Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-05T23:38:48.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2010

Guido Pincione
Affiliation:
Instituto Torcuato Di Tella, Buenos Aires
Fernando R. Tesón
Affiliation:
Florida State University
Get access

Summary

The Allure of Deliberation

It is generally assumed that political deliberation is one of our most cherished values. Ideally, it precedes democratic decisions and enhances their legitimacy. Deliberative democracy, a form of political organization that fosters robust deliberation among citizens, is attractive because it appears as the only alternative to various undesirable things. First, deliberative democracy excludes elitist conceptions of politics. Deliberation stands in the way of the ambitions of self-appointed philosopher-kings. It vindicates self-government and the views of ordinary citizens. Because everyone's opinion counts, and because everyone participates in the formulation of public policies, deliberative democracy evokes the values of autonomy and civic equality. Second, deliberative democracy rejects political irrationalism. By placing faith in rational argument, theories of deliberative democracy conjure up the image of a political forum analogous to the scientific forum, where critical thinking improves our beliefs and the decisions based on them. Just as scientific deliberation increases our knowledge of the world and improves our technologies, so political deliberation furthers our moral and factual understanding of society and the selection of policies based on that understanding.

The undoubted appeal of deliberation and its role in democracy has led many writers to cast it as the cornerstone of a good polity. They have attempted to substitute a deliberative model of democracy for traditional, liberal models of constitutional democracy – that is, of rights-constrained majority rule. The relationship between theories of deliberative democracy and theories of liberal democracy may assume various forms.

Type
Chapter
Information
Rational Choice and Democratic Deliberation
A Theory of Discourse Failure
, pp. 1 - 7
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Introduction
  • Guido Pincione , Instituto Torcuato Di Tella, Buenos Aires, Fernando R. Tesón, Florida State University
  • Book: Rational Choice and Democratic Deliberation
  • Online publication: 05 May 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511720178.002
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Introduction
  • Guido Pincione , Instituto Torcuato Di Tella, Buenos Aires, Fernando R. Tesón, Florida State University
  • Book: Rational Choice and Democratic Deliberation
  • Online publication: 05 May 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511720178.002
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Introduction
  • Guido Pincione , Instituto Torcuato Di Tella, Buenos Aires, Fernando R. Tesón, Florida State University
  • Book: Rational Choice and Democratic Deliberation
  • Online publication: 05 May 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511720178.002
Available formats
×