Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T05:43:27.632Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2010

David Sobel
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska
Steven Wall
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Reasons for Action , pp. 272 - 284
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, J. (2002) Belief's Own Ethics. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Aristotle, (2000) Nichomachean Ethics, trans. Crisp, R.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armour-Garb, B. and Beall, J.C., eds. (2005) Deflationary Truth. Chicago: Open Court Press.Google Scholar
Arpaly, N. (2000) “On Acting Rationally Against One's Best Judgment,” Ethics, 110, April: 00–00CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atiyah, P.S. (1981) Promises, Morals and Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, J.L. (1961) “Ifs and Cans,” in Philosophical Papers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baier, K. (1966) “Moral Obligation,” American Philosophical Quarterly, 3: 210–226.Google Scholar
Bargh, J.A. and Chartrand, T.L. (1999) “The Unbearable Automaticity of Being,” American Psychologist, 54: 462–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bar-On, D., Horisk, C., and Lycan, W.G. (2005a) “Deflationism, Meaning and Truth-Conditions,” in Armour-Garb, B. and Beall, J.C., eds., Deflationary Truth. Chicago: Open Court Press: 321–343.Google Scholar
Bar-On, D., Horisk, C., and Lycan, W.G. (2005b) “Postscript to ‘Deflationism, Meaning, and Truth-Conditions’,” in Armour-Garb, B. and Beall, J.C., eds., Deflationary Truth. Chicago: Open Court Press.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S. (1995) Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S.et al. (1999) “Value Judgments: Testing the Somatic-Marker Hypothesis Using False Physiological Feedback,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25: 1021–1032.Google Scholar
Baumann., P. and Betzler, M., eds. (2004) Practical Conflicts: New Philosophical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Baumeister, R.F. (1997) Evil: Inside Human Violence and Cruelty. New York: W.H. Freeman: 209–210.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. (1980) “Accountability,” in Stratten, Z. Van., ed., Philosophical Subjects. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Binkley, R. (1965) “A Theory of Practical Reason,” The Philosophical Review, 74: 423–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bittner, R. (1992) “Is it Reasonable to Regret Things One Did?,” The Journal of Philosophy, 89: 262–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, S. (1984) Spreading The Word. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blackburn, S. (1993) Essays in Quasi-Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blackburn, S. (1997) “How to Be an Ethical Anti-Realist,” in Darwall, S., Gibbard, A., and Railton, P., eds., Moral Discourse and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 167–178.Google Scholar
Blackburn, S. (1998) Ruling Passions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boethius, (1902) The Consolation of Philosophy, trans. Cooper, W.V.London: J.M. Dent.Google Scholar
Bond, E.J. (1983) Reason and Value. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brandom, R. (1994) Making It Explicit. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brandt, R. (1979) A Theory of the Good and the Right. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brandt, R. (1996) Facts, Values, and Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bratman, M.E. (1981) “Intention and Means-End Reasoning,” The Philosophical Review, 90: 252–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratman, M.E. (1987) Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; reissued by CSLI Publications, 1999.Google Scholar
Bratman, M.E. (1999) Faces of Intention. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratman, M.E. (2001) “Taking Plans Seriously,” in Millgram, E., ed., Varieties of Practical Reasoning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bratman, M.E. (2007) Structures of Agency: Essays. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratman, M.E. (forthcoming) “Intention, Belief, Practical, Theoretical,” in Timmerman, J., Skorupski, J., and Robertson, S., eds., Spheres of Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brink, D. (1986)“ Externalist Moral Realism,” in The Spindel Conference: The Southern Journal of Philosophy, supplementary volume, 24: 23–41.Google Scholar
Brink, D. (1997) “Kantian Rationalism: Inescapability, Authority and Supremacy,” in Cullity, G. and Gaut, B., eds., Ethics and Practical Reason. Oxford: Clarendon Press: 255–291.Google Scholar
Bronte, C. (1847) Jane Eyre. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Broome, J. (1991) Weighing Goods. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Broome, J. (1997) “Reasons and Motivation,” Aristotelian Society Supplement, 71: 131–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broome, J. (1999) “Normative Requirements,” Ratio, 12: 398–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broome, J. (2004) “Reasons,” in Wallace, R.J., Pettit, P., Scheffler, S., and Smith, M., eds., Reason and Value: Themes from the Moral Philosophy of Joseph Raz. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 28–55.Google Scholar
Broome, J. (2005) “Have we Reason to do as Rationality Requires?—A Comment on Raz,” The Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, Symposium I, www.jesp.org
Broome, J. (2007) “Wide or Narrow Scope?,” Mind, 116: 359–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broome, J. (forthcoming) “The Unity of Reasoning?,” in Timmerman, J., Skorupski, J., and Robertson, S., eds., Spheres of Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Browning, C. (1992) Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. and Hunter, B., eds. (2000) Moral Epistemology Naturalized: Canadian Journal of Philosophy, supplementary volume, 26, Alberta: University of Calgary Press.Google Scholar
Carruthers, P. (1996) “Simulation and Self-Knowledge: A Defence of Theory-Theory,” in Carruthers, P. and Smith, P.K., eds., Theories of Theories of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 22–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, R. (1997) “Introduction,” in Chang, R., ed., Incommensurability, Incomparability, and Practical Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1–34.Google Scholar
Chang, R. (2002) “The Possibility of Parity,” Ethics, 112: 659–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, R. (2004a) “All Things Considered,” Philosophical Perspectives, 18: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, R. (2004b) “Putting Together Morality and Well-Being,” in Baumann, P. and Betzler, M., eds., Practical Conflicts: New Philosophical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 118–158.Google Scholar
Chang, R. (2004c) “Can Desires Provide Reasons for Action?,” in Wallace, R.J., Pettit, P., Scheffler, S., and Smith, M., eds., Reason and Value: Themes from the Moral Philosophy of Joseph Raz. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chang, R. (2005) “Parity, Interval Value, and Choice,” Ethics, 114: 331–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, M.S. and Fiske, S.T., eds. (1982) Affect and Cognition. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Clark, P. (2001) “The Action as Conclusion,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 31, 481–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, P. (2007) “How Reason Can Be Practical: A Reply to Hume,” Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, 94: Moral Psychology, Tenenbaum, Sergio., ed. Amsterdam: Rodopi: 213–230.Google Scholar
Clarke, S. (1706) “Discourse Concerning the Unchangeable Obligations of Natural Religion, and the Truth and Certainty of the Christian Revelation”, in Raphael, D.D., ed., British Moralists 1650–1800. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett: 191–225.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. (1996) “Reason, Humanity, and the Moral Law,” in Korsgaard, C., The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 167–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copp, D. (1995) Morality, Normativity, and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Copp, D. (2001) “Realist-Expressivism: A Neglected Option for Moral Realism,” Social Philosophy and Policy, 18: 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990) Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
D'Arms, J. and Jacobson, D. (2000a) “The Moralistic Fallacy: On the ‘Appropriateness’ of Emotions,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 61: 65–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Arms, J. and Jacobson, D. (2000b) “Sentiment and Value,” Ethics, 110: 722–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Arms, J. and Jacobson, D. (2003) “The Significance of Recalcitrant Emotions (or, Anti-Quasijudgmentalism),” reprinted in Hatzimoysis, Anthony., ed., Philosophy and the Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
D'Arms, J. and Jacobson, D. (2006) “Anthropocentric Constraints on Human Value,” Oxford Studies in Metaethics, 1: 99–126.Google Scholar
Damasio, A. (1994) Descartes' Error. New York: Putnam.Google ScholarPubMed
Dancy, J. (2000) Practical Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dancy, J. (2004) “Enticing Reasons,” in Wallace, R.J., Pettit, P., Scheffler, S., andSmith, M.., eds., Reason and Value: Themes from the Moral Philosophy of Joseph Raz. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Darwall, S. (1983) Impartial Reason, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Darwall, S. (1986) “Agent-Centered Restrictions From the Inside Out,” Philosophical Studies, 50: 291–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, S. (2002) Welfare and Rational Care. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, S. (2003) “Autonomy in Modern Natural Law,” in Krasnoff, L. and Brender, N., eds., New Essays on the History of Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Darwall, S. (2004) “Respect and the Second-Person Standpoint,” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 78: 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, S. (2006) The Second-Person Standpoint: Morality, Respect, and Accountability. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. (1963) “Actions, Reasons and Causes,” reprinted in Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980: 3–20.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. (1970a) “Mental Events,” reprinted in Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980: 207–229.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. (1970b) “How is Weakness of the Will Possible?,” in Feinberg, J., ed. Moral Concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press, reprinted in Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press,1980: 21–43.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. (1971a) “Agency,” reprinted in Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980: 43–46.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. (1971b) “Psychology as Philosophy,” reprinted in Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980: 229–245.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. (1973) “Freedom to Act,” reprinted in Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980: 63–83.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. (1976) “Hempel on Explaining Action,” reprinted in Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980: 261–277.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. (1978) “Intending,” reprinted in Essays on Actions and Events, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001: 83–102.Google Scholar
Davies, W. (2003) Meaning, Expression and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. (2005) Nondescriptive Meaning and Reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, W. (1984) “A Causal Theory of Intending,” American Philosophical Quarterly, 21: 43–54.Google Scholar
Dijksterhuis, A.et al. (2006) “On Making the Right Choice: The Deliberation-without-Attention Effect,” Science, 311: 1005–1007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Downie, R.S. (1985) “Three Concepts of Promising,” Philosophical Quarterly, 35: 259–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgington, D. (1995) “On Conditionals,” Mind, 104: 235–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, P. (1955) The Logic of Moral Discourse. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Enoch, D. (2006) “Agency, Schmagency,” The Philosophical Review, 115: 169–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falk, W.D. (1986) “Fact, Value, and Nonnatural Predication,” in Falk, W.D. and Baier, K., eds., Ought, Reasons, and Morality: The Collected Papers of W.D. Falk. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Feinberg, J. (1980) “The Nature and Value of Rights,” in Rights, Justice, and the Bounds of Liberty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiske, A.P. (1991) Structures of Social Life: The Four Elementary Forms of Human Relationships. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Foot, P. (1978) “Morality as a System of Hypothetical Imperatives,” reprinted in Virtues and Vices. Berkeley: California University Press: 157–173.Google Scholar
Foot, P. (2001). Natural Goodness. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, H. (1988) The Importance of What We Care About. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fried, Charles. (1978) Right and Wrong. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fried, Charles. (1981) Contract and Promise. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Garner, R. (1990) “On the Genuine Queerness of Moral Properties and Facts,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 68: 137–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbard, A. (1990) Wise Choices, Apt Feelings. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbard, A. (2003) Wise Choices, Apt Feelings. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. and Todd., P. (1999) “Fast and Frugal Heuristics: The Adaptive Toolbox,” in Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gilbert, M. (2000) Sociality and Responsibility. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Gilbert, M. (2004) “Scanlon on Promissory Obligation: The Problem of Promisees' Rights,” The Journal of Philosophy, 101: 83–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, M. (2006) A Theory of Political Obligation. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goleman, D. (1995) Emotional Intelligence. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar
Goleman, Daniel. (2006) Social Intelligence. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar
Greenspan, P. (1975) “Conditional Oughts and Hypothetical Imperatives,” The Journal of Philosophy, 72: 259–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H.P. (1968) “Utterer's Meaning, Sentence Meaning, and Word Meaning,” Foundations of Language, 4: 225–242.Google Scholar
Grice, H.P. (1971) “Intention and uncertainty,” Proceedings of the British Academy, 57: 263–279.Google Scholar
Grice, H.P. (1974–5) “Method in Philosophical Psychology (From the Banal to the Bizarre),” (Presidential Address), Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association: 23–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, A. (2005a) “A Critique of Deflationism,” in B. Armour-Garb and J.C. Beall, eds., Deflationary Truth. Chicago: Open Court Press: 199–226.Google Scholar
Gupta, A. (2005b) “Postscript to ‘A Critique of Deflationism’,” in B. Armour-Garb and J.C. Beall, eds., Deflationary Truth. Chicago: Open Court Press: 227–233.Google Scholar
Haidt, J. (2001) “The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment,” Psychological Review, 108: 814–834.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hampton, J. (1998) The Authority of Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harcourt, E. (2005) “Quasi-Realism and Ethical Appearances,” Mind, 114: 249–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hare, R.M. (1971) “Wanting: Some Pitfalls,” in Binkley, R., Bronaugh, R., and Marras, A., eds., Agent, Action, and Reason. Toronto: University of Toronto Press: 81–97.Google Scholar
Hare, R.M. (1993) “Could Kant Have Been a Utilitarian?,” in Kant and Critique: New Essays in Honor of W.H. Werkmeister. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Harman, G. (1976) “Practical Reasoning,” reprinted in Reasoning, Meaning, and Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999: 46–74.Google Scholar
Harman, G. (19xx) “Rationality,” reprinted in Smith, E.E. and Osherson, D.N., eds., Thinking: Invitation Cognitive Science, 3. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Harman, G. (1977) The Nature of Morality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harman, G. (1986a) Change in View. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harman, G. (1986b) “Willing and Intending,” in Grandy, R. and Warner, R., eds., Philosophical Grounds of Rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 363–380.Google Scholar
Hart, H.L.A. (1955) “Are There Any Natural Rights?,” The Philosophical Review, 64: 175–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H.L A. (1968) “Prolegomenon to the Principles of Punishment,” in Punishment and Responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hassin, R.R., Uleman, J.S., and Bargh, J.A. (2005) The New Unconscious. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hauser, M.D., Chomsky, N., and Fitch, W.T. (2002) “The Faculty of Language: What Is It, Who Has It, and How Did It Evolve?,” Science, 298: 1569–1579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helm, B. (2001) Emotional Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, Carl. (1961) “Rational Action,” reprinted in Care, N.S. and Landesman, C., eds., Readings in the Theory of Action. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1968: 285–286.Google Scholar
Hieronymi, P. (2005) “The Wrong Kind of Reason,” The Journal of Philosophy, 102: 435–457.Google Scholar
Hill, C. (2002)Thought and World: An Austere Portrayal of Truth, Reference, and Semantic Correspondence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, T. (1651) Leviathas. New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Hoffman, M.L. (1982) “Development of Prosocial Motivation: Empathy and Guilt,” in Eisenberg, N. ed., The Development of Prosocial Behavior. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Horwich, P. (1990) Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hubin, D. (1999) “What's Special about Humeanism,” Noûs, 33: 30–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humberstone, L. (1992) “Direction of Fit,” Mind, 101: 59–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, D. (1978) A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. Selby-Bigge, L.A. and Nidditch, P.H.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hurley, S. (1989) Natural Reasons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hursthouse, R. (1999) On Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (2002) Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, and Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, F. and Pargetter, R. (1986) “Oughts, Options, and Actualism,” The Philosophical Review, 95: 233–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, F. and Pettit, P. (1998)“ A Problem for Expressivists,” Analysis, 58(4): 00–00.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, James M. (1999) The Foundations of Causal Decision Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, R. (2001) The Myth of Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J.L., and Thaler, R.H. (1999) “Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem,” The Journal of Political Economy, 98: 1325–1348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. (1785) Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals trans. Paton, H.J.. New York: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1966) Metaphysics of Morals, trans. Gregor, M.J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1987) The Critique of Judgment, trans. Pluhar, W.S.. Indianapoli, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1996). Critique of Practical Reason, in Practical Philosophy, trans. and ed. Gregor, M.J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1999). Religion Within the Boundaries of Mere Reason eds. Wood, A.W. and Giovanni, G.Di.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (2007) Critique of Pure Reason trans. Norman, Kemp-Smith Houndmills: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kavka, G. (1983) “The Toxin Puzzle,” Analysis, 43: 33–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ketland, J. (1998) “Deflationism and Tarski's Paradise,” Mind, 108: 69–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolodny, N. (2005) “Why Be Rational?,” Mind, 114: 509–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolodny, N. and Wallace, R.J. (2003) “Promises and Practices Revisited,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 31: 119–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, C. (1986) “Skepticism about Practical Reason,” The Journal of Philosophy, 83: 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, C. (1996a) Creating the Kingdom of Ends. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, C. (1996b) The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, C. (1997) “The Normativity of Instrumental Reason,” in Cullity, G. and Gaut, B., eds., Ethics and Practical Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 215–254.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, C. (1999) “Self-Constitution in the Ethics of Plato and Kant,” Journal of Ethics, 3: 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraut, R. (2007) What is Good and Why: The Ethics of Well-Being. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, J. (1975) An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Nidditch, P.H.Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Machina, M. (1982) “Expected Utility Analysis Without the Independence Axiom,” Econometrica, 50: 277–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, J.L. (1977) Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
McCann, H. (1991) “Settled Objectives and Rational Constraints,” American Philosophical Quarterly, 28: 25–36.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. (1979) “Virtue and Reason,” The Monist, 62: 331–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, J. (1985) “Values and Secondary Qualities,” in Honderich, T., ed., Morality and Objectivity. London: Routledge, & Kegan Paul: 110–129.Google Scholar
McNaughton, D. and Rawlings, P. (1991) “Agent-Relativity and the Doing–Happening Distinction,” Philosophical Studies, 63: 167–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melden, A.I. (1977) Rights and Persons. Berkeley: California University Press.Google Scholar
Mellor, D.H. (1978) Foundations: Essays in Philosophy, Logic, Mathematics and Economics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Metcalf, J. and Mischel, W. (1999) “A Hot/Cool System Analysis of the Delay of Gratification,” Psychological Review, 106: 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, J.S. (1998) Utilitarianism, ed. Crisp, Roger.Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, P. (1997) Introduction to the Theory of Mind: Children, Autism, and Apes. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Moore, G.E. (1971) Morality and Objectivity. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul: 110–129.Google Scholar
Moore, G.E. (1993) Principia Ethica, ed. Baldwin, T.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morton, J.M. (in progress) “Practical Reasoning and the Varieties of Agency,” PhD thesis, Stanford University.
Murphy, S., Haidt, J., and Bjorklund, F. (forthcoming) “Moral Dumbfounding: When Intuition Finds No Reason,” in preparation.
Nagel, T. (1970) The Possibility of Altruism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. (1986) The View From Nowhere. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, M. (1995) “Is it Always Fallacious to Derive Values from Facts?,” Argumentation, 9/4: 553–562.Google Scholar
Nozick, M.(1981)
Olson, J. (2004) “Buck-Passing and the Wrong Kind of Reasons,” Philosophical Quarterly, 54: 295–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owens, D. (2002) “Epistemic Akrasia,” The Monist, 85: 382–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owens, D. (2006) “A Simple Theory of Promising,” The Philosophical Review, 115: 00–00.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parfit, D. (1984) Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Parfit, Derek. (1997) “Reason and Motivation,” Aristotelian Society Supplement, 71: 99–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parfit, Derek. (2001) “Rationality and Reasons,” in Egonsson, D., J. Josefsson, B. Petterson, and T. Rønnow-Rasmussen, eds., Exploring Practical Philosophy: From Action to values. Burlington, VT: Ashgate: 17–39.Google Scholar
Parfit, Derek. (forthcoming) Climbing the Mountain. Oxford University Press.
Peacocke, C. (1979) Holistic Explanation: Action, Space, Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. and Smith, M. (1990) “Backgrounding Desire,” The Philosophical Review, 99: 565–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, M. (2003) “Promises and Perlocutions,” in Matravers, M., ed., Scanlon and Contractualism. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Prichard, D. (2007) “Recent Work on Epistemic Value,” American Philosophical Quarterly, 44: 85–110.Google Scholar
Prichard, H.A. (1968) Moral Obligation and Duty and Interest: Essays and Lectures by H. A. Prichard, ed. Ross, W.D. and Urmson, J.O.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Prichard, H.A. (2002) “Does Moral Philosophy Rest on a Mistake?,” in McAdam, J., ed., Moral Writings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pufendorf, S. (1672) De Jure Naturae et Gentium. Lund; On the Law of Nature and Nations, trans. Oldfather, C.H. and Oldfather, W.A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1934.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. (1975) “The Meaning of Meaning,” in Mind, Language, and Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press:215–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, W. (1991) “Putting Rationality in Its Place,” in Morality and Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rabinowicz, W. and , Rønnow-Rasmussen., T. (2004) “The Strike of the Demon: On Fitting Pro-Attitudes and Value,” Ethics, 114: 391–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Railton, P. (1989) “Naturalism and Prescriptivity,” Social Philosophy and Policy, 7: 151–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Railton, Peter. (2003) Facts, Values, and Norms: Essays Toward a Morality of Consequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsey, F. (1929) “General Propositions and Causality” reprinted in Ramsey's Philosophical Papers, ed. Mellor, D.H.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ramsey, F. (1978) “Facts and Propositions,” in Mellor, D.H., Foundations: Essays in Philosophy, Logic, Mathematics and Economics. London: Routledge: 40–57.Google Scholar
Raphael, D.D., ed. (1991) British Moralists 1650–1800. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. (1980) “Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory,” The Journal of Philosophy, 77: 515–572.Google Scholar
Raz, J. (1972) “Voluntary Obligations and Normative Powers II,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, supplementary volume, 46: 79–101.Google Scholar
Raz, J.(1975) Practical Reasons and Norms. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. (1977) “Promises and Obligations,” in Hacker, P.M.S. and Raz, J., eds., Law, Morality, and Society: Essays in Honor of H.L.A. Hart. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 210–228.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. (1986) The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. (1990) Practical Reason and Norms. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. (1997) “Incommensurability and Agency,” in Chang, R., ed., Incommensurability, Incomparability, and Practical Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press: 110–128.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. (1999) Engaging Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. (2004) “Personal Practical Conflicts,” in Baumann, P. and Betzler, M., eds., Practical Conflicts: New Philosophical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. (2005) “The Myth of Instrumental Rationality,” Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, www.jesp.org, 1 (1).Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. (2008) “Reasons: Normative and Explanatory,” in C. Sandis, ed., New Essays on the Explanation of Action. Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Reid, T. (1788) Essays on the Active Powers of the Human Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, H. (1994) Practical Reasoning about Final Ends. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridge, M. (2005) “Reasons for Action: Agent-Neutral vs. Agent-Relative,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/reasons-agent
Ridge, Michael. (2006a) “Ecumenical Expressivism: Finessing Frege,” Ethics, 116: 302–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridge, Michael. (2006b) “Saving the Ethical Appearances,”Mind, 115: 630–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridge, Michael. (forthcoming) “Ecumenical Expressivism: The Best of Both Worlds?,” in Oxford Studies in Metaethics, 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rosenthal, D. (1997) “A Theory of Consciousness,” in Block, N., Flanagan, O., and Guzeldere, G., eds., The Nature of Consciousness: Philosophical Debates. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press: 729–753.Google Scholar
Ross, W.D. (1930) The Right and the Good. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Salovey, P. and Mayer, J.D. (1990) “Emotional Intelligence,” Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 9: 185–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartre, J.P. (1946) Existentialism and Human Emotions. New York: Citadel Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Savage, L.J. (1972) The Foundations of Statistics, 2nd edn. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T.M. (1998) What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T.M. (2002) “Replies,” Social Theory and Practice, 28, April: 337–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scanlon, T.M. (2003) The Difficulty of Tolerance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scanlon, T.M. (2004) “Reasons: a Puzzling Duality,” in Wallace, R.J., Pettit, P., Scheffler, S., and Smith, M., eds., Reason and Value: Themes from the Moral Philosophy of Joseph Raz. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 230–246.Google Scholar
Scheffler, S. (1982) The Rejection of Consequentialism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Scheffler, S. (2001) Boundaries and Allegiances. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schneewind, J. (1998) The Invention of Autonomy. New York:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J. (1983) Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John. (2001) Rationality in Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sehon, S. (2005) Teleological Realism: Mind, Agency, and Explanation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Setiya, K. (2005) “Cognitivism about Instrumental Reason: Response to Bratman,” comments on Michael Bratman, “Intention, Belief, Practical, Theoretical,” conference on Practical Reason, University of Maryland, April.
Setiya, Kieran. (2007) “Cognitivism about Instrumental Reason,” Ethics, 117: 649–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shafer-Landau, R. (2003) Moral Realism: A Defense. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, N. (2003) “How Truth governs Belief,” The Philosophical Review, 112: 447–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, N. (2006) “A New Argument for Evidentialism,” The Philosophical Quarterly, 56: 481–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, N. (2008) “How Action Governs Intention,” Philosophers' Imprint, Ann Arbor, MI: Scholarly Publishing Office, University Library, University of Michigan, http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.3521354.0008.005
Shah, N. and Velleman, J.D. (2005) “Doxastic Deliberation,” The Philosophical Review, 114: 497–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, S. (1998) “Truth and Proof – Through Thick and Thin,” The Journal of Philosophy, 95: 493–521.Google Scholar
Shoda, Y., Mischel, W., and Peake, P.K. (1990) “Predicting Adolescent Cognitive and Self-Regulatory Competencies from Preschool Delay of Gratification,” Developmental Psychology, 26: 978–986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shultz, W., Dayan, P., and Montague, R.P. (1997) “A Neural Substrate of Prediction and Reward,” Science, 275: 1593–1599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidgwick, H. (1907) The Method of Ethics, 7th edn. Indianapolis. IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Sinclair, N. (2006) “The Moral Belief Problem,” Ratio, 19: 249–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skorupski, J. (1999) Ethical Explorations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, M. (1994) The Moral Problem. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Smith, Michael. (1998) “The Possibility of Philosophy of Action,” in Bransen, J. and Cuypers, S., eds., Human Action, Deliberation and Causation. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic: 17–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Michael. (1999) “The Definition of Moral,” in Jamieson, D., ed., Singer and His Critics. Oxford: Blackwell: 38–63.Google Scholar
Smith, Michael. (2004) “Instrumental Desires, Instrumental Rationality,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, supplementary volume, 78: 93–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Michael. (2006) “Is That All There Is?,” Journal of Ethics, 10: 75–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, J. (2005) Knowledge and Practical Interests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, C. (1944) Ethics and Language. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Stocker, M. (2004) “Raz on the Intelligibility of Bad Acts,” in Wallace, R.J., Pettit, P., Scheffler, S., and Smith, M., eds., Reason and Value : Themes from the Moral Philosophy of Joseph Raz. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Strawson, P.F. (1968) “Freedom and Resentment,” in Studies in the Philosophy of Thought and Action. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stroud, S. (2006) “Epistemic Partiality in Friendship,” Ethics, 116: 498–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarski, A. (1958) “The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages,” in Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics: Papers from 1923 to 1938. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (1985) Human Agency and Language: Philosophical Papers I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thoma, S.J.et al. (1999) “Does Moral Judgment Development Reduce to Political Attitudes or Verbal Ability?,” Educational Psychology Review, 11: 325–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, M. (1995) “The Representation of Life,” in Hursthouse, R., Lawrence, G., and Quinn, W., eds., Virtues and Reasons. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Thomson, J.J. (1990) The Realm of Rights. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Timmerman, J., Skorupski, J., and Robertson, S., eds. (forthcoming) Spheres of Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tognazzini, N. (2007) “The Hybrid Nature of Promissory Obligation,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 35: 203–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullmann-Margalit, E. and Morgenbesser, S. (1977) “Picking and Choosing,” Social Research, 44: 757–785.Google Scholar
Urban Walker, M. (1998) Moral Understandings. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Velleman, J.D. (1989) Practical Reflection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Velleman, J.David. (2000) The Possibility of Practical Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Velleman, J. David. (forthcoming) “What Good is a Will?,” in Leist, A. and Baumann, H., eds., Action in Context. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter and Mouton.
Wright, G.H. (1983) Practical Reason. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wallace, R.J. (1994) Responsibility and the Moral Sentiments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wallace, R.Jay. (2001) “Normativity, Commitment, and Instrumental Reason,” Philosophers' Imprint, 1 (3).Google Scholar
Wallace, R.Jay. (2006) Normativity and the Will: Selected Essays on Moral Psychology and Practical Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Watson, G. (1987) “Responsibility and the Limits of Evil: Variations on a Strawsonian Theme,” in Schoeman, F.D., ed., Responsibility, Character, and the Emotions: New Essays in Moral Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Watson, G. (1998) “Some Considerations in Favor of Contractualism,” in Coleman, J. and Morris, C., eds., Rational Commitment and Social Justice: Essays for Gregory Kavka. New York: Cambridge University Press: 168–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, M. (1998) “The Resilience of the Allais Paradox,” Ethics, 109: 94–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedgwood, R. (2004) “The Metaethicists' Mistake,” Philosophical Perspectives, 18: 405–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedgwood, Ralph. (2007) The Nature of Normativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiting, J. (1986) “Friends and Future Selves,” The Philosophical Review, 95: 547–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiggins, D. (2001) Sameness and Substance Renewed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, B. (1970) “Deciding to Believe,” in Problems of the Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 136–151.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. (1973a) “A Critique of Utilitarianism,” in , J.J.C.Smart, B.Williams, , eds., Utilitarianism: For and Against. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. (1973b) Problems of the Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Bernard. (1981) “Internal and External Reasons,” in Moral Luck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Bernard. (1985) Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. (1995) “Moral Incapacity,” in Making Sense of Humanity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1953) Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wright, C. (1985) “Review of Simon Blackburn, ‘Spreading the Word’,” Mind, 94: 310–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, C. (1992) Truth and Objectivity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Zajonc, R. (1980) “Feeling and Thinking: Preferences Need No Inference,” American Psychologist, 35: 151–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by David Sobel, Steven Wall, University of Connecticut
  • Book: Reasons for Action
  • Online publication: 05 May 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511720185.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by David Sobel, Steven Wall, University of Connecticut
  • Book: Reasons for Action
  • Online publication: 05 May 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511720185.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by David Sobel, Steven Wall, University of Connecticut
  • Book: Reasons for Action
  • Online publication: 05 May 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511720185.013
Available formats
×