Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-2l2gl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T16:24:28.853Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Global governance: climate cooperation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2010

Nicolien van der Grijp
Affiliation:
VU University, Amsterdam
Joyeeta Gupta
Affiliation:
VU University, Amsterdam
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Following the discussion of the global context for development and development cooperation, this chapter focuses on cooperation within the climate change context. It addresses the key issues of international climate change cooperation between rich and poor countries. To this end, it first explains the major elements of consensus in the Climate Convention in terms of principles and commitments (see Section 5.2). It then examines the evolving nature of the climate change deal between industrialized countries (ICs) and developing countries (DCs) and explains why many DCs have difficulties with this process (see Section 5.3). It then examines the resources needed in the regime, with a particular focus on the needs of DCs, compares those with what is available, and discusses the principles on sharing resources and the need for ideas to generate additional funding. It also looks at the relationship between the mechanisms (see Section 5.4) and at the key market mechanisms both for technology transfer and for generating adaptation resources (see Section 5.5), before drawing conclusions (see Section 5.6).

Principles and mechanisms: the consensus of 1992

Introduction

Climate change is intrinsically a North–South issue (see Section 1.2.3). This section explains the consensus on the division of responsibilities between ICs and DCs that underlies the climate regime. It argues that the climate regime was developed according to a leadership paradigm, which substituted for the liability and ‘polluter pays’ principles, and was initially accepted by the DCs in the constructive spirit in which it was offered.

Type
Chapter
Information
Mainstreaming Climate Change in Development Cooperation
Theory, Practice and Implications for the European Union
, pp. 134 - 168
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arts, K. (2009). A child rights perspective on climate change, in Climate Change and Sustainable Development: New Challenges for Poverty Reduction, ed. Salih, M. A.. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 79–93.Google Scholar
Baer, P., Athanasiou, T., Kartha, S. and Kemp-Benedict, E. (2008). The Greenhouse Development Rights Framework: The Right to Development in a Constrained World. Berlin: Heinrich Boll Foundation.Google Scholar
Bayer, J., Suarez, P., Linnerooth-Bayer, J. and Mechler, R. (2007). Feasibility of Risk Financing Schemes for Climate Adaptation: The Case of Malawi. Report to the World Bank's Development Economics Research Group. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
Behrens, A. (2009). Financial impacts of climate change mitigation. Climate Change Law Review, 3(2), 179–87.Google Scholar
,Bergen Declaration (1990). UN/ECE Bergen Ministerial Declaration on Sustainable Development in the ECE Region, Bergen. UN Document A/Conf.151/PC/10, Annex I.
Bodansky, D. (1993). The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change: a commentary. Yale Journal of International Law, 18, 451–588.Google Scholar
Bode, S. and Michaelowa, A. (2003). Avoiding perverse effects of baseline and investment additionality determination in the case of renewable energy projects. Energy Policy, 31(6), 505–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouwer, L. and Vellinga, P. (2002). Changing climate and increasing costs: implications for liability and insurance, in Climatic Change: Implications for the Hydrological Cycle and for Water Management, ed. Beniston, M.. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 429–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouwer, L. M. and Aerts, J. C. J. H. (2006). Financing climate change adaptation. Disasters, 30(1), 49–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyd, E., Hultman, N. E., Roberts, T.et al. (2007). The Clean Development Mechanism: An Assessment of Current Practice and Future Approaches for Policy. Tyndall Centre Working Paper 114. Oxford: Environmental Change Institute Oxford and Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research.Google Scholar
Bradley, R. and Baumert, K., eds. (2005). Navigating the Numbers: Greenhouse Gas Data and International Climate Policy. Washington, D.C.: World Resources Institute.
,Byrd–Hagel Resolution (1997). US Senate Resolution 98 on Global Warming. Congressional Record, October 3, 1997; Senate, page S10308-S10311. Available from Congressional Records online at http://www.gpo.gov.
Chadwick, B. P. (2006). Transaction costs and the Clean Development Mechanism. Natural Resources Forum, 30(4), 256–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Commission on Climate Change and Development (2009). Closing the Gaps: Report of the Commission on Climate Change and Development. Stockholm: Swedish Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Copenhagen Accord (2010). Decision Noted by the Parties to the Fifteenth Conference of the Parties to the Climate Change Convention. FCCC/CP/2009/L.7, 18 December 2009.
Dellink, R., Dekker, T., Elzen, M.et al. (2008). Sharing the Burden of Adaptation Financing: Translating Ethical Principles into Practical Policy. IVM Report R08/05. Amsterdam: Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM).Google Scholar
,EACC (2009). The Costs to Developing Countries of Adapting to Climate Change: New Methods and Estimates, The Global Report of the Economics of Adaptation to Climate Change Study. Washington, D.C.: World Bank, available at http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTCC/Resources/EACCReport0928Final.pdf.Google Scholar
Ellis, J. and Kamel, S. (2007). Overcoming Barriers to Clean Development Mechanism Projects. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development & International Energy Agency (IEA).Google Scholar
,Framework Convention on Climate Change (1992). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Signed 9 May 1992, in New York, NY; entered into force 21 March 1994. Reprinted in (1992). International Legal Materials 31(4), 849.
,FCCC Secretariat (2007a). Investment and Financial Flows to Address Climate Change. Bonn: Secretariat to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Available online at http://unfccc.int/files/cooperation_and_support/financial_mechanism/application/pdf/background_paper.pdf.Google Scholar
,FCCC Secretariat (2007b). Decision 7/CP.13 on Additional Guidance to the Global Environment Facility, Report of the 13th Conference of the Parties, Bali, 3–15 December 2007, UN Document FCCC/CP/2007/6/Add. 1 of 14 March 2008.
,FCCC Secretariat (2008a). Investment and Financial Flows to Address Climate Change: An Update. Technical Paper. UN Document FCCC/TP/2008/7, 26 November 2008. Available online at http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2008/tp/07.pdf.
,FCCC Secretariat (2008b). Analysis of Possible Means to Reach Emission Reduction Targets and of Relevant Methodological Issues: Technical Paper. UN Document FCCC/TP/2008/2, 6 August 2008. Bonn: Secretariat to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Available online at http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2008/tp/02.pdf.
,G-77 and China Proposal (2008). Financial Mechanisms for Meeting Financial Commitments Under the Convention, 25 August 2008. Bonn: Secretariat to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.Google Scholar
,Government of Argentina (2008). Argentina's Views on Enabling the Full, Effective, and Sustained Implementation of the Convention through Long-Term Cooperative Action Now, up to, and beyond 2012. Available online at http://unfccc.int/files/kyoto_protocol/application/pdf/argentinabap300908.pdf.
,Government of China (2008). China's Views on Enabling the Full, Effective and Sustained Implementation of the Convention through Long-Term Cooperative Action Now, up to and beyond 2012. Available online at http://unfccc.int/files/kyoto_protocol/application/pdf/china_bap_280908.pdf.
,Government of India (2008). Government of India Submission on Financing Architecture for Meeting Financial Commitments under the UNFCCC. Available online at http://unfccc.int/files/kyoto_protocol/application/pdf/indiafinancialarchitecture171008.pdf.
,Government of Switzerland (2008). Funding Schemes for Bali Action Plan: A Swiss Proposal for Global Solidarity in Financing Adaptation, Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-Term Cooperative Action Under the Convention (AWG-LCA), 21 August 2008. Available online at http://unfccc.int/files/kyoto_protocol/application/pdf/Switzerland_funding. pdf.
Gupta, J. (1995). The Global Environment Facility in its North–South context. Environmental Politics, 4(1), 19–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, J. (1997). The Climate Change Convention and Developing Countries: From Conflict to Consensus?Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Gupta, J. (1998). Leadership in the Climate Regime: inspiring the commitment of developing countries in the post-Kyoto phase. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 7(2), 178–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, J. (2003). The role of non-state actors in international environmental affairs. Heidelberg Journal of International Law, 63(2), 459–86.Google Scholar
Gupta, J. (2004). India and climate change: the challenge of sustainable development, in Climate Change: Five Years After Kyoto, ed. Grover, V.. Oxford/New Delhi: IBH Publishing, pp. 309–32.Google Scholar
Gupta, J. (2006). The Global Environment Facility in its North–South context, in Contemporary Environmental Politics: From Margins to Mainstream, ed. Stephens, P., Barry, J. and Dobson, A.. London: Routledge, pp. 231–53.Google Scholar
Gupta, J. (2007). Legal steps outside the Climate Convention: litigation as a tool to address climate change. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 16(1) 76–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, J. (2009). Climate change, development and evaluation: can flexibility instruments promote sustainable development? in Evaluating Climate Change and Development, ed. Feinstein, O. and Berg, R.. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Gupta, J. and Asselt, H. (2007). Towards a Fair and Equitable Framework for Post-2012 Climate Change Policy: An ICCO Policy Brief. Utrecht: Interkerkelijke Organisatie voor Ontwikkelingssamenwerking (ICCO).Google Scholar
Gupta, J., Beukering, P., Asselt, H.et al. (2008). Flexibility mechanisms and sustainable development: lessons from five AIJ projects. Climate Policy, 8(3), 261–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Hague Declaration (1989). Declaration of the Hague, Meeting of Heads of State, 11 March 1989.
Haites, E., Duan, M. S. and Seres, S. (2006). Technology transfer by CDM projects. Climate Policy, 6(3), 327–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haya, B. (2007). Failed Mechanism: How the CDM is Subsidizing Hydro Developers and Harming the Kyoto Protocol. Berkeley, CA: International Rivers.Google Scholar
Henningsen, J. (2008). EU Energy and Climate Policy: Two Years On, EPC Policy Paper 55. Brussels: European Policy Centre.Google Scholar
Hess, U. and Syroka, J. (2005). Risk, vulnerability and development. Presentation at BASIX Quarterly Review & Insurance Meeting, Hyderabad, 21 October 2005.
Howell, J. (2007). Civil society in China: chipping away at the edges. Development, 50(3), 17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphrey, J. (2004). The Clean Development Mechanism: how to increase benefits for developing countries. IDS Bulletin, 35, 84–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,IPCC-1 (1990). Climate Change: The IPCC Scientific Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Juma, C. (1995). Review, in Research Project Reviews and Commentaries of the Report: International Policies to Address the Greenhouse Effect. Working Paper 4. Amsterdam: Department of International Relations and Public International Law (University of Amsterdam) and Institute for Environmental Studies (VU University Amsterdam), pp. D1–9.Google Scholar
,Kyoto Protocol (1997). Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Signed 10 December 1997, in Kyoto; entered into force 16 February 2005. Reprinted in (1998) International Legal Materials 37(1), 22.Google Scholar
Krey, M. (2005). Transaction costs of unilateral CDM projects in India: results from an empirical survey. Energy Policy, 33, 2385–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mace, M. J. (2005). Funding for adaptation to climate change: UNFCCC and GEF developments since COP-7. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 14(3), 225–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mani, M., Markandaya, A. and Ipe, V. (2008). Policy and Institutional Reforms to Support Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation in Development Programs: A Practical Guide. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
,Marrakesh Accords (2001). Marrakesh Accords and Marrakesh Declaration, 7th Conference of the Parties to the UNFCCC, 29 October–10 November 2001. UN Document FCCC/CP/2001/13. Available online at http://unfccc.int/cop7/documents/accords_draft.pdf.
,MCII (2008). Munich Climate Insurance Initiative. Available online at http://www.climate-insurance.org.
Metz, B., Davidson, O. R., Martens, J.-W., Rooijen, S. N. M. and McGrory, L. v. W., eds. (2000). Methodological and Technological Issues in Technology Transfer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Michaelowa, A. and Michaelowa, K. (2008). Climate or development: is ODA diverted from its original purpose?Climatic Change, 84(1), 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaelowa, A. and Purohit, P. (2007). Additionality Determination of Indian CDM Projects: Can Indian CDM Project Developers Outwit the CDM Executive Board?Zurich: Climate Strategies.Google Scholar
Michel, L. (2008). Written Statement by Mr Louis Michel, Commissioner for Development and Humanitarian Aid, European Commission. Development Committee, 13 April 2008, Document DC/S/2008–0006. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
Miller, A. (2008). Financing the integration of climate change mitigation into development. Climate Policy, 8(2), 152–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ming, L., Gupta, J. and Kuik, O. (2008). Will CDM in China make a difference? Paper presented at the Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change, IHDP Social–Ecological Research Programme on Long-Term Policies: Governing Social–Ecological Change, Berlin, 22–23 February 2008.
Müller, B. (2007). Nairobi 2006: Trust and the Future of Adaptation Funding. Oxford: Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.Google Scholar
Müller, B. (2008). International Adaptation Finance: The Need for an Innovative and Strategic Approach. Oxford: Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.Google Scholar
Müller, B. and Hepburn, C. (2006). IATAL: An Outline Proposal for an International Air Travel Adaptation Levy. Oxford: Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.Google Scholar
,Noordwijk Declaration (1990). Noordwijk Declaration on Climate Change, in Noordwijk Conference Report: Volume I, ed. Vellinga, P., Kendall, P. and Gupta, J.. The Hague: Netherlands Ministry of Housing, Physical Planning and Environment.Google Scholar
,OECD Development Assistance Committee (2004). ODA Eligibility Rules for Expenditure under the Clean Development Mechanism. DAC Document DCMDAC/Chair(2004)4/final. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Opschoor, H. (2009). Sustainable Development and a Dwindling Carbon Space. Public Lecture Series 2009, No. 1. The Hague: Institute of Social Studies.Google Scholar
,Oxfam (2007). What's Needed in Poor Countries, and Who Should Pay?Oxford: Oxfam International.Google Scholar
Pearson, B. and Shao Loong, Y. (2003). The CDM: Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions, or Relabelling as Usual. Penang: Third World Network and CDM Watch.Google Scholar
,Rio Declaration and Agenda 21 (1992). Rio Declaration and Agenda 21. Report on the UN Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, 3–14 June 1992, UN Document A/Conf.151/26/Rev. 1 (Vols. 1–III). New York, NY: United Nations.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. T., Starr, K., Jones, T. and Abdel-Fattah, D. (2008). The Reality of Official Climate Aid. Oxford Energy and Environment Comment November 2008. Oxford: Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.Google Scholar
Sands, P. (1992). The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 1(3), 270–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, L. (2007). Is the CDM Fulfilling Its Environmental and Sustainable Development Objectives? An Evaluation of the CDM and Options for Improvement. Berlin: Öko-Institut.Google Scholar
Schroeder, M. (2008). Long-term capacity development for local climate governance: what next after PDD development? Paper presented at the Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change, IHDP Social–Ecological Research Programme on Long-Term Policies: Governing Social–Ecological Change, Berlin, 22–23 February 2008.
Srivastava, L., Ramanathan, K., Hasan, S.et al. (2007). Modernising the Indian Electricity Sector. New Delhi: The Energy Research Institute Publications.Google Scholar
Stern, N. (2007). The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,Stockholm Declaration (1972). Report of the UN Conference on the Human Environment, Stockholm, 5–16 June, 1972; UN Document A/CONF.48/14/Rev. 1. New York, NY: United Nations.Google Scholar
Sutter, C. and Parreño, J. C. (2007). Does the current Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) deliver its sustainable development claim? An analysis of officially registered CDM projects. Climatic Change, 84(1), 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,SWCC Scientific Declaration (1990). Scientific Declaration of the Second World Climate Conference. Geneva: World Meteorological Organization.Google Scholar
Tangen, K., Heggelund, G. and Buen, J. (2001). China's climate change positions: at a turning point?Energy and Environment, 12(2/3), 237–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tirpak, D. and Adams, H. (2008). Bilateral and multilateral financial assistance for the energy sector of developing countries. Climate Policy, 8(2), 135–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Toronto Declaration (1988). Conference statement of the conference The Changing Atmosphere: Implications for Global Security, organized by the Government of Canada, Toronto, 27–30 June 1988.
,United Nations Development Programme (2007). Fighting Climate Change: Human Solidarity in a Divided World. UNDP Human Development Report 2007–2008. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
,United Nations General Assembly (1988). United Nations General Assembly Resolution 43/196 of 20 December 1988 on a United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, UN Document A/RES/43/196.
Asselt, H. and Gupta, J. (2009). Stretching too far? Developing countries and the role of flexibility mechanisms beyond Kyoto. Stanford Environment Law Journal, 29(2), 311–78.Google Scholar
Drunen, M., Bouwer, L., Dellink, R.et al. (2009). Financing Adaptation in Developing Countries: Assessing New Mechanisms. Netherlands Research Programme on Scientific Assessment and Policy Analysis for Climate Change (NRP-CC-WAB) Report 500102025. Available online at http://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/rapporten/500102025.pdf.
Wara, M. W. and Victor, D. G. (2008). A Realistic Policy on International Carbon Offsets. Rep. PESD Working Paper 74. Stanford, CA: Programme on Energy and Sustainable Development (PESD).Google Scholar
,WCED (1987). Our Common Future: Brundtland Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Winkler, H. and Thorne, S. (2002). Baselines for suppressed demand: CDM projects contribution to poverty alleviation. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Forum for Economics and Environment, February 2002, Cape Town, South Africa.
,World Bank (2006). Clean Energy and Development: Towards an Investment Framework. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
Yamin, F. (2005). The European Union and future climate policy: is mainstreaming adaptation a distraction or part of the solution? Climate Policy, 5, 349–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Z. (2006). Toward an effective implementation of Clean Development Mechanism projects in China. Energy Policy, 34, 3691–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×