., “Positive parenting and positive development in children,” in Lerner, R. M., Jacobs, F., and Wertlieb, D. (eds.), Handbook of Applied Developmental Science. Volume 1 (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2003), pp. 187–210.Google Scholar
Botvin, G. J., Schinke, S. P., Epstein, J. A., Diaz, T., and Botvin, E. M., “Effectiveness of culturally focused and generic skills training approaches to alcohol and drug abuse prevention among minority youths: Two year follow-up results,” Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 9 (1995), 183–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U., The Ecology of Human Development (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Bus, A. G., Leseman, P. P. M., and Keultjes, P., “Joint book reading across cultures: A comparison of Surinamese-Dutch, Turkish-Dutch, and Dutch parent–child dyads,” Journal of Literacy Research, 32 (2000), 53–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castro, F. G., Barrera, M., and Martinez, C. R., “The cultural adaptation of prevention interventions: Resolving tensions between fidelity and fit,” Prevention Science, 5 (2004), 41–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, P., “Comparison of visual motor development in Hong Kong and the USA assessed on the Qualitative Scoring System for the Modified Bender-Gestalt Test,” Psychological Reports, 88 (2001), 236–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chavajay, P. and Rogoff, B., “Cultural variation in management of attention by children and their caregivers,” Developmental Psychology, 35 (1999), 1079–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, X., Rubin, K. H., Li, B., and Li, D., “Adolescent outcomes of social functioning in Chinese children,” International Journal of Behavioral Development, 23 (1999), 199–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figueroa-Moseley, C., Ramey, C. T., Keltner, B., and Lanzi, R. G., “Variations in Latino parenting practices and their effects on child cognitive developmental outcomes,” Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 28 (2006), 102–14.Google Scholar
Deater-Deckard, K. and Dodge, K. A., “Externalizing behavior problems and discipline revisited: Nonlinear effects and variation by culture, context, and gender,” Psychological Inquiry, 8 (1997), 161–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demetriou, A., Pachaury, A., Metallidou, Y., and Kazi, S., “Universals and specificities in the structure and development of quantitative-relational thought: A cross-cultural study in Greece and India,” International Journal of Behavioral Development, 19 (1996), 255–90.Google Scholar
Duane, R. and Grusec, J. E., “Authoritarian parenting in individualist and collectivist groups: Associations with maternal emotion and cognition and children's self-esteem,” Journal of Family Psychology, 20 (2006), 68–78.Google Scholar
Flavell, J. H., “Theory-of-mind development: Retrospect and prospect,” Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 50 (2004), 274–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, D. C., Pidada, S., Denoma, J., McDonald, K. and Lawton, A., “Reported peer conflicts of children in the United States and Indonesia,” Social Development, 14 (2005), 458–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedlmeier, W. and Trommsdorff, G., “Emotion regulation in early childhood: A cross-cultural comparison between German and Japanese toddlers,” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30 (1999), 684–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frydenberg, E., Lewis, R., Kennedy, G., Ardila, R., Frindte, W., and Hannoun, R., “Coping with concerns: An exploratory comparison of Australian, Colombian, German, and Palestinian adolescents,” Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 32 (2003), 59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geary, D. C., Bow-Thomas, C. C., Liu, F., and Siegler, R. S., “Development of arithmetical competencies in Chinese and American children: Influence of age, language, and schooling,” Child Development, 67 (1996), 2022–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gonzales-Ramos, G., Zayas, L. H., and Cohen, E. V., “Child-rearing values of low-income, urban Puerto Rican mothers of preschool children,” Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 29 (1998), 377–82.Google Scholar
Grader, M., “Expressive timing and interactional synchrony between mothers and infants: Cultural similarities, cultural differences, and the immigration experience,” Cognitive Development, 18 (2003), 533–54.Google Scholar
Harwood, R. L., Schoelmerich, A., Schulze, P. A., and Gonzalez, Z., “Cultural differences in maternal beliefs and behaviors: A study of middle-class Anglo and Puerto Rican mother–infant pairs in four everyday situations,” Child Development, 70 (1999), 1005–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hecht, M. L., Marsiglia, F. F., Elek, E., Wagstaff, D. A., Kulis, S., Dustman, P., and Miller-Day, M., “Culturally grounded substance use prevention: An evaluation of the keepin' it R.E.A.L curriculum,” Prevention Science, 4 (2003), 233–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herz, L. and Gullone, E., “The relationship between self-esteem and parenting style: A cross-cultural comparison of Australian and Vietnamese Australian adolescents,” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30 (1999), 742–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holloway, S., Fuller, B., Rambaud, M., and Eggers-Pierola, C., Through My Own Eyes: Single Mothers and the Cultures of Poverty (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Jolley, R. P., Zhi, Z., and Thomas, G. V., “The development of understanding moods metaphorically expressed in pictures: A cross-cultural comparison,” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29 (1998), 358–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joshi, M. S. and MacLean, M., “Maternal expectations of child development in India, Japan, and England,” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28 (1997), 219–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., “Old-age security value of children: Cross-national socio-economic evidence,” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 13 (1982), 29–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., Family and Human Development across Cultures: A View from the Other Side (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1996).Google Scholar
Keller, H., “Socialization for competence: Cultural models of infancy,” Human Development, 46 (2003), 288–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, H., Borke, J., Yovsi, R., Lohaus, A., and Jensen, H., “Cultural orientations and historical changes as predictors of parenting behaviour,” International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29 (2005), 229–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, H., Lohaus, A., Kuensemueller, P., Abels, M., Yovsi, R., Voelker, S., Jensen, H., Papaligoura, Z., Rosabal-Coto, M., Kulks, D., and Mohita, P., “The bio-culture of parenting: Evidence from five cultural communities,” Parenting: Science and Practice, 4 (2004a), 25–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, H., Yovsi, R., Borke, J., Kärtner, J., Jensen, H., and Papaligoura, Z., “Developmental consequences of early parenting experiences: Self-recognition and self-regulation in three cultural communities,” Child Development, 75 (2004b), 1745–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kermani, H. and Brenner, M. E., “Maternal scaffolding in the child's zone of proximal development across tasks: Cross-cultural perspectives,” Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 15 (2001), 30–52.Google Scholar
Kulis, S., Marsiglia, F. F., Elek, E., Dustman, P., Wagstaff, D. A., and Hecht, M. L., “Mexican/Mexican American adolescents and keepin' it REAL: An evidence-based substance use prevention program,” Children & Schools, 27 (2005), 133–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumpfer, K. L., Alvarado, R., Smith, P., and Bellamy, N., “Cultural sensitivity and adaptation in family-based prevention interventions,” Prevention Science, 3 (2002), 241–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LaFreniere, P., Masataka, N., Butovskaya, M., Chen, Q., Dessen, M. A., Atwanger, K., Schreiner, S., Montirosso, R., and Frigerio, A., “Cross-cultural analysis of social competence and behavior problems in preschoolers,” Early Education and Development, 13 (2002), 201–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lansford, J. E., Deater-Deckard, K., Dodge, K. A., Bates, J. E., and Pettit, G. S., “Ethnic differences in the link between physical discipline and later adolescent externalizing behaviors,” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45 (2004), 801–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Le, T. N., Monfared, G., and Stockdale, G. D., “The relationship of school, parent, and peer contextual factors with self-reported delinquency for Chinese, Cambodian, Laotian or Mien, and Vietnamese youth,” Crime & Delinquency, 51 (2005), 192–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, X., Fuller, B., and Singer, J. D., “Ethnic differences in child care selection: The influence of family structure, parental practices, and home language,” Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 15 (2000), 357–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, S. and Lim, B. K., “Parenting style and child outcomes in Chinese and immigrant Chinese families: Current findings and cross-cultural considerations in conceptualization and research,” Marriage and Family Review, 35 (2004), 21–43.Google Scholar
Maldonado-Molina, M. M., Reyes, N. A., and Espinosa-Hernandez, G., “Prevention research and Latino families: Resources for researchers and practitioners,” Family Relations, 55 (2006), 403–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marek, L. I., Brock, D. P., and Sullivan, R., “Cultural adaptations to a family life skills program: Implementation in rural Appalachia,” Journal of Primary Prevention, 27 (2006), 113–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maynard, A. E. and Greenfield, P. M., “Implicit cognitive development in cultural tools and children: Lessons from Maya Mexico,” Cognitive Development, 18 (2003), 489–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarty, C. A., Weisz, J. R., Wanitromanee, K., Eastman, K. L., Suwanlert, S., Chaiyasit, W., and Band, E. B., “Culture, coping, and context: Primary and secondary control among Thai and American youth,” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40 (1999), 809–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, A. M. and Harwood, R. L., “The cultural organization of parenting: Change and stability of behavior patterns during feeding and social play across the first year of life,” Parenting: Science and Practice, 2 (2002), 241–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mistry, J., Chaudhuri, J. A., and Diez, V., “Ethnotheories of parenting: At the interface between culture and child development,” in Lerner, R. M., Jacobs, F., and Wertlieb, D. (eds.), Handbook of Applied Developmental Science. Volume 1 (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2003), pp. 233–58.Google Scholar
Mosier, C. E. and Rogoff, B., “Privileged treatment of toddlers: Cultural aspects of individual choice and responsibility,” Developmental Psychology, 39 (2003), 1047–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murase, T., Dale, P. S., Ogura, T., Yamashita, Y., and Mahieu, A., “Mother–child conversation during joint picture book reading in Japan and the USA,” First Language, 25 (2005), 197–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parke, R. D. and Buriel, R., “Socialization in the family: Ethnic and ecological perspectives,” in Eisenberg, N., Damon, W., and Lerner, H. (eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology. Volume 3. Social, Emotional, and Personality Development, Sixth edition (Hoboken, NJ, Wiley, 2006), pp. 429–504).Google Scholar
Pilgrim, C. and Rueda-Riedle, A., “The importance of social context in cross-cultural comparisons: First graders in Colombia and the United States,” Journal of Genetic Psychology, 163 (2002), 283–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Portes, P. R., Cuentas, T. E., and Zady, M., “Cognitive socialization across ethnocultural contexts: Literacy and cultural differences in intellectual performance and parent–child interaction,” Journal of Genetic Psychology, 161 (2000), 79–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pullmann, H., Allik, J., and Lynn, R., “The growth of IQ among Estonian schoolchildren from ages 7 to 19,” Journal of Biosocial Science, 36 (2004), 735–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rao, N. and Stewart, S. M., “Cultural influences on sharer and recipient behavior: Sharing in Chinese and Indian preschool children,” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30 (1999), 219–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodney, L. W., Johnson, D. L., and Srivastava, R. P., “The impact of culturally relevant violence prevention models on school-age youth,” Journal of Primary Prevention, 26 (2005), 439–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rudy, D. and Grusec, J. E., “Authoritarian parenting in individualist and collectivist groups: Associations with maternal emotion and cognition and children's self-esteem,” Journal of Family Psychology, 20 (2006), 68–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stewart, S. M., Bond, M. H., Chan, W., Zaman, R. M., Dar, R., and Anwar, M., “Autonomy from parents and psychological adjustment in an interdependent culture,” Psychology and Developing Societies, 15 (2003), 31–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tulviste, T., “Sociocultural variation in mothers' control over children's behavior,” Ethos, 32 (2004), 34–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valdivia, I. A., Schneider, B. H., Chavez, K. L., and Chen, X., “Social withdrawal and maladjustment in a very group-oriented society,” International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29 (2005), 219–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varela, R. E., Vernberg, E. M., Sẵnchez-sosa, J. J., Riveros, A., Mitchell, M., and Mashunkashey, J., “Parenting style of Mexican, Mexican American, and Caucasian-non-Hispanic families: Social context and cultural influences,” Journal of Family Psychology, 18 (2004), 651–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vinden, P. G., “Children's understanding of mind and emotion: A multi-culture study,” Cognition & Emotion, 13 (1999), 19–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Q., “The emergence of cultural self-constructs: Autobiographical memory and self-description in European American and Chinese children,” Developmental Psychology, 40 (2004), 3–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, Q. and Leichtman, M. D., “Same beginnings, different stories: A comparison of American and Chinese children's narratives,” Child Development, 71 (2000), 1329–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, Q., Leichtman, M. D., and Davies, K. I., “Sharing memories and telling stories: American and Chinese mothers and their 3-year-olds,” Memory, 8 (2000), 159–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weisner, T. S., “Introduction,' in Weisner, T. S. (ed.), Discovering Successful Pathways in Children's Development: Mixed Methods in the Study of Childhood and Family Life (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2005), pp. 1–20.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×